Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Colony-Stimulating Factors
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Colony-Stimulating Factors

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Glycoproteins found in a subfraction of normal mammalian plasma and urine.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (818 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Glycoproteins found in a subfraction of normal mammalian plasma and urine. They stimulate the proliferation of bone marrow cells in agar cultures and the formation of colonies of granulocytes and/or macrophages. The factors include interleukin-3; (IL-3); granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; (g-csf); macrophage colony-stimulating factor; (m-csf); and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; (gm-csf).

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Colony Stimulating Factors; Colony Stimulating Factor; Colony-Stimulating Factor; MGI-1 Protein; MGI 1 Protein; MGI-1; Myeloid Cell-Growth Inducer; Cell-Growth Inducer, Myeloid.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Glycoproteins; Hematopoietic Cell Growth Factors
Narrower topics
Erythropoietin; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; Interleukin-3; Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor; Thrombopoietin
See also
Receptors, Colony-Stimulating Factor

Related concepts

  • Interleukin-3
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
  • Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
  • Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
  • Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
  • Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 70,890 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Colony-Stimulating Factors” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 6,520 of them (9.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 29,068 records.

Reviews account for 8,402 records (11.9%) and meta-analyses for 421. Randomized controlled trials number 3,223 (4.5%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 29,068 records; 2000-2009: 20,168 records; 2010-2019: 15,134 records; 2020 onward: 6,520 records29,068through 199920,1682000-200915,1342010-20196,5202020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199929,068
2000-200920,168
2010-201915,134
2020 onward6,520
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 11.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.6 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 4.5 percentReviews11.9% (8,402)Meta-analyses0.6% (421)Randomized controlled trials4.5% (3,223)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 70,890 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews8,40211.9%
Meta-analyses4210.6%
Randomized controlled trials3,2234.5%

Method: PubMed query "Colony-Stimulating Factors"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Macrophages promote pre-metastatic niche formation of breast cancer through aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity
Jiang X, Wang J, Lin L, Du L, Ding Y, Zheng F, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
46cc by
PMID 39690159 · DOI · PMC11652640
Synovial macrophage diversity and activation of M-CSF signaling in post-traumatic osteoarthritis
Knights AJ, Farrell EC, Ellis OM, Song MJ, Appleton CT, Maerz T
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
35cc by
PMID 39969512 · DOI · PMC11839164
The anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody naxitamab plus GM-CSF for relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma: a phase 2 clinical trial
Mora J, Chan GCF, Morgenstern DA, Amoroso L, Nysom K, Faber J, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
26cc by
PMID 39952926 · DOI · PMC11828896
Microglial colonization of the developing mouse brain is controlled by both microglial and neural CSF-1
Bridlance C, Viguier S, Olivié N, Dupont E, Thobois D, Mathieu B, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
6cc by
PMID 41249504 · DOI · PMC12759073

Macrophages promote pre-metastatic niche formation of breast cancer through aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity [1]

Research article Jiang X, Wang J, Lin L, Du L, Ding Y, Zheng F, et al. · · 2024 · cited 46 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Macrophages that acquire an immunosuppressive phenotype play a crucial role in establishing the pre-metastatic niche (PMN), which is essential for facilitating breast cancer metastasis to distant organs.
Closing excerpt
These findings reveal that the crosstalk of breast cancer cells, lung macrophages, and Treg cells via the GM-CSF-STAT5-AHR-PD-L1 cascade modulates the lung pre-metastatic niche during breast cancer progression.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (200 words)

Macrophages that acquire an immunosuppressive phenotype play a crucial role in establishing the pre-metastatic niche (PMN), which is essential for facilitating breast cancer metastasis to distant organs. Our study showed that increased activity of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) in lung macrophages plays a crucial role in establishing the immunosuppressive PMN in breast cancer. Specifically, AHR activation led to high expression of PD-L1 on macrophages by directly binding to the promoter of Pdl1. This upregulation of PD-L1 promoted the differentiation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) within the PMN, further enhancing immunosuppressive conditions. Mice with Ahr conditional deletion in macrophages had reduced lung metastasis of breast cancer. The elevated AHR levels in PMN macrophages were induced by GM-CSF, which was secreted by breast cancer cells. Mechanistically, the activated STAT5 signaling pathway induced by GM-CSF prevented AHR from being ubiquitinated, thereby sustaining its activity in macrophages. In breast cancer patients, the expression of AHR and PD-L1 was correlated with increased Treg cell infiltration, and higher levels of AHR were associated with a poor prognosis. These findings reveal that the crosstalk of breast cancer cells, lung macrophages, and Treg cells via the GM-CSF-STAT5-AHR-PD-L1 cascade modulates the lung pre-metastatic niche during breast cancer progression.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39690159 · DOI · PMC11652640

