Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,170 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Substances that eliminate free radicals. Among other effects, they protect pancreatic islets against damage by cytokines and prevent myocardial and pulmonary reperfusion injury.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Scavengers, Free Radical; Free Radical Scavenger; Radical Scavenger, Free; Scavenger, Free Radical.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Antioxidants
- See also
- Free Radicals; Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity
Related concepts
- Islets of Langerhans
- Cytokines
- Reperfusion Injury
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 22,482 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Free Radical Scavengers” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,751 of them (7.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 8,632 records.
Reviews account for 1,447 records (6.4%) and meta-analyses for 50. Randomized controlled trials number 497 (2.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 4,127 |
| 2000-2009 | 8,632 |
| 2010-2019 | 7,972 |
| 2020 onward | 1,751 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,447 | 6.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 50 | 0.2% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 497 | 2.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Free Radical Scavengers"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in pharmacology
Drug evidence builds in layers: laboratory pharmacology describes how a compound acts, pharmacokinetic studies describe how the body handles it, and randomized trials test whether it helps and what harms it causes. Post-marketing surveillance and observational studies reveal rarer adverse effects but cannot prove causation. This page is educational and is not a recommendation to start, stop or change any medicine; decisions about treatment belong with a qualified clinician.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analytical Methods Used in Determining Antioxidant Activity: A Review | 2021 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 945 | cc by PMID 33806141 · DOI · PMC8037236 |
| Determination of Antioxidants by DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity and Quantitative Phytochemical Analysis of Ficus religiosa | 2022 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 455 | cc by PMID 35209118 · DOI · PMC8878429 |
| Oxidative Stress, Plant Natural Antioxidants, and Obesity | 2021 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 283 | cc by PMID 33670130 · DOI · PMC7916866 |
| Efficacy and safety of edaravone dexborneol for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis | 2026 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 42718446 · DOI · PMC13553342 |
Analytical Methods Used in Determining Antioxidant Activity: A Review [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The study of antioxidants and their implications in various fields, from food engineering to medicine and pharmacy, is of major interest to the scientific community.
- Closing excerpt
- The use of chemical methods together with electrochemical methods may result in clarification of the operating mechanisms and kinetics of the processes involving several antioxidants.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (257 words)
The study of antioxidants and their implications in various fields, from food engineering to medicine and pharmacy, is of major interest to the scientific community. The present paper is a critical presentation of the most important tests used to determine the antioxidant activity, detection mechanism, applicability, advantages and disadvantages of these methods. Out of the tests based on the transfer of a hydrogen atom, the following were presented: the Oxygen Radical Absorption Capacity (ORAC) test, the Hydroxyl Radical Antioxidant Capacity (HORAC) test, the Total Peroxyl Radical Trapping Antioxidant Parameter (TRAP) test, and the Total Oxyradical Scavenging Capacity (TOSC) test. The tests based on the transfer of one electron include the Cupric Reducing Antioxidant Power (CUPRAC) test, the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) test, the Folin-Ciocalteu test. Mixed tests, including the transfer of both a hydrogen atom and an electron, include the 2,2'-Azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) test, and the [2,2-di(4-tert-octylphenyl)-1-picrylhydrazyl] (DPPH) test. All these assays are based on chemical reactions and assessing the kinetics or reaching the equilibrium state relies on spectrophotometry, presupposing the occurrence of characteristic colours or the discolouration of the solutions to be analysed, which are processes monitored by specific wavelength adsorption. These assays were successfully applied in antioxidant analysis or the determination of the antioxidant capacity of complex samples. As a complementary method in such studies, one may use methods based on electrochemical (bio)sensors, requiring stages of calibration and validation. The use of chemical methods together with electrochemical methods may result in clarification of the operating mechanisms and kinetics of the processes involving several antioxidants.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33806141 · DOI · PMC8037236
Determination of Antioxidants by DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity and Quantitative Phytochemical Analysis of Ficus religiosa [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The use of F.
