Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Molecular Biology›Catalytic Domain
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Catalytic Domain

Molecular Biology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 3 min read

The region of an enzyme that interacts with its substrate to cause the enzymatic reaction.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (641 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The region of an enzyme that interacts with its substrate to cause the enzymatic reaction.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Catalytic Domains; Domain, Catalytic; Domains, Catalytic; Catalytic Core; Catalytic Cores; Core, Catalytic; Cores, Catalytic; Catalytic Region.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Binding Sites; Protein Domains

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 36,598 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Catalytic Domain” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 7,322 of them (20.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 19,112 records.

Reviews account for 2,180 records (6.0%) and meta-analyses for 3. Randomized controlled trials number 6 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 630 records; 2000-2009: 9,534 records; 2010-2019: 19,112 records; 2020 onward: 7,322 records630through 19999,5342000-200919,1122010-20197,3222020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999630
2000-20099,534
2010-201919,112
2020 onward7,322
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 6.0 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.0 percentReviews6.0% (2,180)Meta-analyses0.0% (3)Randomized controlled trials0.0% (6)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 36,598 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,1806.0%
Meta-analyses30.0%
Randomized controlled trials60.0%

Method: PubMed query "Catalytic Domain"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in molecular biology

Molecular biology establishes mechanisms through controlled experiments, often in simplified systems such as purified proteins, cultured cells or model organisms. Such work can show what is possible in a defined system, but whether a pathway matters in a whole organism or in human disease needs further evidence. Check the experimental system, whether findings were reproduced by independent groups, and whether the authors tested the mechanism directly or inferred it from correlation.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
X-ray screening identifies active site and allosteric inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease
Günther S, Reinke PYA, Fernández-García Y, Lieske J, Lane TJ, Ginn HM, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
308cc by
PMID 33811162 · DOI · PMC8224385
Fragment binding to the Nsp3 macrodomain of SARS-CoV-2 identified through crystallographic screening and computational docking
Schuller M, Correy GJ, Gahbauer S, Fearon D, Wu T, Díaz RE, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
179cc by
PMID 33853786 · DOI · PMC8046379
Crystal structure of an RNA-cleaving DNAzyme
Liu H, Yu X, Chen Y, Zhang J, Wu B, Zheng L, et al.
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
140cc by
PMID 29222499 · DOI · PMC5722873
ASMC: investigating the amino acid diversity of enzyme active sites
Bailly T, Elisée E, Vallenet D
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 40372409 · DOI · PMC12133276

X-ray screening identifies active site and allosteric inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease [1]

Research article Günther S, Reinke PYA, Fernández-García Y, Lieske J, Lane TJ, Ginn HM, et al. · · 2021 · cited 308 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 is creating tremendous human suffering.
Closing excerpt
We identified two allosteric binding sites representing attractive targets for drug development against SARS-CoV-2.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (126 words)

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 is creating tremendous human suffering. To date, no effective drug is available to directly treat the disease. In a search for a drug against COVID-19, we have performed a high-throughput x-ray crystallographic screen of two repurposing drug libraries against the SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro), which is essential for viral replication. In contrast to commonly applied x-ray fragment screening experiments with molecules of low complexity, our screen tested already-approved drugs and drugs in clinical trials. From the three-dimensional protein structures, we identified 37 compounds that bind to Mpro In subsequent cell-based viral reduction assays, one peptidomimetic and six nonpeptidic compounds showed antiviral activity at nontoxic concentrations. We identified two allosteric binding sites representing attractive targets for drug development against SARS-CoV-2.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33811162 · DOI · PMC8224385

Fragment binding to the Nsp3 macrodomain of SARS-CoV-2 identified through crystallographic screening and computational docking [2]

