Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Genetics and Genomics›Epigenome
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Epigenome

Genetics and Genomics · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A network of chemical compounds surrounding DNA that modify the genome without altering the DNA sequences and have a role in determining which genes are active in a cell.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (750 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A network of chemical compounds surrounding DNA that modify the genome without altering the DNA sequences and have a role in determining which genes are active in a cell.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Epigenomes; Methylome; Methylomes; DNA Methylome; DNA Methylomes; Methylome, DNA; Methylomes, DNA.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Genome
See also
Epigenesis, Genetic

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 2,451 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Epigenome” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 2,265 of them (92.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 2,265 records.

Reviews account for 506 records (20.6%) and meta-analyses for 93. Randomized controlled trials number 10 (0.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 0 records; 2010-2019: 249 records; 2020 onward: 2,265 records0through 199902000-20092492010-20192,2652020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20090
2010-2019249
2020 onward2,265
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 20.6 percent; Meta-analyses: 3.8 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.4 percentReviews20.6% (506)Meta-analyses3.8% (93)Randomized controlled trials0.4% (10)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 2,451 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews50620.6%
Meta-analyses933.8%
Randomized controlled trials100.4%

Method: PubMed query "Epigenome"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in genetics and genomics

Genetic findings vary widely in strength. A variant linked to a condition in one study may not replicate in other ancestries, and most common variants have small effects that are meaningful only in aggregate. Studies of rare, high-impact variants can support strong causal claims about a gene, while association studies describe statistical links that need functional and independent replication. Check the sample size, the ancestry of participants, whether results were replicated, and whether a laboratory or clinical outcome was actually measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Cancer, metastasis, and the epigenome
Kiri S, Ryba T
2024Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
173cc by
PMID 39095874 · DOI · PMC11295362
Durable and efficient gene silencing in vivo by hit-and-run epigenome editing
Cappelluti MA, Mollica Poeta V, Valsoni S, Quarato P, Merlin S, Merelli I, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
159cc by
PMID 38418872 · DOI · PMC10937395
Emerging evidence that the mammalian sperm epigenome serves as a template for embryo development
Lismer A, Kimmins S
2023Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
152cc by
PMID 37059740 · DOI · PMC10104880
Evolution-guided protein design of IscB for persistent epigenome editing in vivo
Kannan S, Altae-Tran H, Zhu S, Xu P, Strebinger D, Oshiro R, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
26cc by
PMID 40335752 · DOI · PMC13180657

Cancer, metastasis, and the epigenome [1]

Review article Kiri S, Ryba T · · 2024 · cited 173 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide and disease burden is expected to increase globally throughout the next several decades, with the majority of cancer-related deaths occurring in metastatic disease.
Closing excerpt
We examine links between epigenetic states, genome structure, and misregulation of tumor suppressors and oncogenes, and discuss how recent technologies for understanding domain-scale regulation have been leveraged for a more complete picture of oncogenic and metastatic potential.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (159 words)

Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide and disease burden is expected to increase globally throughout the next several decades, with the majority of cancer-related deaths occurring in metastatic disease. Cancers exhibit known hallmarks that endow them with increased survival and proliferative capacities, frequently as a result of de-stabilizing mutations. However, the genomic features that resolve metastatic clones from primary tumors are not yet well-characterized, as no mutational landscape has been identified as predictive of metastasis. Further, many cancers exhibit no known mutation signature. This suggests a larger role for non-mutational genome re-organization in promoting cancer evolution and dissemination. In this review, we highlight current critical needs for understanding cell state transitions and clonal selection advantages for metastatic cancer cells. We examine links between epigenetic states, genome structure, and misregulation of tumor suppressors and oncogenes, and discuss how recent technologies for understanding domain-scale regulation have been leveraged for a more complete picture of oncogenic and metastatic potential.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39095874 · DOI · PMC11295362

Durable and efficient gene silencing in vivo by hit-and-run epigenome editing [2]

Research article Cappelluti MA, Mollica Poeta V, Valsoni S, Quarato P, Merlin S, Merelli I, et al. · · 2024 · cited 159 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Permanent epigenetic silencing using programmable editors equipped with transcriptional repressors holds great promise for the treatment of human diseases1-3.
Closing excerpt
Our study lays the foundation for the development of in vivo therapeutics that are based on epigenetic silencing.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (206 words)

