Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Anastrozole
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Anastrozole

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A nitrile and triazole derivative that acts as a selective nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,031 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A nitrile and triazole derivative that acts as a selective nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor. It is used in the treatment of estrogen nuclear receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: 2,2'-(5-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl)-1,3-phenylene)bis(2-methylpropionitrile); Anastrazole; ICI D1033; ZD-1033; ZD 1033; ZD1033; Zeneca ZD 1033; Arimidex.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Nitriles; Triazoles

Related concepts

  • Estrogen Nuclear Receptor-

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 1,638 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Anastrozole” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 235 of them (14.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 707 records.

Reviews account for 308 records (18.8%) and meta-analyses for 33. Randomized controlled trials number 293 (17.9%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 55 records; 2000-2009: 707 records; 2010-2019: 641 records; 2020 onward: 235 records55through 19997072000-20096412010-20192352020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199955
2000-2009707
2010-2019641
2020 onward235
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 18.8 percent; Meta-analyses: 2.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 17.9 percentReviews18.8% (308)Meta-analyses2.0% (33)Randomized controlled trials17.9% (293)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 1,638 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews30818.8%
Meta-analyses332.0%
Randomized controlled trials29317.9%

Method: PubMed query "Anastrozole"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Use of anastrozole for breast cancer prevention (IBIS-II): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial
Cuzick J, Sestak I, Forbes JF, Dowsett M, Cawthorn S, Mansel RE, et al.
2020Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
166cc by
PMID 31839281 · DOI · PMC6961114
Integration of Clinical Variables for the Prediction of Late Distant Recurrence in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With 5 Years of Endocrine Therapy: CTS5
Dowsett M, Sestak I, Regan MM, Dodson A, Viale G, Thürlimann B, et al.
2018Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
153cc by
PMID 29676944 · DOI · PMC6049399
27-Hydroxycholesterol contributes to cognitive deficits in APP/PS1 transgenic mice through microbiota dysbiosis and intestinal barrier dysfunction
Wang Y, An Y, Ma W, Yu H, Lu Y, Zhang X, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
86cc by
PMID 32593306 · DOI · PMC7321549
Biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant palbociclib plus anastrozole in endocrine-resistant estrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer: a phase 2 trial
Kong T, Mabry A, Highkin M, Wang AZ, Hoog J, Guo Z, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
4cc by
PMID 41593097 · DOI · PMC12848104

Use of anastrozole for breast cancer prevention (IBIS-II): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial [1]

Randomized controlled trial Cuzick J, Sestak I, Forbes JF, Dowsett M, Cawthorn S, Mansel RE, et al. · · 2020 · cited 166 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundTwo large clinical trials have shown a reduced rate of breast cancer development in high-risk women in the initial 5 years of follow-up after use of aromatase inhibitors (MAP.
Closing excerpt
FundingCancer Research UK, the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Sanofi Aventis, and AstraZeneca.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (259 words)

BackgroundTwo large clinical trials have shown a reduced rate of breast cancer development in high-risk women in the initial 5 years of follow-up after use of aromatase inhibitors (MAP.3 and International Breast Cancer Intervention Study II [IBIS-II]). Here, we report blinded long-term follow-up results for the IBIS-II trial, which compared anastrozole with placebo, with the objective of determining the efficacy of anastrozole for preventing breast cancer (both invasive and ductal carcinoma in situ) in the post-treatment period.MethodsIBIS-II is an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Postmenopausal women at increased risk of developing breast cancer were recruited and were randomly assigned (1:1) to either anastrozole (1 mg per day, oral) or matching placebo daily for 5 years. After treatment completion, women were followed on a yearly basis to collect data on breast cancer incidence, death, other cancers, and major adverse events (cardiovascular events and fractures). The primary outcome was all breast cancer.Findings3864 women were recruited between Feb 2, 2003, and Jan 31, 2012. 1920 women were randomly assigned to 5 years anastrozole and 1944 to placebo. After a median follow-up of 131 months (IQR 105-156), a 49% reduction in breast cancer was observed for anastrozole (85 vs 165 cases, hazard ratio [HR] 0·51, 95% CI 0·39-0·66, pInterpretationThis analysis has identified a significant continuing reduction in breast cancer with anastrozole in the post-treatment follow-up period, with no evidence of new late side-effects. Further follow-up is needed to assess the effect on breast cancer mortality.FundingCancer Research UK, the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Sanofi Aventis, and AstraZeneca.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31839281 · DOI · PMC6961114

