Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Gingival Crevicular Fluid
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Gingival Crevicular Fluid

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

A fluid occurring in minute amounts in the gingival crevice, believed by some authorities to be an inflammatory exudate and by others to cleanse material from the crevice, containing sticky plasma proteins which improve adhesions

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,075 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A fluid occurring in minute amounts in the gingival crevice, believed by some authorities to be an inflammatory exudate and by others to cleanse material from the crevice, containing sticky plasma proteins which improve adhesions of the epithelial attachment, have antimicrobial properties, and exert antibody activity. (From Jablonski, Illustrated Dictionary of Dentistry, 1982)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Crevicular Fluid, Gingival; Crevicular Fluids, Gingival; Fluid, Gingival Crevicular; Fluids, Gingival Crevicular; Gingival Crevicular Fluids; Gingival Exudate; Exudate, Gingival; Exudates, Gingival.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Exudates and Transudates

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 4,133 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Gingival Crevicular Fluid” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 881 of them (21.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,347 records.

Reviews account for 335 records (8.1%) and meta-analyses for 52. Randomized controlled trials number 460 (11.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,347 records; 2000-2009: 747 records; 2010-2019: 1,158 records; 2020 onward: 881 records1,347through 19997472000-20091,1582010-20198812020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,347
2000-2009747
2010-20191,158
2020 onward881
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.3 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 11.1 percentReviews8.1% (335)Meta-analyses1.3% (52)Randomized controlled trials11.1% (460)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 4,133 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3358.1%
Meta-analyses521.3%
Randomized controlled trials46011.1%

Method: PubMed query "Gingival Crevicular Fluid"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF): A Diagnostic Tool for the Detection of Periodontal Health and Diseases
Fatima T, Khurshid Z, Rehman A, Imran E, Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D
2021Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
135cc by
PMID 33668185 · DOI · PMC7956529
Effect of orthodontic forces on cytokine and receptor levels in gingival crevicular fluid: a systematic review
Kapoor P, Kharbanda OP, Monga N, Miglani R, Kapila S
2014Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
112cc by
PMID 25487828 · DOI · PMC4259981
SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Gingival Crevicular Fluid
Gupta S, Mohindra R, Chauhan PK, Singla V, Goyal K, Sahni V, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
96cc by
PMID 33138663 · DOI · PMC7642823
Untargeted Metabolomic and Lipidomic Profiles of Gingival Crevicular Fluid in the Context of Periodontitis
Henderzahs CH, Yamada C, Morozov A, Yalartai T, John V, AlQallaf H, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41664514 · DOI · PMC13086549

Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF): A Diagnostic Tool for the Detection of Periodontal Health and Diseases [1]

Review article Fatima T, Khurshid Z, Rehman A, Imran E, Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D · · 2021 · cited 135 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The methodologies applicable for the evaluation of periodontal associated diseases are constantly evolving to provide quick, realistic, and scientifically proven results.
Closing excerpt
Thus, the review aims at describing GCF as a potential oral biofluid helpful in differentiating periodontal health and disease status.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (226 words)

The methodologies applicable for the evaluation of periodontal associated diseases are constantly evolving to provide quick, realistic, and scientifically proven results. Trends in the past followed a clinical evaluation of periodontal tissues and radiographic-based reports that formed the foundation for detection of diseases involving the structures supporting the teeth. As the confines and limitations of conventional strategies became obvious over the passage of time, hand in hand variety of techniques have evolved and experimentally justified. These improvisations are based on an improved understanding of the periodontal-pathogenic cascade. Periodontal pathogenesis and a paradigm shift from disease understanding to disease prevention and treatment entail few prerequisites that demand the objectivity of diagnostics procedure that includes sensitivity and specificity along with an explanation of the intensity of the disease, Gingival crevicular fluid an oral bio-fluid resides in the close proximity with gingival tissues have been widely used to understand and differentiate the periodontal health and diseased status. The biomarkers present in the GCF can be a reliable tool to detect the minute changes seen in the disease processes. The GCF consists of various host and bacterial-derived products as well as biomarkers which in turn can be evaluated for the diagnosis, prognosis as well as management of the periodontal disease. Thus, the review aims at describing GCF as a potential oral biofluid helpful in differentiating periodontal health and disease status.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33668185 · DOI · PMC7956529

Effect of orthodontic forces on cytokine and receptor levels in gingival crevicular fluid: a systematic review [2]

Systematic review Kapoor P, Kharbanda OP, Monga N, Miglani R, Kapila S · · 2014 · cited 112 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
This systematic review aimed to generate evidence on role of potent markers of inflammation [cytokines, chemokines, their associated receptors and antagonists] following the application of orthodontic forces.
Closing excerpt
Lack of homogeneity in several parameters calls for a better controlled research on the biology of OTM.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (342 words)