Synovial macrophage diversity and activation of M-CSF signaling in post-traumatic osteoarthritis [2]

Research article Knights AJ, Farrell EC, Ellis OM, Song MJ, Appleton CT, Maerz T · · 2025 · cited 35 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Synovium is home to immune and stromal cell types that orchestrate inflammation following a joint injury; in particular, macrophages are central protagonists in this process.
Closing excerpt
Nuanced characterization of the distinct functions, origins, and disease kinetics of macrophage subtypes in PTOA will be critical for targeting these highly versatile cells for therapeutic purposes.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (236 words)

Synovium is home to immune and stromal cell types that orchestrate inflammation following a joint injury; in particular, macrophages are central protagonists in this process. We sought to define the cellular and temporal dynamics of the synovial immune niche in a mouse model of post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), and to identify stromal-immune crosstalk mechanisms that coordinate macrophage function and phenotype. We induced PTOA in mice using a non-invasive tibial compression model of anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ACLR). Single-cell RNA-sequencing and flow cytometry were used to assess immune cell populations in healthy (Sham) and injured (7 and 28 days post-ACLR) synovium. Characterization of synovial macrophage polarization states was performed, alongside computational modeling of macrophage differentiation, as well as implicated transcriptional regulators and stromal-immune communication axes. Immune cell types are broadly represented in healthy synovium, but experience drastic expansion and speciation in PTOA, most notably in the macrophage portion. We identified several polarization states of macrophages in synovium following joint injury, underpinned by distinct transcriptomic signatures, and regulated in part by stromal-derived macrophage colony-stimulating factor signaling. The transcription factors Pu.1, Cebpα, Cebpβ, and Jun were predicted to control differentiation of systemically derived monocytes into pro-inflammatory synovial macrophages. In summary, we defined different synovial macrophage subpopulations present in healthy and injured mouse synovium. Nuanced characterization of the distinct functions, origins, and disease kinetics of macrophage subtypes in PTOA will be critical for targeting these highly versatile cells for therapeutic purposes.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39969512 · DOI · PMC11839164

The anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody naxitamab plus GM-CSF for relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma: a phase 2 clinical trial [3]

Research article Mora J, Chan GCF, Morgenstern DA, Amoroso L, Nysom K, Faber J, et al. · · 2025 · cited 26 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
In this single-arm, non-randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT03363373), 74 patients with relapsed/refractory high-risk neuroblastoma and residual disease in bone/bone marrow (BM) received naxitamab on Days 1, 3, and 5 (3 mg/kg/day) with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Days -4 to 5) every 4 weeks, until complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) followed by 5 additional cycles every 4 weeks.
Closing excerpt
Overall, naxitamab demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy with manageable safety in patients with residual neuroblastoma in bone/BM.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (203 words)

In this single-arm, non-randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT03363373), 74 patients with relapsed/refractory high-risk neuroblastoma and residual disease in bone/bone marrow (BM) received naxitamab on Days 1, 3, and 5 (3 mg/kg/day) with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Days -4 to 5) every 4 weeks, until complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) followed by 5 additional cycles every 4 weeks. Primary endpoint in the prespecified interim analysis was overall response (2017 International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria). Among 26 responders (CR + PR) in the efficacy population (N = 52), 58% had refractory disease, and 42% had relapsed disease. Overall response rate (ORR) was 50% (95% CI: 36-64%), and CR and PR were observed in 38% and 12%, respectively. With the 95% CI lower limit for ORR exceeding 20%, the primary endpoint of overall response was met. Patients with evaluable bone disease had a 58% (29/50) bone compartment response (CR, 40%; PR, 18%). BM compartment response was 74% (17/23; CR, 74%). One-year overall survival and progression-free survival (secondary endpoints) were 93% (95% CI: 80-98%) and 35% (95% CI: 16-54%), respectively. Naxitamab-related Grade 3 adverse events included hypotension (58%) and pain (54%). Overall, naxitamab demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy with manageable safety in patients with residual neuroblastoma in bone/BM.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39952926 · DOI · PMC11828896

Microglial colonization of the developing mouse brain is controlled by both microglial and neural CSF-1 [4]

Research article Bridlance C, Viguier S, Olivié N, Dupont E, Thobois D, Mathieu B, et al. · · 2026 · cited 6 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Microglia are brain-resident macrophages critical for cerebral development, function, and homeostasis.
Closing excerpt
Our study reveals that microglia rely on distinct, local, and cell-type-specific sources of CSF-1 for their developmental distribution, which has major implications for understanding how microglia colonize the brain in health and disease.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (179 words)

