Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (978 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Tendon that connects the muscles in the back of the calf to the heel bone.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Tendon, Achilles; Tendo Calcaneus; Calcaneal Tendon; Calcaneal Tendons; Tendon, Calcaneal; Tendons, Calcaneal.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Tendons
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 10,784 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Achilles Tendon” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 2,627 of them (24.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 3,361 records.
Reviews account for 1,063 records (9.9%) and meta-analyses for 124. Randomized controlled trials number 358 (3.3%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 2,835 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,961 |
| 2010-2019 | 3,361 |
| 2020 onward | 2,627 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,063 | 9.9% |
| Meta-analyses | 124 | 1.1% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 358 | 3.3% |
Method: PubMed query "Achilles Tendon"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incidence, demographics, characteristics and management of acute Achilles tendon rupture: An epidemiological study | 2024 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 39 | cc by PMID 38905182 · DOI · PMC11192343 |
| Surgical management of chronic Achilles tendon rupture: evidence-based guidelines | 2024 | Systematic review Design not recorded in structured metadata | 35 | cc by PMID 38341569 · DOI · PMC10858558 |
| The effectiveness of shockwave therapy on patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy, and plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis | 2023 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 29 | cc by PMID 37662911 · DOI · PMC10468604 |
| Biomechanical insights into Achilles tendinopathy risk and protection in runners: a large prospective study 4HAIE | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 3 | cc by PMID 41672607 · DOI · PMC13018850 |
Incidence, demographics, characteristics and management of acute Achilles tendon rupture: An epidemiological study [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundAchilles tendon rupture (ATR) account for 10.
- Closing excerpt
- 3%) of individuals report Achilles pain prior to ATR.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (168 words)
BackgroundAchilles tendon rupture (ATR) account for 10.7% of all tendon and ligament injuries and causes lasting muscular deficits and have a profound impact on patients' quality of life. The incidence, characteristics and management of ATR in the United Kingdom (UK) is poorly understood. This investigation aims to understand the incidence of ATR in the UK.MethodsProspective data collection of ATR incidence from a United Kingdom Emergency department. Retrospective review of management protocols and immobilisation duration from electronic medical records.ResultsATR incidence is 8 per 100,000 people per annum. Participants were predominately male (79.2%) and primarily reported a sporting mechanism of injury (65.2%). Mean immobilisation duration was 63.1 days. 97.1% were non-surgically managed post ATR. 46.2% of participants had experienced a previous ATR or Achilles tendinopathy prior to their current ATR.ConclusionThe incidence of ATR found was 8. cases per 100,000 people per annum. Most ATR were managed non-surgically in this cohort. The majority of ruptures occurred during sporting activity. Almost one quarter (23.3%) of individuals report Achilles pain prior to ATR.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38905182 · DOI · PMC11192343
Surgical management of chronic Achilles tendon rupture: evidence-based guidelines [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundChronic Achilles tendon ruptures (CATR) often require surgical intervention to restore function.
- Closing excerpt
- We are confident that this guideline will serve as a valuable resource for physicians when making decisions regarding the surgical treatment of patients with CATR.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (250 words)
BackgroundChronic Achilles tendon ruptures (CATR) often require surgical intervention to restore function. Despite numerous treatment modalities available, the optimal management strategy remains controversial given the limited high-quality evidence available. This article aims to provide evidence-based guidelines for the surgical management of CATR through a comprehensive systematic review of the available data. The consensus reached by synthesizing the findings will assist clinicians in making informed decisions and improving patient outcomes.MethodsA group of 9 foot surgeons in three continents was consulted to gather their expertise on guidelines regarding the surgical management of CATR. Following the proposal of 9 clinical topics, a thorough and comprehensive search of relevant literature published since 1980 was conducted for each topic using electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library, to identify relevant studies published until 1 October 2023. All authors collaborated in drafting, discussing, and finalizing the recommendations and statements. The recommendations were then categorized into two grades: grade a (strong) and grade b (weak), following the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) concept. Additionally, feedback from 21 external specialists, who were independent from the authors, was taken into account to further refine and finalize the clinical guidelines.ResultsNine statements and guidelines were completed regarding surgical indications, surgical strategies, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol.ConclusionBased on the findings of the systematic review, this guideline provides recommendations for the surgical management of CATR. We are confident that this guideline will serve as a valuable resource for physicians when making decisions regarding the surgical treatment of patients with CATR.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38341569 · DOI · PMC10858558
The effectiveness of shockwave therapy on patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy, and plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundTendinopathy is a growing global concern affecting many people, like athletes, workers, and the elderly.
