Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Immunology›Antibody Specificity
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Antibody Specificity

Immunology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The property of antibodies which enables them to react with some antigenic determinants and not with others.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (941 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The property of antibodies which enables them to react with some antigenic determinants and not with others. Specificity is dependent on chemical composition, physical forces, and molecular structure at the binding site.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Antibody Specificities; Specificities, Antibody; Specificity, Antibody.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Immune System Phenomena
See also
Antibodies, Bispecific; T-Cell Antigen Receptor Specificity

Related concepts

  • Antigenic Determinants

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 44,616 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Antibody Specificity” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 840 of them (1.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 29,944 records.

Reviews account for 2,097 records (4.7%) and meta-analyses for 9. Randomized controlled trials number 179 (0.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 29,944 records; 2000-2009: 8,793 records; 2010-2019: 5,039 records; 2020 onward: 840 records29,944through 19998,7932000-20095,0392010-20198402020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199929,944
2000-20098,793
2010-20195,039
2020 onward840
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 4.7 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.4 percentReviews4.7% (2,097)Meta-analyses0.0% (9)Randomized controlled trials0.4% (179)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 44,616 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,0974.7%
Meta-analyses90.0%
Randomized controlled trials1790.4%

Method: PubMed query "Antibody Specificity"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in immunology

Immune responses are studied in model organisms, in cells from donors and in patients, and the same pathway can behave differently across these settings. Mouse immune systems differ from human ones in important ways, and blood measurements may not reflect what happens in tissues. Clinical conclusions about immune-mediated disease or immunotherapy come mainly from controlled trials and long-term cohorts. Check the species and tissue studied, whether markers were linked to outcomes patients notice, and the follow-up time.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Antibody targeting of E3 ubiquitin ligases for receptor degradation
Marei H, Tsai WK, Kee YS, Ruiz K, He J, Cox C, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
227cc by
PMID 36131013 · DOI · PMC9534761
Autoantibody Specificities in Myasthenia Gravis; Implications for Improved Diagnostics and Therapeutics
Lazaridis K, Tzartos SJ
2020Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
188cc by
PMID 32117321 · DOI · PMC7033452
Enhanced tumor-targeting selectivity by modulating bispecific antibody binding affinity and format valence
Mazor Y, Sachsenmeier KF, Yang C, Hansen A, Filderman J, Mulgrew K, et al.
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
115cc by
PMID 28067257 · DOI · PMC5220356
Construction and Evaluation of Guanylyl Cyclase C-Specific Antibody for Noninvasive Diagnosis and Targeted Therapy of Colorectal Cancer
Rong Z, Liu H, Teng X, Chen L, Gu Y, Dong B, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 41469159 · DOI · PMC12955545

Antibody targeting of E3 ubiquitin ligases for receptor degradation [1]

Research article Marei H, Tsai WK, Kee YS, Ruiz K, He J, Cox C, et al. · · 2022 · cited 227 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Most current therapies that target plasma membrane receptors function by antagonizing ligand binding or enzymatic activities.
Closing excerpt
In summary, this work describes a strategy for the rapid development of potent, bioavailable and tissue-selective degraders of cell-surface proteins.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (191 words)

Most current therapies that target plasma membrane receptors function by antagonizing ligand binding or enzymatic activities. However, typical mammalian proteins comprise multiple domains that execute discrete but coordinated activities. Thus, inhibition of one domain often incompletely suppresses the function of a protein. Indeed, targeted protein degradation technologies, including proteolysis-targeting chimeras1 (PROTACs), have highlighted clinically important advantages of target degradation over inhibition2. However, the generation of heterobifunctional compounds binding to two targets with high affinity is complex, particularly when oral bioavailability is required3. Here we describe the development of proteolysis-targeting antibodies (PROTABs) that tether cell-surface E3 ubiquitin ligases to transmembrane proteins, resulting in target degradation both in vitro and in vivo. Focusing on zinc- and ring finger 3 (ZNRF3), a Wnt-responsive ligase, we show that this approach can enable colorectal cancer-specific degradation. Notably, by examining a matrix of additional cell-surface E3 ubiquitin ligases and transmembrane receptors, we demonstrate that this technology is amendable for 'on-demand' degradation. Furthermore, we offer insights on the ground rules governing target degradation by engineering optimized antibody formats. In summary, this work describes a strategy for the rapid development of potent, bioavailable and tissue-selective degraders of cell-surface proteins.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36131013 · DOI · PMC9534761

Autoantibody Specificities in Myasthenia Gravis; Implications for Improved Diagnostics and Therapeutics [2]

Review article Lazaridis K, Tzartos SJ · · 2020 · cited 188 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by muscle weakness and fatiguability of skeletal muscles.
Closing excerpt
Overall, the development of novel autoantibody assays is aiding in the more accurate diagnosis and classification of MG patients, supporting the development of advanced therapeutics and ultimately the improvement of disease management and patient quality of life.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (349 words)

