Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Cardiovascular Medicine›Acute Coronary Syndrome
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Cardiovascular Medicine · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 5 min read

An episode of myocardial ischemia that generally lasts longer than a transient anginal episode that ultimately may lead to myocardial infarction.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (912 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

An episode of myocardial ischemia that generally lasts longer than a transient anginal episode that ultimately may lead to myocardial infarction.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Acute Coronary Syndromes; Coronary Syndrome, Acute; Coronary Syndromes, Acute; Syndrome, Acute Coronary; Syndromes, Acute Coronary.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Myocardial Ischemia

Related concepts

  • Myocardial Ischemia
  • Myocardial Infarction

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 23,143 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Acute Coronary Syndrome” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 7,514 of them (32.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 13,436 records.

Reviews account for 3,882 records (16.8%) and meta-analyses for 774. Randomized controlled trials number 1,864 (8.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 2,604 records; 2010-2019: 13,436 records; 2020 onward: 7,514 records0through 19992,6042000-200913,4362010-20197,5142020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20092,604
2010-201913,436
2020 onward7,514
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 16.8 percent; Meta-analyses: 3.3 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 8.1 percentReviews16.8% (3,882)Meta-analyses3.3% (774)Randomized controlled trials8.1% (1,864)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 23,143 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3,88216.8%
Meta-analyses7743.3%
Randomized controlled trials1,8648.1%

Method: PubMed query "Acute Coronary Syndrome"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in cardiovascular medicine

Cardiovascular medicine has an unusually large body of randomized trials, so the type of outcome matters: hard clinical events such as death, heart attack and stroke carry more weight than changes in blood pressure, cholesterol or imaging markers that only predict risk. Observational studies can show associations but are confounded by age, lifestyle and other illness. Check whether a result is about prevention or treatment, the baseline risk of participants, and the absolute rather than only the relative size of any benefit.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
GLP-1 receptor agonists and coronary plaques regression in diabetic patients after acute coronary syndromes
Gitto M, Catapano F, Francone M, Mincione G, Scialò V, Pivato CA, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
10cc by
PMID 41186740 · DOI · PMC12957045
Anti-inflammatory therapy with low-dose IL-2 in acute coronary syndromes: a randomized phase 2 trial
Sriranjan-Rothwell RS, Zhao TX, Hoole SP, Bond SJ, Tarkin JM, Brubert J, et al.
2026Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
9cc by
PMID 41507574 · DOI · PMC12920103
The junctional protein associated with coronary artery disease predicts adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes at high residual risk
Kraler S, Liberale L, Tirandi A, Moriero M, Wang Y, Farag M, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
8cc by
PMID 41430589 · DOI · PMC13384729

GLP-1 receptor agonists and coronary plaques regression in diabetic patients after acute coronary syndromes [1]

Research article Gitto M, Catapano F, Francone M, Mincione G, Scialò V, Pivato CA, et al. · · 2026 · cited 10 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundDespite advances in therapeutic strategies a significant proportion of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients experience early coronary artery disease (CAD) progression, particularly those with diabetes.
Closing excerpt
These findings suggest a potential role for GLP-1Ra in modifying atherosclerosis progression beyond glycemic control.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (320 words)

BackgroundDespite advances in therapeutic strategies a significant proportion of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients experience early coronary artery disease (CAD) progression, particularly those with diabetes.AimTo evaluate CAD progression in diabetic patients treated with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) over 1 year after an ACS.MethodsPatients presenting with non-ST-elevation ACS between 2019 and 2022 were enrolled in a prospective registry and underwent serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) at baseline (after revascularization, during the index hospitalization) and at 1-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was the absolute change (1 year - baseline) in non-culprit lesion plaque burden (ΔPB) on CCTA, with the absolute change in patient percent atheroma volume (ΔPAV) as a key secondary endpoint. A comprehensive lipidomic, metabolomic, and proteomic plasma assessment was also performed in all GLP-1Ra-treated patients and four randomly selected controls.ResultsOf 28 diabetic patients, 7 (25%) with 22 coronary plaques were treated with GLP-1Ra, and 21 (75%) with 65 plaques received other antidiabetic agents. In the 1-year observation frame, both ΔPB (-5.8 ± 12.8% vs. -1.1 ± 13.6%, p = 0.041) and ΔPAV (-6.1% [-7.3, -1.8] vs. -0.7% [-2.4, 9.8], p = 0.039) were significantly lower in GLP-1Ra-treated patients. Total atheroma volume also showed a numerically greater reduction in the GLP-1Ra cohort (0.7 mm³ [-2.5-8.7] vs. 25.0 mm³ [4.8-39.7]), primarily due to a decrease in plaque fibrofatty volume percentage (-2.9 ± 10.1% vs. 1.0 ± 6.8%, p = 0.042). Lipidomic, metabolomic, and proteomic analyses identified reductions in monoacylglycerols and triacylglycerols, increases in diacylglycerols and phosphatidylethanolamine, a shift from carbohydrate metabolism toward lipid metabolism and hormone regulation, and differential expression of proteins involved in complement activation, endothelial function, and cytoskeletal organization in GLP-1Ra-treated patients compared with controls.ConclusionsIn diabetic patients with ACS, GLP-1Ra therapy was associated with a significant regression in coronary plaque burden at 1 year, supported by favorable lipidomic, metabolomic, and proteomic changes. These findings suggest a potential role for GLP-1Ra in modifying atherosclerosis progression beyond glycemic control.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41186740 · DOI · PMC12957045

