Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,049 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Narrowing or stricture of any part of the carotid arteries, most often due to atherosclerotic plaque formation. Ulcerations may form in atherosclerotic plaques and induce thrombus formation. Platelet or cholesterol emboli may arise from stenotic carotid lesions and induce a transient ischemic attack; cerebrovascular accident; or temporary blindness (amaurosis fugax). (From Adams et al., Principles of Neurology, 6th ed, pp 822-3)
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Carotid Stenoses; Stenoses, Carotid; Stenosis, Carotid; Carotid Artery Stenosis; Artery Stenoses, Carotid; Artery Stenosis, Carotid; Carotid Artery Stenoses; Stenoses, Carotid Artery.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Carotid Artery Diseases; Arterial Occlusive Diseases
- See also
- Endarterectomy, Carotid
Related concepts
- Carotid Arteries
- Thrombus
- Transient Ischemic Attack
- Stroke
- Amaurosis Fugax
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 19,912 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Carotid Stenosis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 4,107 of them (20.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 6,876 records.
Reviews account for 2,469 records (12.4%) and meta-analyses for 368. Randomized controlled trials number 554 (2.8%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 2,754 |
| 2000-2009 | 6,175 |
| 2010-2019 | 6,876 |
| 2020 onward | 4,107 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 2,469 | 12.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 368 | 1.8% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 554 | 2.8% |
Method: PubMed query "Carotid Stenosis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in cardiovascular medicine
Cardiovascular medicine has an unusually large body of randomized trials, so the type of outcome matters: hard clinical events such as death, heart attack and stroke carry more weight than changes in blood pressure, cholesterol or imaging markers that only predict risk. Observational studies can show associations but are confounded by age, lifestyle and other illness. Check whether a result is about prevention or treatment, the baseline risk of participants, and the absolute rather than only the relative size of any benefit.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals sex differences in the subcellular composition and associated gene-regulatory network activity of human carotid plaques [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Carotid stenosis causes ischemic stroke in both sexes, but the clinical presentation and plaque characteristics differ.
- Closing excerpt
- The impact of GRN195 on EC proliferation in males was functionally validated, providing evidence for potential therapy targets for atherosclerosis that are sex specific.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (159 words)
Carotid stenosis causes ischemic stroke in both sexes, but the clinical presentation and plaque characteristics differ. Here we run deep single-cell sequencing of 7,690 human carotid plaque cells from male and female patients. While we found no sex differences in major cell types, we identified a predominance of the osteogenic phenotype in smooth muscle cells, immunomodulating macrophages (MPs) and endothelial cells (ECs) undergoing endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in females. In males, we found smooth muscle cells with the chondrocytic phenotype, MPs involved in tissue remodeling and ECs with angiogenic activity. Sex-biased subcellular clusters were integrated with tissue-specific gene-regulatory networks (GRNs) from the Stockholm-Tartu Atherosclerosis Reverse Network Engineering Task study. We identified GRN195 involved in angiogenesis and T cell-mediated cytotoxicity in male ECs, while in females, we found GRN33 and GRN122 related to TREM2-/TREM1+ MPs and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. The impact of GRN195 on EC proliferation in males was functionally validated, providing evidence for potential therapy targets for atherosclerosis that are sex specific.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40211055 · DOI · PMC11994450
Assessment of microvascular flow in human atherosclerotic carotid plaques using ultrasound localization microscopy [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundNeovascularisation of carotid plaques contributes to their vulnerability.
