Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (841 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A serotonin antagonist and a histamine H1 blocker used as antipruritic, appetite stimulant, antiallergic, and for the post-gastrectomy dumping syndrome, etc.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Antergan; Dihexazin; Periactin; Peritol; Viternum.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Dibenzocycloheptenes; Piperidines
- Narrower topics
- Loratadine
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 3,536 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Cyproheptadine” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 271 of them (7.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,026 records.
Reviews account for 209 records (5.9%) and meta-analyses for 20. Randomized controlled trials number 495 (14.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 2,026 |
| 2000-2009 | 761 |
| 2010-2019 | 478 |
| 2020 onward | 271 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 209 | 5.9% |
| Meta-analyses | 20 | 0.6% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 495 | 14.0% |
Method: PubMed query "Cyproheptadine"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Why do open-label placebos work? A randomized controlled trial of an open-label placebo induction with and without extended information about the placebo effect in allergic rhinitis [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundSeveral studies demonstrated that placebo treatment may have a significant impact on many different symptoms.
- Closing excerpt
- Clinical trial registration numberGerman Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00012303.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (206 words)
BackgroundSeveral studies demonstrated that placebo treatment may have a significant impact on many different symptoms. While in the traditional view concealment of the placebo is essential, recent studies report intriguing evidence that placebos may work even without deception. For example, it has been demonstrated that open-label placebos can improve symptoms in allergic rhinitis. However, the mechanisms of how placebos without concealment work remain unknown.Trial designIn order to examine expectancy effects we conducted a randomized controlled trial (N = 46), in which patients with allergic symptoms received either placebos without deception or no pills at all. In half of those patients we induced positive expectations about the placebo effect. After two weeks we tested whether symptoms and quality of life had changed.ResultsResults revealed that open-label placebos improved allergic symptoms more than the control group. Inducing positive expectations had no effects on the improvement of allergic symptoms (the primary and more objective outcome), but on mental sum scores of the quality of life questionnaire.ConclusionsPlacebos without deception can improve symptoms in allergic rhinitis. Positive expectations do not contribute to the efficacy of open-label placebos, but seem to have an effect on more global and subjective well-being (mental or emotional quality of life).Clinical trial registration numberGerman Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00012303.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29513699 · DOI · PMC5841659
Antiallergic drug desloratadine as a selective antagonist of 5HT2A receptor ameliorates pathology of Alzheimer's disease model mice by improving microglial dysfunction [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressively neurodegenerative disease characterized by cognitive deficits and alteration of personality and behavior.
- Closing excerpt
- Together, our work has highly supported that 5HT2A R antagonism might be a promising therapeutic strategy for AD and highlighted the potential of DLT in the treatment of this disease.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (194 words)
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressively neurodegenerative disease characterized by cognitive deficits and alteration of personality and behavior. As yet, there is no efficient treatment for AD. 5HT2A receptor (5HT2A R) is a subtype of 5HT2 receptor belonging to the serotonin receptor family, and its antagonists have been clinically used as antipsychotics to relieve psychopathy. Here, we discovered that clinically first-line antiallergic drug desloratadine (DLT) functioned as a selective antagonist of 5HT2A R and efficiently ameliorated pathology of APP/PS1 mice. The underlying mechanism has been intensively investigated by assay against APP/PS1 mice with selective 5HT2A R knockdown in the brain treated by adeno-associated virus (AAV)-ePHP-si-5HT2A R. DLT reduced amyloid plaque deposition by promoting microglial Aβ phagocytosis and degradation, and ameliorated innate immune response by polarizing microglia to an anti-inflammatory phenotype. It stimulated autophagy process and repressed neuroinflammation through 5HT2A R/cAMP/PKA/CREB/Sirt1 pathway, and activated glucocorticoid receptor (GR) nuclear translocation to upregulate the transcriptions of phagocytic receptors TLR2 and TLR4 in response to microglial phagocytosis stimulation. Together, our work has highly supported that 5HT2A R antagonism might be a promising therapeutic strategy for AD and highlighted the potential of DLT in the treatment of this disease.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33369003 · DOI · PMC7811850
Rupatadine protects against pulmonary fibrosis by attenuating PAF-mediated senescence in rodents [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- A similar immune response is implicated in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis and allergic disorders.
