Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Gastric Fundus
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Gastric Fundus

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

The superior portion of the body of the stomach above the level of the cardiac notch.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (873 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The superior portion of the body of the stomach above the level of the cardiac notch.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Fundus, Gastric.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Stomach
See also
Fundoplication

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 2,815 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Gastric Fundus” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 167 of them (5.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,675 records.

Reviews account for 138 records (4.9%) and meta-analyses for 3. Randomized controlled trials number 52 (1.8%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,675 records; 2000-2009: 582 records; 2010-2019: 391 records; 2020 onward: 167 records1,675through 19995822000-20093912010-20191672020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,675
2000-2009582
2010-2019391
2020 onward167
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 4.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.8 percentReviews4.9% (138)Meta-analyses0.1% (3)Randomized controlled trials1.8% (52)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 2,815 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1384.9%
Meta-analyses30.1%
Randomized controlled trials521.8%

Method: PubMed query "Gastric Fundus"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux can be reduced by changes in surgical technique
Daes J, Jimenez ME, Said N, Daza JC, Dennis R
2012Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
128cc by
PMID 22915063 · DOI · PMC3505545
A Thickness Calibration Device Is Needed to Determine Staple Height and Avoid Leaks in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
Huang R, Gagner M
2015Clinical trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
45cc by
PMID 26024735 · DOI · PMC4644197
Accuracy and cut-off values of pepsinogens I, II and gastrin 17 for diagnosis of gastric fundic atrophy: influence of gastritis
Nasrollahzadeh D, Aghcheli K, Sotoudeh M, Shakeri R, Persson EC, Islami F, et al.
2011Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
45cc by
PMID 22066020 · DOI · PMC3204997
Growth Differentiation Factor 15 Induces Gastric Fundus Contraction Involving Cholinergic Excitation: Morphofunctional Evidence in Rodent Models
Garella R, Palmieri F, Tarchi L, Tani A, Chellini F, Guarnieri G, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 40464681 · DOI · PMC12135347

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux can be reduced by changes in surgical technique [1]

Research article Daes J, Jimenez ME, Said N, Daza JC, Dennis R · · 2012 · cited 128 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundBariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) in obese patients, with the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass being the technique preferred by many surgeons.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsOur results confirm that careful attention to surgical technique can result in significantly reduced occurrence of symptoms of GERD up to 12 months postoperatively, compared with previous reports of LSG in the literature.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (236 words)

BackgroundBariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) in obese patients, with the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass being the technique preferred by many surgeons. Published data reporting the results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with GERD are contradictory. In a previous observational study, we found that relative narrowing of the distal sleeve, hiatal hernia (HH), and dilation of the fundus predispose to GERD after LSG. In this study, we evaluated the effects of standardization of our LSG technique on the incidence of postoperative symptoms of GERD.MethodsThis was a concurrent cohort study. Patients who underwent bariatric surgery at our center were followed prospectively. LSG was performed in all patients in this series.ResultsA total of 234 patients underwent surgery. There were no cases of death, fistula, or conversion to open surgery. All 134 patients who completed 6-12 months of postoperative follow-up were evaluated. Excess weight loss at 1 year was 73.5%. In the study group, 66 patients (49.2%) were diagnosed with GERD preoperatively, and HH was detected in 34 patients (25.3%) intraoperatively. HH was treated by reduction in three patients, anterior repair in 28, and posterior repair in three. Only two patients (1.5%) had symptoms of GERD at 6-12 months postoperatively.ConclusionsOur results confirm that careful attention to surgical technique can result in significantly reduced occurrence of symptoms of GERD up to 12 months postoperatively, compared with previous reports of LSG in the literature.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 22915063 · DOI · PMC3505545

A Thickness Calibration Device Is Needed to Determine Staple Height and Avoid Leaks in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy [2]

Clinical trial Huang R, Gagner M · · 2015 · cited 45 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundLeaks after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) may be due to a mismatch between staple height and tissue thickness.
Closing excerpt
To help avoid leaks, a thickness calibration device is needed to determine correct staple height.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (218 words)

