Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Molecular Biology›G1 Phase
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

G1 Phase

Molecular Biology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

The period of the cell cycle preceding dna replication in S phase.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (754 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The period of the cell cycle preceding dna replication in S phase. Subphases of G1 include competence (to respond to growth factors), G1a (entry into G1), G1b (progression), and G1c (assembly). Progression through the G1 subphases is effected by limiting growth factors, nutrients, or inhibitors.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: G1 Phases; Phase, G1; Phases, G1; Gap Phase 1; Phase 1, Gap; First Gap Phase; First Gap Phases; Gap Phase, First.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Interphase
Narrower topics
G1 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints

Related concepts

  • Cell Cycle
  • Dna Replication
  • Phase

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 12,001 records tagged with the MeSH heading “G1 Phase” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 861 of them (7.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 4,809 records.

Reviews account for 463 records (3.9%) and meta-analyses for 2. Randomized controlled trials number 3 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,304 records; 2000-2009: 4,027 records; 2010-2019: 4,809 records; 2020 onward: 861 records2,304through 19994,0272000-20094,8092010-20198612020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,304
2000-20094,027
2010-20194,809
2020 onward861
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 3.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.0 percentReviews3.9% (463)Meta-analyses0.0% (2)Randomized controlled trials0.0% (3)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 12,001 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4633.9%
Meta-analyses20.0%
Randomized controlled trials30.0%

Method: PubMed query "G1 Phase"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in molecular biology

Molecular biology establishes mechanisms through controlled experiments, often in simplified systems such as purified proteins, cultured cells or model organisms. Such work can show what is possible in a defined system, but whether a pathway matters in a whole organism or in human disease needs further evidence. Check the experimental system, whether findings were reproduced by independent groups, and whether the authors tested the mechanism directly or inferred it from correlation.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Metformin induces autophagy and G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest in myeloma by targeting the AMPK/mTORC1 and mTORC2 pathways
Wang Y, Xu W, Yan Z, Zhao W, Mi J, Li J, et al.
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
206cc by
PMID 29554968 · DOI · PMC5859411
Ribosome biogenesis during cell cycle arrest fuels EMT in development and disease
Prakash V, Carson BB, Feenstra JM, Dass RA, Sekyrova P, Hoshino A, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
202cc by
PMID 31068593 · DOI · PMC6506521
A short G1 phase imposes constitutive replication stress and fork remodelling in mouse embryonic stem cells
Ahuja AK, Jodkowska K, Teloni F, Bizard AH, Zellweger R, Herrador R, et al.
2016Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
181cc by
PMID 26876348 · DOI · PMC4756311
Nuclear compartmentalization at the G1/S transition plays a key role in DNA replication control
Oji A, Yusa K, Noda I, Ichinose T, Kondo Y, Hiratani I
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 42575893 · DOI · PMC13458202

Metformin induces autophagy and G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest in myeloma by targeting the AMPK/mTORC1 and mTORC2 pathways [1]

Research article Wang Y, Xu W, Yan Z, Zhao W, Mi J, Li J, et al. · · 2018 · cited 206 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundMetformin is a commonly used drug for the treatment of diabetes.
Closing excerpt
Our study provides a theoretical basis for the development of novel strategies for the treatment of MM using metformin as an already approved and safe drug.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (296 words)

