Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Epirubicin
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Epirubicin

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 7 min read

An anthracycline which is the 4'-epi-isomer of doxorubicin.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,354 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

An anthracycline which is the 4'-epi-isomer of doxorubicin. The compound exerts its antitumor effects by interference with the synthesis and function of DNA.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: 4'-Epiadriamycin; 4' Epiadriamycin; 4'-Epidoxorubicin; 4' Epidoxorubicin; 4'-Epi-DXR; 4' Epi DXR; 4'-Epi-Adriamycin; 4' Epi Adriamycin.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Doxorubicin

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 5,710 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Epirubicin” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 522 of them (9.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,814 records.

Reviews account for 290 records (5.1%) and meta-analyses for 38. Randomized controlled trials number 929 (16.3%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,814 records; 2000-2009: 1,781 records; 2010-2019: 1,593 records; 2020 onward: 522 records1,814through 19991,7812000-20091,5932010-20195222020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,814
2000-20091,781
2010-20191,593
2020 onward522
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.7 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 16.3 percentReviews5.1% (290)Meta-analyses0.7% (38)Randomized controlled trials16.3% (929)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 5,710 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2905.1%
Meta-analyses380.7%
Randomized controlled trials92916.3%

Method: PubMed query "Epirubicin"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine followed by resection in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (UK MRC OE05): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial
Alderson D, Cunningham D, Nankivell M, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM, Crellin A, et al.
2017Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
184cc by
PMID 28784312 · DOI · PMC5585417
OTUB1 inhibits the ubiquitination and degradation of FOXM1 in breast cancer and epirubicin resistance
Karunarathna U, Kongsema M, Zona S, Gong C, Cabrera E, Gomes AR, et al.
2016Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
126cc by
PMID 26148240 · DOI · PMC4606987
FOXM1 targets NBS1 to regulate DNA damage-induced senescence and epirubicin resistance
Khongkow P, Karunarathna U, Khongkow M, Gong C, Gomes AR, Yagüe E, et al.
2014Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
107cc by
PMID 24141789 · DOI · PMC3969838
Synergistic Effect of Paclitaxel and Epirubicin Coadministration─Insight into the Mechanisms of Interactions with Model Breast Cancer Cell Membranes
Dziubak D, Kaczmarczyk P, Leszczyńska I, Batys P, Fontaine P, Matyszewska D
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
4cc by
PMID 41021905 · DOI · PMC12529955

Neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine followed by resection in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (UK MRC OE05): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial [1]

Randomized controlled trial Alderson D, Cunningham D, Nankivell M, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM, Crellin A, et al. · · 2017 · cited 184 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery improves survival compared with surgery alone for patients with oesophageal cancer.
Closing excerpt
FundingCancer Research UK and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (516 words)

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery improves survival compared with surgery alone for patients with oesophageal cancer. The OE05 trial assessed whether increasing the duration and intensity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy further improved survival compared with the current standard regimen.MethodsOE05 was an open-label, phase 3, randomised clinical trial. Patients with surgically resectable oesophageal adenocarcinoma classified as stage cT1N1, cT2N1, cT3N0/N1, or cT4N0/N1 were recruited from 72 UK hospitals. Eligibility criteria included WHO performance status 0 or 1, adequate respiratory, cardiac, and liver function, white blood cell count at least 3 × 109 cells per L, platelet count at least 100 × 109 platelets per L, and a glomerular filtration rate at least 60 mL/min. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) using a computerised minimisation program with a random element and stratified by centre and tumour stage, to receive two cycles of cisplatin and fluorouracil (CF; two 3-weekly cycles of cisplatin [80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1] and fluorouracil [1 g/m2 per day intravenously on days 1-4]) or four cycles of epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (ECX; four 3-weekly cycles of epirubicin [50 mg/m2] and cisplatin [60 mg/m2] intravenously on day 1, and capecitabine [1250 mg/m2] daily throughout the four cycles) before surgery, stratified according to centre and clinical disease stage. Neither patients nor study staff were masked to treatment allocation. Two-phase oesophagectomy with two-field (abdomen and thorax) lymphadenectomy was done within 4-6 weeks of completion of chemotherapy. The primary outcome measure was overall survival, and primary and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry (number 01852072) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00041262), and is completed.FindingsBetween Jan 13, 2005, and Oct 31, 2011, 897 patients were recruited and 451 were assigned to the CF group and 446 to the ECX group. By Nov 14, 2016, 327 (73%) of 451 patients in the CF group and 302 (68%) of 446 in the ECX group had died. Median survival was 23·4 months (95% CI 20·6-26·3) with CF and 26·1 months (22·5-29·7) with ECX (hazard ratio 0·90 (95% CI 0·77-1·05, p=0·19). No unexpected chemotherapy toxicity was seen, and neutropenia was the most commonly reported event (grade 3 or 4 neutropenia: 74 [17%] of 446 patients in the CF group vs 101 [23%] of 441 people in the ECX group). The proportions of patients with postoperative complications (224 [56%] of 398 people for whom data were available in the CF group and 233 [62%] of 374 in the ECX group; p=0·089) were similar between the two groups. One patient in the ECX group died of suspected treatment-related neutropenic sepsis.InterpretationFour cycles of neoadjuvant ECX compared with two cycles of CF did not increase survival, and cannot be considered standard of care. Our study involved a large number of centres and detailed protocol with comprehensive prospective assessment of health-related quality of life in a patient population confined to people with adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction (Siewert types 1 and 2). Alternative chemotherapy regimens and neoadjuvant chemoradiation are being investigated to improve outcomes for patients with oesophageal carcinoma.FundingCancer Research UK and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28784312 · DOI · PMC5585417

