Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Corneal Stroma
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Corneal Stroma

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The lamellated connective tissue constituting the thickest layer of the cornea between the Bowman and Descemet membranes.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (902 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The lamellated connective tissue constituting the thickest layer of the cornea between the Bowman and Descemet membranes.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Corneal Stromas; Stroma, Corneal; Stromas, Corneal.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Cornea

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 7,281 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Corneal Stroma” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,617 of them (22.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 2,856 records.

Reviews account for 453 records (6.2%) and meta-analyses for 38. Randomized controlled trials number 258 (3.5%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 984 records; 2000-2009: 1,824 records; 2010-2019: 2,856 records; 2020 onward: 1,617 records984through 19991,8242000-20092,8562010-20191,6172020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999984
2000-20091,824
2010-20192,856
2020 onward1,617
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 6.2 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.5 percentReviews6.2% (453)Meta-analyses0.5% (38)Randomized controlled trials3.5% (258)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 7,281 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4536.2%
Meta-analyses380.5%
Randomized controlled trials2583.5%

Method: PubMed query "Corneal Stroma"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
3D bioprinting of a corneal stroma equivalent
Isaacson A, Swioklo S, Connon CJ
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
252cc by
PMID 29772228 · DOI · PMC6083436
The Corneal Basement Membranes and Stromal Fibrosis
Medeiros CS, Marino GK, Santhiago MR, Wilson SE
2018Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
115cc by
PMID 30098200 · DOI · PMC6088801
Corneal stromal stem cells reduce corneal scarring by mediating neutrophil infiltration after wounding
Hertsenberg AJ, Shojaati G, Funderburgh ML, Mann MM, Du Y, Funderburgh JL
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
83cc by
PMID 28257425 · DOI · PMC5336198
Predicting the Effects of Customized Corneal Cross-Linking on Corneal Geometry
Frigelli M, Ariza Gracia MA, Aydemir ME, Torres-Netto EA, Hafezi F, Rozema J, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 40985801 · DOI · PMC12468094

3D bioprinting of a corneal stroma equivalent [1]

Research article Isaacson A, Swioklo S, Connon CJ · · 2018 · cited 252 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Corneal transplantation constitutes one of the leading treatments for severe cases of loss of corneal function.
Closing excerpt
We established 3D bio-printing to be a feasible method by which artificial corneal structures can be engineered.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (157 words)

Corneal transplantation constitutes one of the leading treatments for severe cases of loss of corneal function. Due to its limitations, a concerted effort has been made by tissue engineers to produce functional, synthetic corneal prostheses as an alternative recourse. However, successful translation of these therapies into the clinic has not yet been accomplished. 3D bioprinting is an emerging technology that can be harnessed for the fabrication of biological tissue for clinical applications. We applied this to the area of corneal tissue engineering in order to fabricate corneal structures that resembled the structure of the native human corneal stroma using an existing 3D digital human corneal model and a suitable support structure. These were 3D bioprinted from an in-house collagen-based bio-ink containing encapsulated corneal keratocytes. Keratocytes exhibited high cell viability both at day 1 post-printing (>90%) and at day 7 (83%). We established 3D bio-printing to be a feasible method by which artificial corneal structures can be engineered.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29772228 · DOI · PMC6083436

The Corneal Basement Membranes and Stromal Fibrosis [2]

Review article Medeiros CS, Marino GK, Santhiago MR, Wilson SE · · 2018 · cited 115 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeThe purpose of this review was to provide detailed insights into the pathophysiology of myofibroblast-mediated fibrosis (scarring or late haze) after corneal injury, surgery, or infection.
Closing excerpt
It is hypothesized that defective regeneration of the EBM or Descemet's BM allows key profibrotic growth factors, including transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1) and TGF-β2, to penetrate the stroma at sustained levels necessary to drive the development and maintenance of mature opacity-producing myofibroblasts from myofibroblast precursors cells, and studies suggest that perlecan and collagen type IV are the critical components in EBM and Descemet's BM that bind TGF-β1, TGF-β2, platelet-derived growth factor, and possibly other growth factors, and regulate their bioavailability and function during homeostasis and corneal wound healing.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (279 words)