Permanent epigenetic silencing using programmable editors equipped with transcriptional repressors holds great promise for the treatment of human diseases1-3. However, to unlock its full therapeutic potential, an experimental confirmation of durable epigenetic silencing after the delivery of transient delivery of editors in vivo is needed. To this end, here we targeted Pcsk9, a gene expressed in hepatocytes that is involved in cholesterol homeostasis. In vitro screening of different editor designs indicated that zinc-finger proteins were the best-performing DNA-binding platform for efficient silencing of mouse Pcsk9. A single administration of lipid nanoparticles loaded with the editors' mRNAs almost halved the circulating levels of PCSK9 for nearly one year in mice. Notably, Pcsk9 silencing and accompanying epigenetic repressive marks also persisted after forced liver regeneration, further corroborating the heritability of the newly installed epigenetic state. Improvements in construct design resulted in the development of an all-in-one configuration that we term evolved engineered transcriptional repressor (EvoETR). This design, which is characterized by a high specificity profile, further reduced the circulating levels of PCSK9 in mice with an efficiency comparable with that obtained through conventional gene editing, but without causing DNA breaks. Our study lays the foundation for the development of in vivo therapeutics that are based on epigenetic silencing.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38418872 · DOI · PMC10937395

Emerging evidence that the mammalian sperm epigenome serves as a template for embryo development [3]

Review article Lismer A, Kimmins S · · 2023 · cited 152 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Although more studies are demonstrating that a father's environment can influence child health and disease, the molecular mechanisms underlying non-genetic inheritance remain unclear.
Closing excerpt
Understanding how sperm-inherited epigenetic factors influence embryo development will permit a greater understanding related to the developmental origins of health and disease.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (221 words)

Although more studies are demonstrating that a father's environment can influence child health and disease, the molecular mechanisms underlying non-genetic inheritance remain unclear. It was previously thought that sperm exclusively contributed its genome to the egg. More recently, association studies have shown that various environmental exposures including poor diet, toxicants, and stress, perturbed epigenetic marks in sperm at important reproductive and developmental loci that were associated with offspring phenotypes. The molecular and cellular routes that underlie how epigenetic marks are transmitted at fertilization, to resist epigenetic reprogramming in the embryo, and drive phenotypic changes are only now beginning to be unraveled. Here, we provide an overview of the state of the field of intergenerational paternal epigenetic inheritance in mammals and present new insights into the relationship between embryo development and the three pillars of epigenetic inheritance: chromatin, DNA methylation, and non-coding RNAs. We evaluate compelling evidence of sperm-mediated transmission and retention of paternal epigenetic marks in the embryo. Using landmark examples, we discuss how sperm-inherited regions may escape reprogramming to impact development via mechanisms that implicate transcription factors, chromatin organization, and transposable elements. Finally, we link paternally transmitted epigenetic marks to functional changes in the pre- and post-implantation embryo. Understanding how sperm-inherited epigenetic factors influence embryo development will permit a greater understanding related to the developmental origins of health and disease.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37059740 · DOI · PMC10104880

Evolution-guided protein design of IscB for persistent epigenome editing in vivo [4]

Research article Kannan S, Altae-Tran H, Zhu S, Xu P, Strebinger D, Oshiro R, et al. · · 2026 · cited 26 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Naturally existing enzymes have been adapted for a variety of molecular technologies, with enhancements or modifications to the enzymes introduced to improve the desired function; however, it is difficult to engineer variants with enhanced activity while maintaining specificity.
Closing excerpt
This study highlights the power of combining natural diversity with protein engineering to design enhanced enzymes for molecular biology applications.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (164 words)

Naturally existing enzymes have been adapted for a variety of molecular technologies, with enhancements or modifications to the enzymes introduced to improve the desired function; however, it is difficult to engineer variants with enhanced activity while maintaining specificity. Here we engineer the compact Obligate Mobile Element Guided Activity (OMEGA) RNA-guided endonuclease IscB and its guiding RNA (ωRNA) by combining ortholog screening, structure-guided protein domain design and RNA engineering, and deep learning-based structure prediction to generate an improved variant, NovaIscB. We show that the compact NovaIscB achieves up to 40% indel activity (~100-fold improvement over wild-type OgeuIscB) on the human genome with improved specificity relative to existing IscBs. We further show that NovaIscB can be fused with a methyltransferase to create a programmable transcriptional repressor, OMEGAoff, that is compact enough to be packaged in a single adeno-associated virus vector for persistent in vivo gene repression. This study highlights the power of combining natural diversity with protein engineering to design enhanced enzymes for molecular biology applications.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40335752 · DOI · PMC13180657