- Closing excerpt
- religiosa has antioxidant qualities and may be useful in the treatment of disorders caused by free radicals.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (299 words)
The use of F. religiosa might be beneficial in inflammatory illnesses and can be used for a variety of health conditions. In this article, we studied the identification of antioxidants using (DPPH) 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazylradical scavenging activity in Ficus religiosa, as F. religiosa is an important herbal plant, and every part of it has various medicinal properties such as antibacterial properties that can be used by the researchers in the development and design of various new drugs. The 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) is a popular, quick, easy, and affordable approach for the measurement of antioxidant properties that includes the use of the free radicals used for assessing the potential of substances to serve as hydrogen providers or free-radical scavengers (FRS). The technique of DPPH testing is associated with the elimination of DPPH, which would be a stabilized free radical. The free-radical DPPH interacts with an odd electron to yield a strong absorbance at 517 nm, i.e., a purple hue. An FRS antioxidant, for example, reacts to DPPH to form DPPHH, which has a lower absorbance than DPPH because of the lower amount of hydrogen. It is radical in comparison to the DPPH-H form, because it causes decolorization, or a yellow hue, as the number of electrons absorbed increases. Decolorization affects the lowering capacity significantly. As soon as the DPPH solutions are combined with the hydrogen atom source, the lower state of diphenylpicrylhydrazine is formed, shedding its violet color. To explain the processes behind the DPPH tests, as well as their applicability to Ficus religiosa (F. religiosa) in the manufacture of metal oxide nanoparticles, in particular MgO, and their influence on antioxidants, a specimen from the test was chosen for further study. According to our findings, F. religiosa has antioxidant qualities and may be useful in the treatment of disorders caused by free radicals.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35209118 · DOI · PMC8878429
Oxidative Stress, Plant Natural Antioxidants, and Obesity [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Oxidative stress is important in the pathophysiology of obesity, altering regulatory factors of mitochondrial activity, modifying the concentration of inflammation mediators associated with a large number and size of adipocytes, promoting lipogenesis, stimulating differentiation of preadipocytes to mature adipocytes, and regulating the energy balance in hypothalamic neurons that control appetite.
- Closing excerpt
- Controlled and well-designed clinical trials are still necessary to better know the effects of these compounds.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)
Oxidative stress is important in the pathophysiology of obesity, altering regulatory factors of mitochondrial activity, modifying the concentration of inflammation mediators associated with a large number and size of adipocytes, promoting lipogenesis, stimulating differentiation of preadipocytes to mature adipocytes, and regulating the energy balance in hypothalamic neurons that control appetite. This review discusses the participation of oxidative stress in obesity and the important groups of compounds found in plants with antioxidant properties, which include (a) polyphenols such as phenolic acids, stilbenes, flavonoids (flavonols, flavanols, anthocyanins, flavanones, flavones, flavanonols, and isoflavones), and curcuminoids (b) carotenoids, (c) capsaicinoids and casinoids, (d) isothiocyanates, (e) catechins, and (f) vitamins. Examples are analyzed, such as resveratrol, quercetin, curcumin, ferulic acid, phloretin, green tea, Hibiscus Sabdariffa, and garlic. The antioxidant activities of these compounds depend on their activities as reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers and on their capacity to prevent the activation of NF-κB (nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells), and reduce the expression of target genes, including those participating in inflammation. We conclude that natural compounds have therapeutic potential for diseases mediated by oxidative stress, particularly obesity. Controlled and well-designed clinical trials are still necessary to better know the effects of these compounds.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33670130 · DOI · PMC7916866
Efficacy and safety of edaravone dexborneol for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of Edaravone Dexborneol in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
- Closing excerpt
- Future multicenter, large-sample clinical studies are still needed to further validate the efficacy and safety of Edaravone Dexborneol.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (415 words)
