Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (916 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
An immunological attack mounted by a graft against the host because of histoincompatibility when immunologically competent cells are transplanted to an immunologically incompetent host; the resulting clinical picture is that of graft VS host disease.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Human Leukocyte Antigen Sensitization; HLA Sensitization; Sensitization, HLA.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Transplantation Immunology
- Narrower topics
- Graft vs Tumor Effect
- See also
- Graft vs Host Disease
Related concepts
- Histocompatibility
- Transplants
- Host Disease
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 6,836 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Graft vs Host Reaction” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 188 of them (2.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 4,790 records.
Reviews account for 1,189 records (17.4%) and meta-analyses for 2. Randomized controlled trials number 28 (0.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 4,790 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,219 |
| 2010-2019 | 639 |
| 2020 onward | 188 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 1,189 | 17.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 2 | 0.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 28 | 0.4% |
Method: PubMed query "Graft vs Host Reaction"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in immunology
Immune responses are studied in model organisms, in cells from donors and in patients, and the same pathway can behave differently across these settings. Mouse immune systems differ from human ones in important ways, and blood measurements may not reflect what happens in tissues. Clinical conclusions about immune-mediated disease or immunotherapy come mainly from controlled trials and long-term cohorts. Check the species and tissue studied, whether markers were linked to outcomes patients notice, and the follow-up time.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Who, When, and How? | 2021 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 87 | cc by PMID 34012445 · DOI · PMC8126705 |
| Mechanisms of Leukemia Immune Evasion and Their Role in Relapse After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation | 2020 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 60 | cc by PMID 32158444 · DOI · PMC7052328 |
| Strategies for Enhancing and Preserving Anti-leukemia Effects Without Aggravating Graft-Versus-Host Disease | 2018 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 59 | cc by PMID 30619371 · DOI · PMC6308132 |
| Progress in reprogramming failed graft-versus-leukemia immunity in acute myeloid leukemia relapse after allogeneic transplantation | 2026 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 0 | cc by PMID 42755912 · DOI · PMC13581880 |
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Who, When, and How? [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Although the majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with intensive chemotherapy achieve a complete remission (CR), many are destined to relapse if treated with intensive chemotherapy alone.
- Closing excerpt
- Future progress in optimizing transplant outcome will be dependent on the successful delivery by the international transplant community of randomized prospective clinical trials which permit examination of current and future transplant therapies with the same degree of rigor as is routinely adopted for non-transplant therapies.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (260 words)
Although the majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with intensive chemotherapy achieve a complete remission (CR), many are destined to relapse if treated with intensive chemotherapy alone. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) represents a pivotally important treatment strategy in fit adults with AML because of its augmented anti-leukemic activity consequent upon dose intensification and the genesis of a potent graft-versus-leukemia effect. Increased donor availability coupled with the advent of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has dramatically increased transplant access and consequently allo-SCT is now a key component of the treatment algorithm in both patients with AML in first CR (CR1) and advanced disease. Although transplant related mortality has fallen steadily over recent decades there has been no real progress in reducing the risk of disease relapse which remains the major cause of transplant failure and represents a major area of unmet need. A number of therapeutic approaches with the potential to reduce disease relapse, including advances in induction chemotherapy, the development of novel conditioning regimens and the emergence of the concept of post-transplant maintenance, are currently under development. Furthermore, the use of genetics and measurable residual disease technology in disease assessment has improved the identification of patients who are likely to benefit from an allo-SCT which now represents an increasingly personalized therapy. Future progress in optimizing transplant outcome will be dependent on the successful delivery by the international transplant community of randomized prospective clinical trials which permit examination of current and future transplant therapies with the same degree of rigor as is routinely adopted for non-transplant therapies.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34012445 · DOI · PMC8126705
Mechanisms of Leukemia Immune Evasion and Their Role in Relapse After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Over the last decade, the development of multiple strategies to allow the safe transfer from the donor to the patient of high numbers of partially HLA-incompatible T cells has dramatically reduced the toxicities of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT), but this was not accompanied by a similar positive impact on the incidence of post-transplantation relapse.
- Closing excerpt
- Ultimately, we will review the available treatment options for patients who relapse after haplo-HCT and discuss on how a deeper insight into relapse immunobiology might inform the rational and personalized selection of therapies to improve the largely unsatisfactory clinical outcome of relapsing patients.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)
Over the last decade, the development of multiple strategies to allow the safe transfer from the donor to the patient of high numbers of partially HLA-incompatible T cells has dramatically reduced the toxicities of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT), but this was not accompanied by a similar positive impact on the incidence of post-transplantation relapse. In the present review, we will elaborate on how the unique interplay between HLA-mismatched immune system and malignancy that characterizes haplo-HCT may impact relapse biology, shaping the selection of disease variants that are resistant to the "graft-vs.-leukemia" effect. In particular, we will present current knowledge on genomic loss of HLA, a relapse modality first described in haplo-HCT and accounting for a significant proportion of relapses in this setting, and discuss other more recently identified mechanisms of post-transplantation immune evasion and relapse, including the transcriptional downregulation of HLA class II molecules and the enforcement of inhibitory checkpoints between T cells and leukemia. Ultimately, we will review the available treatment options for patients who relapse after haplo-HCT and discuss on how a deeper insight into relapse immunobiology might inform the rational and personalized selection of therapies to improve the largely unsatisfactory clinical outcome of relapsing patients.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32158444 · DOI · PMC7052328
Strategies for Enhancing and Preserving Anti-leukemia Effects Without Aggravating Graft-Versus-Host Disease [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a curable method for the treatment of hematological malignancies.