Anti-inflammatory therapy with low-dose IL-2 in acute coronary syndromes: a randomized phase 2 trial [2]

Randomized controlled trial Sriranjan-Rothwell RS, Zhao TX, Hoole SP, Bond SJ, Tarkin JM, Brubert J, et al. · · 2026 · cited 9 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Regulatory T (Treg) cells are powerful endogenous modulators of the immune response and their levels are reduced in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs).
Closing excerpt
gov registration: NCT04241601 .
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (240 words)

Regulatory T (Treg) cells are powerful endogenous modulators of the immune response and their levels are reduced in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) has been shown to increase Treg cell levels, potentially providing an immunomodulatory strategy in ACSs. The IVORY trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial in which patients presenting with ACSs and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels >2 mg l-1 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous low-dose IL-2 (1.5 × 106 IU) or placebo for 8 weeks. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography of the ascending aorta and carotid arteries was performed before and after treatment. Here the primary outcome was the difference in arterial inflammation in the index vessel (the vessel with the highest average maximum target-to-background ratio pre-treatment) on follow-up imaging between the two groups (placebo = 29 (female-to-male ratio (F-to-M) = 6:23); low-dose IL-2 = 31 (F-to-M = 3:28)). At the end of treatment, arterial inflammation was -0.171 (-7.7%) lower in the low-dose IL-2 group compared to the placebo group (95% confidence interval -0.308 to -0.034, P = 0.015). In secondary efficacy analyses, the difference in arterial inflammation between the low-dose IL-2 and placebo groups was greater (-8.3%, P = 0.009) in more inflamed segments and low-dose IL-2 treatment increased Treg cell levels compared to placebo (P reg cell levels and reduces arterial inflammation. The clinical benefit of low-dose IL-2 requires validation in larger studies. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04241601 .

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41507574 · DOI · PMC12920103

The junctional protein associated with coronary artery disease predicts adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes at high residual risk [3]

Research article Kraler S, Liberale L, Tirandi A, Moriero M, Wang Y, Farag M, et al. · · 2026 · cited 8 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Background and aimsPatients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are at high ischaemic risk to which cholesterol, inflammation, and yet-to-be-identified pathways jointly contribute.
Closing excerpt
gov identifiersNCT01000701, NCT02562690.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (352 words)

Background and aimsPatients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are at high ischaemic risk to which cholesterol, inflammation, and yet-to-be-identified pathways jointly contribute. The junctional protein associated with coronary artery disease (JCAD) drives incident cardiovascular events by acting on coagulation and fibrinolysis. This study aimed to assess whether JCAD serves as a novel marker of or target to address residual risk.MethodsIn the discovery cohort (SPUM-ACS; n = 4787), ACS patients at residual lipid risk [RLR; on-statin LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) ≥70 mg/dL or ≥1.8 mmol/L], residual inflammatory risk [RIR; on-statin high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) ≥2.0 mg/L], or both (RILR; on-statin LDL-c ≥70 mg/dL and hs-CRP ≥2.0 mg/L) were identified and compared with propensity-score matched controls. Contributions of hs-CRP, LDL-c and JCAD to recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were analysed. In an independent cohort (RISK-PPCI study; n = 496), effects of JCAD on endogenous coagulation and fibrinolysis were gauged, and JCAD-MACE associations were externally validated.ResultsAt 1 year, patients at RLR, RIR, or RILR were at higher MACE risk as compared to controls [hazard ratio (HR), 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-2.23; HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.24-2.61; and HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.12-2.75, respectively]. In those at RLR, MACE risk rose with increasing hs-CRP and JCAD, respectively, in uni- (HR per log2 increase, 1.17, 95% CI 1.06-1.30; HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.62) and multivariable-adjusted models [adjusted (a)HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.30; aHR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.60]. In those at RIR, MACE risk increased 1.28-fold per log2 increase in JCAD (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.59), which prevailed in multivariable-adjusted models (aHR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04-1.65). Similarly, in patients at RILR, MACE risk increased almost linearly with increasing JCAD (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.09-1.92), independently of potential confounders (aHR 1.47, 95% CI 1.11-1.97). Plasma levels of JCAD correlated positively with proxies of impaired endogenous fibrinolysis, with the JCAD-MACE association being similarly observed in the external validation cohort.ConclusionsAcute coronary syndrome patients at RLR, RIR, or both are at high ischaemic risk. By modulating coagulation and endogenous fibrinolysis, JCAD represents a promising candidate to address the high residual risk that persists in ACS patients receiving guideline-recommended care.Clinicaltrials.gov identifiersNCT01000701, NCT02562690.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41430589 · DOI · PMC13384729

