Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (919 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The presence of fungi circulating in the blood. Opportunistic fungal sepsis is seen most often in immunosuppressed patients with severe neutropenia or in postoperative patients with intravenous catheters and usually follows prolonged antibiotic therapy.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Invasive Fungal Infections; Sepsis
- Narrower topics
- Candidemia
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 5,183 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Fungemia” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,006 of them (19.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 2,041 records.
Reviews account for 666 records (12.8%) and meta-analyses for 31. Randomized controlled trials number 55 (1.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 746 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,390 |
| 2010-2019 | 2,041 |
| 2020 onward | 1,006 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 666 | 12.8% |
| Meta-analyses | 31 | 0.6% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 55 | 1.1% |
Method: PubMed query "Fungemia"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in infectious diseases
Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk factors for candidemia: a prospective matched case-control study | 2020 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 146 | cc by PMID 32188500 · DOI · PMC7081522 |
| Risks and features of secondary infections in severe and critical ill COVID-19 patients | 2020 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 145 | cc by PMID 32815458 · DOI · PMC8284966 |
| Rezafungin Versus Caspofungin in a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind Study for the Treatment of Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: The STRIVE Trial | 2021 | Randomized controlled trial Design not recorded in structured metadata | 135 | cc by PMID 32955088 · DOI · PMC8662762 |
| Changes in Epidemiology of Candidemia in the United States With a Focus on Candida auris | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 3 | cc by PMID 42116798 · DOI · PMC13644864 |
Risk factors for candidemia: a prospective matched case-control study [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundCandidemia is an opportunistic infection associated with high morbidity and mortality in patients hospitalized both inside and outside intensive care units (ICUs).
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionThis study provides novel risk scores for candidemia accounting for the hospital setting and recent progress in patients' management strategies and fungal epidemiology.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (292 words)
BackgroundCandidemia is an opportunistic infection associated with high morbidity and mortality in patients hospitalized both inside and outside intensive care units (ICUs). Identification of patients at risk is crucial to ensure prompt antifungal therapy. We sought to assess risk factors for candidemia and death, both outside and inside ICUs.MethodsThis prospective multicenter matched case-control study involved six teaching hospitals in Switzerland and France. Cases were defined by positive blood cultures for Candida sp. Controls were matched to cases using the following criteria: age, hospitalization ward, hospitalization duration, and, when applicable, type of surgery. One to three controls were enrolled by case. Risk factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate conditional regression models, as a basis for a new scoring system to predict candidemia.ResultsOne hundred ninety-two candidemic patients and 411 matched controls were included. Forty-four percent of included patients were hospitalized in ICUs, and 56% were hospitalized outside ICUs. Independent risk factors for candidemia in the ICU population included total parenteral nutrition, acute kidney injury, heart disease, prior septic shock, and exposure to aminoglycoside antibiotics. Independent risk factors for candidemia in the non-ICU population included central venous catheter, total parenteral nutrition, and exposure to glycopeptides and nitroimidazoles. The accuracy of the scores based on these risk factors is better in the ICU than in the non-ICU population. Independent risk factors for death in candidemic patients included septic shock, acute kidney injury, and the number of antibiotics to which patients were exposed before candidemia.DiscussionWhile this study shows a role for known and novel risk factors for candidemia, it specifically highlights important differences in their distribution according to the hospital setting (ICU versus non-ICU).ConclusionThis study provides novel risk scores for candidemia accounting for the hospital setting and recent progress in patients' management strategies and fungal epidemiology.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32188500 · DOI · PMC7081522
Risks and features of secondary infections in severe and critical ill COVID-19 patients [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Objectives Severe or critical COVID-19 is associated with intensive care unit admission, increased secondary infection rate, and would lead to significant worsened prognosis.
- Closing excerpt
- Secondary infections risks increased after receiving invasive respiratory ventilations and intravascular devices, and would lead to a lower discharge rate and a higher mortality rate.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (146 words)
Objectives Severe or critical COVID-19 is associated with intensive care unit admission, increased secondary infection rate, and would lead to significant worsened prognosis. Risks and characteristics relating to secondary infections in severe COVID-19 have not been described. Methods Severe and critical COVID-19 patients from Shanghai were included. We collected lower respiratory, urine, catheters, and blood samples according to clinical necessity and culture and mNGS were performed. Clinical and laboratory data were archived. Results We found 57.89% (22/38) patients developed secondary infections. The patient receiving invasive mechanical ventilation or in critical state has a higher chance of secondary infections (PConclusion Our study originally illustrated secondary infection proportion in severe and critical COVID-19 patients. Culture accompanied with metagenomics sequencing increased pathogen diagnostic rate. Secondary infections risks increased after receiving invasive respiratory ventilations and intravascular devices, and would lead to a lower discharge rate and a higher mortality rate.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32815458 · DOI · PMC8284966
Rezafungin Versus Caspofungin in a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind Study for the Treatment of Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: The STRIVE Trial [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundRezafungin (RZF) is a novel echinocandin exhibiting distinctive pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics.
