Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Cancer and Oncology›Carcinoma
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Carcinoma

Cancer and Oncology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 3 min read

A malignant neoplasm made up of epithelial cells tending to infiltrate the surrounding tissues and give rise to metastases.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (560 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A malignant neoplasm made up of epithelial cells tending to infiltrate the surrounding tissues and give rise to metastases. It is a histological type of neoplasm and not a synonym for cancer.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Carcinomas; Epithelioma; Epitheliomas; Malignant Epithelial Neoplasms; Epithelial Neoplasm, Malignant; Malignant Epithelial Neoplasm; Neoplasm, Malignant Epithelial; Neoplasms, Malignant Epithelial.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
Narrower topics
Adenocarcinoma; Carcinoma in Situ; Carcinoma, Adenosquamous; Carcinoma, Basosquamous; Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor; Carcinoma, Giant Cell; Carcinoma, Krebs 2; Carcinoma, Large Cell; Carcinoma, Lewis Lung; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Carcinoma, Papillary; Carcinoma, Small Cell; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 805,413 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Carcinoma” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 169,229 of them (21.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 251,125 records.

Reviews account for 79,607 records (9.9%) and meta-analyses for 7,124. Randomized controlled trials number 10,873 (1.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 251,125 records; 2000-2009: 154,274 records; 2010-2019: 230,785 records; 2020 onward: 169,229 records251,125through 1999154,2742000-2009230,7852010-2019169,2292020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999251,125
2000-2009154,274
2010-2019230,785
2020 onward169,229
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.9 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.3 percentReviews9.9% (79,607)Meta-analyses0.9% (7,124)Randomized controlled trials1.3% (10,873)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 805,413 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews79,6079.9%
Meta-analyses7,1240.9%
Randomized controlled trials10,8731.3%

Method: PubMed query "Carcinoma"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in cancer and oncology

Cancer research spans very different kinds of evidence. Laboratory studies in cell lines and animal models reveal mechanisms but often do not translate to patients. Early-phase trials mainly test safety and dosing, while phase 3 randomized trials and their meta-analyses are the usual basis for treatment conclusions. Outcomes also differ in meaning: tumour shrinkage, progression-free survival and overall survival are not interchangeable, and screening studies can be distorted by lead-time and overdiagnosis. When reading a result, check the cancer type and stage studied, the comparison treatment, and which outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Fusion-driven oncogenic programs shape the immune landscape in translocation renal cell carcinoma
Konda P, Wakolbinger AJ, Cui Y, Roberti de Oliveira G, Nabil YL, Weiss CN, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42786155 · DOI · PMC13612822
No phenotypes in Ttc22 knockout mice
Liu J, Gu L, You A, Yuan H, Zhou J, Tian W, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42912804 · DOI · PMC13693868
Tumor cell-intrinsic stress states drive sensitivity to CAR T cell therapy in pancreatic cancer
Fröse J, Chen E, Whittaker CA, Leclerc P, Doherty S, Langenbucher A, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42826199 · DOI · PMC13641470

Fusion-driven oncogenic programs shape the immune landscape in translocation renal cell carcinoma [1]

Research article Konda P, Wakolbinger AJ, Cui Y, Roberti de Oliveira G, Nabil YL, Weiss CN, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) comprise multiple molecularly distinct cancers but most are treated empirically with therapies designed for clear cell RCC (ccRCC), the most common subtype, due to incomplete understanding of subtype-specific biology.
Closing excerpt
Our findings highlight unique TFE3 fusion-driven biology in tRCC, explaining its reduced immunotherapy responsiveness relative to ccRCC, and suggesting strategies for targeting fusion-driven oncogenic programs and TME reprogramming.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (154 words)

Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) comprise multiple molecularly distinct cancers but most are treated empirically with therapies designed for clear cell RCC (ccRCC), the most common subtype, due to incomplete understanding of subtype-specific biology. We analyzed single-cell transcriptomes and chromatin accessibility profiles from translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC), an aggressive RCC defined by oncogenic TFE3 gene fusions. We show that, despite arising from a proximal tubule cell of origin similar to ccRCC, tRCCs display distinct oncogenic programs and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). tRCCs exhibit six conserved tumor meta-programs, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and proximal tubule identity programs whose balance is regulated by TFE3 fusion activity. The fusion-driven EMT program drives a suppressive TME marked by progenitor-exhausted CD8 + T cells, anti-inflammatory SPP1+ macrophages, and matrix-associated fibroblasts. Our findings highlight unique TFE3 fusion-driven biology in tRCC, explaining its reduced immunotherapy responsiveness relative to ccRCC, and suggesting strategies for targeting fusion-driven oncogenic programs and TME reprogramming.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42786155 · DOI · PMC13612822

No phenotypes in Ttc22 knockout mice [2]

Research article Liu J, Gu L, You A, Yuan H, Zhou J, Tian W, et al. · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The TTC22 gene encodes a protein containing seven tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs), which mediate protein‒protein interactions as chaperones.
Closing excerpt
In conclusion, no phenotypes were induced by Ttc22 inactivation in C57BL/6N mice.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (244 words)

The TTC22 gene encodes a protein containing seven tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs), which mediate protein‒protein interactions as chaperones. We previously reported that the level of TTC22 transcript variant 1 (TTC22v1) was downregulated in human colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) and that TTC22 upregulated m6A-mediated WTAP and SNAI1 expression via the TTC22‒RPL4 interaction and subsequently promoted COAD metastasis. Thus, a commercially available C57BL/6N mouse model in which the Ttc22 exon 2&3 encoding the TPR4 (equal to the human TTC22 TPR3) domain was knocked out via CRISPR-Cas9 was used to evaluate the contribution of Ttc22 to the development of mice and COAD. To determine the status of Ttc22 expression in Ttc22 knockout mice, we prepared a rabbit polyclonal antibody against the mouse Ttc22 protein, which could bind both wild-type Ttc22 and TPR4-deleted Ttc22 proteins overexpressed in HEK293T cells, as determined by Western blot analysis. Ttc22 proteins were detected in colon tissue samples from wild-type mice and Ttc22 hemi-knockout (Ttc22+/-) mice but not in those from fully Ttc22 knockout (Ttc22-/-) mice. Unfortunately, the long-term observation results demonstrated that Ttc22 knockout (KO, including Ttc22+/- or Ttc22-/-) did not affect the body weight, development, fertility, or spontaneous tumor incidence of male or female mice. No differences in the incidence of AOM/DSS-induced COAD were observed between these mouse groups, although Ttc22 deletion partially resulted in the upregulation of genes related to the host adaptive response to inflammation in the colon mucosa. In conclusion, no phenotypes were induced by Ttc22 inactivation in C57BL/6N mice.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42912804 · DOI · PMC13693868

Tumor cell-intrinsic stress states drive sensitivity to CAR T cell therapy in pancreatic cancer [3]

Research article Fröse J, Chen E, Whittaker CA, Leclerc P, Doherty S, Langenbucher A, et al. · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has transformed the treatment of hematologic cancers but has shown limited efficacy in solid tumors, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Closing excerpt
These findings provide a foundation to improve efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid malignancies and to better stratify patients with cancer by tumor genotype.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (162 words)

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has transformed the treatment of hematologic cancers but has shown limited efficacy in solid tumors, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The cellular and molecular factors that influence CAR T cell therapy response remain largely unknown. By integrating modular in vivo CRISPR screens with single-cell genomics and immunocompetent orthotopic models of PDAC, we uncover oxidative and proteotoxic stress pathways as previously unknown modulators of CAR T cell therapy response. Disruption of stress regulatory genes, particularly Keap1 and Slc33a1, sensitizes PDAC tumors to CAR T cell killing in vivo. Hyperactivation of the Nrf2 pathway by genetic ablation of Keap1 or endogenous engineering of clinically observed Keap1 or Nfe2l2 mutations enhances tumor susceptibility to CAR T cell therapy. Thus, tumor-intrinsic molecular stress phenotypes can induce unexpected cell state-specific vulnerabilities to cell-based immunotherapies. These findings provide a foundation to improve efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid malignancies and to better stratify patients with cancer by tumor genotype.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42826199 · DOI · PMC13641470