OTUB1 inhibits the ubiquitination and degradation of FOXM1 in breast cancer and epirubicin resistance [2]

Research article Karunarathna U, Kongsema M, Zona S, Gong C, Cabrera E, Gomes AR, et al. · · 2016 · cited 126 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The forkhead transcription factor FOXM1 has a key role in DNA damage response, and its deregulated overexpression is associated with genotoxic drug resistance in breast cancer.
Closing excerpt
Collectively, these data suggest that OTUB1 limits the ubiquitination and degradation of FOXM1 in breast cancer and has a key role in genotoxic agent resistance.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (297 words)

The forkhead transcription factor FOXM1 has a key role in DNA damage response, and its deregulated overexpression is associated with genotoxic drug resistance in breast cancer. However, little is known about the posttranslational mechanisms by which FOXM1 expression is regulated by genotoxic agents and how they are deregulated in resistant cells. Initial co-immunoprecipitation studies verified previous proteomic analysis finding that the OTUB1 is a novel FOXM1-interacting protein. Western blot analysis showed that both OTUB1 and FOXM1 expression reduced upon genotoxic agent treatment in MCF-7 cells, but remained relatively constant in resistant cells. FOXM1 expression reduced upon OTUB1 depletion by siRNA and increased with OTUB1 overexpression in MCF-7 cells, arguing that OTUB1 positively regulates FOXM1 expression. In agreement, co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that FOXM1 expression is associated with OTUB1 binding but inversely correlates with conjugation to the protein degradation-associated Lys-48-linked ubiquitin-chains. Overexpression of wild-type (WT) OTUB1, but not the OTUB1(C91S) mutant, disrupted the formation of Lys48-linked ubiquitin-conjugates on FOXM1. Importantly, knockdown of OTUB1 by siRNA resulted in an increase in turnover of FOXM1 in MCF-7 cells treated with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide, whereas overexpression of WT OTUB1, but not the OTUB1(C91S) mutant, significantly enhances the half-life of FOXM1. In addition, proliferative and clonogenic assays also show that OTUB1 can enhance the proliferative rate and epirubicin resistance through targeting FOXM1, as OTUB1 has little effect on FOXM1-deficient cells. The physiological relevance of the regulation of FOXM1 by OTUB1 is further underscored by the significant correlations between FOXM1 and OTUB1 expression in breast cancer patient samples. Cox-regression survival analysis indicates that OTUB1 overexpression is linked to poorer outcome in particular in patients treated with chemotherapy. Collectively, these data suggest that OTUB1 limits the ubiquitination and degradation of FOXM1 in breast cancer and has a key role in genotoxic agent resistance.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26148240 · DOI · PMC4606987

FOXM1 targets NBS1 to regulate DNA damage-induced senescence and epirubicin resistance [3]

Research article Khongkow P, Karunarathna U, Khongkow M, Gong C, Gomes AR, Yagüe E, et al. · · 2014 · cited 107 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
FOXM1 is implicated in genotoxic drug resistance but its mechanism of action remains elusive.
Closing excerpt
The physiological relevance of the regulation of NBS1 expression by FOXM1 is further underscored by the strong and significant correlation between nuclear FOXM1 and total NBS1 expression in breast cancer patient samples, further suggesting that NBS1 as a key FOXM1 target gene involved in DNA damage response, genotoxic drug resistance and DNA damage-induced senescence.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (308 words)

