Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,044 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Species- or subspecies-specific DNA (including complementary dna; conserved genes, whole chromosomes, or whole genomes) used in hybridization studies in order to identify microorganisms, to measure dna-dna homologies, to group subspecies, etc. The DNA probe hybridizes with a specific mRNA, if present. Conventional techniques used for testing for the hybridization product include dot blot assays, Southern blot assays, and DNA:RNA hybrid-specific antibody tests. Conventional labels for the DNA probe include the radioisotope labels 32P and 125I and the chemical label biotin. The use of DNA probes provides a specific, sensitive, rapid, and inexpensive replacement for cell culture techniques for diagnosing infections.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Probes, DNA; DNA Probe; Probe, DNA; DNA Hybridization Probe; Hybridization Probe, DNA; Probe, DNA Hybridization; DNA Hybridization Probes; Hybridization Probes, DNA.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Nucleic Acid Probes
- Narrower topics
- DNA Probes, HLA; DNA Probes, HPV; DNA, Complementary; DNA Primers
- See also
- Chromosome Walking
Related concepts
- Complementary Dna
- Dna-Dna
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 195,594 records tagged with the MeSH heading “DNA Probes” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 3,993 of them (2.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 84,849 records.
Reviews account for 2,880 records (1.5%) and meta-analyses for 20. Randomized controlled trials number 213 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 72,859 |
| 2000-2009 | 84,849 |
| 2010-2019 | 33,893 |
| 2020 onward | 3,993 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 2,880 | 1.5% |
| Meta-analyses | 20 | 0.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 213 | 0.1% |
Method: PubMed query "DNA Probes"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in pharmacology
Drug evidence builds in layers: laboratory pharmacology describes how a compound acts, pharmacokinetic studies describe how the body handles it, and randomized trials test whether it helps and what harms it causes. Post-marketing surveillance and observational studies reveal rarer adverse effects but cannot prove causation. This page is educational and is not a recommendation to start, stop or change any medicine; decisions about treatment belong with a qualified clinician.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Universal Probe Set for Targeted Sequencing of 353 Nuclear Genes from Any Flowering Plant Designed Using k-Medoids Clustering | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 411 | cc by PMID 30535394 · DOI · PMC6568016 |
| Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing | 2021 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 333 | cc by PMID 33627512 · DOI · PMC8544895 |
| Ultrasensitive detection of nucleic acids using deformed graphene channel field effect biosensors | 2020 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 216 | cc by PMID 32210235 · DOI · PMC7093535 |
| varVAMP: degenerate primer design for tiled full genome sequencing and qPCR | 2025 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 9 | cc by PMID 40449995 · DOI · PMC12126543 |
A Universal Probe Set for Targeted Sequencing of 353 Nuclear Genes from Any Flowering Plant Designed Using k-Medoids Clustering [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Sequencing of target-enriched libraries is an efficient and cost-effective method for obtaining DNA sequence data from hundreds of nuclear loci for phylogeny reconstruction.
- Closing excerpt
- These results suggest that the Angiosperms353 probe set described here is effective for any group of flowering plants and would be useful for phylogenetic studies from the species level to higher-order groups, including the entire angiosperm clade itself.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (347 words)
Sequencing of target-enriched libraries is an efficient and cost-effective method for obtaining DNA sequence data from hundreds of nuclear loci for phylogeny reconstruction. Much of the cost of developing targeted sequencing approaches is associated with the generation of preliminary data needed for the identification of orthologous loci for probe design. In plants, identifying orthologous loci has proven difficult due to a large number of whole-genome duplication events, especially in the angiosperms (flowering plants). We used multiple sequence alignments from over 600 angiosperms for 353 putatively single-copy protein-coding genes identified by the One Thousand Plant Transcriptomes Initiative to design a set of targeted sequencing probes for phylogenetic studies of any angiosperm group. To maximize the phylogenetic potential of the probes, while minimizing the cost of production, we introduce a k-medoids clustering approach to identify the minimum number of sequences necessary to represent each coding sequence in the final probe set. Using this method, 5-15 representative sequences were selected per orthologous locus, representing the sequence diversity of angiosperms more efficiently than if probes were designed using available sequenced genomes alone. To test our approximately 80,000 probes, we hybridized libraries from 42 species spanning all higher-order groups of angiosperms, with a focus on taxa not present in the sequence alignments used to design the probes. Out of a possible 353 coding sequences, we recovered an average of 283 per species and at least 100 in all species. Differences among taxa in sequence recovery could not be explained by relatedness to the representative taxa selected for probe design, suggesting that there is no phylogenetic bias in the probe set. Our probe set, which targeted 260 kbp of coding sequence, achieved a median recovery of 137 kbp per taxon in coding regions, a maximum recovery of 250 kbp, and an additional median of 212 kbp per taxon in flanking non-coding regions across all species. These results suggest that the Angiosperms353 probe set described here is effective for any group of flowering plants and would be useful for phylogenetic studies from the species level to higher-order groups, including the entire angiosperm clade itself.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30535394 · DOI · PMC6568016
Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Short-amplicon 16S rRNA gene sequencing is currently the method of choice for studies investigating microbiomes.