This systematic review aimed to generate evidence on role of potent markers of inflammation [cytokines, chemokines, their associated receptors and antagonists] following the application of orthodontic forces. Subsequent to registration with PROSPERO, literature search followed a predetermined search strategy to key databases along with hand search (HS). Seventy-seven articles from PubMed (P), 637 from Scopus (S), 51 from Embase (E), and 3 from hand search (HS) were identified. A total of 39 articles were shortlisted that met strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and quality assessment. Each study was evaluated for participant characteristics, study design, oral hygiene regimen, and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) handling. Among these studies, biomarkers in the order of frequency were interleukin (IL)-1β (N=21), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (N=10), IL-8,IL-6(N=8), receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) (N=7), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 (N=3), IL-2 (N=4), IL-4, IL-10, RANTES (N=2), IL-1, IL-5, IL-1α, IP-10, osteopontin (OPN) (N=1) and receptors and their antagonists in the order of osteoprotegerin (OPG) (N=8), IL-1RA (N=5), and RANK (N=1). Results revealed an immediate release of inflammatory bone-resorptive mediators, IL-1β and TNF-α, where IL-1β increased as early as 1 min to 1 h reaching peak at 24 h while TNF-α increased at 1 h or 1 day. This was accompanied by a fall in bone-protective mediator (OPG) levels at 1 h and 24 h after orthodontic force application. Continuous forces were accompanied by a decrease in mediator levels after attaining peak levels (most commonly at 24 h) while repeated activations in interrupted force upregulated their secretion. Significant correlations of IL-1β levels with pain intensity, rate of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and of activity index (AI) (IL-1β/IL-1RA) with velocity of tooth movement and growth status of individuals have also been deduced. A greater AI and RANKL/OPG ratio was seen in juveniles as compared to adults or non-growers that were associated with faster rate of OTM in juveniles. None of the studies addressed the effect of estrous cycle in female subjects. Lack of homogeneity in several parameters calls for a better controlled research on the biology of OTM.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25487828 · DOI · PMC4259981

SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Gingival Crevicular Fluid [3]

Research article Gupta S, Mohindra R, Chauhan PK, Singla V, Goyal K, Sahni V, et al. · · 2021 · cited 96 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Understanding the pathophysiology of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection remains a significant challenge of our times.
Closing excerpt
The results establish GCF as a possible mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2, which is the first such report in the literature, and also provide the first quantifiable evidence pointing toward a link between the COVID-19 infection and oral health.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (308 words)

Understanding the pathophysiology of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection remains a significant challenge of our times. The gingival crevicular fluid being representative of systemic status and having a proven track record of detecting viruses and biomarkers forms a logical basis for evaluating the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The study aimed to assess gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) for evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in 33 patients who were deemed to be COVID-19 positive upon nasopharyngeal sampling. An attempt was also made to comparatively evaluate it with saliva in terms of its sensitivity, as a diagnostic fluid for SARS-CoV-2. GCF and saliva samples were collected from 33 COVID-19-confirmed patients. Total RNA was extracted using NucliSENS easyMAG (bioMérieux) and eluted in the elution buffer. Envelope gene (E gene) of SARS-CoV-2 and human RNase P gene as internal control were detected in GCF samples by using the TRUPCR SARS-CoV-2 RT qPCR kit V-2.0 (I) in an Applied Biosystems 7500 real-time machine. A significant majority of both asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients exhibited the presence of the novel coronavirus in their GCF samples. Considering the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal swab sampling as gold standard, the sensitivity of GCF and saliva, respectively, was 63.64% (confidence interval [CI], 45.1% to 79.60%) and 64.52% (CI, 45.37% to 80.77%). GCF was found to be comparable to saliva in terms of its sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2. Saliva samples tested positive in 3 of the 12 patients whose GCF tested negative, and likewise GCF tested positive for 2 of the 11 patients whose saliva tested negative on real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The results establish GCF as a possible mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2, which is the first such report in the literature, and also provide the first quantifiable evidence pointing toward a link between the COVID-19 infection and oral health.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33138663 · DOI · PMC7642823

Untargeted Metabolomic and Lipidomic Profiles of Gingival Crevicular Fluid in the Context of Periodontitis [4]

Research article Henderzahs CH, Yamada C, Morozov A, Yalartai T, John V, AlQallaf H, et al. · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Aim(s)This cross-sectional clinical study aimed to explore the untargeted metabolomic and lipidomic profiles in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) obtained from healthy individuals and patients with periodontitis.
Closing excerpt
This knowledge is pivotal for the development of a precision paradigm in periodontitis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)