PurposeThe purpose of this review was to provide detailed insights into the pathophysiology of myofibroblast-mediated fibrosis (scarring or late haze) after corneal injury, surgery, or infection.MethodLiterature review.ResultsThe epithelium and epithelial basement membrane (EBM) and/or endothelium and Descemet's basement membrane (BM) are commonly disrupted after corneal injuries, surgeries, and infections. Regeneration of these critical regulatory structures relies on the coordinated production of BM components, including laminins, nidogens, perlecan, and collagen type IV by epithelial, endothelial, and keratocyte cells. Whether a cornea, or an area in the cornea, heals with transparency or fibrosis may be determined by whether there is injury to one or both corneal basement membranes (EBM and/or Descemet's BM) and delayed or defective regeneration or replacement of the BM. These opaque myofibroblasts, and the disordered extracellular matrix these cells produce, persist in the stroma until the EBM and/or Descemet's BM is regenerated or replaced.ConclusionsCorneal stromal fibrosis (also termed "stromal scarring" or "late haze") occurs as a consequence of BM injury and defective regeneration in both the anterior (EBM) and posterior (Descemet's BM) cornea. The resolution of fibrosis and return of stromal transparency depends on reestablished BM structure and function. It is hypothesized that defective regeneration of the EBM or Descemet's BM allows key profibrotic growth factors, including transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1) and TGF-β2, to penetrate the stroma at sustained levels necessary to drive the development and maintenance of mature opacity-producing myofibroblasts from myofibroblast precursors cells, and studies suggest that perlecan and collagen type IV are the critical components in EBM and Descemet's BM that bind TGF-β1, TGF-β2, platelet-derived growth factor, and possibly other growth factors, and regulate their bioavailability and function during homeostasis and corneal wound healing.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30098200 · DOI · PMC6088801

Corneal stromal stem cells reduce corneal scarring by mediating neutrophil infiltration after wounding [3]

Research article Hertsenberg AJ, Shojaati G, Funderburgh ML, Mann MM, Du Y, Funderburgh JL · · 2017 · cited 83 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Corneal scarring limits vision for millions of individuals worldwide.
Closing excerpt
These results support the conclusion that neutrophil infiltration is an essential event in the fibrotic response to corneal damage and that prevention of scarring by CSSC is mediated by secretion of TSG-6 by these cells.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (236 words)

Corneal scarring limits vision for millions of individuals worldwide. Corneal transplantation (keratoplasty) is the standard of care for corneal opacity; however, it bears the risk of graft rejection and infection and is not universally available. Stem cell therapy holds promise as an alternative to keratoplasty. Stem cells from human corneal stroma (CSSC) induce regeneration of transparent corneal tissue in a mouse wound-healing model. In this study we investigated the mechanism by which CSSC prevent deposition of fibrotic tissue. Infiltration by CD11b+/Ly6G+ neutrophils and myeloperoxidase expression were increased in corneas 24 hr after corneal wounding but were reduced in CSSC-treated wounds. Secretion of TSG-6, a protein known to regulate neutrophil migration, was up-regulated in CSSC in response to TNFα and as CSSC differentiate to keratocytes. In vivo, wounded mouse corneas treated with CSSC contained human TSG-6. Inhibition of neutrophil infiltration into cornea by CSSC was reversed when TSG-6 expression was knocked down using siRNA. Silencing of TSG-6 expression in CSSC reduced their ability to block scarring and the expression of mRNA for fibrosis-associated proteins collagen III, tenascin C, and smooth muscle actin in wounded corneas. Neutropenic mice exhibited a significant reduction in corneal scarring and fibrotic mRNA expression 2 weeks after wounding. These results support the conclusion that neutrophil infiltration is an essential event in the fibrotic response to corneal damage and that prevention of scarring by CSSC is mediated by secretion of TSG-6 by these cells.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28257425 · DOI · PMC5336198

Predicting the Effects of Customized Corneal Cross-Linking on Corneal Geometry [4]

Research article Frigelli M, Ariza Gracia MA, Aydemir ME, Torres-Netto EA, Hafezi F, Rozema J, et al. · · 2025 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
PurposeTo validate an existing finite element model (FEM) for predicting the flattening effect of corneal cross-linking (CXL) in a clinical scenario and to use this model to investigate the parameters that most influence CXL-induced flattening effects.
Closing excerpt
The induced flattening effects depend on the IOP, keratoconus-induced biomechanical weakening, and the fluence delivered to the cone.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (230 words)