- Closing excerpt
- The use of processing pipelines and parameters must be tested beforehand.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (382 words)
Short-amplicon 16S rRNA gene sequencing is currently the method of choice for studies investigating microbiomes. However, comparative studies on differences in procedures are scarce. We sequenced human stool samples and mock communities with increasing complexity using a variety of commonly used protocols. Short amplicons targeting different variable regions (V-regions) or ranges thereof (V1-V2, V1-V3, V3-V4, V4, V4-V5, V6-V8, and V7-V9) were investigated for differences in the composition outcome due to primer choices. Next, the influence of clustering (operational taxonomic units [OTUs], zero-radius OTUs [zOTUs], and amplicon sequence variants [ASVs]), different databases (GreenGenes, the Ribosomal Database Project, Silva, the genomic-based 16S rRNA Database, and The All-Species Living Tree), and bioinformatic settings on taxonomic assignment were also investigated. We present a systematic comparison across all typically used V-regions using well-established primers. While it is known that the primer choice has a significant influence on the resulting microbial composition, we show that microbial profiles generated using different primer pairs need independent validation of performance. Further, comparing data sets across V-regions using different databases might be misleading due to differences in nomenclature (e.g., Enterorhabdus versus Adlercreutzia) and varying precisions in classification down to genus level. Overall, specific but important taxa are not picked up by certain primer pairs (e.g., Bacteroidetes is missed using primers 515F-944R) or due to the database used (e.g., Acetatifactor in GreenGenes and the genomic-based 16S rRNA Database). We found that appropriate truncation of amplicons is essential and different truncated-length combinations should be tested for each study. Finally, specific mock communities of sufficient and adequate complexity are highly recommended.IMPORTANCE In 16S rRNA gene sequencing, certain bacterial genera were found to be underrepresented or even missing in taxonomic profiles when using unsuitable primer combinations, outdated reference databases, or inadequate pipeline settings. Concerning the last, quality thresholds as well as bioinformatic settings (i.e., clustering approach, analysis pipeline, and specific adjustments such as truncation) are responsible for a number of observed differences between studies. Conclusions drawn by comparing one data set to another (e.g., between publications) appear to be problematic and require independent cross-validation using matching V-regions and uniform data processing. Therefore, we highlight the importance of a thought-out study design including sufficiently complex mock standards and appropriate V-region choice for the sample of interest. The use of processing pipelines and parameters must be tested beforehand.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33627512 · DOI · PMC8544895
Ultrasensitive detection of nucleic acids using deformed graphene channel field effect biosensors [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Field-effect transistor (FET)-based biosensors allow label-free detection of biomolecules by measuring their intrinsic charges.