BackgroundLeaks after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) may be due to a mismatch between staple height and tissue thickness. The aim of this study was to determine the range of gastric thicknesses in three areas of stapling.MethodsSG was performed using a 40-Fr suction calibration system 4 cm from the pylorus. Measurement of combined gastric walls was accomplished with an applied pressure of 8 g/mm(2) on the fundus, midbody, and antrum.ResultsWe enrolled 26 SG patients (15 women, 11 men; mean age 36.8 years). Body mass index (BMI) averaged 45.3 kg/m(2) overall, 44.7 kg/m(2) for males and 45.7 kg/m(2) for females. Although male patients had a thicker stomach antrum than female patients (3.12 vs. 3.09 mm), the midbody (2.57 vs. 3.09 mm) and proximal areas (1.67 vs. 1.72 mm) were thicker in female patients. However, some maximum fundus thicknesses were up to 2.83 mm in females and 2.28 mm in males. Some antra were as thick as 4.07 mm in females and 5.39 mm in males. Also, men had a longer average staple line (22.95 vs. 19.90 cm).ConclusionBecause of the range of gastric thicknesses, a single staple height cannot be used to appose the full range of gastric wall thicknesses without potentially causing necrosis or poor apposition. To help avoid leaks, a thickness calibration device is needed to determine correct staple height.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 26024735 · DOI · PMC4644197

Accuracy and cut-off values of pepsinogens I, II and gastrin 17 for diagnosis of gastric fundic atrophy: influence of gastritis [3]

Research article Nasrollahzadeh D, Aghcheli K, Sotoudeh M, Shakeri R, Persson EC, Islami F, et al. · · 2011 · cited 45 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundTo establish optimal cutoff values for serologic diagnosis of fundic atrophy in a high-risk area for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric cancer with high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H.
Closing excerpt
PGI is a stable biomarker in assessment of fundic atrophy and has similar accuracy to PGI/PGII ratio among populations with prevalent nonatrophic pangastritis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (240 words)

BackgroundTo establish optimal cutoff values for serologic diagnosis of fundic atrophy in a high-risk area for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric cancer with high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in Northern Iran, we performed an endoscopy-room-based validation study.MethodsWe measured serum pepsinogens I (PGI) and II (PGII), gastrin 17 (G-17), and antibodies against whole H. pylori, or cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA) antigen among 309 consecutive patients in two major endoscopy clinics in northeastern Iran. Updated Sydney System was used as histology gold standard. Areas under curves (AUCs), optimal cutoff and predictive values were calculated for serum biomarkers against the histology.Results309 persons were recruited (mean age: 63.5 years old, 59.5% female). 84.5% were H. pylori positive and 77.5% were CagA positive. 21 fundic atrophy and 101 nonatrophic pangastritis were diagnosed. The best cutoff values in fundic atrophy assessment were calculated at PGI40 pmol/l was 81% sensitive and 73.3% specific for diagnosing fundic atrophy. At cutoff concentration of 11.8 µg/l, PGII showed 84.2% sensitivity and 45.4% specificity to distinguish nonatrophic pangastritis. Exclusion of nonatrophic pangastritis enhanced diagnostic ability of PGI/PGII ratio (from AUC = 0.66 to 0.90) but did not affect AUC of PGI. After restricting study samples to those with PGIIConclusionsAmong endoscopy clinic patients, PGII is a sensitive marker for extension of nonatrophic gastritis toward the corpus. PGI is a stable biomarker in assessment of fundic atrophy and has similar accuracy to PGI/PGII ratio among populations with prevalent nonatrophic pangastritis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 22066020 · DOI · PMC3204997

Growth Differentiation Factor 15 Induces Gastric Fundus Contraction Involving Cholinergic Excitation: Morphofunctional Evidence in Rodent Models [4]

Research article Garella R, Palmieri F, Tarchi L, Tani A, Chellini F, Guarnieri G, et al. · · 2025 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15) is a peptide from the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β superfamily, typically found at low levels in mammalian tissues, but significantly upregulated during cellular stress or injury.
Closing excerpt
Further studies will shed light on its mechanism of action and on the potential translational perspective of current results, elucidating whether elevated plasma levels of GDF15 observed in several physiological and pathological conditions can also have repercussions in gastric physiology, appetite regulation and weight loss.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (179 words)

Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15) is a peptide from the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β superfamily, typically found at low levels in mammalian tissues, but significantly upregulated during cellular stress or injury. Initially recognised for its role in inducing anorexia and vomiting, GDF15 is now seen as a broader regulator of homeostasis, although its effects on gastrointestinal function remain unclear. This study examined GDF15's impact on the gastric fundus, a key region for appetite regulation. In ex vivo rodent gastric smooth muscle, GDF15 receptors were detected, and exposure to GDF15 caused smooth muscle depolarization, leading to increased mechanical activation. Morphological analyses revealed changes in the contractile apparatus, resembling cholinergic excitatory pathways. These effects were blocked by atropine, indicating muscarinic receptor involvement. Taken together, these findings suggest that GDF15 enhances gastric contractility by influencing cholinergic tone. Further studies will shed light on its mechanism of action and on the potential translational perspective of current results, elucidating whether elevated plasma levels of GDF15 observed in several physiological and pathological conditions can also have repercussions in gastric physiology, appetite regulation and weight loss.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40464681 · DOI · PMC12135347

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Prokinetics and fundic relaxants in upper functional GI disorders [5]
    Tack J · Curr Opin Pharmacol · 2008 · cited 97 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Systematic review with meta-analysis: fundic gland polyps and proton pump inhibitors [6]
    Martin FC, Chenevix-Trench G, Yeomans ND · Aliment Pharmacol Ther · 2016 · cited 54 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland (chief cell-predominant type): A review of endoscopic and clinicopathological features [7]
    Miyazawa M, Matsuda M, Yano M, Hara Y, Arihara F, Horita Y, et al. · World J Gastroenterol · 2016 · cited 42 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Gastric somatostatin: a paracrine regulator of acid secretion [8]
    Makhlouf GM, Schubert ML · Metabolism · 1990 · cited 38 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Laparoscopic gastrostomy and fundoplication [9]
    Georgeson KE · Pediatr Ann · 1993 · cited 35 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Optical techniques for perfusion monitoring of the gastric tube after esophagectomy: a review of technologies and thresholds [10]
    Jansen SM, de Bruin DM, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Strackee SD, Veelo DP, van Leeuwen TG, et al. · Dis Esophagus · 2018 · cited 33 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Daes J, Jimenez ME, Said N, Daza JC, Dennis R. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux can be reduced by changes in surgical technique. . 2012. PMID 22915063 · DOI · PMC3505545
  2. Huang R, Gagner M. A Thickness Calibration Device Is Needed to Determine Staple Height and Avoid Leaks in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. . 2015. PMID 26024735 · DOI · PMC4644197
  3. Nasrollahzadeh D, Aghcheli K, Sotoudeh M, Shakeri R, Persson EC, Islami F, et al.. Accuracy and cut-off values of pepsinogens I, II and gastrin 17 for diagnosis of gastric fundic atrophy: influence of gastritis. . 2011. PMID 22066020 · DOI · PMC3204997
  4. Garella R, Palmieri F, Tarchi L, Tani A, Chellini F, Guarnieri G, et al.. Growth Differentiation Factor 15 Induces Gastric Fundus Contraction Involving Cholinergic Excitation: Morphofunctional Evidence in Rodent Models. . 2025. PMID 40464681 · DOI · PMC12135347
  5. Tack J. Prokinetics and fundic relaxants in upper functional GI disorders. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2008. PMID 18940266 · DOI
  6. Martin FC, Chenevix-Trench G, Yeomans ND. Systematic review with meta-analysis: fundic gland polyps and proton pump inhibitors. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016. PMID 27634363 · DOI
  7. Miyazawa M, Matsuda M, Yano M, Hara Y, Arihara F, Horita Y, et al.. Gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland (chief cell-predominant type): A review of endoscopic and clinicopathological features. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID 28082804 · DOI · PMC5192263
  8. Makhlouf GM, Schubert ML. Gastric somatostatin: a paracrine regulator of acid secretion. Metabolism. 1990. PMID 1976209 · DOI
  9. Georgeson KE. Laparoscopic gastrostomy and fundoplication. Pediatr Ann. 1993. PMID 8290324 · DOI
  10. Jansen SM, de Bruin DM, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Strackee SD, Veelo DP, van Leeuwen TG, et al.. Optical techniques for perfusion monitoring of the gastric tube after esophagectomy: a review of technologies and thresholds. Dis Esophagus. 2018. PMID 29701760 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Gastric MucosaAnatomy and Physiology
  • CardiaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Ampulla of VaterAnatomy and Physiology
  • DuodenumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Esophageal MucosaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Esophagogastric JunctionAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

2,815
PubMed records on this heading
6%
published since 2020
138
review articles
52
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Gastric MucosaAnatomy and Physiology
  • CardiaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Ampulla of VaterAnatomy and Physiology
  • DuodenumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Esophageal MucosaAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support