- Closing excerpt
- We will also review the approaches, including optimal donor selection and, conditioning regimens, donor lymphocyte infusion, BCR/ABL-specific CTL, and chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells, which have been successfully used in the clinic to enhance and preserve anti-leukemia activity, especially GVL effects, without aggravating GVHD or alleviate GVHD.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (198 words)
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a curable method for the treatment of hematological malignancies. In the past two decades, the establishment of haploidentical transplant modalities make "everyone has a donor" become a reality. However, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and relapse remain the major two causes of death either in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched transplant or haploidentical transplant settings, both of which restrict the improvement of transplant outcomes. Preclinical mice model showed that both donor-derived T cells and natural killer (NK) cells play important role in the pathogenesis of GVHD and the effects of graft-versus-leukemia (GVL). Hence, understanding the immune mechanisms of GVHD and GVL would provide potential strategies for the control of leukemia relapse without aggravating GVHD. The purpose of the current review is to summarize the biology of GVHD and GVL responses in preclinical models and to discuss potential novel therapeutic strategies to reduce the relapse rate after allo-SCT. We will also review the approaches, including optimal donor selection and, conditioning regimens, donor lymphocyte infusion, BCR/ABL-specific CTL, and chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells, which have been successfully used in the clinic to enhance and preserve anti-leukemia activity, especially GVL effects, without aggravating GVHD or alleviate GVHD.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30619371 · DOI · PMC6308132
Progress in reprogramming failed graft-versus-leukemia immunity in acute myeloid leukemia relapse after allogeneic transplantation [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) affects 40-50% of recipients and remains the leading cause of posttransplant mortality; median overall survival is approximately 5 months and 1-year survival is below 20%.
- Closing excerpt
- We integrate the mechanistic rationale and early clinical evidence for each approach, propose a four-pathway treatment algorithm built around relapse-clone HLA typing before DLI, and outline the gaps that must close before cellular therapy enters standard practice.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (259 words)
Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) affects 40-50% of recipients and remains the leading cause of posttransplant mortality; median overall survival is approximately 5 months and 1-year survival is below 20%. Conventional salvage-chemotherapy, immunosuppression withdrawal, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), hypomethylating agents, targeted agents, and second transplantation-benefits a minority and has improved only incrementally over two decades. Relapse in this setting reflects leukemia that has survived an engrafted allogeneic immune system. Documented escape mechanisms include genomic loss of the mismatched human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype, epigenetic downregulation of class II HLA molecules, checkpoint ligand upregulation, microenvironmental suppression, and clonal evolution-each calling for targeted redirection of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) response rather than further nonspecific cytotoxicity. We propose a GVL Failure Framework that organizes posttransplant relapse into three biologically defined categories of immune escape, aligns matched cellular therapies with each, and overlays a separate clinical transplant-eligibility axis that sets the therapeutic goal. Several cellular strategies have matured: autologous and donor-derived chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells targeting CD33, CD123, C-type lectin-like molecule 1 (CLL-1)/CD371, and CD117; armored CAR-T products secreting interleukin-18; CD83-directed CAR-T cells targeting blasts and alloreactive T cells simultaneously; HLA-DRB1-directed CAR-T and chimeric antigen receptor natural killer (CAR-NK) cells exploiting donor-recipient mismatch for leukemia specificity; and off-the-shelf CAR-NK platforms reprogramming innate rather than adaptive allogeneic immunity. We integrate the mechanistic rationale and early clinical evidence for each approach, propose a four-pathway treatment algorithm built around relapse-clone HLA typing before DLI, and outline the gaps that must close before cellular therapy enters standard practice.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42755912 · DOI · PMC13581880
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Graft-versus-leukemia effects of transplantation and donor lymphocytes [5]
- Research article Immunobiology of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [6]
- Research article Natural killer cell receptors: new biology and insights into the graft-versus-leukemia effect [7]
- Research article Haematopoietic cell transplantation as immunotherapy [8]
- Research article Graft-versus-leukemia reactions in allogeneic chimeras [9]
- Research article Molecules and mechanisms of the graft-versus-leukaemia effect [10]
References
- Loke J, Buka R, Craddock C. Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Who, When, and How?. . 2021. PMID 34012445 · DOI · PMC8126705
- Rovatti PE, Gambacorta V, Lorentino F, Ciceri F, Vago L. Mechanisms of Leukemia Immune Evasion and Their Role in Relapse After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. . 2020. PMID 32158444 · DOI · PMC7052328
- Chang YJ, Zhao XY, Huang XJ. Strategies for Enhancing and Preserving Anti-leukemia Effects Without Aggravating Graft-Versus-Host Disease. . 2018. PMID 30619371 · DOI · PMC6308132
- AlJohani NI, Almasari A, Alzahrani Z, Shihata N, Usman B, Albeirouti B. Progress in reprogramming failed graft-versus-leukemia immunity in acute myeloid leukemia relapse after allogeneic transplantation. . 2026. PMID 42755912 · DOI · PMC13581880
- Kolb HJ. Graft-versus-leukemia effects of transplantation and donor lymphocytes. Blood. 2008. PMID 19029455 · DOI
- Welniak LA, Blazar BR, Murphy WJ. Immunobiology of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007. PMID 17129175 · DOI
- Farag SS, Fehniger TA, Ruggeri L, Velardi A, Caligiuri MA. Natural killer cell receptors: new biology and insights into the graft-versus-leukemia effect. Blood. 2002. PMID 12200350 · DOI
- Appelbaum FR. Haematopoietic cell transplantation as immunotherapy. Nature. 2001. PMID 11357147 · DOI
- Kolb HJ, Schmid C, Barrett AJ, Schendel DJ. Graft-versus-leukemia reactions in allogeneic chimeras. Blood. 2004. PMID 12958064 · DOI
- Bleakley M, Riddell SR. Molecules and mechanisms of the graft-versus-leukaemia effect. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004. PMID 15122208 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.