FOXM1 is implicated in genotoxic drug resistance but its mechanism of action remains elusive. We show here that FOXM1-depletion can sensitize breast cancer cells and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) into entering epirubicin-induced senescence, with the loss of long-term cell proliferation ability, the accumulation of γH2AX foci, and the induction of senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity and cell morphology. Conversely, reconstitution of FOXM1 in FOXM1-deficient MEFs alleviates the accumulation of senescence-associated γH2AX foci. We also demonstrate that FOXM1 regulates NBS1 at the transcriptional level through an forkhead response element on its promoter. Like FOXM1, NBS1 is overexpressed in the epirubicin-resistant MCF-7Epi(R) cells and its expression level is low but inducible by epirubicin in MCF-7 cells. Consistently, overexpression of FOXM1 augmented and FOXM1 depletion reduced NBS1 expression and epirubicin-induced ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM)phosphorylation in breast cancer cells. Together these findings suggest that FOXM1 increases NBS1 expression and ATM phosphorylation, possibly through increasing the levels of the MRN(MRE11/RAD50/NBS1) complex. Consistent with this idea, the loss of P-ATM induction by epirubicin in the NBS1-deficient NBS1-LBI fibroblasts can be rescued by NBS1 reconstitution. Resembling FOXM1, NBS1 depletion also rendered MCF-7 and MCF-7Epi(R) cells more sensitive to epirubicin-induced cellular senescence. In agreement, the DNA repair-defective and senescence phenotypes in FOXM1-deficent cells can be effectively rescued by overexpression of NBS1. Moreover, overexpression of NBS1 and FOXM1 similarly enhanced and their depletion downregulated homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair activity. Crucially, overexpression of FOXM1 failed to augment HR activity in the background of NBS1 depletion, demonstrating that NBS1 is indispensable for the HR function of FOXM1. The physiological relevance of the regulation of NBS1 expression by FOXM1 is further underscored by the strong and significant correlation between nuclear FOXM1 and total NBS1 expression in breast cancer patient samples, further suggesting that NBS1 as a key FOXM1 target gene involved in DNA damage response, genotoxic drug resistance and DNA damage-induced senescence.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 24141789 · DOI · PMC3969838

Synergistic Effect of Paclitaxel and Epirubicin Coadministration─Insight into the Mechanisms of Interactions with Model Breast Cancer Cell Membranes [4]

Research article Dziubak D, Kaczmarczyk P, Leszczyńska I, Batys P, Fontaine P, Matyszewska D · · 2025 · cited 4 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
This study investigates the synergistic interaction mechanism of paclitaxel (PTX) and epirubicin (EPI) coadministration with model breast cancer cell membranes formed by monocomponent and ternary phospholipid monolayers composed of DPPC, cholesterol, and DMPS (4:4:2 molar ratio) at the air-water interface.
Closing excerpt
These findings provide valuable insights into the interfacial interactions of anticancer drugs with lipid membrane materials, which can contribute to the development of improved combination therapies.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (233 words)

This study investigates the synergistic interaction mechanism of paclitaxel (PTX) and epirubicin (EPI) coadministration with model breast cancer cell membranes formed by monocomponent and ternary phospholipid monolayers composed of DPPC, cholesterol, and DMPS (4:4:2 molar ratio) at the air-water interface. These biomimetic membrane models were characterized using a combination of interface-sensitive techniques, including Langmuir monolayers, compression-expansion cycles, grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXD), quartz crystal microbalance (QCM), and attenuated total reflection spectroscopy (ATR) for supported layers. These experimental methods were complemented by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to gain molecular-level insights. The study confirms that neutral PTX interacts with all membrane components, while positively charged EPI exhibits significant interactions predominantly with the negatively charged DMPS lipid. Notably, the PTX + EPI combination demonstrated pronounced synergistic effects on both types of phospholipid monolayers, especially the ternary mixture, leading to significant membrane fluidization and the formation of irreversible aggregates. GIXD further corroborated the increased membrane fluidity and structural reorganization induced by the drug combination. QCM and ATR spectroscopy revealed substantial structural alterations and lipid rearrangement in the supported bilayers upon exposure to PTX + EPI. MD simulations suggest that these synergistic effects result from the formation of drug clusters within the lipid bilayer, influencing the physicochemical properties of the model biomembranes. These findings provide valuable insights into the interfacial interactions of anticancer drugs with lipid membrane materials, which can contribute to the development of improved combination therapies.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41021905 · DOI · PMC12529955

