Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Immunology›Graft vs Host Reaction
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Graft vs Host Reaction

Immunology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

An immunological attack mounted by a graft against the host because of histoincompatibility when immunologically competent cells are transplanted to an immunologically incompetent host; the resulting clinical picture is that of gr

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (916 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

An immunological attack mounted by a graft against the host because of histoincompatibility when immunologically competent cells are transplanted to an immunologically incompetent host; the resulting clinical picture is that of graft VS host disease.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Human Leukocyte Antigen Sensitization; HLA Sensitization; Sensitization, HLA.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Transplantation Immunology
Narrower topics
Graft vs Tumor Effect
See also
Graft vs Host Disease

Related concepts

  • Histocompatibility
  • Transplants
  • Host Disease

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 6,836 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Graft vs Host Reaction” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 188 of them (2.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 4,790 records.

Reviews account for 1,189 records (17.4%) and meta-analyses for 2. Randomized controlled trials number 28 (0.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 4,790 records; 2000-2009: 1,219 records; 2010-2019: 639 records; 2020 onward: 188 records4,790through 19991,2192000-20096392010-20191882020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19994,790
2000-20091,219
2010-2019639
2020 onward188
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 17.4 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.4 percentReviews17.4% (1,189)Meta-analyses0.0% (2)Randomized controlled trials0.4% (28)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 6,836 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,18917.4%
Meta-analyses20.0%
Randomized controlled trials280.4%

Method: PubMed query "Graft vs Host Reaction"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in immunology

Immune responses are studied in model organisms, in cells from donors and in patients, and the same pathway can behave differently across these settings. Mouse immune systems differ from human ones in important ways, and blood measurements may not reflect what happens in tissues. Clinical conclusions about immune-mediated disease or immunotherapy come mainly from controlled trials and long-term cohorts. Check the species and tissue studied, whether markers were linked to outcomes patients notice, and the follow-up time.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Who, When, and How?
Loke J, Buka R, Craddock C
2021Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
87cc by
PMID 34012445 · DOI · PMC8126705
Mechanisms of Leukemia Immune Evasion and Their Role in Relapse After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Rovatti PE, Gambacorta V, Lorentino F, Ciceri F, Vago L
2020Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
60cc by
PMID 32158444 · DOI · PMC7052328
Strategies for Enhancing and Preserving Anti-leukemia Effects Without Aggravating Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Chang YJ, Zhao XY, Huang XJ
2018Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
59cc by
PMID 30619371 · DOI · PMC6308132
Progress in reprogramming failed graft-versus-leukemia immunity in acute myeloid leukemia relapse after allogeneic transplantation
AlJohani NI, Almasari A, Alzahrani Z, Shihata N, Usman B, Albeirouti B
2026Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42755912 · DOI · PMC13581880

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Who, When, and How? [1]

Review article Loke J, Buka R, Craddock C · · 2021 · cited 87 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Although the majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with intensive chemotherapy achieve a complete remission (CR), many are destined to relapse if treated with intensive chemotherapy alone.
Closing excerpt
Future progress in optimizing transplant outcome will be dependent on the successful delivery by the international transplant community of randomized prospective clinical trials which permit examination of current and future transplant therapies with the same degree of rigor as is routinely adopted for non-transplant therapies.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (260 words)

Although the majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with intensive chemotherapy achieve a complete remission (CR), many are destined to relapse if treated with intensive chemotherapy alone. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) represents a pivotally important treatment strategy in fit adults with AML because of its augmented anti-leukemic activity consequent upon dose intensification and the genesis of a potent graft-versus-leukemia effect. Increased donor availability coupled with the advent of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has dramatically increased transplant access and consequently allo-SCT is now a key component of the treatment algorithm in both patients with AML in first CR (CR1) and advanced disease. Although transplant related mortality has fallen steadily over recent decades there has been no real progress in reducing the risk of disease relapse which remains the major cause of transplant failure and represents a major area of unmet need. A number of therapeutic approaches with the potential to reduce disease relapse, including advances in induction chemotherapy, the development of novel conditioning regimens and the emergence of the concept of post-transplant maintenance, are currently under development. Furthermore, the use of genetics and measurable residual disease technology in disease assessment has improved the identification of patients who are likely to benefit from an allo-SCT which now represents an increasingly personalized therapy. Future progress in optimizing transplant outcome will be dependent on the successful delivery by the international transplant community of randomized prospective clinical trials which permit examination of current and future transplant therapies with the same degree of rigor as is routinely adopted for non-transplant therapies.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34012445 · DOI · PMC8126705

Mechanisms of Leukemia Immune Evasion and Their Role in Relapse After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation [2]

