Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (775 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Area of the human body underneath the shoulder joint, also known as the armpit or underarm.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Armpit; Underarm.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Upper Extremity
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 16,079 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Axilla” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 3,169 of them (19.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 4,613 records.
Reviews account for 1,516 records (9.4%) and meta-analyses for 185. Randomized controlled trials number 705 (4.4%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 4,613 |
| 2000-2009 | 3,760 |
| 2010-2019 | 4,537 |
| 2020 onward | 3,169 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,516 | 9.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 185 | 1.2% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 705 | 4.4% |
Method: PubMed query "Axilla"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical evaluation of a microwave device for treating axillary hyperhidrosis | 2012 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 80 | cc by PMID 22452511 · DOI · PMC3489040 |
| Characterization of Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium clusters in the human axillary region | 2013 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 72 | cc by PMID 23950955 · DOI · PMC3741381 |
| Increases in arm volume predict lymphoedema and quality of life deficits after axillary surgery: a prospective cohort study | 2020 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 58 | cc by PMID 32362658 · DOI · PMC7341763 |
| Machine Learning Classification of Axillary Lymph Nodes Using Microwave Signals | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 42515350 · DOI · PMC13431324 |
Clinical evaluation of a microwave device for treating axillary hyperhidrosis [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundA third-generation microwave-based device has been developed to treat axillary hyperhidrosis by selectively heating the interface between the skin and underlying fat where the sweat glands reside.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionThe device tested provided efficacious and durable treatment for axillary hyperhidrosis.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (184 words)
BackgroundA third-generation microwave-based device has been developed to treat axillary hyperhidrosis by selectively heating the interface between the skin and underlying fat where the sweat glands reside.Materials and methodsThirty-one (31) adults with primary axillary hyperhidrosis were enrolled. All subjects had one to three procedure sessions over a 6-month period to treat both axillae fully. Efficacy was assessed using the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS), gravimetric weight of sweat, and the Dermatologic Life Quality Index (DLQI), a dermatology-specific quality-of-life scale. Subject safety was assessed at each visit. Subjects were followed for 12 months after all procedure sessions were complete.ResultsAt the 12-month follow-up visit, 90.3% had HDSS scores of 1 or 2, 90.3% had at least a 50% reduction in axillary sweat from baseline, and 85.2% had a reduction of at least 5 points on the DLQI. All subjects experienced transient effects in the treatment area such as swelling, discomfort, and numbness. The most common adverse event (12 subjects) was the presence of altered sensation in the skin of the arm that resolved in all subjects.ConclusionThe device tested provided efficacious and durable treatment for axillary hyperhidrosis.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 22452511 · DOI · PMC3489040
Characterization of Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium clusters in the human axillary region [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The skin microbial community is regarded as essential for human health and well-being, but likewise plays an important role in the formation of body odor in, for instance, the axillae.
- Closing excerpt
- The deodorant usage had a proportional linear influence on the species diversity of the axillary microbiome.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (195 words)
The skin microbial community is regarded as essential for human health and well-being, but likewise plays an important role in the formation of body odor in, for instance, the axillae. Few molecular-based research was done on the axillary microbiome. This study typified the axillary microbiome of a group of 53 healthy subjects. A profound view was obtained of the interpersonal, intrapersonal and temporal diversity of the human axillary microbiota. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and next generation sequencing on 16S rRNA gene region were combined and used as extent to each other. Two important clusters were characterized, where Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium species were the abundant species. Females predominantly clustered within the Staphylococcus cluster (87%, n = 17), whereas males clustered more in the Corynebacterium cluster (39%, n = 36). The axillary microbiota was unique to each individual. Left-right asymmetry occurred in about half of the human population. For the first time, an elaborate study was performed on the dynamics of the axillary microbiome. A relatively stable axillary microbiome was noticed, although a few subjects evolved towards another stable community. The deodorant usage had a proportional linear influence on the species diversity of the axillary microbiome.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 23950955 · DOI · PMC3741381
Increases in arm volume predict lymphoedema and quality of life deficits after axillary surgery: a prospective cohort study [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundLymphoedema develops after axillary clearance (ANC) in 25% of patients.
- Closing excerpt
- BMI > 30 predicted lymphoedema diagnosis and progression.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (195 words)
BackgroundLymphoedema develops after axillary clearance (ANC) in 25% of patients. This prospective, multi-centre study compared multi-frequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) with arm volume measurement to: (1) determine which test has better diagnostic accuracy, (2) identify factors predicting development of lymphoedema, and its effect on quality-of-life.MethodsParticipants (N = 1100) underwent measurements pre and post-ANC surgery for breast cancer. Relative arm volume increase (RAVI) of >10% diagnosed lymphoedema. Predictors of lymphoedema were determined using logistic regression. Optimal diagnostic method was assessed using diagnostic accuracy. Quality-of-life was assessed using the FACT B + 4 questionnaire.ResultsLymphoedema was diagnosed in 22.8% women using RAVI > 10%, 45.6% using BIS criteria, while 24.5% underwent compression sleeve application by 24 months. BMI > 30 was an independent factor for both development (p = 0.005) and progression (p = 0.015) of lymphoedema. RAVI at 1 month, BMI > 30 and number of involved nodes contributed to a novel scoring model to predict lymphoedema by 36 months. Larger decreases in QoL scores post-surgery occurred in lymphoedema patients (p ConclusionsRAVI measurement was the best diagnostic tool for lymphoedema. BIS alone is not appropriate for lymphoedema screening or diagnosis. BMI > 30 predicted lymphoedema diagnosis and progression.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32362658 · DOI · PMC7341763
Machine Learning Classification of Axillary Lymph Nodes Using Microwave Signals [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Axillary Lymph Nodes (ALNs) can be affected by breast cancer, and the number of affected ALNs is a determinant factor in breast cancer staging.