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis [4]
    Kelshiker MA, Seligman H, Howard JP, Rahman H, Foley M, Nowbar AN, et al. · Eur Heart J · 2022 · cited 250 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Triglyceride-glucose index and coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk, severity, and prognosis [5]
    Liang S, Wang C, Zhang J, Liu Z, Bai Y, Chen Z, et al. · Cardiovasc Diabetol · 2023 · cited 168 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Association of Influenza Vaccination With Cardiovascular Risk: A Meta-analysis [6]
    Behrouzi B, Bhatt DL, Cannon CP, Vardeny O, Lee DS, Solomon SD, et al. · JAMA Netw Open · 2022 · cited 151 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Sex Differences in Symptom Presentation in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [7]
    van Oosterhout REM, de Boer AR, Maas AHEM, Rutten FH, Bots ML, Peters SAE · J Am Heart Assoc · 2020 · cited 149 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Nonobstructive Versus Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis [8]
    Pizzi C, Xhyheri B, Costa GM, Faustino M, Flacco ME, Gualano MR, et al. · J Am Heart Assoc · 2016 · cited 94 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Growth differentiation factor 15 and cardiovascular risk: individual patient meta-analysis [9]
    Kato ET, Morrow DA, Guo J, Berg DD, Blazing MA, Bohula EA, et al. · Eur Heart J · 2023 · cited 90 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Gitto M, Catapano F, Francone M, Mincione G, Scialò V, Pivato CA, et al.. GLP-1 receptor agonists and coronary plaques regression in diabetic patients after acute coronary syndromes. . 2026. PMID 41186740 · DOI · PMC12957045
  2. Sriranjan-Rothwell RS, Zhao TX, Hoole SP, Bond SJ, Tarkin JM, Brubert J, et al.. Anti-inflammatory therapy with low-dose IL-2 in acute coronary syndromes: a randomized phase 2 trial. . 2026. PMID 41507574 · DOI · PMC12920103
  3. Kraler S, Liberale L, Tirandi A, Moriero M, Wang Y, Farag M, et al.. The junctional protein associated with coronary artery disease predicts adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes at high residual risk. . 2026. PMID 41430589 · DOI · PMC13384729
  4. Kelshiker MA, Seligman H, Howard JP, Rahman H, Foley M, Nowbar AN, et al.. Coronary flow reserve and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2022. PMID 34849697 · DOI · PMC9020988
  5. Liang S, Wang C, Zhang J, Liu Z, Bai Y, Chen Z, et al.. Triglyceride-glucose index and coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk, severity, and prognosis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023. PMID 37415168 · DOI · PMC10327356
  6. Behrouzi B, Bhatt DL, Cannon CP, Vardeny O, Lee DS, Solomon SD, et al.. Association of Influenza Vaccination With Cardiovascular Risk: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID 35486404 · DOI · PMC9055450
  7. van Oosterhout REM, de Boer AR, Maas AHEM, Rutten FH, Bots ML, Peters SAE. Sex Differences in Symptom Presentation in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020. PMID 32363989 · DOI · PMC7428564
  8. Pizzi C, Xhyheri B, Costa GM, Faustino M, Flacco ME, Gualano MR, et al.. Nonobstructive Versus Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016. PMID 27986756 · DOI · PMC5210396
  9. Kato ET, Morrow DA, Guo J, Berg DD, Blazing MA, Bohula EA, et al.. Growth differentiation factor 15 and cardiovascular risk: individual patient meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2023. PMID 36303404 · DOI · PMC10066747

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Coronary DiseaseCardiovascular Medicine
  • Myocardial IschemiaCardiovascular Medicine
  • Coronary ThrombosisCardiovascular Medicine
  • Angina PectorisCardiovascular Medicine
  • ST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionCardiovascular Medicine
  • Myocardial InfarctionCardiovascular Medicine

All 105 articles in Cardiovascular Medicine →

At a glance

23,143
PubMed records on this heading
32%
published since 2020
3,882
review articles
1,864
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Coronary DiseaseCardiovascular Medicine
  • Myocardial IschemiaCardiovascular Medicine
  • Coronary ThrombosisCardiovascular Medicine
  • Angina PectorisCardiovascular Medicine
  • ST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionCardiovascular Medicine

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support