Integration of Clinical Variables for the Prediction of Late Distant Recurrence in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With 5 Years of Endocrine Therapy: CTS5 [2]

Randomized controlled trial Dowsett M, Sestak I, Regan MM, Dodson A, Viale G, Thürlimann B, et al. · · 2018 · cited 153 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Purpose Estimating risk of late distant recurrence (DR) is an important goal for managing women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer after 5 years of endocrine treatment without recurrence.
Closing excerpt
The final CTS5 algorithm identified 42% of women with < 1% per-year risk of DR who could be advised of the limited potential value of extended endocrine therapy.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (292 words)

Purpose Estimating risk of late distant recurrence (DR) is an important goal for managing women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer after 5 years of endocrine treatment without recurrence. We developed and validated a simple clinicopathologic tool (Clinical Treatment Score post-5 years [CTS5]) to estimate residual risk of DR after 5 years of endocrine treatment. Patients and Methods The ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) data set (N = 4,735) was used to create a prognostic score for post-5-year risk of DR. Validity of CTS5 (ATAC) was tested in the BIG 1-98 data set (N = 6,711). Time to late DR, 5 years after finishing scheduled endocrine therapy, was the primary end point. Cox regression models estimated the prognostic performance of CTS5 (ATAC). Results CTS5 (ATAC) was significantly prognostic for late DR in the ATAC cohort (hazard ratio, 2.47; 95% CI, 2.24 to 2.73; P 10%) identified 43% of the validation cohort as low risk, with an observed DR rate of 3.6% (95% CI, 2.7% to 4.9%) during years 5 to 10. From years 5 to 10, 63% of node-negative patients were low risk, with a DR rate of 3.9% (95% CI, 2.9% to 5.3%), and 24% with one to three positive nodes were low risk, with a DR rate of 1.5% (95% CI, 0.5% to 3.8%). A final CTS5 for future use was derived from pooled data from ATAC and BIG 1-98. Conclusion CTS5 is a simple tool based on information that is readily available to all clinicians. CTS5 was validated as highly prognostic for late DR in the independent BIG 1-98 study. The final CTS5 algorithm identified 42% of women with < 1% per-year risk of DR who could be advised of the limited potential value of extended endocrine therapy.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29676944 · DOI · PMC6049399

27-Hydroxycholesterol contributes to cognitive deficits in APP/PS1 transgenic mice through microbiota dysbiosis and intestinal barrier dysfunction [3]

Research article Wang Y, An Y, Ma W, Yu H, Lu Y, Zhang X, et al. · · 2020 · cited 86 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundResearch on the brain-gut-microbiota axis has led to accumulating interest in gut microbiota dysbiosis and intestinal barrier dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease (AD).
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsThe current study demonstrates for the first time that 27-OHC treatment aggravates AD-associated pathophysiological alterations, specifically gut microbiota dysbiosis and intestinal barrier dysfunction, which suggests that the gut microbiome and intestinal barrier function warrant further investigation as potential targets to mitigate the neurotoxic impact of 27-OHC on cognitive function and the development of AD.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (326 words)