- Closing excerpt
- These results demonstrate the potential of microwave signal-based classification to differentiate healthy and metastasised ALNs and axillary regions, supporting future integration with MWI image interpretation.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (201 words)
Axillary Lymph Nodes (ALNs) can be affected by breast cancer, and the number of affected ALNs is a determinant factor in breast cancer staging. Microwave imaging (MWI) has emerged as a promising technique for ALN assessment, addressing limitations in conventional imaging modalities. This study investigates, for the first time, the classification of ALNs and axillary regions from microwave signals, without image reconstruction. Classification is performed considering realistic morphological characteristics of ALNs reported in the literature and is based solely on geometric differences, which differ from targets previously explored in microwave-based classification studies. Eighty ALN numerical models were mathematically generated based on state-of-the-art anatomical descriptions. Microwave signals were simulated for three scenarios of different complexity, involving one and two ALNs, representing healthy and metastasised conditions. The methodology evaluated multiple combinations of signal types, feature extraction methods, and classifiers, including scenarios with multiple targets, reflecting clinically relevant axillary conditions and limited angular views inherent to axillary imaging. Classification accuracy reached 95% for single-ALN scenarios using kNN, while more complex two-ALN cases achieved accuracies up to 83.3% using SVM. These results demonstrate the potential of microwave signal-based classification to differentiate healthy and metastasised ALNs and axillary regions, supporting future integration with MWI image interpretation.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42515350 · DOI · PMC13431324
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Endoscopic thyroid surgery through the axillo-bilateral-breast approach [5]
- Research article American Thyroid Association Statement on Remote-Access Thyroid Surgery [6]
- Research article Axillary staging of breast cancer: what the radiologist should know [7]
- Research article Temperature measured at the axilla compared with rectum in children and young people: systematic review [8]
- Research article Role of the preaxillary flora in pacemaker infections: a prospective study [9]
- Research article Microbiological and biochemical origins of human axillary odour [10]
References
- Hong HC, Lupin M, O'Shaughnessy KF. Clinical evaluation of a microwave device for treating axillary hyperhidrosis. . 2012. PMID 22452511 · DOI · PMC3489040
- Callewaert C, Kerckhof FM, Granitsiotis MS, Van Gele M, Van de Wiele T, Boon N. Characterization of Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium clusters in the human axillary region. . 2013. PMID 23950955 · DOI · PMC3741381
- Bundred N, Foden P, Todd C, Morris J, Watterson D, Purushotham A, et al.. Increases in arm volume predict lymphoedema and quality of life deficits after axillary surgery: a prospective cohort study. . 2020. PMID 32362658 · DOI · PMC7341763
- Godinho DM, Felício JM, Fernandes CA, Conceição RC. Machine Learning Classification of Axillary Lymph Nodes Using Microwave Signals. . 2026. PMID 42515350 · DOI · PMC13431324
- Shimazu K, Shiba E, Tamaki Y, Takiguchi S, Taniguchi E, Ohashi S, et al.. Endoscopic thyroid surgery through the axillo-bilateral-breast approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003. PMID 12819505 · DOI
- Berber E, Bernet V, Fahey TJ, Kebebew E, Shaha A, Stack BC, et al.. American Thyroid Association Statement on Remote-Access Thyroid Surgery. Thyroid. 2016. PMID 26858014 · DOI · PMC4994052
- Ecanow JS, Abe H, Newstead GM, Ecanow DB, Jeske JM. Axillary staging of breast cancer: what the radiologist should know. Radiographics. 2013. PMID 24108553 · DOI
- Craig JV, Lancaster GA, Williamson PR, Smyth RL. Temperature measured at the axilla compared with rectum in children and young people: systematic review. BMJ. 2000. PMID 10784539 · DOI · PMC27359
- Da Costa A, Lelièvre H, Kirkorian G, Célard M, Chevalier P, Vandenesch F, et al.. Role of the preaxillary flora in pacemaker infections: a prospective study. Circulation. 1998. PMID 9603533 · DOI
- James AG, Austin CJ, Cox DS, Taylor D, Calvert R. Microbiological and biochemical origins of human axillary odour. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013. PMID 23278215 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.