- Closing excerpt
- Rupatadine holds promise as a novel drug to treat the devastating disease of pulmonary fibrosis.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (248 words)
A similar immune response is implicated in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis and allergic disorders. We investigated the potential therapeutic efficacy and mechanism of rupatadine, a dual antagonist of histamine and platelet-activation factor (PAF), in bleomycin- (BLM-) and silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis. The indicated dosages of rupatadine were administered in rodents with bleomycin or silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis. The tissue injury, fibrosis, inflammatory cells and cytokines, and lung function were examined to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of rupatadine. The anti-fibrosis effect of rupatadine was compared with an H1 or PAF receptor antagonist, and efforts were made to reveal rupatadine's anti-fibrotic mechanism. Rupatadine promoted the resolution of pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in a dose-dependent manner, as indicated by the reductions in inflammation score, collagen deposition and epithelial-mesenchymal transformation, and infiltration or expression of inflammatory cells or cytokines in the fibrotic lung tissue. Thus, rupatadine treatment improved the declined lung function and significantly decreased animal death. Moreover, rupatadine was able not only to attenuate silica-induced silicosis but also to produce a superior therapeutic efficacy compared to pirfenidone, histamine H1 antagonist loratadine, or PAF antagonist CV-3988. The anti-fibrotic action of rupatadine might relate to its attenuation of BLM- or PAF-induced premature senescence because rupatadine treatment protected against the in vivo and in vitro activation of the p53/p21-dependent senescence pathway. Our studies indicate that rupatadine promotes the resolution of pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis by attenuating the PAF-mediated senescence response. Rupatadine holds promise as a novel drug to treat the devastating disease of pulmonary fibrosis.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 23869224 · DOI · PMC3711902
Repurposing loratadine to reverse colistin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae through targeting lipid A modification [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The emergence of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae poses a significant challenge to clinical treatment and public health.
- Closing excerpt
- Collectively, this study highlights the potential of drug repurposing as an effective strategy to combat antimicrobial resistance and provides a foundation for the development of combination therapies against multidrug-resistant pathogens.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (193 words)
The emergence of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae poses a significant challenge to clinical treatment and public health. Strategies combining antibiotics with FDA-approved non-antibiotic drugs have recently attracted attention as a promising approach to overcome antibiotic resistance. In this study, we systematically evaluated the synergistic effect of the antihistamine loratadine in combination with colistin against K. pneumoniae. Our results demonstrate that loratadine significantly restores the bactericidal activity of colistin against colistin-resistant K. pneumoniae both in vitro and in vivo, without increasing toxicity, while also delaying the development of colistin resistance. Mechanistic investigations using fluorescence-based assays and proteomic analysis revealed that loratadine acts as a potent adjuvant for colistin, effectively restoring its activity against colistin-resistant K. pneumoniae by interfering with lipid A modification. This phenomenon is further supported by the downregulation of lipid A-modifying enzyme-related protein EptB. In addition, the combination of loratadine and colistin disrupts the double-layer membrane barrier, leading to proton motive force (PMF) dysregulation, reduced intracellular ATP levels, and impaired efflux pump activity. Collectively, this study highlights the potential of drug repurposing as an effective strategy to combat antimicrobial resistance and provides a foundation for the development of combination therapies against multidrug-resistant pathogens.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41678146 · DOI · PMC12903943
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Loratadine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in allergic disorders [5]
- Research article Comparison of pharmacokinetics and metabolism of desloratadine, fexofenadine, levocetirizine and mizolastine in humans [6]
- Research article Loratadine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy [7]
- Research article Rupatadine in allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria [8]
- Research article Treatment effect of sublingual immunotherapy tablets and pharmacotherapies for seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis: Pooled analyses [9]
- Research article Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine : a comparative review [10]
References
- Schaefer M, Sahin T, Berstecher B. Why do open-label placebos work? A randomized controlled trial of an open-label placebo induction with and without extended information about the placebo effect in allergic rhinitis. . 2018. PMID 29513699 · DOI · PMC5841659
- Lu J, Zhang C, Lv J, Zhu X, Jiang X, Lu W, et al.. Antiallergic drug desloratadine as a selective antagonist of 5HT2A receptor ameliorates pathology of Alzheimer's disease model mice by improving microglial dysfunction. . 2021. PMID 33369003 · DOI · PMC7811850
- Lv XX, Wang XX, Li K, Wang ZY, Li Z, Lv Q, et al.. Rupatadine protects against pulmonary fibrosis by attenuating PAF-mediated senescence in rodents. . 2013. PMID 23869224 · DOI · PMC3711902
- Wu X, Ge Z, Zhan H, Zheng M, Feng Y, Zhai Y, et al.. Repurposing loratadine to reverse colistin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae through targeting lipid A modification. . 2026. PMID 41678146 · DOI · PMC12903943
- Haria M, Fitton A, Peters DH. Loratadine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in allergic disorders. Drugs. 1994. PMID 7528133 · DOI
- Molimard M, Diquet B, Benedetti MS. Comparison of pharmacokinetics and metabolism of desloratadine, fexofenadine, levocetirizine and mizolastine in humans. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004. PMID 15312146 · DOI
- Clissold SP, Sorkin EM, Goa KL. Loratadine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 1989. PMID 2523301 · DOI
- Mullol J, Bousquet J, Bachert C, Canonica WG, Gimenez-Arnau A, Kowalski ML, et al.. Rupatadine in allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria. Allergy. 2008. PMID 18339040 · DOI
- Durham SR, Creticos PS, Nelson HS, Li Z, Kaur A, Meltzer EO, et al.. Treatment effect of sublingual immunotherapy tablets and pharmacotherapies for seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis: Pooled analyses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016. PMID 27527264 · DOI
- Devillier P, Roche N, Faisy C. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of desloratadine, fexofenadine and levocetirizine : a comparative review. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008. PMID 18336052 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.