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article PARP Inhibitor Maintenance After First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [4]
    Petousis S, Kahramanoglu I, Appenzeller-Herzog C, Angeles MA, Margioula-Siarkou C, Kacperczyk-Bartnik J, et al. · JAMA Netw Open · 2025 · cited 18 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Meta-Analysis: Utilisation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance [5]
    Tang NSY, Gunalan S, Ong CEY, Koh B, Tham EKJ, Lim RY, et al. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther · 2026 · cited 15 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Pathologic Response and Survival After Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Resectable Mucosal HNSCC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [6]
    Mastrolonardo EV, De Ravin E, Kaki PC, Estephan LE, Nunes K, Kenny H, et al. · JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg · 2026 · cited 8 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Histopathology and outcomes of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus: systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
    Lasorsa F, Pandolfo SD, Bignante G, Lambertini L, Orsini A, Rutigliano M, et al. · Eur J Surg Oncol · 2025 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Minimally invasive liver surgery for perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies [8]
    de Hondt J, Zwart MJW, Uijterwijk BA, Burchell GL, Görgeç B, Zonderhuis B, et al. · Surg Endosc · 2025 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Prognostic significance of prognostic nutritional index in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [9]
    Wang Y, Wang J, Xiao B, Wang Y, Huang F, Jiang Y, et al. · Front Immunol · 2025 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Konda P, Wakolbinger AJ, Cui Y, Roberti de Oliveira G, Nabil YL, Weiss CN, et al.. Fusion-driven oncogenic programs shape the immune landscape in translocation renal cell carcinoma. . 2026. PMID 42786155 · DOI · PMC13612822
  2. Liu J, Gu L, You A, Yuan H, Zhou J, Tian W, et al.. No phenotypes in Ttc22 knockout mice. . 2026. PMID 42912804 · DOI · PMC13693868
  3. Fröse J, Chen E, Whittaker CA, Leclerc P, Doherty S, Langenbucher A, et al.. Tumor cell-intrinsic stress states drive sensitivity to CAR T cell therapy in pancreatic cancer. . 2026. PMID 42826199 · DOI · PMC13641470
  4. Petousis S, Kahramanoglu I, Appenzeller-Herzog C, Angeles MA, Margioula-Siarkou C, Kacperczyk-Bartnik J, et al.. PARP Inhibitor Maintenance After First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID 41191357 · DOI · PMC12590296
  5. Tang NSY, Gunalan S, Ong CEY, Koh B, Tham EKJ, Lim RY, et al.. Meta-Analysis: Utilisation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2026. PMID 41077883 · DOI
  6. Mastrolonardo EV, De Ravin E, Kaki PC, Estephan LE, Nunes K, Kenny H, et al.. Pathologic Response and Survival After Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Resectable Mucosal HNSCC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2026. PMID 41410931 · DOI
  7. Lasorsa F, Pandolfo SD, Bignante G, Lambertini L, Orsini A, Rutigliano M, et al.. Histopathology and outcomes of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID 41046750 · DOI
  8. de Hondt J, Zwart MJW, Uijterwijk BA, Burchell GL, Görgeç B, Zonderhuis B, et al.. Minimally invasive liver surgery for perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID 40931102 · DOI · PMC12618328
  9. Wang Y, Wang J, Xiao B, Wang Y, Huang F, Jiang Y, et al.. Prognostic significance of prognostic nutritional index in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Front Immunol. 2025. PMID 40936893 · DOI · PMC12421403

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Carcinoma in SituCancer and Oncology
  • GliomaCancer and Oncology
  • Prostatic Intraepithelial NeoplasiaCancer and Oncology
  • Basal Cell CarcinomaCancer and Oncology
  • Carcinoid TumorCancer and Oncology
  • Adrenocortical CarcinomaCancer and Oncology

All 107 articles in Cancer and Oncology →

At a glance

805,413
PubMed records on this heading
21%
published since 2020
79,607
review articles
10,873
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Carcinoma in SituCancer and Oncology
  • GliomaCancer and Oncology
  • Prostatic Intraepithelial NeoplasiaCancer and Oncology
  • Basal Cell CarcinomaCancer and Oncology
  • Carcinoid TumorCancer and Oncology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support