Aim(s)This cross-sectional clinical study aimed to explore the untargeted metabolomic and lipidomic profiles in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) obtained from healthy individuals and patients with periodontitis.Materials and methodsGCF was collected from 17 periodontally healthy and 19 periodontitis patients. For the unbiased characterisation of positively and negatively charged polar metabolite and lipid compounds, we employed hydrophilic interaction and reversed-phase liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry platforms, followed by a semisupervised deep learning-based approach for metabolomic peak curation and data analysis.ResultsA total of 256 metabolites were identified with Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI) confidence Levels 1-3, including 198 elevated and 58 diminished compounds in periodontal lesions (q 2-transformed Fold Change (FC)| > 1). Periodontitis samples exhibited a significant positive accumulation of purine degradation and ceramide metabolites, along with a negative regulation of oxy fatty acids metabolism. Additionally, we observed a significant increase in established periodontitis biomarkers, including N-acetylneuraminic acid, citrulline and 2-pyrrolidineacetic acid. The study also characterised distinct differences in bacterial and fungal metabolite profiles between the healthy and diseased samples.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that untargeted metabolomic screening of GCF may significantly improve our understanding of biochemical changes between healthy tissue and periodontitis. This knowledge is pivotal for the development of a precision paradigm in periodontitis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41664514 · DOI · PMC13086549

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Gingival crevicular fluid as a source of biomarkers for periodontitis [5]
    Barros SP, Williams R, Offenbacher S, Morelli T · Periodontol 2000 · 2016 · cited 297 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Analysis of matrix metalloproteinases, especially MMP-8, in gingival creviclular fluid, mouthrinse and saliva for monitoring periodontal diseases [6]
    Sorsa T, Gursoy UK, Nwhator S, Hernandez M, Tervahartiala T, Leppilahti J, et al. · Periodontol 2000 · 2016 · cited 235 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Formation, collection and significance of gingival crevice fluid [7]
    Griffiths GS · Periodontol 2000 · 2003 · cited 220 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Oxidative stress-related biomarkers in saliva and gingival crevicular fluid associated with chronic periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Chen M, Cai W, Zhao S, Shi L, Chen Y, Li X, et al. · J Clin Periodontol · 2019 · cited 194 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Origin and function of the cellular components in gingival crevice fluid [9]
    Delima AJ, Van Dyke TE · Periodontol 2000 · 2003 · cited 171 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Analysis of gingival crevicular fluid as applied to the diagnosis of oral and systemic diseases [10]
    Lamster IB, Ahlo JK · Ann N Y Acad Sci · 2007 · cited 166 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Fatima T, Khurshid Z, Rehman A, Imran E, Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D. Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF): A Diagnostic Tool for the Detection of Periodontal Health and Diseases. . 2021. PMID 33668185 · DOI · PMC7956529
  2. Kapoor P, Kharbanda OP, Monga N, Miglani R, Kapila S. Effect of orthodontic forces on cytokine and receptor levels in gingival crevicular fluid: a systematic review. . 2014. PMID 25487828 · DOI · PMC4259981
  3. Gupta S, Mohindra R, Chauhan PK, Singla V, Goyal K, Sahni V, et al.. SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Gingival Crevicular Fluid. . 2021. PMID 33138663 · DOI · PMC7642823
  4. Henderzahs CH, Yamada C, Morozov A, Yalartai T, John V, AlQallaf H, et al.. Untargeted Metabolomic and Lipidomic Profiles of Gingival Crevicular Fluid in the Context of Periodontitis. . 2026. PMID 41664514 · DOI · PMC13086549
  5. Barros SP, Williams R, Offenbacher S, Morelli T. Gingival crevicular fluid as a source of biomarkers for periodontitis. Periodontol 2000. 2016. PMID 26662482 · DOI · PMC4911175
  6. Sorsa T, Gursoy UK, Nwhator S, Hernandez M, Tervahartiala T, Leppilahti J, et al.. Analysis of matrix metalloproteinases, especially MMP-8, in gingival creviclular fluid, mouthrinse and saliva for monitoring periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000. 2016. PMID 26662488 · DOI
  7. Griffiths GS. Formation, collection and significance of gingival crevice fluid. Periodontol 2000. 2003. PMID 12656994 · DOI
  8. Chen M, Cai W, Zhao S, Shi L, Chen Y, Li X, et al.. Oxidative stress-related biomarkers in saliva and gingival crevicular fluid associated with chronic periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019. PMID 30989678 · DOI
  9. Delima AJ, Van Dyke TE. Origin and function of the cellular components in gingival crevice fluid. Periodontol 2000. 2003. PMID 12656996 · DOI
  10. Lamster IB, Ahlo JK. Analysis of gingival crevicular fluid as applied to the diagnosis of oral and systemic diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007. PMID 17435131 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Synovial FluidAnatomy and Physiology
  • Extracellular FluidAnatomy and Physiology
  • Amniotic FluidAnatomy and Physiology
  • Aqueous HumorAnatomy and Physiology
  • Follicular FluidAnatomy and Physiology
  • Subretinal FluidAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

4,133
PubMed records on this heading
21%
published since 2020
335
review articles
460
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Synovial FluidAnatomy and Physiology
  • Extracellular FluidAnatomy and Physiology
  • Amniotic FluidAnatomy and Physiology
  • Aqueous HumorAnatomy and Physiology
  • Follicular FluidAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support