- Closing excerpt
- Co-funding by ART (Technological Research Accelerator) biomedical ultrasound program of INSERM, France.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (386 words)
BackgroundNeovascularisation of carotid plaques contributes to their vulnerability. Current imaging methods such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) usually lack the required spatial resolution and quantification capability for precise neovessels identification. We aimed at quantifying plaque vascularisation with ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) and compared the results to histological analysis.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, monocentric, study involving patients who were undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for carotid artery stenosis. The day before CEA ultrasound examination coupled with the injection of microbubbles (MB) as a contrast agent (CEUS) to image the MB circulating within and around the carotid plaque was performed. CEUS images analysis classified patients into 2 groups: absence of neovascularisation (group A) or presence of neovascularisation (group B). ULM was performed by localising and tracking individual MB centres to reconstruct the neovessels structure with a resolution of around 60 μm. Plaques were manually segmented on the images to quantify the number of neovessels and various haemodynamic metrics inside the plaques. Histological analysis of the excised carotid plaque specimens classified patients into 2 groups: absence of neovascularisation (group I) or presence of neovascularisation (group II).FindingsAmong the 26 patients included, classification was as follows: group I: n = 8 and group II: n = 18, 18 patients had analysable CEUS images and were classified as follows: group A: n = 10, group B: n = 8. The median (Q1-Q3) number of MB tracked per second inside the plaque was 0.03 (0-0.37) for patients in group I and 0.51 (0-3) for patients in group A versus (vs.) 3.55 (1.26-17.68) for patients in group II and 9.69 (5.83-34.68) for patients in group B (p = 0.00049; p = 0.010 respectively). The length of the MB tracks was 0.02 mm (0-0.16) in group I vs. 0.29 mm (0.22-0.45) in group II (p = 0.0069). The study also showed that flow in the neovessels was greater during systole than during diastole period: 9.38 (1.67-19.17) MB tracked per second vs. 1.35 (0.28-6.56) (p = 0.021).InterpretationULM allows the detection of neovessels within the carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Thus, ULM provides a precise picture of plaque neovascularisation in patients and could be used as a non-invasive imaging technique to assess carotid plaque vulnerability.FundingThe study was sponsored and funded by Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (CRC 1806 APHP INNOVATION 2018). Co-funding by ART (Technological Research Accelerator) biomedical ultrasound program of INSERM, France.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39729884 · DOI · PMC11733184
Prediction of Severe Baseline Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Subsequent Risk of Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundRisk models to identify patients at high risk of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) can help in selecting patients for screening, but long-term outcomes in these patients are unknown.
- Closing excerpt
- Selective screening of patients with high PACAS sum scores may help to prevent future stroke or CVD.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (248 words)
BackgroundRisk models to identify patients at high risk of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) can help in selecting patients for screening, but long-term outcomes in these patients are unknown. We assessed the diagnostic and prognostic value of the previously published Prevalence of ACAS (PACAS) risk model to detect ACAS at baseline and to predict subsequent risk of stroke and cardiovascular disease (CVD) during follow-up.MethodsWe validated the discrimination and calibration of the PACAS risk model to detect severe (≥70% narrowing) ACAS with patients from the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health registry. We subsequently calculated the incidence rates of stroke and CVD (fatal and nonfatal stroke or myocardial infarction or vascular death) during follow-up in 4 risk groups (low, medium, high, and very high, corresponding to sum scores of ≤9, 10-13, 14-17, and ≥18, respectively).ResultsAmong 26 384 patients, aged between 45 and 80 years, without prior carotid procedures, 1662 (6.3%) had severe baseline ACAS. During ≈70 000 patient-years of follow-up, 1124 strokes and 2484 CVD events occurred. Discrimination of the PACAS model was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.65-0.68), and calibration showed adequate concordance between predicted and observed risks of severe baseline ACAS after recalibration. Significantly higher incidence rates of stroke (PtrendPtrendConclusionsThe PACAS risk model can reliably identify patients at high risk of severe baseline ACAS. Incidence rates of stroke and CVD during follow-up were significantly higher in patients with high PACAS sum scores. Selective screening of patients with high PACAS sum scores may help to prevent future stroke or CVD.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39319460 · DOI · PMC11518973
Multi-omics data integration from patients with carotid stenosis illuminates key molecular signatures of atherosclerotic instability [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BACKGROUND: Understanding the pathophysiology of unstable atherosclerosis is imperative to prevent myocardial infarction and stroke.