- Closing excerpt
- Clinical trials registrationNCT02734862.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (247 words)
BackgroundRezafungin (RZF) is a novel echinocandin exhibiting distinctive pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. STRIVE was a phase 2, double-blind, randomized trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy of RZF once weekly (QWk) to caspofungin (CAS) once daily for treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis (IC).MethodsAdults with systemic signs and mycological confirmation of candidemia and/or IC were randomized to RZF 400 mg QWk (400 mg), RZF 400 mg on week 1 then 200 mg QWk (400/200 mg), or CAS 70 mg as a loading dose followed by 50 mg daily for ≤4 weeks. Efficacy assessments included overall cure (resolution of signs of candidemia/IC + mycological eradication) at day 14 (primary endpoint), investigator-assessed clinical response at day 14, and 30-day all-cause mortality (ACM) (secondary endpoints), and time to negative blood culture. Safety was evaluated by adverse events and ACM through follow-up.ResultsOf 207 patients enrolled, 183 were in the microbiological intent-to-treat population (~21% IC). Overall cure rates were 60.5% (46/76) for RZF 400 mg, 76.1% (35/46) for RZF 400/200 mg, and 67.2% (41/61) for CAS; investigator-assessed clinical cure rates were 69.7% (53/76), 80.4% (37/46), and 70.5% (43/61), respectively. In total, 30-day ACM was 15.8% for RZF 400 mg, 4.4% for RZF 400/200 mg, and 13.1% for CAS. Candidemia was cleared in 19.5 and 22.8 hours in RZF and CAS patients, respectively. No concerning safety trends were observed; ACM through follow-up was 15.2% (21/138) for RZF and 18.8% (13/69) for CAS.ConclusionsRZF was safe and efficacious in the treatment of candidemia and/or IC.Clinical trials registrationNCT02734862.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32955088 · DOI · PMC8662762
Changes in Epidemiology of Candidemia in the United States With a Focus on Candida auris [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundCandidemia is a common complication in hospitalized and critically ill patients.
- Closing excerpt
- Overall, our findings highlight concerning nationwide US candidemia trends.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (234 words)
BackgroundCandidemia is a common complication in hospitalized and critically ill patients. Nationwide US data on candidemia risk factors, species, antifungal resistance, and outcomes remain limited. Our objective was to describe candidemia trends from 2015 to 2024 and identify risk factors for Candida auris candidemia.MethodsRetrospective study using the Epic Cosmos database. We analyzed trends in candidemia risk factors and outcomes. Thirty-day mortality was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, Elixhauser comorbidity index, COVID-19-related hospitalization, ICU-acquired candidemia, and calendar year. We compared characteristics of patients with C. auris vs. non-C. auris candidemia.ResultsA total of 29 454 candidemia cases were identified among 27 926 unique patients; candidemia incidence increased over time (P = .02). Overall 30-day mortality was 31.5% and increased significantly over the study period (from 24.7% to 31.8%; P = .02). There were similar trends in in-hospital mortality (P = .01) and intensive care unit-acquired candidemia (P = .03). The proportion of cases involving C. albicans decreased (P = .05) while C. auris cases increased (P = .008). Patients with C. auris candidemia were more likely to be Black, have renal failure, and have a higher social vulnerability index (P ConclusionsCandidemia-associated 30-day mortality increased over the past decade, aligning with a trend toward older, more acutely ill patients developing candidemia. Candida auris candidemia was associated with Black race, higher social vulnerability, and renal failure. Overall, our findings highlight concerning nationwide US candidemia trends.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42116798 · DOI · PMC13644864
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Global trends in the distribution of Candida species causing candidemia [5]
- Research article Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks? [6]
- Research article The Effect of Molecular Rapid Diagnostic Testing on Clinical Outcomes in Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [7]
- Research article Intravascular catheter-related infections: advances in diagnosis, prevention, and management [8]
- Research article Population-based epidemiology and microbiology of community-onset bloodstream infections [9]
- Research article Invasive candidiasis as a cause of sepsis in the critically ill patient [10]
References
- Poissy J, Damonti L, Bignon A, Khanna N, Von Kietzell M, Boggian K, et al.. Risk factors for candidemia: a prospective matched case-control study. . 2020. PMID 32188500 · DOI · PMC7081522
- Zhang H, Zhang Y, Wu J, Li Y, Zhou X, Li X, et al.. Risks and features of secondary infections in severe and critical ill COVID-19 patients. . 2020. PMID 32815458 · DOI · PMC8284966
- Thompson GR, Soriano A, Skoutelis A, Vazquez JA, Honore PM, Horcajada JP, et al.. Rezafungin Versus Caspofungin in a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind Study for the Treatment of Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis: The STRIVE Trial. . 2021. PMID 32955088 · DOI · PMC8662762
- Pérez MA, Patel KA, Rasmy L, Yoshida H, Arias CA, Nigo M, et al.. Changes in Epidemiology of Candidemia in the United States With a Focus on Candida auris. . 2026. PMID 42116798 · DOI · PMC13644864
- Guinea J. Global trends in the distribution of Candida species causing candidemia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014. PMID 24506442 · DOI
- Boyle RJ, Robins-Browne RM, Tang ML. Probiotic use in clinical practice: what are the risks?. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006. PMID 16762934 · DOI
- Timbrook TT, Morton JB, McConeghy KW, Caffrey AR, Mylonakis E, LaPlante KL. The Effect of Molecular Rapid Diagnostic Testing on Clinical Outcomes in Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2017. PMID 27678085 · DOI
- Raad I, Hanna H, Maki D. Intravascular catheter-related infections: advances in diagnosis, prevention, and management. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007. PMID 17897607 · DOI
- Laupland KB, Church DL. Population-based epidemiology and microbiology of community-onset bloodstream infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014. PMID 25278570 · DOI · PMC4187633
- Delaloye J, Calandra T. Invasive candidiasis as a cause of sepsis in the critically ill patient. Virulence. 2014. PMID 24157707 · DOI · PMC3916370
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.