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Epirubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cancer chemotherapy [5]
    Plosker GL, Faulds D · Drugs · 1993 · cited 156 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Epirubicin: is it like doxorubicin in breast cancer? A clinical review [6]
    Khasraw M, Bell R, Dang C · Breast · 2012 · cited 151 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Final results of a randomized phase III trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with a dose-intensified epirubicin and cyclophosphamide + filgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK multicenter study [7]
    Therasse P, Mauriac L, Welnicka-Jaskiewicz M, Bruning P, Cufer T, Bonnefoi H, et al. · J Clin Oncol · 2003 · cited 149 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Epirubicin and doxorubicin: a comparison of their characteristics, therapeutic activity and toxicity [8]
    Launchbury AP, Habboubi N · Cancer Treat Rev · 1993 · cited 135 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Drugs ten years later: epirubicin [9]
    Bonadonna G, Gianni L, Santoro A, Bonfante V, Bidoli P, Casali P, et al. · Ann Oncol · 1993 · cited 104 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Comparison of cardiac events associated with liposomal doxorubicin, epirubicin and doxorubicin in breast cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis [10]
    Yamaguchi N, Fujii T, Aoi S, Kozuch PS, Hortobagyi GN, Blum RH · Eur J Cancer · 2015 · cited 70 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Alderson D, Cunningham D, Nankivell M, Blazeby JM, Griffin SM, Crellin A, et al.. Neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine followed by resection in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (UK MRC OE05): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. . 2017. PMID 28784312 · DOI · PMC5585417
  2. Karunarathna U, Kongsema M, Zona S, Gong C, Cabrera E, Gomes AR, et al.. OTUB1 inhibits the ubiquitination and degradation of FOXM1 in breast cancer and epirubicin resistance. . 2016. PMID 26148240 · DOI · PMC4606987
  3. Khongkow P, Karunarathna U, Khongkow M, Gong C, Gomes AR, Yagüe E, et al.. FOXM1 targets NBS1 to regulate DNA damage-induced senescence and epirubicin resistance. . 2014. PMID 24141789 · DOI · PMC3969838
  4. Dziubak D, Kaczmarczyk P, Leszczyńska I, Batys P, Fontaine P, Matyszewska D. Synergistic Effect of Paclitaxel and Epirubicin Coadministration─Insight into the Mechanisms of Interactions with Model Breast Cancer Cell Membranes. . 2025. PMID 41021905 · DOI · PMC12529955
  5. Plosker GL, Faulds D. Epirubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cancer chemotherapy. Drugs. 1993. PMID 7686469 · DOI
  6. Khasraw M, Bell R, Dang C. Epirubicin: is it like doxorubicin in breast cancer? A clinical review. Breast. 2012. PMID 22260846 · DOI
  7. Therasse P, Mauriac L, Welnicka-Jaskiewicz M, Bruning P, Cufer T, Bonnefoi H, et al.. Final results of a randomized phase III trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with a dose-intensified epirubicin and cyclophosphamide + filgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID 12610183 · DOI
  8. Launchbury AP, Habboubi N. Epirubicin and doxorubicin: a comparison of their characteristics, therapeutic activity and toxicity. Cancer Treat Rev. 1993. PMID 8334677 · DOI
  9. Bonadonna G, Gianni L, Santoro A, Bonfante V, Bidoli P, Casali P, et al.. Drugs ten years later: epirubicin. Ann Oncol. 1993. PMID 8353070 · DOI
  10. Yamaguchi N, Fujii T, Aoi S, Kozuch PS, Hortobagyi GN, Blum RH. Comparison of cardiac events associated with liposomal doxorubicin, epirubicin and doxorubicin in breast cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2015. PMID 26343314 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • AnthracyclinesDrugs and Chemicals
  • DaunorubicinDrugs and Chemicals
  • IdarubicinDrugs and Chemicals
  • MinocyclineDrugs and Chemicals
  • OxytetracyclineDrugs and Chemicals
  • TetracyclinesDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

5,710
PubMed records on this heading
9%
published since 2020
290
review articles
929
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • AnthracyclinesDrugs and Chemicals
  • DaunorubicinDrugs and Chemicals
  • IdarubicinDrugs and Chemicals
  • MinocyclineDrugs and Chemicals
  • OxytetracyclineDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support