Review article Rovatti PE, Gambacorta V, Lorentino F, Ciceri F, Vago L · · 2020 · cited 60 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Over the last decade, the development of multiple strategies to allow the safe transfer from the donor to the patient of high numbers of partially HLA-incompatible T cells has dramatically reduced the toxicities of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT), but this was not accompanied by a similar positive impact on the incidence of post-transplantation relapse.
Closing excerpt
Ultimately, we will review the available treatment options for patients who relapse after haplo-HCT and discuss on how a deeper insight into relapse immunobiology might inform the rational and personalized selection of therapies to improve the largely unsatisfactory clinical outcome of relapsing patients.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)

Over the last decade, the development of multiple strategies to allow the safe transfer from the donor to the patient of high numbers of partially HLA-incompatible T cells has dramatically reduced the toxicities of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT), but this was not accompanied by a similar positive impact on the incidence of post-transplantation relapse. In the present review, we will elaborate on how the unique interplay between HLA-mismatched immune system and malignancy that characterizes haplo-HCT may impact relapse biology, shaping the selection of disease variants that are resistant to the "graft-vs.-leukemia" effect. In particular, we will present current knowledge on genomic loss of HLA, a relapse modality first described in haplo-HCT and accounting for a significant proportion of relapses in this setting, and discuss other more recently identified mechanisms of post-transplantation immune evasion and relapse, including the transcriptional downregulation of HLA class II molecules and the enforcement of inhibitory checkpoints between T cells and leukemia. Ultimately, we will review the available treatment options for patients who relapse after haplo-HCT and discuss on how a deeper insight into relapse immunobiology might inform the rational and personalized selection of therapies to improve the largely unsatisfactory clinical outcome of relapsing patients.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32158444 · DOI · PMC7052328

Strategies for Enhancing and Preserving Anti-leukemia Effects Without Aggravating Graft-Versus-Host Disease [3]

Review article Chang YJ, Zhao XY, Huang XJ · · 2018 · cited 59 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a curable method for the treatment of hematological malignancies.
Closing excerpt
We will also review the approaches, including optimal donor selection and, conditioning regimens, donor lymphocyte infusion, BCR/ABL-specific CTL, and chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells, which have been successfully used in the clinic to enhance and preserve anti-leukemia activity, especially GVL effects, without aggravating GVHD or alleviate GVHD.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (198 words)

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a curable method for the treatment of hematological malignancies. In the past two decades, the establishment of haploidentical transplant modalities make "everyone has a donor" become a reality. However, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and relapse remain the major two causes of death either in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched transplant or haploidentical transplant settings, both of which restrict the improvement of transplant outcomes. Preclinical mice model showed that both donor-derived T cells and natural killer (NK) cells play important role in the pathogenesis of GVHD and the effects of graft-versus-leukemia (GVL). Hence, understanding the immune mechanisms of GVHD and GVL would provide potential strategies for the control of leukemia relapse without aggravating GVHD. The purpose of the current review is to summarize the biology of GVHD and GVL responses in preclinical models and to discuss potential novel therapeutic strategies to reduce the relapse rate after allo-SCT. We will also review the approaches, including optimal donor selection and, conditioning regimens, donor lymphocyte infusion, BCR/ABL-specific CTL, and chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells, which have been successfully used in the clinic to enhance and preserve anti-leukemia activity, especially GVL effects, without aggravating GVHD or alleviate GVHD.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30619371 · DOI · PMC6308132

Progress in reprogramming failed graft-versus-leukemia immunity in acute myeloid leukemia relapse after allogeneic transplantation [4]

Review article AlJohani NI, Almasari A, Alzahrani Z, Shihata N, Usman B, Albeirouti B · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) affects 40-50% of recipients and remains the leading cause of posttransplant mortality; median overall survival is approximately 5 months and 1-year survival is below 20%.
Closing excerpt
We integrate the mechanistic rationale and early clinical evidence for each approach, propose a four-pathway treatment algorithm built around relapse-clone HLA typing before DLI, and outline the gaps that must close before cellular therapy enters standard practice.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (259 words)

