Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (754 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The period of the cell cycle preceding dna replication in S phase. Subphases of G1 include competence (to respond to growth factors), G1a (entry into G1), G1b (progression), and G1c (assembly). Progression through the G1 subphases is effected by limiting growth factors, nutrients, or inhibitors.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: G1 Phases; Phase, G1; Phases, G1; Gap Phase 1; Phase 1, Gap; First Gap Phase; First Gap Phases; Gap Phase, First.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Interphase
- Narrower topics
- G1 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints
Related concepts
- Cell Cycle
- Dna Replication
- Phase
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 12,001 records tagged with the MeSH heading “G1 Phase” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 861 of them (7.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 4,809 records.
Reviews account for 463 records (3.9%) and meta-analyses for 2. Randomized controlled trials number 3 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 2,304 |
| 2000-2009 | 4,027 |
| 2010-2019 | 4,809 |
| 2020 onward | 861 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 463 | 3.9% |
| Meta-analyses | 2 | 0.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 3 | 0.0% |
Method: PubMed query "G1 Phase"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in molecular biology
Molecular biology establishes mechanisms through controlled experiments, often in simplified systems such as purified proteins, cultured cells or model organisms. Such work can show what is possible in a defined system, but whether a pathway matters in a whole organism or in human disease needs further evidence. Check the experimental system, whether findings were reproduced by independent groups, and whether the authors tested the mechanism directly or inferred it from correlation.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metformin induces autophagy and G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest in myeloma by targeting the AMPK/mTORC1 and mTORC2 pathways | 2018 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 206 | cc by PMID 29554968 · DOI · PMC5859411 |
| Ribosome biogenesis during cell cycle arrest fuels EMT in development and disease | 2019 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 202 | cc by PMID 31068593 · DOI · PMC6506521 |
| A short G1 phase imposes constitutive replication stress and fork remodelling in mouse embryonic stem cells | 2016 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 181 | cc by PMID 26876348 · DOI · PMC4756311 |
| Nuclear compartmentalization at the G1/S transition plays a key role in DNA replication control | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 2 | cc by PMID 42575893 · DOI · PMC13458202 |
Metformin induces autophagy and G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest in myeloma by targeting the AMPK/mTORC1 and mTORC2 pathways [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundMetformin is a commonly used drug for the treatment of diabetes.
- Closing excerpt
- Our study provides a theoretical basis for the development of novel strategies for the treatment of MM using metformin as an already approved and safe drug.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (296 words)
BackgroundMetformin is a commonly used drug for the treatment of diabetes. Accumulating evidence suggests that it exerts anti-tumor effects in many cancers, including multiple myeloma (MM); however, the underlying molecular mechanisms have not been clearly elucidated.MethodsThe anti-myeloma effects of metformin were evaluated using human MM cell lines (RPMI8226 and U266) in vitro and in vivo NOD-SCID murine xenograft MM model. Cell viability was assessed with CCK8 and cell proliferation was measured by EdU incorporation assay. Cell cycle distribution and apoptosis were examined by flow cytometry. Transmission electron microscopy was used to visualized autophagosomes. Activation of AMPK and inhibition of mTORC1/C2 pathways was assessed by Western blot analysis. RPMI8226 cells and U266 cell lines with AMPK knockdown were generated by transfection with small interfering RNA targeting the AMPK-α1 and α2 subunits using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent.ResultsMetformin effectively inhibited the proliferation of MM cell lines, an effect that was associated with the induction of autophagy and G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, but not apoptosis. Metformin activated AMPK and repressed both mTORC1 and mTORC2 signaling pathways in myeloma cells as well as downstream molecular signaling pathways, such as p-4EBP1 and p-AKT. AMPK activation resulted in direct phosphorylation and activation of tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2), leading to inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). In addition, metformin inhibited myeloma cell growth in an AMPK-dependent manner. The xenograft mouse model further confirmed that metformin inhibited tumor growth by upregulation of AMPK and downregulation of mTOR.ConclusionsMetformin inhibits the proliferation of myeloma cells by inducing autophagy and cell-cycle arrest. Our results suggest that the molecular mechanism involves dual repression of mTORC1 and mTORC2 pathways via AMPK activation. Our study provides a theoretical basis for the development of novel strategies for the treatment of MM using metformin as an already approved and safe drug.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29554968 · DOI · PMC5859411
Ribosome biogenesis during cell cycle arrest fuels EMT in development and disease [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Ribosome biogenesis is a canonical hallmark of cell growth and proliferation.