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease characterized by muscle weakness and fatiguability of skeletal muscles. It is an antibody-mediated disease, caused by autoantibodies targeting neuromuscular junction proteins. In the majority of patients (~85%) antibodies against the muscle acetylcholine receptor (AChR) are detected, while in 6% antibodies against the muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) are detected. In ~10% of MG patients no autoantibodies can be found with the classical diagnostics for AChR and MuSK antibodies (seronegative MG, SN-MG), making the improvement of methods for the detection of known autoantibodies or the discovery of novel antigenic targets imperative. Over the past years, using cell-based assays or improved highly sensitive immunoprecipitation assays, it has been possible to detect autoantibodies in previously SN-MG patients, including the identification of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) as a third MG autoantigen, as well as AChR and MuSK antibodies undetectable by conventional methods. Furthermore, antibodies against other extracellular or intracellular targets, such as titin, the ryanodine receptor, agrin, collagen Q, Kv1.4 potassium channels and cortactin have been found in some MG patients, which can be useful biomarkers. In addition to the improvement of diagnosis, the identification of the patients' autoantibody specificity is important for their stratification into respective subgroups, which can differ in terms of clinical manifestations, prognosis and most importantly their response to therapies. The knowledge of the autoantibody profile of MG patients would allow for a therapeutic strategy tailored to their MG subgroup. This is becoming especially relevant as there is increasing progress toward the development of antigen-specific therapies, targeting only the specific autoantibodies or immune cells involved in the autoimmune response, such as antigen-specific immunoadsorption, which have shown promising results. We will herein review the advances made by us and others toward development of more sensitive detection methods and the identification of new antibody targets in MG, and discuss their significance in MG diagnosis and therapy. Overall, the development of novel autoantibody assays is aiding in the more accurate diagnosis and classification of MG patients, supporting the development of advanced therapeutics and ultimately the improvement of disease management and patient quality of life.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32117321 · DOI · PMC7033452

Enhanced tumor-targeting selectivity by modulating bispecific antibody binding affinity and format valence [3]

Research article Mazor Y, Sachsenmeier KF, Yang C, Hansen A, Filderman J, Mulgrew K, et al. · · 2017 · cited 115 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Bispecific antibodies are considered attractive bio-therapeutic agents owing to their ability to target two distinct disease mediators.
Closing excerpt
Affinity-reduced monovalent bispecific variants, but not their bivalent bispecific counterparts, mediated a greater degree of tumor targeting selectivity, while the overall efficacy against the targeted tumor was not substantially affected.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (196 words)

Bispecific antibodies are considered attractive bio-therapeutic agents owing to their ability to target two distinct disease mediators. Cross-arm avidity targeting of antigen double-positive cancer cells over single-positive normal tissue is believed to enhance the therapeutic efficacy, restrict major escape mechanisms and increase tumor-targeting selectivity, leading to reduced systemic toxicity and improved therapeutic index. However, the interplay of factors regulating target selectivity is not well understood and often overlooked when developing clinically relevant bispecific therapeutics. We show in vivo that dual targeting alone is not sufficient to endow selective tumor-targeting, and report the pivotal roles played by the affinity of the individual arms, overall avidity and format valence. Specifically, a series of monovalent and bivalent bispecific IgGs composed of the anti-HER2 trastuzumab moiety paired with affinity-modulated VH and VL regions of the anti-EGFR GA201 mAb were tested for selective targeting and eradication of double-positive human NCI-H358 non-small cell lung cancer target tumors over single-positive, non-target NCI-H358-HER2 CRISPR knock out tumors in nude mice bearing dual-flank tumor xenografts. Affinity-reduced monovalent bispecific variants, but not their bivalent bispecific counterparts, mediated a greater degree of tumor targeting selectivity, while the overall efficacy against the targeted tumor was not substantially affected.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28067257 · DOI · PMC5220356

Construction and Evaluation of Guanylyl Cyclase C-Specific Antibody for Noninvasive Diagnosis and Targeted Therapy of Colorectal Cancer [4]

Research article Rong Z, Liu H, Teng X, Chen L, Gu Y, Dong B, et al. · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide despite therapeutic advances.
Closing excerpt
Conclusion: We have established both optical and radionuclide probes with PR15-7 as a versatile therapeutic strategy, providing valuable insights into targeted therapy for CRC.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (205 words)