- Closing excerpt
- The findings raise possibilities for translational prioritizations to aid personalized medicine.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (256 words)
BACKGROUND: Understanding the pathophysiology of unstable atherosclerosis is imperative to prevent myocardial infarction and stroke. Here, we used multi-omics integration to identify key molecular targets with diagnostic and therapeutic potential. METHODS: Biobank of Karolinska Endarterectomies encompassing patients with symptomatic (S) and asymptomatic (AS) carotid atherosclerosis was the main resource. Plaques, peripheral blood monocytes and plasma sampled locally from around plaque or periphery of n > 700 individuals, were profiled by transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics. A supervised machine learning method DIABLO was used for patient data integration. Multi-omics layers were integrated separately across local and peripheral disease sites, and their intersection, with stratification for symptomatology. Identified analytes were investigated using scRNAseq, clinical and outcome data. RESULTS: In peripheral circulation, FABP4, IL6, Bilirubin and Sphingomyelin were the most prominent analytes. F11, ANGPTL3, ICOSLG, ITGB1 and Sphingomyelin were enriched in the local disease site, while FABP4, C1R, IL6, Bilirubin and Sphingomyelin appeared at the intersection. Coagulation, necroptosis, inflammation and cholesterol metabolism were confirmed as key pathways determining symptomatology. Clinical analyses showed an impact of lipid-lowering therapy on ICOSLG expression, anti-hypertensives on plasma FABP4 and BLVRB levels, anti-diabetics on plasma Sphingomyelins, while no medications affected ANGPTL3. Association with future adverse events was shown for plasma Bilirubin, Sphingomyelin, ANGPTL3 and ICOSLG plaque levels. Open-source target analyses suggested genetic involvement of F11, C1S, EGFR, IL6, ANGPTL3 in the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Using an innovative, multi-modal data integration machine learning framework, this study provides confirmatory and novel information on mechanisms behind atherosclerotic instability. The findings raise possibilities for translational prioritizations to aid personalized medicine.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41652626 · DOI · PMC12927228
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Carotid plaque MRI and stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis [5]
- Research article Cerebrovascular reserve and stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis or occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
- Research article Carotid intima-media thickness and antihypertensive treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [7]
- Research article Risk of stroke in relation to degree of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a population-based cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis [8]
- Research article Plaque echolucency and stroke risk in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
- Research article Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis [10]
References
- Sukhavasi K, Mocci G, Ma L, Hodonsky CJ, Diez Benevante E, Muhl L, et al.. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals sex differences in the subcellular composition and associated gene-regulatory network activity of human carotid plaques. . 2025. PMID 40211055 · DOI · PMC11994450
- Leroy H, Wang LZ, Jimenez A, Mohamedi N, Papadacci C, Julia P, et al.. Assessment of microvascular flow in human atherosclerotic carotid plaques using ultrasound localization microscopy. . 2025. PMID 39729884 · DOI · PMC11733184
- Poorthuis MHF, Hageman SHJ, Fiolet ATL, Kappelle LJ, Bots ML, Steg PG, et al.. Prediction of Severe Baseline Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Subsequent Risk of Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease. . 2024. PMID 39319460 · DOI · PMC11518973
- Das V, Narayanan S, Zhang X, Bergman O, Djordjevic D, Kronqvist M, et al.. Multi-omics data integration from patients with carotid stenosis illuminates key molecular signatures of atherosclerotic instability. . 2026. PMID 41652626 · DOI · PMC12927228
- Gupta A, Baradaran H, Schweitzer AD, Kamel H, Pandya A, Delgado D, et al.. Carotid plaque MRI and stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013. PMID 23988640 · DOI
- Gupta A, Chazen JL, Hartman M, Delgado D, Anumula N, Shao H, et al.. Cerebrovascular reserve and stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis or occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2012. PMID 23091119 · DOI · PMC3500140
- Wang JG, Staessen JA, Li Y, Van Bortel LM, Nawrot T, Fagard R, et al.. Carotid intima-media thickness and antihypertensive treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stroke. 2006. PMID 16763185 · DOI
- Howard DPJ, Gaziano L, Rothwell PM, Oxford Vascular Study. Risk of stroke in relation to degree of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a population-based cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2021. PMID 33609477 · DOI · PMC7889579
- Gupta A, Kesavabhotla K, Baradaran H, Kamel H, Pandya A, Giambrone AE, et al.. Plaque echolucency and stroke risk in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 2015. PMID 25406150 · DOI · PMC4280234
- Chambers BR, Donnan GA. Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005. PMID 16235289 · DOI · PMC6669257
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.