- Closing excerpt
- Collectively, these phenomena allow for ultrasensitive electronic biomolecular detection in millimeter scale structures.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (143 words)
Field-effect transistor (FET)-based biosensors allow label-free detection of biomolecules by measuring their intrinsic charges. The detection limit of these sensors is determined by the Debye screening of the charges from counter ions in solutions. Here, we use FETs with a deformed monolayer graphene channel for the detection of nucleic acids. These devices with even millimeter scale channels show an ultra-high sensitivity detection in buffer and human serum sample down to 600 zM and 20 aM, respectively, which are ∼18 and ∼600 nucleic acid molecules. Computational simulations reveal that the nanoscale deformations can form 'electrical hot spots' in the sensing channel which reduce the charge screening at the concave regions. Moreover, the deformed graphene could exhibit a band-gap, allowing an exponential change in the source-drain current from small numbers of charges. Collectively, these phenomena allow for ultrasensitive electronic biomolecular detection in millimeter scale structures.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32210235 · DOI · PMC7093535
varVAMP: degenerate primer design for tiled full genome sequencing and qPCR [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Time- and cost-saving surveillance of viral pathogens is achieved by tiled sequencing in which a viral genome is amplified in overlapping PCR amplicons and qPCR.
- Closing excerpt
- com/jonas-fuchs/varVAMP .
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (172 words)
Time- and cost-saving surveillance of viral pathogens is achieved by tiled sequencing in which a viral genome is amplified in overlapping PCR amplicons and qPCR. However, designing pan-specific primers for viral pathogens with high genomic variability represents a significant challenge. Here, we present a bioinformatics command-line tool, called varVAMP (variable virus amplicons), which addresses this issue. It relies on multiple sequence alignments of highly variable virus sequences and enables degenerate primer design for qPCR or tiled amplicon whole genome sequencing. We demonstrate the utility of varVAMP by designing and evaluating novel pan-specific primer schemes suitable for sequencing the genomes of SARS-CoV-2, Hepatitis E virus, rat Hepatitis E virus, Hepatitis A virus, Borna-disease-virus-1, and Poliovirus using clinical samples. Importantly, we also designed primers on the same input data using the software packages PrimalScheme and Olivar and showed that varVAMP minimizes primer mismatches most efficiently. Finally, we established highly sensitive and specific Poliovirus qPCR assays that could potentially simplify current Poliovirus surveillance. varVAMP is open-source and available through PyPI, UseGalaxy, Bioconda, and https://github.com/jonas-fuchs/varVAMP .
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40449995 · DOI · PMC12126543
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations [5]
- Research article Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers [6]
- Research article The thermodynamics of DNA structural motifs [7]
- Research article Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays [8]
- Research article Interpreting cDNA sequences: some insights from studies on translation [9]
- Research article Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays [10]
References
- Johnson MG, Pokorny L, Dodsworth S, Botigué LR, Cowan RS, Devault A, et al.. A Universal Probe Set for Targeted Sequencing of 353 Nuclear Genes from Any Flowering Plant Designed Using k-Medoids Clustering. . 2019. PMID 30535394 · DOI · PMC6568016
- Abellan-Schneyder I, Matchado MS, Reitmeier S, Sommer A, Sewald Z, Baumbach J, et al.. Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing. . 2021. PMID 33627512 · DOI · PMC8544895
- Hwang MT, Heiranian M, Kim Y, You S, Leem J, Taqieddin A, et al.. Ultrasensitive detection of nucleic acids using deformed graphene channel field effect biosensors. . 2020. PMID 32210235 · DOI · PMC7093535
- Fuchs J, Kleine J, Schemmerer M, Kreibich J, Maier W, Battur N, et al.. varVAMP: degenerate primer design for tiled full genome sequencing and qPCR. . 2025. PMID 40449995 · DOI · PMC12126543
- Huggett J, Dheda K, Bustin S, Zumla A. Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes Immun. 2005. PMID 15815687 · DOI
- Baker GC, Smith JJ, Cowan DA. Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. J Microbiol Methods. 2003. PMID 14607398 · DOI
- SantaLucia J, Hicks D. The thermodynamics of DNA structural motifs. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2004. PMID 15139820 · DOI
- Duggan DJ, Bittner M, Chen Y, Meltzer P, Trent JM. Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 1999. PMID 9915494 · DOI
- Kozak M. Interpreting cDNA sequences: some insights from studies on translation. Mamm Genome. 1996. PMID 8679005 · DOI
- Churchill GA. Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 2002. PMID 12454643 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.