Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Cancer and Oncology›Hodgkin Disease
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Hodgkin Disease

Cancer and Oncology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

A malignant disease characterized by progressive enlargement of the lymph nodes, spleen, and general lymphoid tissue.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,186 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A malignant disease characterized by progressive enlargement of the lymph nodes, spleen, and general lymphoid tissue. In the classical variant, giant usually multinucleate Hodgkin's and reed-sternberg cells are present; in the nodular lymphocyte predominant variant, lymphocytic and histiocytic cells are seen.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Disease, Hodgkin; Granuloma, Hodgkin; Hodgkin Granuloma; Granuloma, Hodgkin's; Hodgkin's Granuloma; Granuloma, Hodgkins; Hodgkins Granuloma; Granuloma, Malignant.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Lymphoma
See also
Reed-Sternberg Cells

Related concepts

  • Reed-Sternberg Cells

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 36,890 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Hodgkin Disease” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 2,699 of them (7.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 24,012 records.

Reviews account for 4,100 records (11.1%) and meta-analyses for 126. Randomized controlled trials number 606 (1.6%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 24,012 records; 2000-2009: 4,921 records; 2010-2019: 5,258 records; 2020 onward: 2,699 records24,012through 19994,9212000-20095,2582010-20192,6992020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199924,012
2000-20094,921
2010-20195,258
2020 onward2,699
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 11.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.3 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.6 percentReviews11.1% (4,100)Meta-analyses0.3% (126)Randomized controlled trials1.6% (606)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 36,890 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4,10011.1%
Meta-analyses1260.3%
Randomized controlled trials6061.6%

Method: PubMed query "Hodgkin Disease"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in cancer and oncology

Cancer research spans very different kinds of evidence. Laboratory studies in cell lines and animal models reveal mechanisms but often do not translate to patients. Early-phase trials mainly test safety and dosing, while phase 3 randomized trials and their meta-analyses are the usual basis for treatment conclusions. Outcomes also differ in meaning: tumour shrinkage, progression-free survival and overall survival are not interchangeable, and screening studies can be distorted by lead-time and overdiagnosis. When reading a result, check the cancer type and stage studied, the comparison treatment, and which outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Deficit Accumulation Index and Biological Markers of Aging in Survivors of Childhood Cancer
Williams AM, Mandelblatt JS, Wang M, Dong Q, Armstrong GT, Bhakta N, et al.
2023Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
17cc by
PMID 37983031 · DOI · PMC10660189
Late Cardiac Toxic Effects Associated With Treatment Protocols for Hodgkin Lymphoma in Children
Lo AC, Liu A, Liu Q, Yasui Y, Castellino SM, Kelly KM, et al.
2024Clinical trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
16cc by
PMID 38241048 · DOI · PMC10799264
Follow-up of the GHSG HD16 trial of PET-guided treatment in early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma
Fuchs M, Jacob AS, Kaul H, Kobe C, Kuhnert G, Pabst T, et al.
2024Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
14cc by
PMID 37845285 · DOI · PMC10776396
Epstein-Barr virus orchestrates spatial reorganization and immunomodulation in the classic Hodgkin lymphoma tumor microenvironment
Yeo YY, Qiu H, Bai Y, Zhu B, Chang Y, Iannelli F, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41923627 · DOI · PMC13130692

Deficit Accumulation Index and Biological Markers of Aging in Survivors of Childhood Cancer [1]

Research article Williams AM, Mandelblatt JS, Wang M, Dong Q, Armstrong GT, Bhakta N, et al. · · 2023 · cited 17 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ImportanceSurvivors of childhood cancer experience premature aging compared with community controls.
Closing excerpt
Both the DAI and EAA were effective at identifying aging phenotypes, and either may be used to measure aging and response to interventions targeting aging pathways.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (376 words)