Microglia are brain-resident macrophages critical for cerebral development, function, and homeostasis. During development, yolk sac-derived microglial progenitor cells colonize and populate the brain following a well-defined spatiotemporal pattern. However, the mechanisms controlling microglial colonization and proliferation remain largely unknown. Here, we describe two broad waves of microglial proliferation in the developing mouse forebrain. Microglia accumulate in transient hotspots, in a proliferative axon tract-associated microglia (ATM)-like state. Prenatal and early postnatal patterns of microglial colonization do not rely on neuronal activity. Instead, using conditional inactivation of the microglial regulator colony-stimulating factor 1 (Csf1) gene, we reveal that the distribution and proliferation of embryonic cortical microglia critically rely on neural CSF-1, mainly produced by cortical progenitor cells but also by post-mitotic neurons, with the action of CSF-1 being local, dose-dependent, and transient. In addition, intrinsic CSF-1 expressed by ATM microglia contributes to their sustained proliferation in developmental hotspots. Our study reveals that microglia rely on distinct, local, and cell-type-specific sources of CSF-1 for their developmental distribution, which has major implications for understanding how microglia colonize the brain in health and disease.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41249504 · DOI · PMC12759073

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article The effect of HIF on metabolism and immunity [5]
    Taylor CT, Scholz CC · Nat Rev Nephrol · 2022 · cited 457 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Mortality and target haemoglobin concentrations in anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease treated with erythropoietin: a meta-analysis [6]
    Phrommintikul A, Haas SJ, Elsik M, Krum H · Lancet · 2007 · cited 405 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article GM-CSF: A Double-Edged Sword in Cancer Immunotherapy [7]
    Kumar A, Taghi Khani A, Sanchez Ortiz A, Swaminathan S · Front Immunol · 2022 · cited 226 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [8]
    Clark OA, Lyman GH, Castro AA, Clark LG, Djulbegovic B · J Clin Oncol · 2005 · cited 178 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
    Cooper KL, Madan J, Whyte S, Stevenson MD, Akehurst RL · BMC Cancer · 2011 · cited 176 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for sepsis: a meta-analysis [10]
    Bo L, Wang F, Zhu J, Li J, Deng X · Crit Care · 2011 · cited 176 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Jiang X, Wang J, Lin L, Du L, Ding Y, Zheng F, et al.. Macrophages promote pre-metastatic niche formation of breast cancer through aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity. . 2024. PMID 39690159 · DOI · PMC11652640
  2. Knights AJ, Farrell EC, Ellis OM, Song MJ, Appleton CT, Maerz T. Synovial macrophage diversity and activation of M-CSF signaling in post-traumatic osteoarthritis. . 2025. PMID 39969512 · DOI · PMC11839164
  3. Mora J, Chan GCF, Morgenstern DA, Amoroso L, Nysom K, Faber J, et al.. The anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody naxitamab plus GM-CSF for relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma: a phase 2 clinical trial. . 2025. PMID 39952926 · DOI · PMC11828896
  4. Bridlance C, Viguier S, Olivié N, Dupont E, Thobois D, Mathieu B, et al.. Microglial colonization of the developing mouse brain is controlled by both microglial and neural CSF-1. . 2026. PMID 41249504 · DOI · PMC12759073
  5. Taylor CT, Scholz CC. The effect of HIF on metabolism and immunity. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022. PMID 35726016 · DOI · PMC9208707
  6. Phrommintikul A, Haas SJ, Elsik M, Krum H. Mortality and target haemoglobin concentrations in anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease treated with erythropoietin: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007. PMID 17276778 · DOI
  7. Kumar A, Taghi Khani A, Sanchez Ortiz A, Swaminathan S. GM-CSF: A Double-Edged Sword in Cancer Immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID 35865534 · DOI · PMC9294178
  8. Clark OA, Lyman GH, Castro AA, Clark LG, Djulbegovic B. Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID 15961767 · DOI
  9. Cooper KL, Madan J, Whyte S, Stevenson MD, Akehurst RL. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia prophylaxis following chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2011. PMID 21943360 · DOI · PMC3203098
  10. Bo L, Wang F, Zhu J, Li J, Deng X. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for sepsis: a meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2011. PMID 21310070 · DOI · PMC3221991

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorDrugs and Chemicals
  • Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorDrugs and Chemicals
  • Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorDrugs and Chemicals
  • FilgrastimDrugs and Chemicals
  • ThrombopoietinDrugs and Chemicals
  • CD40 LigandDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

70,890
PubMed records on this heading
9%
published since 2020
8,402
review articles
3,223
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorDrugs and Chemicals
  • Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorDrugs and Chemicals
  • Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorDrugs and Chemicals
  • FilgrastimDrugs and Chemicals
  • ThrombopoietinDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support