Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Pharmacology›DNA Probes
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

DNA Probes

Pharmacology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

Species- or subspecies-specific DNA (including complementary dna; conserved genes, whole chromosomes, or whole genomes) used in hybridization studies in order to identify microorganisms, to measure dna-dna homologies, to group sub

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,044 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Species- or subspecies-specific DNA (including complementary dna; conserved genes, whole chromosomes, or whole genomes) used in hybridization studies in order to identify microorganisms, to measure dna-dna homologies, to group subspecies, etc. The DNA probe hybridizes with a specific mRNA, if present. Conventional techniques used for testing for the hybridization product include dot blot assays, Southern blot assays, and DNA:RNA hybrid-specific antibody tests. Conventional labels for the DNA probe include the radioisotope labels 32P and 125I and the chemical label biotin. The use of DNA probes provides a specific, sensitive, rapid, and inexpensive replacement for cell culture techniques for diagnosing infections.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Probes, DNA; DNA Probe; Probe, DNA; DNA Hybridization Probe; Hybridization Probe, DNA; Probe, DNA Hybridization; DNA Hybridization Probes; Hybridization Probes, DNA.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Nucleic Acid Probes
Narrower topics
DNA Probes, HLA; DNA Probes, HPV; DNA, Complementary; DNA Primers
See also
Chromosome Walking

Related concepts

  • Complementary Dna
  • Dna-Dna

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 195,594 records tagged with the MeSH heading “DNA Probes” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 3,993 of them (2.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 84,849 records.

Reviews account for 2,880 records (1.5%) and meta-analyses for 20. Randomized controlled trials number 213 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 72,859 records; 2000-2009: 84,849 records; 2010-2019: 33,893 records; 2020 onward: 3,993 records72,859through 199984,8492000-200933,8932010-20193,9932020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199972,859
2000-200984,849
2010-201933,893
2020 onward3,993
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 1.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.1 percentReviews1.5% (2,880)Meta-analyses0.0% (20)Randomized controlled trials0.1% (213)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 195,594 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,8801.5%
Meta-analyses200.0%
Randomized controlled trials2130.1%

Method: PubMed query "DNA Probes"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in pharmacology

Drug evidence builds in layers: laboratory pharmacology describes how a compound acts, pharmacokinetic studies describe how the body handles it, and randomized trials test whether it helps and what harms it causes. Post-marketing surveillance and observational studies reveal rarer adverse effects but cannot prove causation. This page is educational and is not a recommendation to start, stop or change any medicine; decisions about treatment belong with a qualified clinician.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
A Universal Probe Set for Targeted Sequencing of 353 Nuclear Genes from Any Flowering Plant Designed Using k-Medoids Clustering
Johnson MG, Pokorny L, Dodsworth S, Botigué LR, Cowan RS, Devault A, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
411cc by
PMID 30535394 · DOI · PMC6568016
Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
Abellan-Schneyder I, Matchado MS, Reitmeier S, Sommer A, Sewald Z, Baumbach J, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
333cc by
PMID 33627512 · DOI · PMC8544895
Ultrasensitive detection of nucleic acids using deformed graphene channel field effect biosensors
Hwang MT, Heiranian M, Kim Y, You S, Leem J, Taqieddin A, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
216cc by
PMID 32210235 · DOI · PMC7093535
varVAMP: degenerate primer design for tiled full genome sequencing and qPCR
Fuchs J, Kleine J, Schemmerer M, Kreibich J, Maier W, Battur N, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
9cc by
PMID 40449995 · DOI · PMC12126543

A Universal Probe Set for Targeted Sequencing of 353 Nuclear Genes from Any Flowering Plant Designed Using k-Medoids Clustering [1]

Research article Johnson MG, Pokorny L, Dodsworth S, Botigué LR, Cowan RS, Devault A, et al. · · 2019 · cited 411 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Sequencing of target-enriched libraries is an efficient and cost-effective method for obtaining DNA sequence data from hundreds of nuclear loci for phylogeny reconstruction.
Closing excerpt
These results suggest that the Angiosperms353 probe set described here is effective for any group of flowering plants and would be useful for phylogenetic studies from the species level to higher-order groups, including the entire angiosperm clade itself.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (347 words)