Research article Schuller M, Correy GJ, Gahbauer S, Fearon D, Wu T, Díaz RE, et al. · · 2021 · cited 179 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) macrodomain within the nonstructural protein 3 counteracts host-mediated antiviral adenosine diphosphate-ribosylation signaling.
Closing excerpt
The 234 fragment structures explore a wide range of chemotypes and provide starting points for development of potent SARS-CoV-2 macrodomain inhibitors.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (149 words)

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) macrodomain within the nonstructural protein 3 counteracts host-mediated antiviral adenosine diphosphate-ribosylation signaling. This enzyme is a promising antiviral target because catalytic mutations render viruses nonpathogenic. Here, we report a massive crystallographic screening and computational docking effort, identifying new chemical matter primarily targeting the active site of the macrodomain. Crystallographic screening of 2533 diverse fragments resulted in 214 unique macrodomain-binders. An additional 60 molecules were selected from docking more than 20 million fragments, of which 20 were crystallographically confirmed. X-ray data collection to ultra-high resolution and at physiological temperature enabled assessment of the conformational heterogeneity around the active site. Several fragment hits were confirmed by solution binding using three biophysical techniques (differential scanning fluorimetry, homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence, and isothermal titration calorimetry). The 234 fragment structures explore a wide range of chemotypes and provide starting points for development of potent SARS-CoV-2 macrodomain inhibitors.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33853786 · DOI · PMC8046379

Crystal structure of an RNA-cleaving DNAzyme [3]

Research article Liu H, Yu X, Chen Y, Zhang J, Wu B, Zheng L, et al. · · 2017 · cited 140 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
In addition to storage of genetic information, DNA can also catalyze various reactions.
Closing excerpt
Our studies reveal that DNA is capable of forming a compacted structure and that the functionality-limited bio-polymer can have a novel solution for a functional need in catalysis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (154 words)

In addition to storage of genetic information, DNA can also catalyze various reactions. RNA-cleaving DNAzymes are the catalytic DNAs discovered the earliest, and they can cleave RNAs in a sequence-specific manner. Owing to their great potential in medical therapeutics, virus control, and gene silencing for disease treatments, RNA-cleaving DNAzymes have been extensively studied; however, the mechanistic understandings of their substrate recognition and catalysis remain elusive. Here, we report three catalytic form 8-17 DNAzyme crystal structures. 8-17 DNAzyme adopts a V-shape fold, and the Pb2+ cofactor is bound at the pre-organized pocket. The structures with Pb2+ and the modification at the cleavage site captured the pre-catalytic state of the RNA cleavage reaction, illustrating the unexpected Pb2+-accelerated catalysis, intrinsic tertiary interactions, and molecular kink at the active site. Our studies reveal that DNA is capable of forming a compacted structure and that the functionality-limited bio-polymer can have a novel solution for a functional need in catalysis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29222499 · DOI · PMC5722873

ASMC: investigating the amino acid diversity of enzyme active sites [4]

Research article Bailly T, Elisée E, Vallenet D · · 2025 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
MotivationThe analysis of enzyme active sites is essential for understanding their activity in terms of catalyzed reaction and substrate specificity, providing insights for engineering to obtain targeted properties or modify the substrate scope.
Closing excerpt
com/labgem/ASMC, along with a complete documentation (wiki, tutorial).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (212 words)

MotivationThe analysis of enzyme active sites is essential for understanding their activity in terms of catalyzed reaction and substrate specificity, providing insights for engineering to obtain targeted properties or modify the substrate scope. In 2010, a first version of the Active Site Modeling and Clustering (ASMC) workflow was published. ASMC predicts isofunctional clusters from enzyme families, based on structural modeling and clustering of active sites. Since then, structure- and sequence-based methods have developed considerably.ResultsWe present here a redesign of the ASMC workflow. This new major version includes recent pocket prediction, structural alignment and clustering methods, as well as a refined amino acid distance matrix, thereby improving the relevance of results and reducing the need for laborious manual analysis to obtain relevant clusters. In addition, we have implemented multiple sequence alignment as a possible input for the clustering step, along with an additional script to compare 2D and 3D active sites. Finally, the code has been unified from three to one programming language (Python) to facilitate its installation and maintenance. This new version of ASMC was evaluated on a set of protein families, resulting in overall better performances compared to its original version.Availability and implementationASMC is supported on Linux operating system and freely available at https://github.com/labgem/ASMC, along with a complete documentation (wiki, tutorial).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40372409 · DOI · PMC12133276