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of Edaravone Dexborneol in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS).MethodsRandomized clinical trials (RCTs) and Prospective cohort study on Edaravone Dexborneol for AIS were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2. Efficacy evaluation is based on the changes in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and mRS scores from baseline to 10-14 days after treatment, as well as the proportion of patients achieving a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 90 days. Safety evaluation is based on the incidence of adverse events during treatment or within 3 months.ResultsThe meta-analysis included 54 studies. For efficacy evaluation: 1. Compared with the control group, the edaravone dexborneol (ED) treatment group showed a reduction in NIHSS score of 2.27, which was statistically significant (I 2 = 93%, MD = -2.27, 95% CI:-2.61 to-1.94, p I 2 = 91%, MD = -1.92, 95% CI:-2.30 to-1.54, p I 2 = 94%, MD = -2.76, 95% CI: -3.72 to -1.79, p I 2 = 80%, MD = -3.50, 95% CI: -4.76 to -2.24, p = 0.04). Patients with higher baseline NIHSS scores may have more pronounced functional improvement after ED treatment. 2. At 2 weeks after treatment, the ED group showed a reduction in mRS score of 0.93 compared with the control group, with statistical significance (I 2 = 98%, MD = -0.93, 95% CI:-1.23 to-0.63, p I 2 = 57%, RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.18, p = 0.01). The results indicate a statistically significant functional improvement at 90 days after ED treatment for acute cerebral infarction. Therefore, ED may achieve both short-term and long-term neurological improvement in acute ischemic stroke. For safety evaluation, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the ED group and the control group (RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.03, p = 0.60).ConclusionThis meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of Edaravone Dexborneol for both short- and long-term treatment of acute ischemic stroke. It significantly reduced NIHSS and mRS scores at 10-14 days post-treatment and increased the proportion of patients achieving an mRS score of 0-1 at 90 days. Patients with higher baseline NIHSS scores may derive greater prognostic benefit from edaravone dexborneol therapy. Future multicenter, large-sample clinical studies are still needed to further validate the efficacy and safety of Edaravone Dexborneol.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42718446 · DOI · PMC13553342
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Curcumin: from ancient medicine to current clinical trials [5]
- Research article Molecular mechanisms of N-acetylcysteine actions [6]
- Research article The antioxidant properties of serum albumin [7]
- Research article Targeting Free Radicals in Oxidative Stress-Related Human Diseases [8]
- Research article Nitric oxide release: part II. Therapeutic applications [9]
- Research article N-Acetylcysteine as an antioxidant and disulphide breaking agent: the reasons why [10]
References
- Munteanu IG, Apetrei C. Analytical Methods Used in Determining Antioxidant Activity: A Review. . 2021. PMID 33806141 · DOI · PMC8037236
- Baliyan S, Mukherjee R, Priyadarshini A, Vibhuti A, Gupta A, Pandey RP, et al.. Determination of Antioxidants by DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity and Quantitative Phytochemical Analysis of Ficus religiosa. . 2022. PMID 35209118 · DOI · PMC8878429
- Pérez-Torres I, Castrejón-Téllez V, Soto ME, Rubio-Ruiz ME, Manzano-Pech L, Guarner-Lans V. Oxidative Stress, Plant Natural Antioxidants, and Obesity. . 2021. PMID 33670130 · DOI · PMC7916866
- Shi X, Wang Y, Wang R, Shi X, Xu L. Efficacy and safety of edaravone dexborneol for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. . 2026. PMID 42718446 · DOI · PMC13553342
- Hatcher H, Planalp R, Cho J, Torti FM, Torti SV. Curcumin: from ancient medicine to current clinical trials. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008. PMID 18324353 · DOI · PMC4686230
- Zafarullah M, Li WQ, Sylvester J, Ahmad M. Molecular mechanisms of N-acetylcysteine actions. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2003. PMID 12613655 · DOI · PMC11138873
- Roche M, Rondeau P, Singh NR, Tarnus E, Bourdon E. The antioxidant properties of serum albumin. FEBS Lett. 2008. PMID 18474236 · DOI
- Poprac P, Jomova K, Simunkova M, Kollar V, Rhodes CJ, Valko M. Targeting Free Radicals in Oxidative Stress-Related Human Diseases. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017. PMID 28551354 · DOI
- Carpenter AW, Schoenfisch MH. Nitric oxide release: part II. Therapeutic applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2012. PMID 22362384 · DOI · PMC3341526
- Aldini G, Altomare A, Baron G, Vistoli G, Carini M, Borsani L, et al.. N-Acetylcysteine as an antioxidant and disulphide breaking agent: the reasons why. Free Radic Res. 2018. PMID 29742938 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.