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide despite therapeutic advances. Guanylyl cyclase C (GUCY2C), an intestinal epithelial receptor, is emerging as a promising diagnostic and therapeutic target for CRC. Thus, we are interested in developing a monoclonal antibody probe targeting GUCY2C for both in vitro and in vivo diagnosis and treatment of CRC. Methods: The GUCY2C-specific monoclonal antibody, PR15-7, was generated by hybridoma fusion. We developed [89Zr]Zr-DFO-PR15-7 for PET imaging, Cy5-PR15-7 for near-infrared fluorescence I (NIR-I) detection, and ICG-PR15-7 for NIR-II-guided surgical navigation. The therapeutic potential was evaluated using [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-PR15-7 for targeted radiotherapy. Biologic properties and antitumor activity of PR15-7 probes were evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Results: PR15-7 showed strong GUCY2C binding affinity and tumor selectivity. PR15-7 probes in antibody-based PET and NIR imaging revealed 3 times higher signal intensity in GUCY2C-positive tumors compared with controls. The NIR-II probe ICG-PR15-7 enabled precise intraoperative tumor visualization and complete resection in orthotopic models. Therapeutic administration of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-PR15-7 significantly inhibited tumor growth, with standardized tumor volumes at 16 d being markedly smaller than those in the control groups. Conclusion: We have established both optical and radionuclide probes with PR15-7 as a versatile therapeutic strategy, providing valuable insights into targeted therapy for CRC.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41469159 · DOI · PMC12955545

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Xenogeneic monoclonal antibodies to mouse lymphoid differentiation antigens [5]
    Ledbetter JA, Herzenberg LA · Immunol Rev · 1979 · cited 1,459 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Site-specific antibody drug conjugates for cancer therapy [6]
    Panowski S, Bhakta S, Raab H, Polakis P, Junutula JR · MAbs · 2014 · cited 497 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article CD5+ B lymphocytes, polyreactive antibodies and the human B-cell repertoire [7]
    Casali P, Notkins AL · Immunol Today · 1989 · cited 333 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Intrinsic and extrinsic factors in protein antigenic structure [8]
    Berzofsky JA · Science · 1985 · cited 326 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Estimating the protective concentration of anti-pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide antibodies [9]
    Siber GR, Chang I, Baker S, Fernsten P, O'Brien KL, Santosham M, et al. · Vaccine · 2007 · cited 298 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Autoantibody systems in rheumatoid arthritis: specificity, sensitivity and diagnostic value [10]
    van Boekel MA, Vossenaar ER, van den Hoogen FH, van Venrooij WJ · Arthritis Res · 2002 · cited 232 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Marei H, Tsai WK, Kee YS, Ruiz K, He J, Cox C, et al.. Antibody targeting of E3 ubiquitin ligases for receptor degradation. . 2022. PMID 36131013 · DOI · PMC9534761
  2. Lazaridis K, Tzartos SJ. Autoantibody Specificities in Myasthenia Gravis; Implications for Improved Diagnostics and Therapeutics. . 2020. PMID 32117321 · DOI · PMC7033452
  3. Mazor Y, Sachsenmeier KF, Yang C, Hansen A, Filderman J, Mulgrew K, et al.. Enhanced tumor-targeting selectivity by modulating bispecific antibody binding affinity and format valence. . 2017. PMID 28067257 · DOI · PMC5220356
  4. Rong Z, Liu H, Teng X, Chen L, Gu Y, Dong B, et al.. Construction and Evaluation of Guanylyl Cyclase C-Specific Antibody for Noninvasive Diagnosis and Targeted Therapy of Colorectal Cancer. . 2026. PMID 41469159 · DOI · PMC12955545
  5. Ledbetter JA, Herzenberg LA. Xenogeneic monoclonal antibodies to mouse lymphoid differentiation antigens. Immunol Rev. 1979. PMID 398327 · DOI
  6. Panowski S, Bhakta S, Raab H, Polakis P, Junutula JR. Site-specific antibody drug conjugates for cancer therapy. MAbs. 2014. PMID 24423619 · DOI · PMC3929453
  7. Casali P, Notkins AL. CD5+ B lymphocytes, polyreactive antibodies and the human B-cell repertoire. Immunol Today. 1989. PMID 2482031 · DOI
  8. Berzofsky JA. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors in protein antigenic structure. Science. 1985. PMID 2410982 · DOI
  9. Siber GR, Chang I, Baker S, Fernsten P, O'Brien KL, Santosham M, et al.. Estimating the protective concentration of anti-pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide antibodies. Vaccine. 2007. PMID 17368878 · DOI
  10. van Boekel MA, Vossenaar ER, van den Hoogen FH, van Venrooij WJ. Autoantibody systems in rheumatoid arthritis: specificity, sensitivity and diagnostic value. Arthritis Res. 2002. PMID 11879544 · DOI · PMC128920

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Substrate SpecificityMolecular Biology
  • Antibody AffinityImmunology
  • Sensitivity and SpecificityClinical Research
  • Antibody-Dependent EnhancementImmunology
  • Antibody-Dependent Cell CytotoxicityImmunology
  • Antiphospholipid SyndromeImmunology

All 90 articles in Immunology →

At a glance

44,616
PubMed records on this heading
2%
published since 2020
2,097
review articles
179
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Substrate SpecificityMolecular Biology
  • Antibody AffinityImmunology
  • Sensitivity and SpecificityClinical Research
  • Antibody-Dependent EnhancementImmunology
  • Antibody-Dependent Cell CytotoxicityImmunology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support