- Closing excerpt
- ID=CRD42023396835, identifier CRD42023396835.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (300 words)
BackgroundTendinopathy is a growing global concern affecting many people, like athletes, workers, and the elderly. Despite its commonality among the sporting population, there is no practical clinical guideline for patellar tendinopathy (PT). Furthermore, there is conflicting evidence between clinical guidelines on shockwave therapy's application and clinical utility for Achilles tendinopathy (AT) and plantar fasciitis (PF). Thus, our aim of this study is to evaluate the evidence for shockwave therapy; to provide a Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) level of the evidence and effectiveness of shockwave therapy for patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy, and Plantar fasciitis.MethodMedical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), Embase, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure database (CNKI) were searched to find relevant studies published before December 14th, 2022.ResultsOur study showed that for PT in the short term, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) or ESWT + eccentric exercise (EE) has a negligible effect on pain and function compared to a placebo or placebo + EE. On the contrary, ESWT significantly affects pain compared to conservative treatment (CT). For AT, ESWT has a small inconclusive effect on pain and function in the short term compared to EE. On the other hand, a placebo outperformed ESWT in improving function for AT but not pain outcomes. PF showed that ESWT significantly affects short- and long-term pain and function. When ESWT was compared to other interventions such as low laser therapy (LLLT), corticosteroid injection (CSI), or CT, there was a small inconclusive effect on pain and function in the short term.ConclusionThere is low-moderate evidence that ESWT has a negligible effect on pain and function for PT and AT. However, high-quality evidence suggests ESWT has a large effect on pain and function for PF.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023396835, identifier CRD42023396835.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37662911 · DOI · PMC10468604
Biomechanical insights into Achilles tendinopathy risk and protection in runners: a large prospective study 4HAIE [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate whether lower limb biomechanics in runners and non-runners are risk factors for the onset of Achilles tendinopathy, and to assess the contributions of age, sex, running distance and injury history to the onset of Achilles tendinopathy.
- Closing excerpt
- Targeting biomechanical factors and running volume may help prevent Achilles tendinopathy.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (260 words)
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate whether lower limb biomechanics in runners and non-runners are risk factors for the onset of Achilles tendinopathy, and to assess the contributions of age, sex, running distance and injury history to the onset of Achilles tendinopathy.MethodsThis prospective cohort study used quota sampling stratified by age, sex, region and physical activity status (runner, non-runner). Baseline assessments included questionnaires on running history and Achilles tendinopathy symptoms, running biomechanics, MRI and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Participants were followed for 1 year using a Fitbit device and a custom mobile application for weekly injury reporting and orthopaedic diagnoses. Binary logistic regression identified risk factors (OR, 95% CI). Primary biomechanical variables included ankle, knee and hip kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of running. The main outcome was a medically confirmed diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy within 1 year.ResultsOur study included 911 adults (mean age 37.7±12.5 years; 429 (47%) females; 528 (58%) runners) followed for 1 year. A higher peak ankle inversion moment (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.61) during the stance phase decreased the odds of developing Achilles tendinopathy, while a lower peak ankle external rotation angle (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.03) and greater running distance (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.22) increased the odds of onset. The findings were consistent across the full cohort and runners.ConclusionWe identified a lower peak ankle inversion moment, a lower peak ankle external rotation angle and a greater running volume as significant predictors of the onset of Achilles tendinopathy. Targeting biomechanical factors and running volume may help prevent Achilles tendinopathy.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41672607 · DOI · PMC13018850
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Tendinopathy [5]
- Research article Operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures: systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
- Research article Achilles Pain, Stiffness, and Muscle Power Deficits: Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy Revision 2018 [7]
- Research article Current Clinical Concepts: Conservative Management of Achilles Tendinopathy [8]
- Research article Surgical Treatment Versus Conservative Management for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [9]
- Research article Which treatment is most effective for patients with Achilles tendinopathy? A living systematic review with network meta-analysis of 29 randomised controlled trials [10]
References
- Briggs-Price S, Mangwani J, Houchen-Wolloff L, Modha G, Fitzpatrick E, Faizi M, et al.. Incidence, demographics, characteristics and management of acute Achilles tendon rupture: An epidemiological study. . 2024. PMID 38905182 · DOI · PMC11192343
- Feng SM, Maffulli N, Oliva F, Saxena A, Hao YF, Hua YH, et al.. Surgical management of chronic Achilles tendon rupture: evidence-based guidelines. . 2024. PMID 38341569 · DOI · PMC10858558
- Charles R, Fang L, Zhu R, Wang J. The effectiveness of shockwave therapy on patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy, and plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2023. PMID 37662911 · DOI · PMC10468604
- Jandacka D, Skypala J, Plesek J, Urbaczka J, Golian M, Burda M, et al.. Biomechanical insights into Achilles tendinopathy risk and protection in runners: a large prospective study 4HAIE. . 2026. PMID 41672607 · DOI · PMC13018850
- Millar NL, Silbernagel KG, Thorborg K, Kirwan PD, Galatz LM, Abrams GD, et al.. Tendinopathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021. PMID 33414454 · DOI
- Ochen Y, Beks RB, van Heijl M, Hietbrink F, Leenen LPH, van der Velde D, et al.. Operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019. PMID 30617123 · DOI · PMC6322065
- Martin RL, Chimenti R, Cuddeford T, Houck J, Matheson JW, McDonough CM, et al.. Achilles Pain, Stiffness, and Muscle Power Deficits: Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy Revision 2018. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018. PMID 29712543 · DOI
- Silbernagel KG, Hanlon S, Sprague A. Current Clinical Concepts: Conservative Management of Achilles Tendinopathy. J Athl Train. 2020. PMID 32267723 · DOI · PMC7249277
- Deng S, Sun Z, Zhang C, Chen G, Li J. Surgical Treatment Versus Conservative Management for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017. PMID 29079238 · DOI
- van der Vlist AC, Winters M, Weir A, Ardern CL, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, et al.. Which treatment is most effective for patients with Achilles tendinopathy? A living systematic review with network meta-analysis of 29 randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. 2021. PMID 32522732 · DOI · PMC7907558
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.