Sequencing of target-enriched libraries is an efficient and cost-effective method for obtaining DNA sequence data from hundreds of nuclear loci for phylogeny reconstruction. Much of the cost of developing targeted sequencing approaches is associated with the generation of preliminary data needed for the identification of orthologous loci for probe design. In plants, identifying orthologous loci has proven difficult due to a large number of whole-genome duplication events, especially in the angiosperms (flowering plants). We used multiple sequence alignments from over 600 angiosperms for 353 putatively single-copy protein-coding genes identified by the One Thousand Plant Transcriptomes Initiative to design a set of targeted sequencing probes for phylogenetic studies of any angiosperm group. To maximize the phylogenetic potential of the probes, while minimizing the cost of production, we introduce a k-medoids clustering approach to identify the minimum number of sequences necessary to represent each coding sequence in the final probe set. Using this method, 5-15 representative sequences were selected per orthologous locus, representing the sequence diversity of angiosperms more efficiently than if probes were designed using available sequenced genomes alone. To test our approximately 80,000 probes, we hybridized libraries from 42 species spanning all higher-order groups of angiosperms, with a focus on taxa not present in the sequence alignments used to design the probes. Out of a possible 353 coding sequences, we recovered an average of 283 per species and at least 100 in all species. Differences among taxa in sequence recovery could not be explained by relatedness to the representative taxa selected for probe design, suggesting that there is no phylogenetic bias in the probe set. Our probe set, which targeted 260 kbp of coding sequence, achieved a median recovery of 137 kbp per taxon in coding regions, a maximum recovery of 250 kbp, and an additional median of 212 kbp per taxon in flanking non-coding regions across all species. These results suggest that the Angiosperms353 probe set described here is effective for any group of flowering plants and would be useful for phylogenetic studies from the species level to higher-order groups, including the entire angiosperm clade itself.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30535394 · DOI · PMC6568016

Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing [2]

Research article Abellan-Schneyder I, Matchado MS, Reitmeier S, Sommer A, Sewald Z, Baumbach J, et al. · · 2021 · cited 333 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Short-amplicon 16S rRNA gene sequencing is currently the method of choice for studies investigating microbiomes.
Closing excerpt
The use of processing pipelines and parameters must be tested beforehand.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (382 words)

Short-amplicon 16S rRNA gene sequencing is currently the method of choice for studies investigating microbiomes. However, comparative studies on differences in procedures are scarce. We sequenced human stool samples and mock communities with increasing complexity using a variety of commonly used protocols. Short amplicons targeting different variable regions (V-regions) or ranges thereof (V1-V2, V1-V3, V3-V4, V4, V4-V5, V6-V8, and V7-V9) were investigated for differences in the composition outcome due to primer choices. Next, the influence of clustering (operational taxonomic units [OTUs], zero-radius OTUs [zOTUs], and amplicon sequence variants [ASVs]), different databases (GreenGenes, the Ribosomal Database Project, Silva, the genomic-based 16S rRNA Database, and The All-Species Living Tree), and bioinformatic settings on taxonomic assignment were also investigated. We present a systematic comparison across all typically used V-regions using well-established primers. While it is known that the primer choice has a significant influence on the resulting microbial composition, we show that microbial profiles generated using different primer pairs need independent validation of performance. Further, comparing data sets across V-regions using different databases might be misleading due to differences in nomenclature (e.g., Enterorhabdus versus Adlercreutzia) and varying precisions in classification down to genus level. Overall, specific but important taxa are not picked up by certain primer pairs (e.g., Bacteroidetes is missed using primers 515F-944R) or due to the database used (e.g., Acetatifactor in GreenGenes and the genomic-based 16S rRNA Database). We found that appropriate truncation of amplicons is essential and different truncated-length combinations should be tested for each study. Finally, specific mock communities of sufficient and adequate complexity are highly recommended.IMPORTANCE In 16S rRNA gene sequencing, certain bacterial genera were found to be underrepresented or even missing in taxonomic profiles when using unsuitable primer combinations, outdated reference databases, or inadequate pipeline settings. Concerning the last, quality thresholds as well as bioinformatic settings (i.e., clustering approach, analysis pipeline, and specific adjustments such as truncation) are responsible for a number of observed differences between studies. Conclusions drawn by comparing one data set to another (e.g., between publications) appear to be problematic and require independent cross-validation using matching V-regions and uniform data processing. Therefore, we highlight the importance of a thought-out study design including sufficiently complex mock standards and appropriate V-region choice for the sample of interest. The use of processing pipelines and parameters must be tested beforehand.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33627512 · DOI · PMC8544895

Ultrasensitive detection of nucleic acids using deformed graphene channel field effect biosensors [3]

Research article Hwang MT, Heiranian M, Kim Y, You S, Leem J, Taqieddin A, et al. · · 2020 · cited 216 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Field-effect transistor (FET)-based biosensors allow label-free detection of biomolecules by measuring their intrinsic charges.
Closing excerpt
Collectively, these phenomena allow for ultrasensitive electronic biomolecular detection in millimeter scale structures.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (143 words)

Field-effect transistor (FET)-based biosensors allow label-free detection of biomolecules by measuring their intrinsic charges. The detection limit of these sensors is determined by the Debye screening of the charges from counter ions in solutions. Here, we use FETs with a deformed monolayer graphene channel for the detection of nucleic acids. These devices with even millimeter scale channels show an ultra-high sensitivity detection in buffer and human serum sample down to 600 zM and 20 aM, respectively, which are ∼18 and ∼600 nucleic acid molecules. Computational simulations reveal that the nanoscale deformations can form 'electrical hot spots' in the sensing channel which reduce the charge screening at the concave regions. Moreover, the deformed graphene could exhibit a band-gap, allowing an exponential change in the source-drain current from small numbers of charges. Collectively, these phenomena allow for ultrasensitive electronic biomolecular detection in millimeter scale structures.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32210235 · DOI · PMC7093535

varVAMP: degenerate primer design for tiled full genome sequencing and qPCR [4]