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article CRISPR technologies for precise epigenome editing [5]
    Nakamura M, Gao Y, Dominguez AA, Qi LS · Nat Cell Biol · 2021 · cited 311 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Enhancer RNAs are an important regulatory layer of the epigenome [6]
    Sartorelli V, Lauberth SM · Nat Struct Mol Biol · 2020 · cited 309 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Chromatin replication and epigenetic cell memory [7]
    Stewart-Morgan KR, Petryk N, Groth A · Nat Cell Biol · 2020 · cited 269 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The timeline of epigenetic drug discovery: from reality to dreams [8]
    Ganesan A, Arimondo PB, Rots MG, Jeronimo C, Berdasco M · Clin Epigenetics · 2019 · cited 248 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Making sense of the ageing methylome [9]
    Seale K, Horvath S, Teschendorff A, Eynon N, Voisin S · Nat Rev Genet · 2022 · cited 241 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Sexual Dimorphism in Innate Immunity: The Role of Sex Hormones and Epigenetics [10]
    Shepherd R, Cheung AS, Pang K, Saffery R, Novakovic B · Front Immunol · 2020 · cited 240 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Kiri S, Ryba T. Cancer, metastasis, and the epigenome. . 2024. PMID 39095874 · DOI · PMC11295362
  2. Cappelluti MA, Mollica Poeta V, Valsoni S, Quarato P, Merlin S, Merelli I, et al.. Durable and efficient gene silencing in vivo by hit-and-run epigenome editing. . 2024. PMID 38418872 · DOI · PMC10937395
  3. Lismer A, Kimmins S. Emerging evidence that the mammalian sperm epigenome serves as a template for embryo development. . 2023. PMID 37059740 · DOI · PMC10104880
  4. Kannan S, Altae-Tran H, Zhu S, Xu P, Strebinger D, Oshiro R, et al.. Evolution-guided protein design of IscB for persistent epigenome editing in vivo. . 2026. PMID 40335752 · DOI · PMC13180657
  5. Nakamura M, Gao Y, Dominguez AA, Qi LS. CRISPR technologies for precise epigenome editing. Nat Cell Biol. 2021. PMID 33420494 · DOI
  6. Sartorelli V, Lauberth SM. Enhancer RNAs are an important regulatory layer of the epigenome. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2020. PMID 32514177 · DOI · PMC7343394
  7. Stewart-Morgan KR, Petryk N, Groth A. Chromatin replication and epigenetic cell memory. Nat Cell Biol. 2020. PMID 32231312 · DOI
  8. Ganesan A, Arimondo PB, Rots MG, Jeronimo C, Berdasco M. The timeline of epigenetic drug discovery: from reality to dreams. Clin Epigenetics. 2019. PMID 31791394 · DOI · PMC6888921
  9. Seale K, Horvath S, Teschendorff A, Eynon N, Voisin S. Making sense of the ageing methylome. Nat Rev Genet. 2022. PMID 35501397 · DOI
  10. Shepherd R, Cheung AS, Pang K, Saffery R, Novakovic B. Sexual Dimorphism in Innate Immunity: The Role of Sex Hormones and Epigenetics. Front Immunol. 2020. PMID 33584674 · DOI · PMC7873844

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Transcription Initiation SiteGenetics and Genomics
  • 3' Untranslated RegionsGenetics and Genomics
  • AllelesGenetics and Genomics
  • CodonGenetics and Genomics
  • ExomeGenetics and Genomics
  • ExonsGenetics and Genomics

All 95 articles in Genetics and Genomics →

At a glance

2,451
PubMed records on this heading
92%
published since 2020
506
review articles
10
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Transcription Initiation SiteGenetics and Genomics
  • 3' Untranslated RegionsGenetics and Genomics
  • AllelesGenetics and Genomics
  • CodonGenetics and Genomics
  • ExomeGenetics and Genomics

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support