BackgroundMetformin is a commonly used drug for the treatment of diabetes. Accumulating evidence suggests that it exerts anti-tumor effects in many cancers, including multiple myeloma (MM); however, the underlying molecular mechanisms have not been clearly elucidated.MethodsThe anti-myeloma effects of metformin were evaluated using human MM cell lines (RPMI8226 and U266) in vitro and in vivo NOD-SCID murine xenograft MM model. Cell viability was assessed with CCK8 and cell proliferation was measured by EdU incorporation assay. Cell cycle distribution and apoptosis were examined by flow cytometry. Transmission electron microscopy was used to visualized autophagosomes. Activation of AMPK and inhibition of mTORC1/C2 pathways was assessed by Western blot analysis. RPMI8226 cells and U266 cell lines with AMPK knockdown were generated by transfection with small interfering RNA targeting the AMPK-α1 and α2 subunits using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent.ResultsMetformin effectively inhibited the proliferation of MM cell lines, an effect that was associated with the induction of autophagy and G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, but not apoptosis. Metformin activated AMPK and repressed both mTORC1 and mTORC2 signaling pathways in myeloma cells as well as downstream molecular signaling pathways, such as p-4EBP1 and p-AKT. AMPK activation resulted in direct phosphorylation and activation of tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2), leading to inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). In addition, metformin inhibited myeloma cell growth in an AMPK-dependent manner. The xenograft mouse model further confirmed that metformin inhibited tumor growth by upregulation of AMPK and downregulation of mTOR.ConclusionsMetformin inhibits the proliferation of myeloma cells by inducing autophagy and cell-cycle arrest. Our results suggest that the molecular mechanism involves dual repression of mTORC1 and mTORC2 pathways via AMPK activation. Our study provides a theoretical basis for the development of novel strategies for the treatment of MM using metformin as an already approved and safe drug.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29554968 · DOI · PMC5859411

Ribosome biogenesis during cell cycle arrest fuels EMT in development and disease [2]

Research article Prakash V, Carson BB, Feenstra JM, Dass RA, Sekyrova P, Hoshino A, et al. · · 2019 · cited 202 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Ribosome biogenesis is a canonical hallmark of cell growth and proliferation.
Closing excerpt
These findings implicate the EMT-associated ribosome biogenesis program with cellular plasticity, de-differentiation, cancer progression and metastatic disease.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)

Ribosome biogenesis is a canonical hallmark of cell growth and proliferation. Here we show that execution of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), a migratory cellular program associated with development and tumor metastasis, is fueled by upregulation of ribosome biogenesis during G1/S arrest. This unexpected EMT feature is independent of species and initiating signal, and is accompanied by release of the repressive nucleolar chromatin remodeling complex (NoRC) from rDNA, together with recruitment of the EMT-driving transcription factor Snai1 (Snail1), RNA Polymerase I (Pol I) and the Upstream Binding Factor (UBF). EMT-associated ribosome biogenesis is also coincident with increased nucleolar recruitment of Rictor, an essential component of the EMT-promoting mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2). Inhibition of rRNA synthesis in vivo differentiates primary tumors to a benign, Estrogen Receptor-alpha (ERα) positive, Rictor-negative phenotype and reduces metastasis. These findings implicate the EMT-associated ribosome biogenesis program with cellular plasticity, de-differentiation, cancer progression and metastatic disease.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31068593 · DOI · PMC6506521

A short G1 phase imposes constitutive replication stress and fork remodelling in mouse embryonic stem cells [3]

Research article Ahuja AK, Jodkowska K, Teloni F, Bizard AH, Zellweger R, Herrador R, et al. · · 2016 · cited 181 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) represent a transient biological state, where pluripotency is coupled with fast proliferation.
Closing excerpt
We propose that rapid cell cycle progression makes ESCs dependent on effective replication-coupled mechanisms to protect genome integrity.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (158 words)

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) represent a transient biological state, where pluripotency is coupled with fast proliferation. ESCs display a constitutively active DNA damage response (DDR), but its molecular determinants have remained elusive. Here we show in cultured ESCs and mouse embryos that H2AX phosphorylation is dependent on Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) and is associated with chromatin loading of the ssDNA-binding proteins RPA and RAD51. Single-molecule analysis of replication intermediates reveals massive ssDNA gap accumulation, reduced fork speed and frequent fork reversal. All these marks of replication stress do not impair the mitotic process and are rapidly lost at differentiation onset. Delaying the G1/S transition in ESCs allows formation of 53BP1 nuclear bodies and suppresses ssDNA accumulation, fork slowing and reversal in the following S-phase. Genetic inactivation of fork slowing and reversal leads to chromosomal breakage in unperturbed ESCs. We propose that rapid cell cycle progression makes ESCs dependent on effective replication-coupled mechanisms to protect genome integrity.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26876348 · DOI · PMC4756311

Nuclear compartmentalization at the G1/S transition plays a key role in DNA replication control [4]