- Closing excerpt
- These findings implicate the EMT-associated ribosome biogenesis program with cellular plasticity, de-differentiation, cancer progression and metastatic disease.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)
Ribosome biogenesis is a canonical hallmark of cell growth and proliferation. Here we show that execution of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), a migratory cellular program associated with development and tumor metastasis, is fueled by upregulation of ribosome biogenesis during G1/S arrest. This unexpected EMT feature is independent of species and initiating signal, and is accompanied by release of the repressive nucleolar chromatin remodeling complex (NoRC) from rDNA, together with recruitment of the EMT-driving transcription factor Snai1 (Snail1), RNA Polymerase I (Pol I) and the Upstream Binding Factor (UBF). EMT-associated ribosome biogenesis is also coincident with increased nucleolar recruitment of Rictor, an essential component of the EMT-promoting mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2). Inhibition of rRNA synthesis in vivo differentiates primary tumors to a benign, Estrogen Receptor-alpha (ERα) positive, Rictor-negative phenotype and reduces metastasis. These findings implicate the EMT-associated ribosome biogenesis program with cellular plasticity, de-differentiation, cancer progression and metastatic disease.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31068593 · DOI · PMC6506521
A short G1 phase imposes constitutive replication stress and fork remodelling in mouse embryonic stem cells [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) represent a transient biological state, where pluripotency is coupled with fast proliferation.
- Closing excerpt
- We propose that rapid cell cycle progression makes ESCs dependent on effective replication-coupled mechanisms to protect genome integrity.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (158 words)
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) represent a transient biological state, where pluripotency is coupled with fast proliferation. ESCs display a constitutively active DNA damage response (DDR), but its molecular determinants have remained elusive. Here we show in cultured ESCs and mouse embryos that H2AX phosphorylation is dependent on Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) and is associated with chromatin loading of the ssDNA-binding proteins RPA and RAD51. Single-molecule analysis of replication intermediates reveals massive ssDNA gap accumulation, reduced fork speed and frequent fork reversal. All these marks of replication stress do not impair the mitotic process and are rapidly lost at differentiation onset. Delaying the G1/S transition in ESCs allows formation of 53BP1 nuclear bodies and suppresses ssDNA accumulation, fork slowing and reversal in the following S-phase. Genetic inactivation of fork slowing and reversal leads to chromosomal breakage in unperturbed ESCs. We propose that rapid cell cycle progression makes ESCs dependent on effective replication-coupled mechanisms to protect genome integrity.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26876348 · DOI · PMC4756311
Nuclear compartmentalization at the G1/S transition plays a key role in DNA replication control [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Upon entry into the G1 phase following mitosis, mammalian chromosomal DNA becomes spatially segregated into A and B compartments, which correspond closely to classic euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively.
- Closing excerpt
- Our findings uncover a previously unrecognized role for GINS4 in regulating nuclear architecture and underscore the biological significance of nuclear compartmentalization in DNA replication control.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)
Upon entry into the G1 phase following mitosis, mammalian chromosomal DNA becomes spatially segregated into A and B compartments, which correspond closely to classic euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. The functional significance of this spatial segregation, however, has remained unexplored due to the lack of means to manipulate this level of chromosomal organization. Through a genome-wide loss-of-function CRISPR screen, we identify GINS4, a component of the replicative DNA helicase complex, as a factor essential for segregation of A and B compartments during the G1-to-S phase transition. Using GINS4 depletion experiments, we show that proper A/B compartment organization at the time of S-phase entry plays a key role in efficient DNA synthesis. Furthermore, DNA synthesis with attenuated A/B compartments is associated with defects in replication timing regulation. Our findings uncover a previously unrecognized role for GINS4 in regulating nuclear architecture and underscore the biological significance of nuclear compartmentalization in DNA replication control.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42575893 · DOI · PMC13458202
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression [5]
- Research article G1 phase progression: cycling on cue [6]
- Research article Mammalian G1 cyclins [7]
- Research article Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases [8]
- Research article G1 cell-cycle control and cancer [9]
- Research article The ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway as a master regulator of the G1- to S-phase transition [10]
References
- Wang Y, Xu W, Yan Z, Zhao W, Mi J, Li J, et al.. Metformin induces autophagy and G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest in myeloma by targeting the AMPK/mTORC1 and mTORC2 pathways. . 2018. PMID 29554968 · DOI · PMC5859411
- Prakash V, Carson BB, Feenstra JM, Dass RA, Sekyrova P, Hoshino A, et al.. Ribosome biogenesis during cell cycle arrest fuels EMT in development and disease. . 2019. PMID 31068593 · DOI · PMC6506521
- Ahuja AK, Jodkowska K, Teloni F, Bizard AH, Zellweger R, Herrador R, et al.. A short G1 phase imposes constitutive replication stress and fork remodelling in mouse embryonic stem cells. . 2016. PMID 26876348 · DOI · PMC4756311
- Oji A, Yusa K, Noda I, Ichinose T, Kondo Y, Hiratani I. Nuclear compartmentalization at the G1/S transition plays a key role in DNA replication control. . 2026. PMID 42575893 · DOI · PMC13458202
- Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999. PMID 10385618 · DOI
- Sherr CJ. G1 phase progression: cycling on cue. Cell. 1994. PMID 7954821 · DOI
- Sherr CJ. Mammalian G1 cyclins. Cell. 1993. PMID 8513492 · DOI
- Bertoli C, Skotheim JM, de Bruin RA. Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013. PMID 23877564 · DOI · PMC4569015
- Massagué J. G1 cell-cycle control and cancer. Nature. 2004. PMID 15549091 · DOI
- Meloche S, Pouysségur J. The ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway as a master regulator of the G1- to S-phase transition. Oncogene. 2007. PMID 17496918 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.