Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Pharmacology›Enzyme Replacement Therapy
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Enzyme Replacement Therapy

Pharmacology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Therapeutic replacement or supplementation of defective or missing enzymes to alleviate the effects of enzyme deficiency (e.g., glucosylceramidase replacement for gaucher disease).

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (830 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Therapeutic replacement or supplementation of defective or missing enzymes to alleviate the effects of enzyme deficiency (e.g., glucosylceramidase replacement for gaucher disease).

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Enzyme Replacement Therapies; Replacement Therapies, Enzyme; Replacement Therapy, Enzyme; Therapies, Enzyme Replacement; Therapy, Enzyme Replacement.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Enzyme Therapy

Related concepts

  • Glucosylceramidase
  • Gaucher Disease

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 3,146 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Enzyme Replacement Therapy” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,198 of them (38.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 1,923 records.

Reviews account for 839 records (26.7%) and meta-analyses for 34. Randomized controlled trials number 90 (2.9%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 84 records; 2010-2019: 1,923 records; 2020 onward: 1,198 records0through 1999842000-20091,9232010-20191,1982020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-200984
2010-20191,923
2020 onward1,198
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 26.7 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.9 percentReviews26.7% (839)Meta-analyses1.1% (34)Randomized controlled trials2.9% (90)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 3,146 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews83926.7%
Meta-analyses341.1%
Randomized controlled trials902.9%

Method: PubMed query "Enzyme Replacement Therapy"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in pharmacology

Drug evidence builds in layers: laboratory pharmacology describes how a compound acts, pharmacokinetic studies describe how the body handles it, and randomized trials test whether it helps and what harms it causes. Post-marketing surveillance and observational studies reveal rarer adverse effects but cannot prove causation. This page is educational and is not a recommendation to start, stop or change any medicine; decisions about treatment belong with a qualified clinician.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Possible strategies to cross the blood-brain barrier
Bellettato CM, Scarpa M
2018Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
179cc by
PMID 30442184 · DOI · PMC6238258
Enzyme replacement therapy: efficacy and limitations
Concolino D, Deodato F, Parini R
2018Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
150cc by
PMID 30442189 · DOI · PMC6238252
Intravenous Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Mucopolysaccharidoses: Clinical Effectiveness and Limitations
Parini R, Deodato F
2020Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
87cc by
PMID 32340185 · DOI · PMC7215308
Pompe Disease: A Review of Diagnosis, Molecular Genetics, and Treatment Management
Adadi N, El Brouzi MY
2026Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 40947720 · DOI · PMC13273755

Possible strategies to cross the blood-brain barrier [1]

Review article Bellettato CM, Scarpa M · · 2018 · cited 179 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a heterogeneous group of in-born metabolic conditions caused by genetic defects that result in the absence or severe deficiency of one of the lysosomal hydrolases responsible for the degradation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs).
Closing excerpt
This chapter presents an overview of the BBB and of the different strategies that have been developed to overcome the problem of drug transport at the BBB, assuring efficient delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (152 words)

The mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a heterogeneous group of in-born metabolic conditions caused by genetic defects that result in the absence or severe deficiency of one of the lysosomal hydrolases responsible for the degradation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Such enzyme deficiency causes accumulation of GAGs that begins in infancy and progressively worsens, often affecting several organs including the central nervous system (CNS) inducing mental retardation, progressive neurodegeneration, and premature death. Over the last years, enormous progress has been made in the treatment of many MPS types, and available treatments are efficacious for many of them. Nevertheless, treatment of MPS with CNS involvement is limited mostly because of delivery impediments related to the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This chapter presents an overview of the BBB and of the different strategies that have been developed to overcome the problem of drug transport at the BBB, assuring efficient delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30442184 · DOI · PMC6238258

Enzyme replacement therapy: efficacy and limitations [2]

Review article Concolino D, Deodato F, Parini R · · 2018 · cited 150 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is available for mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) I, MPS II, MPS VI, and MPS IVA.
Closing excerpt
It has not yet been definitely clarified if high-titre antibodies may, at least in some cases, reduce the efficacy of ERT.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (251 words)

Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is available for mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) I, MPS II, MPS VI, and MPS IVA. The efficacy of ERT has been evaluated in clinical trials and in many post-marketing studies with a long-term follow-up for MPS I, MPS II, and MPS VI. While ERT is effective in reducing urinary glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and liver and spleen volume, cartilaginous organs such as the trachea and bronchi, bones and eyes are poorly impacted by ERT probably due to limited penetration in the specific tissue. ERT in the present formulations also does not cross the blood-brain barrier, with the consequence that the central nervous system is not cured by ERT. This is particularly important for severe forms of MPS I and MPS II characterized by cognitive decline. For severe MPS I patients (Hurler), early haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the gold standard, while still controversial is the role of stem cell transplantation in MPS II. The use of ERT in patients with severe cognitive decline is the subject of debate; the current position of the scientific community is that ERT must be started in all patients who do not have a more effective treatment. Neonatal screening is widely suggested for treatable MPS, and many pilot studies are ongoing. The rationale is that early, possibly pre-symptomatic treatment can improve prognosis. All patients develop anti-ERT antibodies but only a few have drug-related adverse reactions. It has not yet been definitely clarified if high-titre antibodies may, at least in some cases, reduce the efficacy of ERT.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30442189 · DOI · PMC6238252

Intravenous Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Mucopolysaccharidoses: Clinical Effectiveness and Limitations [3]

Review article Parini R, Deodato F · · 2020 · cited 87 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The aim of this review is to summarize the evidence on efficacy, effectiveness and safety of intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) available for mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs) I, II, IVA, VI and VII, gained in phase III clinical trials and in observational post-approval studies.
Closing excerpt
Currently, other treatments are under evaluation and will surely help improve the prognosis of MPS patients.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (198 words)

The aim of this review is to summarize the evidence on efficacy, effectiveness and safety of intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) available for mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs) I, II, IVA, VI and VII, gained in phase III clinical trials and in observational post-approval studies. Post-marketing data are sometimes conflicting or controversial, possibly depending on disease severity, differently involved organs, age at starting treatment, and development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). There is general agreement that ERT is effective in reducing urinary glycosaminoglycans and liver and spleen volume, while heart and joints outcomes are variable in different studies. Effectiveness on cardiac valves, trachea and bronchi, hearing and eyes is definitely poor, probably due to limited penetration in the specific tissues. ERT does not cross the blood-brain barrier, with the consequence that the central nervous system is not cured by intravenously injected ERT. All patients develop ADAs but their role in ERT tolerance and effectiveness has not been well defined yet. Lack of reliable biomarkers contributes to the uncertainties about effectiveness. The data obtained from affected siblings strongly indicates the need of neonatal screening for treatable MPSs. Currently, other treatments are under evaluation and will surely help improve the prognosis of MPS patients.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32340185 · DOI · PMC7215308

Pompe Disease: A Review of Diagnosis, Molecular Genetics, and Treatment Management [4]

Review article Adadi N, El Brouzi MY · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
IntroductionPompe disease, a rare autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder, results from mutations in the GAA gene that lead to deficient acid alpha-glucosidase activity and glycogen accumulation in various tissues.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionThis article highlights advances and challenges in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of Pompe disease, providing a comprehensive resource for clinicians and researchers.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (229 words)

IntroductionPompe disease, a rare autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder, results from mutations in the GAA gene that lead to deficient acid alpha-glucosidase activity and glycogen accumulation in various tissues.MethodsThis review employs the diagnostic approach to the disease, encompassing enzymatic assays and molecular genetics, with a focus on genotype-phenotype correlations and regionspecific mutations.ResultsOver 500 mutations in the GAA gene, including missense, nonsense, insertions, deletions, and splicing defects, contribute to varying levels of enzyme deficiency, accounting for the diverse clinical manifestations of Pompe disease.DiscussionCurrent therapies, including Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), are the cornerstone treatments for Pompe disease, utilizing recombinant human alpha-glucosidase to restore enzyme activity and reduce glycogen accumulation in lysosomes. While ERT significantly improves survival, cardiomyopathy, and respiratory function, its limited uptake in skeletal muscle and immunogenicity pose challenges. Innovations include immune tolerance protocols and nextgeneration enzymes to enhance skeletal muscle delivery. Gene therapy emerges as a promising alternative, leveraging viral vectors to deliver functional GAA genes, thereby enabling sustained endogenous enzyme production and addressing limitations of ERT. Preclinical and early-phase trials demonstrate efficacy, reduced immunogenicity, and enhanced skeletal muscle uptake; however, challenges, such as vector immunogenicity and cost, remain. Thus, genetic counseling is essential for family planning and managing emotional and psychosocial challenges related to this disease.ConclusionThis article highlights advances and challenges in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of Pompe disease, providing a comprehensive resource for clinicians and researchers.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40947720 · DOI · PMC13273755