PurposeTo validate an existing finite element model (FEM) for predicting the flattening effect of corneal cross-linking (CXL) in a clinical scenario and to use this model to investigate the parameters that most influence CXL-induced flattening effects.MethodsRetrospective data were collected from two clinical cohorts, each with 20 patients receiving either standard or customized CXL. Data were collected before surgery and at the six-month follow-up. Both CXL treatments were simulated with a FEM calibrated on experimental data. Standard anterior corneal geometry indexes (e.g., sphere, cylinder), as well as the curvature changes observed at follow-up were compared to those predicted by FEM simulations.ResultsAt follow-up, patients who underwent customized CXL exhibited more corneal flattening compared to those who received standard CXL (Kmax-t: -2.28 ± 1.4 D vs. -0.81 ± 1.5 D; P 0.9 for nine corneal geometry parameters and customized CXL model for three. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that a 3 mm Hg increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) combined with a 10% weaker keratoconus region alters flattening outcomes by up to 20%.ConclusionsCustomized CXL induces a flattening of about 2 diopters in the cone region six months after surgery. The model adequately captured the curvature corrections induced by the treatment in the keratoconus cone region, but showed reduced accuracy in predicting global corneal metrics, particularly for customized CXL. The induced flattening effects depend on the IOP, keratoconus-induced biomechanical weakening, and the fluence delivered to the cone.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40985801 · DOI · PMC12468094

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article The corneal wound healing response: cytokine-mediated interaction of the epithelium, stroma, and inflammatory cells [5]
    Wilson SE, Mohan RR, Mohan RR, Ambrósio R, Hong J, Lee J · Prog Retin Eye Res · 2001 · cited 447 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Herpes simplex epithelial and stromal keratitis: an epidemiologic update [6]
    Farooq AV, Shukla D · Surv Ophthalmol · 2012 · cited 357 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Corneal stromal wound healing in refractive surgery: the role of myofibroblasts [7]
    Jester JV, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD · Prog Retin Eye Res · 1999 · cited 330 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The keratocyte: corneal stromal cell with variable repair phenotypes [8]
    West-Mays JA, Dwivedi DJ · Int J Biochem Cell Biol · 2006 · cited 292 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments [9]
    Roberts CJ, Dupps WJ · J Cataract Refract Surg · 2014 · cited 290 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The corneal fibrosis response to epithelial-stromal injury [10]
    Torricelli AA, Santhanam A, Wu J, Singh V, Wilson SE · Exp Eye Res · 2016 · cited 233 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Isaacson A, Swioklo S, Connon CJ. 3D bioprinting of a corneal stroma equivalent. . 2018. PMID 29772228 · DOI · PMC6083436
  2. Medeiros CS, Marino GK, Santhiago MR, Wilson SE. The Corneal Basement Membranes and Stromal Fibrosis. . 2018. PMID 30098200 · DOI · PMC6088801
  3. Hertsenberg AJ, Shojaati G, Funderburgh ML, Mann MM, Du Y, Funderburgh JL. Corneal stromal stem cells reduce corneal scarring by mediating neutrophil infiltration after wounding. . 2017. PMID 28257425 · DOI · PMC5336198
  4. Frigelli M, Ariza Gracia MA, Aydemir ME, Torres-Netto EA, Hafezi F, Rozema J, et al.. Predicting the Effects of Customized Corneal Cross-Linking on Corneal Geometry. . 2025. PMID 40985801 · DOI · PMC12468094
  5. Wilson SE, Mohan RR, Mohan RR, Ambrósio R, Hong J, Lee J. The corneal wound healing response: cytokine-mediated interaction of the epithelium, stroma, and inflammatory cells. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001. PMID 11470453 · DOI
  6. Farooq AV, Shukla D. Herpes simplex epithelial and stromal keratitis: an epidemiologic update. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID 22542912 · DOI · PMC3652623
  7. Jester JV, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD. Corneal stromal wound healing in refractive surgery: the role of myofibroblasts. Prog Retin Eye Res. 1999. PMID 10192516 · DOI
  8. West-Mays JA, Dwivedi DJ. The keratocyte: corneal stromal cell with variable repair phenotypes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006. PMID 16675284 · DOI · PMC2505273
  9. Roberts CJ, Dupps WJ. Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014. PMID 24774009 · DOI · PMC4850839
  10. Torricelli AA, Santhanam A, Wu J, Singh V, Wilson SE. The corneal fibrosis response to epithelial-stromal injury. Exp Eye Res. 2016. PMID 26675407 · DOI · PMC4683352

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Descemet MembraneAnatomy and Physiology
  • CorneaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Anterior ChamberAnatomy and Physiology
  • Aqueous HumorAnatomy and Physiology
  • Ciliary BodyAnatomy and Physiology
  • ConjunctivaAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

7,281
PubMed records on this heading
22%
published since 2020
453
review articles
258
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Descemet MembraneAnatomy and Physiology
  • CorneaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Anterior ChamberAnatomy and Physiology
  • Aqueous HumorAnatomy and Physiology
  • Ciliary BodyAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support