BackgroundResearch on the brain-gut-microbiota axis has led to accumulating interest in gut microbiota dysbiosis and intestinal barrier dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Our previous studies have demonstrated neurotoxic effects of 27-hydroxycholesterol (27-OHC) in in vitro and in vivo models. Here, alterations in the gut microbiota and intestinal barrier functions were investigated as the possible causes of cognitive deficits induced by 27-OHC treatment.MethodsMale APP/PS1 transgenic and C57BL/6J mice were treated for 3 weeks with 27-OHC (5.5 mg/kg/day, subcutaneous injection) and either a 27-OHC synthetase inhibitor (anastrozole, ANS) or saline. The Morris water maze and passive avoidance test were used to assess cognitive impairment. Injuries of the intestine were evaluated by histopathological examination. Intestinal barrier function was assessed by plasma diamine oxidase (DAO) activity and D-lactate. Systemic and intestinal inflammation were evaluated by IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-17 concentrations as determined by ELISA. The fecal microbiome and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analyzed using 16S rDNA sequencing and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS). Tight junction proteins were evaluated in the ileum and colon by qRT-PCR and Western blots. Tight junction ultrastructure was examined by transmission electron microscopy.ResultsTreatment with 27-OHC resulted in severe pathologies in the ileum and colon. There was impaired intestinal barrier integrity as indicated by dilated tight junctions and downregulation of tight junction proteins, including occludin, claudin 1, claudin 5, and ZO-1, and signs of inflammation (increased IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-17). Fecal 16S rDNA sequencing and taxonomic analysis further revealed a decreased abundance of Roseburia and reduced fecal levels of several SCFAs in 27-OHC-treated mice. Meanwhile, co-treatment with ANS reduced intestinal inflammation and partially preserved intestinal barrier integrity in the presence of 27-OHC.ConclusionsThe current study demonstrates for the first time that 27-OHC treatment aggravates AD-associated pathophysiological alterations, specifically gut microbiota dysbiosis and intestinal barrier dysfunction, which suggests that the gut microbiome and intestinal barrier function warrant further investigation as potential targets to mitigate the neurotoxic impact of 27-OHC on cognitive function and the development of AD.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32593306 · DOI · PMC7321549

Biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant palbociclib plus anastrozole in endocrine-resistant estrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer: a phase 2 trial [4]

Research article Kong T, Mabry A, Highkin M, Wang AZ, Hoog J, Guo Z, et al. · · 2026 · cited 4 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) improve outcomes for estrogen receptor (ER) positive/HER2-negative breast cancers (BCs), yet intrinsic and acquired resistance exist.
Closing excerpt
These findings underscore dysregulated oncogenic pathways as potential resistance mechanisms and biomarkers of response to CDK4/6i.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (154 words)

CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) improve outcomes for estrogen receptor (ER) positive/HER2-negative breast cancers (BCs), yet intrinsic and acquired resistance exist. Here, we evaluated anastrozole in combination with palbociclib (ANA/PAL) in the NeoPalAna Endocrine-Resistant cohort (NCT01723774). Thirty-four patients with clinical stage II/III ER + /HER2- BCs resistant to standard neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (on-treatment Ki67 > 10%) received neoadjuvant ANA/PAL, with serial biopsies analyzed. The primary endpoint, complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA; Ki67C1D15 ≤ 2.7% at cycle 1, day 15), was achieved in 57.6% of patients (95%CI: 39.2-74.5%). Resistance to ANA/PAL (Ki67C1D15 > 10%) was associated with higher pre-treatment tumor grade, Ki67, and specific PAM50 subtypes. Resistant tumors demonstrated reduced ER signaling and upregulation of cell cycle, mTOR, interferon, JAK/STAT, and immune checkpoints. Additionally, a 33-gene signature that predicted neoadjuvant Ki67 response to ANA/PAL was prognostic in a metastatic validation cohort. These findings underscore dysregulated oncogenic pathways as potential resistance mechanisms and biomarkers of response to CDK4/6i.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41593097 · DOI · PMC12848104