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Lysosomes as a therapeutic target [5]
    Bonam SR, Wang F, Muller S · Nat Rev Drug Discov · 2019 · cited 599 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Fabry disease revisited: Management and treatment recommendations for adult patients [6]
    Ortiz A, Germain DP, Desnick RJ, Politei J, Mauer M, Burlina A, et al. · Mol Genet Metab · 2018 · cited 476 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Lysosomal storage diseases: from pathophysiology to therapy [7]
    Parenti G, Andria G, Ballabio A · Annu Rev Med · 2015 · cited 309 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Enzyme replacement therapy for lysosomal diseases: lessons from 20 years of experience and remaining challenges [8]
    Desnick RJ, Schuchman EH · Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet · 2012 · cited 203 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Enzyme replacement therapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at diagnosis in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I: results of a European consensus procedure [9]
    de Ru MH, Boelens JJ, Das AM, Jones SA, van der Lee JH, Mahlaoui N, et al. · Orphanet J Rare Dis · 2011 · cited 165 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Clinical challenges and future therapeutic approaches for neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis [10]
    Mole SE, Anderson G, Band HA, Berkovic SF, Cooper JD, Kleine Holthaus SM, et al. · Lancet Neurol · 2019 · cited 158 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Bellettato CM, Scarpa M. Possible strategies to cross the blood-brain barrier. . 2018. PMID 30442184 · DOI · PMC6238258
  2. Concolino D, Deodato F, Parini R. Enzyme replacement therapy: efficacy and limitations. . 2018. PMID 30442189 · DOI · PMC6238252
  3. Parini R, Deodato F. Intravenous Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Mucopolysaccharidoses: Clinical Effectiveness and Limitations. . 2020. PMID 32340185 · DOI · PMC7215308
  4. Adadi N, El Brouzi MY. Pompe Disease: A Review of Diagnosis, Molecular Genetics, and Treatment Management. . 2026. PMID 40947720 · DOI · PMC13273755
  5. Bonam SR, Wang F, Muller S. Lysosomes as a therapeutic target. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019. PMID 31477883 · DOI · PMC7097195
  6. Ortiz A, Germain DP, Desnick RJ, Politei J, Mauer M, Burlina A, et al.. Fabry disease revisited: Management and treatment recommendations for adult patients. Mol Genet Metab. 2018. PMID 29530533 · DOI
  7. Parenti G, Andria G, Ballabio A. Lysosomal storage diseases: from pathophysiology to therapy. Annu Rev Med. 2015. PMID 25587658 · DOI
  8. Desnick RJ, Schuchman EH. Enzyme replacement therapy for lysosomal diseases: lessons from 20 years of experience and remaining challenges. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2012. PMID 22970722 · DOI
  9. de Ru MH, Boelens JJ, Das AM, Jones SA, van der Lee JH, Mahlaoui N, et al.. Enzyme replacement therapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at diagnosis in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I: results of a European consensus procedure. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011. PMID 21831279 · DOI · PMC3170181
  10. Mole SE, Anderson G, Band HA, Berkovic SF, Cooper JD, Kleine Holthaus SM, et al.. Clinical challenges and future therapeutic approaches for neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis. Lancet Neurol. 2019. PMID 30470609 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Chelation TherapyPharmacology
  • Molecular Targeted TherapyPharmacology
  • Estrogen Replacement TherapyPharmacology
  • Thrombolytic TherapyPharmacology
  • Fluid TherapyPharmacology
  • Drug TherapyPharmacology

All 99 articles in Pharmacology →

At a glance

3,146
PubMed records on this heading
38%
published since 2020
839
review articles
90
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Chelation TherapyPharmacology
  • Molecular Targeted TherapyPharmacology
  • Estrogen Replacement TherapyPharmacology
  • Thrombolytic TherapyPharmacology
  • Fluid TherapyPharmacology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support