Research article Oji A, Yusa K, Noda I, Ichinose T, Kondo Y, Hiratani I · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Upon entry into the G1 phase following mitosis, mammalian chromosomal DNA becomes spatially segregated into A and B compartments, which correspond closely to classic euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively.
Closing excerpt
Our findings uncover a previously unrecognized role for GINS4 in regulating nuclear architecture and underscore the biological significance of nuclear compartmentalization in DNA replication control.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)

Upon entry into the G1 phase following mitosis, mammalian chromosomal DNA becomes spatially segregated into A and B compartments, which correspond closely to classic euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. The functional significance of this spatial segregation, however, has remained unexplored due to the lack of means to manipulate this level of chromosomal organization. Through a genome-wide loss-of-function CRISPR screen, we identify GINS4, a component of the replicative DNA helicase complex, as a factor essential for segregation of A and B compartments during the G1-to-S phase transition. Using GINS4 depletion experiments, we show that proper A/B compartment organization at the time of S-phase entry plays a key role in efficient DNA synthesis. Furthermore, DNA synthesis with attenuated A/B compartments is associated with defects in replication timing regulation. Our findings uncover a previously unrecognized role for GINS4 in regulating nuclear architecture and underscore the biological significance of nuclear compartmentalization in DNA replication control.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42575893 · DOI · PMC13458202

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression [5]
    Sherr CJ, Roberts JM · Genes Dev · 1999 · cited 4,456 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article G1 phase progression: cycling on cue [6]
    Sherr CJ · Cell · 1994 · cited 1,972 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Mammalian G1 cyclins [7]
    Sherr CJ · Cell · 1993 · cited 1,404 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases [8]
    Bertoli C, Skotheim JM, de Bruin RA · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2013 · cited 1,198 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article G1 cell-cycle control and cancer [9]
    Massagué J · Nature · 2004 · cited 917 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway as a master regulator of the G1- to S-phase transition [10]
    Meloche S, Pouysségur J · Oncogene · 2007 · cited 871 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Wang Y, Xu W, Yan Z, Zhao W, Mi J, Li J, et al.. Metformin induces autophagy and G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest in myeloma by targeting the AMPK/mTORC1 and mTORC2 pathways. . 2018. PMID 29554968 · DOI · PMC5859411
  2. Prakash V, Carson BB, Feenstra JM, Dass RA, Sekyrova P, Hoshino A, et al.. Ribosome biogenesis during cell cycle arrest fuels EMT in development and disease. . 2019. PMID 31068593 · DOI · PMC6506521
  3. Ahuja AK, Jodkowska K, Teloni F, Bizard AH, Zellweger R, Herrador R, et al.. A short G1 phase imposes constitutive replication stress and fork remodelling in mouse embryonic stem cells. . 2016. PMID 26876348 · DOI · PMC4756311
  4. Oji A, Yusa K, Noda I, Ichinose T, Kondo Y, Hiratani I. Nuclear compartmentalization at the G1/S transition plays a key role in DNA replication control. . 2026. PMID 42575893 · DOI · PMC13458202
  5. Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999. PMID 10385618 · DOI
  6. Sherr CJ. G1 phase progression: cycling on cue. Cell. 1994. PMID 7954821 · DOI
  7. Sherr CJ. Mammalian G1 cyclins. Cell. 1993. PMID 8513492 · DOI
  8. Bertoli C, Skotheim JM, de Bruin RA. Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013. PMID 23877564 · DOI · PMC4569015
  9. Massagué J. G1 cell-cycle control and cancer. Nature. 2004. PMID 15549091 · DOI
  10. Meloche S, Pouysségur J. The ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway as a master regulator of the G1- to S-phase transition. Oncogene. 2007. PMID 17496918 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • G2 PhaseMolecular Biology
  • S PhaseMolecular Biology
  • InterphaseMolecular Biology
  • Cell CycleMolecular Biology
  • Cell DivisionMolecular Biology
  • MitosisMolecular Biology

All 100 articles in Molecular Biology →

At a glance

12,001
PubMed records on this heading
7%
published since 2020
463
review articles
3
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • G2 PhaseMolecular Biology
  • S PhaseMolecular Biology
  • InterphaseMolecular Biology
  • Cell CycleMolecular Biology
  • Cell DivisionMolecular Biology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support