Research article Fuchs J, Kleine J, Schemmerer M, Kreibich J, Maier W, Battur N, et al. · · 2025 · cited 9 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Time- and cost-saving surveillance of viral pathogens is achieved by tiled sequencing in which a viral genome is amplified in overlapping PCR amplicons and qPCR.
Closing excerpt
com/jonas-fuchs/varVAMP .
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (172 words)

Time- and cost-saving surveillance of viral pathogens is achieved by tiled sequencing in which a viral genome is amplified in overlapping PCR amplicons and qPCR. However, designing pan-specific primers for viral pathogens with high genomic variability represents a significant challenge. Here, we present a bioinformatics command-line tool, called varVAMP (variable virus amplicons), which addresses this issue. It relies on multiple sequence alignments of highly variable virus sequences and enables degenerate primer design for qPCR or tiled amplicon whole genome sequencing. We demonstrate the utility of varVAMP by designing and evaluating novel pan-specific primer schemes suitable for sequencing the genomes of SARS-CoV-2, Hepatitis E virus, rat Hepatitis E virus, Hepatitis A virus, Borna-disease-virus-1, and Poliovirus using clinical samples. Importantly, we also designed primers on the same input data using the software packages PrimalScheme and Olivar and showed that varVAMP minimizes primer mismatches most efficiently. Finally, we established highly sensitive and specific Poliovirus qPCR assays that could potentially simplify current Poliovirus surveillance. varVAMP is open-source and available through PyPI, UseGalaxy, Bioconda, and https://github.com/jonas-fuchs/varVAMP .

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40449995 · DOI · PMC12126543

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations [5]
    Huggett J, Dheda K, Bustin S, Zumla A · Genes Immun · 2005 · cited 1,297 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers [6]
    Baker GC, Smith JJ, Cowan DA · J Microbiol Methods · 2003 · cited 1,181 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The thermodynamics of DNA structural motifs [7]
    SantaLucia J, Hicks D · Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct · 2004 · cited 908 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays [8]
    Duggan DJ, Bittner M, Chen Y, Meltzer P, Trent JM · Nat Genet · 1999 · cited 833 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Interpreting cDNA sequences: some insights from studies on translation [9]
    Kozak M · Mamm Genome · 1996 · cited 618 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays [10]
    Churchill GA · Nat Genet · 2002 · cited 593 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Johnson MG, Pokorny L, Dodsworth S, Botigué LR, Cowan RS, Devault A, et al.. A Universal Probe Set for Targeted Sequencing of 353 Nuclear Genes from Any Flowering Plant Designed Using k-Medoids Clustering. . 2019. PMID 30535394 · DOI · PMC6568016
  2. Abellan-Schneyder I, Matchado MS, Reitmeier S, Sommer A, Sewald Z, Baumbach J, et al.. Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing. . 2021. PMID 33627512 · DOI · PMC8544895
  3. Hwang MT, Heiranian M, Kim Y, You S, Leem J, Taqieddin A, et al.. Ultrasensitive detection of nucleic acids using deformed graphene channel field effect biosensors. . 2020. PMID 32210235 · DOI · PMC7093535
  4. Fuchs J, Kleine J, Schemmerer M, Kreibich J, Maier W, Battur N, et al.. varVAMP: degenerate primer design for tiled full genome sequencing and qPCR. . 2025. PMID 40449995 · DOI · PMC12126543
  5. Huggett J, Dheda K, Bustin S, Zumla A. Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes Immun. 2005. PMID 15815687 · DOI
  6. Baker GC, Smith JJ, Cowan DA. Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. J Microbiol Methods. 2003. PMID 14607398 · DOI
  7. SantaLucia J, Hicks D. The thermodynamics of DNA structural motifs. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2004. PMID 15139820 · DOI
  8. Duggan DJ, Bittner M, Chen Y, Meltzer P, Trent JM. Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 1999. PMID 9915494 · DOI
  9. Kozak M. Interpreting cDNA sequences: some insights from studies on translation. Mamm Genome. 1996. PMID 8679005 · DOI
  10. Churchill GA. Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet. 2002. PMID 12454643 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Molecular ProbesPharmacology
  • RadiopharmaceuticalsPharmacology
  • Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive SubstancesDrugs and Chemicals
  • Gene RearrangementGenetics and Genomics
  • Gene EditingGenetics and Genomics
  • Up-RegulationPharmacology

All 99 articles in Pharmacology →

At a glance

195,594
PubMed records on this heading
2%
published since 2020
2,880
review articles
213
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Molecular ProbesPharmacology
  • RadiopharmaceuticalsPharmacology
  • Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive SubstancesDrugs and Chemicals
  • Gene RearrangementGenetics and Genomics
  • Gene EditingGenetics and Genomics

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support