Relapse of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) affects 40-50% of recipients and remains the leading cause of posttransplant mortality; median overall survival is approximately 5 months and 1-year survival is below 20%. Conventional salvage-chemotherapy, immunosuppression withdrawal, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), hypomethylating agents, targeted agents, and second transplantation-benefits a minority and has improved only incrementally over two decades. Relapse in this setting reflects leukemia that has survived an engrafted allogeneic immune system. Documented escape mechanisms include genomic loss of the mismatched human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotype, epigenetic downregulation of class II HLA molecules, checkpoint ligand upregulation, microenvironmental suppression, and clonal evolution-each calling for targeted redirection of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) response rather than further nonspecific cytotoxicity. We propose a GVL Failure Framework that organizes posttransplant relapse into three biologically defined categories of immune escape, aligns matched cellular therapies with each, and overlays a separate clinical transplant-eligibility axis that sets the therapeutic goal. Several cellular strategies have matured: autologous and donor-derived chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells targeting CD33, CD123, C-type lectin-like molecule 1 (CLL-1)/CD371, and CD117; armored CAR-T products secreting interleukin-18; CD83-directed CAR-T cells targeting blasts and alloreactive T cells simultaneously; HLA-DRB1-directed CAR-T and chimeric antigen receptor natural killer (CAR-NK) cells exploiting donor-recipient mismatch for leukemia specificity; and off-the-shelf CAR-NK platforms reprogramming innate rather than adaptive allogeneic immunity. We integrate the mechanistic rationale and early clinical evidence for each approach, propose a four-pathway treatment algorithm built around relapse-clone HLA typing before DLI, and outline the gaps that must close before cellular therapy enters standard practice.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42755912 · DOI · PMC13581880

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Graft-versus-leukemia effects of transplantation and donor lymphocytes [5]
    Kolb HJ · Blood · 2008 · cited 456 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Immunobiology of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [6]
    Welniak LA, Blazar BR, Murphy WJ · Annu Rev Immunol · 2007 · cited 370 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Natural killer cell receptors: new biology and insights into the graft-versus-leukemia effect [7]
    Farag SS, Fehniger TA, Ruggeri L, Velardi A, Caligiuri MA · Blood · 2002 · cited 350 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Haematopoietic cell transplantation as immunotherapy [8]
    Appelbaum FR · Nature · 2001 · cited 311 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Graft-versus-leukemia reactions in allogeneic chimeras [9]
    Kolb HJ, Schmid C, Barrett AJ, Schendel DJ · Blood · 2004 · cited 292 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Molecules and mechanisms of the graft-versus-leukaemia effect [10]
    Bleakley M, Riddell SR · Nat Rev Cancer · 2004 · cited 288 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Loke J, Buka R, Craddock C. Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Who, When, and How?. . 2021. PMID 34012445 · DOI · PMC8126705
  2. Rovatti PE, Gambacorta V, Lorentino F, Ciceri F, Vago L. Mechanisms of Leukemia Immune Evasion and Their Role in Relapse After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. . 2020. PMID 32158444 · DOI · PMC7052328
  3. Chang YJ, Zhao XY, Huang XJ. Strategies for Enhancing and Preserving Anti-leukemia Effects Without Aggravating Graft-Versus-Host Disease. . 2018. PMID 30619371 · DOI · PMC6308132
  4. AlJohani NI, Almasari A, Alzahrani Z, Shihata N, Usman B, Albeirouti B. Progress in reprogramming failed graft-versus-leukemia immunity in acute myeloid leukemia relapse after allogeneic transplantation. . 2026. PMID 42755912 · DOI · PMC13581880
  5. Kolb HJ. Graft-versus-leukemia effects of transplantation and donor lymphocytes. Blood. 2008. PMID 19029455 · DOI
  6. Welniak LA, Blazar BR, Murphy WJ. Immunobiology of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007. PMID 17129175 · DOI
  7. Farag SS, Fehniger TA, Ruggeri L, Velardi A, Caligiuri MA. Natural killer cell receptors: new biology and insights into the graft-versus-leukemia effect. Blood. 2002. PMID 12200350 · DOI
  8. Appelbaum FR. Haematopoietic cell transplantation as immunotherapy. Nature. 2001. PMID 11357147 · DOI
  9. Kolb HJ, Schmid C, Barrett AJ, Schendel DJ. Graft-versus-leukemia reactions in allogeneic chimeras. Blood. 2004. PMID 12958064 · DOI
  10. Bleakley M, Riddell SR. Molecules and mechanisms of the graft-versus-leukaemia effect. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004. PMID 15122208 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • HistocompatibilityImmunology
  • Graft vs Host DiseaseImmunology
  • AnaphylaxisImmunology
  • Cross ReactionsImmunology
  • Graft SurvivalImmunology
  • Transplantation ToleranceImmunology

All 90 articles in Immunology →

At a glance

6,836
PubMed records on this heading
3%
published since 2020
1,189
review articles
28
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • HistocompatibilityImmunology
  • Graft vs Host DiseaseImmunology
  • AnaphylaxisImmunology
  • Cross ReactionsImmunology
  • Graft SurvivalImmunology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support