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Preventing Breast Cancer Through Identification and Pharmacologic Management of High-Risk Patients [5]
    Gilman EA, Pruthi S, Hofstatter EW, Mussallem DM · Mayo Clin Proc · 2021 · cited 14 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Primary antiphospholipid syndrome during aromatase inhibitors therapy: A case report and review of the literature [6]
    Tenti S, Giordano N, Cutolo M, Giannini F, Fioravanti A · Medicine (Baltimore) · 2019 · cited 12 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A meta-analysis of clinical benefit rates for fulvestrant 500 mg vs. alternative endocrine therapies for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer [7]
    Robertson JFR, Jiang Z, Di Leo A, Ohno S, Pritchard KI, Ellis M, et al. · Breast Cancer · 2019 · cited 9 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article In case of anastrozole-related hallucinations, can switching to letrozole be a treatment option? A case report and literature review [8]
    Bozkaya Y, Erdem GU, Demirci NS · J Oncol Pharm Pract · 2019 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Possible role of anastrozole-induced hormonal alterations in pathogenesis of mammary apocrine carcinoma and follicular lymphoma: a case report and review of the literature [9]
    Kitagawa Y, Nassiri M, Mesa H, Prakash J, Popnikolov N · J Med Case Rep · 2025 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Forbes JF, Dowsett M, Cawthorn S, Mansel RE, et al.. Use of anastrozole for breast cancer prevention (IBIS-II): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. . 2020. PMID 31839281 · DOI · PMC6961114
  2. Dowsett M, Sestak I, Regan MM, Dodson A, Viale G, Thürlimann B, et al.. Integration of Clinical Variables for the Prediction of Late Distant Recurrence in Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With 5 Years of Endocrine Therapy: CTS5. . 2018. PMID 29676944 · DOI · PMC6049399
  3. Wang Y, An Y, Ma W, Yu H, Lu Y, Zhang X, et al.. 27-Hydroxycholesterol contributes to cognitive deficits in APP/PS1 transgenic mice through microbiota dysbiosis and intestinal barrier dysfunction. . 2020. PMID 32593306 · DOI · PMC7321549
  4. Kong T, Mabry A, Highkin M, Wang AZ, Hoog J, Guo Z, et al.. Biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant palbociclib plus anastrozole in endocrine-resistant estrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer: a phase 2 trial. . 2026. PMID 41593097 · DOI · PMC12848104
  5. Gilman EA, Pruthi S, Hofstatter EW, Mussallem DM. Preventing Breast Cancer Through Identification and Pharmacologic Management of High-Risk Patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021. PMID 33814072 · DOI
  6. Tenti S, Giordano N, Cutolo M, Giannini F, Fioravanti A. Primary antiphospholipid syndrome during aromatase inhibitors therapy: A case report and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID 30921233 · DOI · PMC6455664
  7. Robertson JFR, Jiang Z, Di Leo A, Ohno S, Pritchard KI, Ellis M, et al.. A meta-analysis of clinical benefit rates for fulvestrant 500 mg vs. alternative endocrine therapies for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2019. PMID 31079343 · DOI · PMC6821663
  8. Bozkaya Y, Erdem GU, Demirci NS. In case of anastrozole-related hallucinations, can switching to letrozole be a treatment option? A case report and literature review. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019. PMID 29536789 · DOI
  9. Kitagawa Y, Nassiri M, Mesa H, Prakash J, Popnikolov N. Possible role of anastrozole-induced hormonal alterations in pathogenesis of mammary apocrine carcinoma and follicular lymphoma: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2025. PMID 41024216 · DOI · PMC12482693

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • LetrozoleDrugs and Chemicals
  • RyanodineDrugs and Chemicals
  • LosartanDrugs and Chemicals
  • ValsartanDrugs and Chemicals
  • SunitinibDrugs and Chemicals
  • AcetazolamideDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

1,638
PubMed records on this heading
14%
published since 2020
308
review articles
293
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • LetrozoleDrugs and Chemicals
  • RyanodineDrugs and Chemicals
  • LosartanDrugs and Chemicals
  • ValsartanDrugs and Chemicals
  • SunitinibDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support