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Protein phosphatase 1--targeted in many directions [5]
    Cohen PT · J Cell Sci · 2002 · cited 704 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The pyruvate dehydrogenase complexes: structure-based function and regulation [6]
    Patel MS, Nemeria NS, Furey W, Jordan F · J Biol Chem · 2014 · cited 530 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The extended PP1 toolkit: designed to create specificity [7]
    Bollen M, Peti W, Ragusa MJ, Beullens M · Trends Biochem Sci · 2010 · cited 446 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Structural basis of perturbed pKa values of catalytic groups in enzyme active sites [8]
    Harris TK, Turner GJ · IUBMB Life · 2002 · cited 382 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The structural basis for control of eukaryotic protein kinases [9]
    Endicott JA, Noble ME, Johnson LN · Annu Rev Biochem · 2012 · cited 362 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Structural and catalytic diversity within the amidohydrolase superfamily [10]
    Seibert CM, Raushel FM · Biochemistry · 2005 · cited 302 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Günther S, Reinke PYA, Fernández-García Y, Lieske J, Lane TJ, Ginn HM, et al.. X-ray screening identifies active site and allosteric inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease. . 2021. PMID 33811162 · DOI · PMC8224385
  2. Schuller M, Correy GJ, Gahbauer S, Fearon D, Wu T, Díaz RE, et al.. Fragment binding to the Nsp3 macrodomain of SARS-CoV-2 identified through crystallographic screening and computational docking. . 2021. PMID 33853786 · DOI · PMC8046379
  3. Liu H, Yu X, Chen Y, Zhang J, Wu B, Zheng L, et al.. Crystal structure of an RNA-cleaving DNAzyme. . 2017. PMID 29222499 · DOI · PMC5722873
  4. Bailly T, Elisée E, Vallenet D. ASMC: investigating the amino acid diversity of enzyme active sites. . 2025. PMID 40372409 · DOI · PMC12133276
  5. Cohen PT. Protein phosphatase 1--targeted in many directions. J Cell Sci. 2002. PMID 11839776 · DOI
  6. Patel MS, Nemeria NS, Furey W, Jordan F. The pyruvate dehydrogenase complexes: structure-based function and regulation. J Biol Chem. 2014. PMID 24798336 · DOI · PMC4059105
  7. Bollen M, Peti W, Ragusa MJ, Beullens M. The extended PP1 toolkit: designed to create specificity. Trends Biochem Sci. 2010. PMID 20399103 · DOI · PMC3131691
  8. Harris TK, Turner GJ. Structural basis of perturbed pKa values of catalytic groups in enzyme active sites. IUBMB Life. 2002. PMID 12049200 · DOI
  9. Endicott JA, Noble ME, Johnson LN. The structural basis for control of eukaryotic protein kinases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012. PMID 22482904 · DOI
  10. Seibert CM, Raushel FM. Structural and catalytic diversity within the amidohydrolase superfamily. Biochemistry. 2005. PMID 15850372 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Protein DomainsMolecular Biology
  • Amino Acid SequenceMolecular Biology
  • Binding SitesMolecular Biology
  • Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsMolecular Biology
  • Consensus SequenceMolecular Biology
  • Conserved SequenceMolecular Biology

All 100 articles in Molecular Biology →

At a glance

36,598
PubMed records on this heading
20%
published since 2020
2,180
review articles
6
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Protein DomainsMolecular Biology
  • Amino Acid SequenceMolecular Biology
  • Binding SitesMolecular Biology
  • Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsMolecular Biology
  • Consensus SequenceMolecular Biology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support