ImportanceSurvivors of childhood cancer experience premature aging compared with community controls. The deficit accumulation index (DAI) uses readily available clinical data to measure physiological age in survivors; however, little data exist on how well deficit accumulation represents underlying biological aging among survivors of cancer.ObjectiveTo examine the associations between the DAI and epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) and mean leukocyte telomere length (LTL).Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study analyzed data from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort, an assessment of survivors of childhood cancer who were treated at St Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee. Data were collected between 2007 and 2016, assayed between 2014 and 2019, and analyzed between 2022 and 2023. Participants were adult survivors who were diagnosed between 1962 and 2012 and who survived 5 years or more from time of diagnosis. The analyses were restricted to survivors with European ancestry, as there were too few survivors with non-European ancestry.ExposuresThe DAI included 44 aging-related items, such as chronic health conditions and functional, psychosocial, and mental well-being. Item responses were summed and divided by the total number of items, resulting in a ratio ranging from 0 to 1. These DAI results were categorized based on reported associations with hospitalization and mortality: low, defined as a DAI less than 0.2; medium, defined as a DAI of 0.2 to less than 0.35; and high, defined as a DAI of 0.35 or higher.Main outcomes and measuresGenome-wide DNA methylation was generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived DNA. The EAA was calculated as the residuals from regressing the Levine epigenetic age on chronological age. The mean LTL was estimated using whole-genome sequencing data.ResultsThis study included 2101 survivors of childhood cancer (1122 males [53.4%]; mean [SD] age, 33.9 [9.1] years; median [IQR] time since diagnosis, 25.1 [18.7-31.9] years) with European ancestry. Compared with survivors in the low DAI group, those in the high DAI group experienced 3.7 more years of EAA (β = 3.66; 95% CI, 2.47-4.85; P Conclusions and relevanceThis cross-sectional study of survivors of childhood cancer showed that the DAI was associated with EAA, suggesting an underlying biological process to the accumulation of deficits. Both the DAI and EAA were effective at identifying aging phenotypes, and either may be used to measure aging and response to interventions targeting aging pathways.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37983031 · DOI · PMC10660189

Late Cardiac Toxic Effects Associated With Treatment Protocols for Hodgkin Lymphoma in Children [2]

Clinical trial Lo AC, Liu A, Liu Q, Yasui Y, Castellino SM, Kelly KM, et al. · · 2024 · cited 16 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ImportanceContemporary North American trials for children with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have decreased radiation therapy (RT) use and increased pharmacologic cardioprotection but also increased the cumulative doxorubicin dose, making overall treatment consequences for late cardiac toxic effects uncertain.
Closing excerpt
These findings suggest that survivorship follow-up guidelines should be refined to align with the risks associated with treatment.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (433 words)

ImportanceContemporary North American trials for children with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have decreased radiation therapy (RT) use and increased pharmacologic cardioprotection but also increased the cumulative doxorubicin dose, making overall treatment consequences for late cardiac toxic effects uncertain.ObjectiveTo estimate the risk of cardiac toxic effects associated with treatments used in modern pediatric HL clinical trials.Design, setting, and participantsFor this cohort study, Fine and Gray models were fitted using survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study who were diagnosed with HL between January 1, 1970, and December 31, 1999, and were followed for a median of 23.5 (range, 5.0-46.3) years. These models were applied to the exposures in the study population to estimate the 30-year cumulative incidence of cardiac disease. The study population comprised patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk HL treated in 4 consecutive Children's Oncology Group clinical trials from September 2002 to October 2022: AHOD0031, AHOD0831, AHOD1331, and S1826. Data analysis was performed from April 2020 to February 2023.ExposuresAll patients received chemotherapy including doxorubicin, and some patients received mediastinal RT, dexrazoxane, or mediastinal RT and dexrazoxane.Main outcomes and measuresEstimated 30-year cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 5 cardiac disease.ResultsThe study cohort comprised 2563 patients, with a median age at diagnosis of 15 (range, 1-22) years. More than half of the patients were male (1357 [52.9%]). All 2563 patients received doxorubicin, 1362 patients (53.1%) received mediastinal RT, and 307 patients (12.0%) received dexrazoxane. Radiation therapy use and the median mean heart dose among patients receiving RT decreased, whereas the planned cumulative dose of doxorubicin and use of dexrazoxane cardioprotection increased. For patients treated at age 15 years, the estimated 30-year cumulative incidence of severe or fatal cardiac disease was 9.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-16.4%) in the AHOD0031 standard treatment group (enrolled 2002-2009), 8.6% (95% CI, 3.8%-14.9%) in the AHOD0831 trial (enrolled 2009-2012), 8.2% (95% CI, 3.6%-14.3%) in the AHOD1331 trial (enrolled 2015-2019), and 6.2% (95% CI, 2.7%-10.9%) in the S1826 trial (enrolled 2019-2022), whereas the expected rate in an untreated population was 5.0% (95% CI, 2.1%-9.3%). Despite the estimated reduction in late cardiac morbidity, the frequency of recommended echocardiographic screening among survivors will increase based on current guidelines.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of sequential HL trials, reductions in the proportion of children receiving mediastinal RT and increases in dexrazoxane use were estimated to offset the increased doxorubicin dose and produce a net reduction in late cardiac disease. Further studies on dexrazoxane are warranted to confirm whether its role in reducing cardiac toxic effects is maintained long term. These findings suggest that survivorship follow-up guidelines should be refined to align with the risks associated with treatment.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38241048 · DOI · PMC10799264

Follow-up of the GHSG HD16 trial of PET-guided treatment in early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma [3]

Randomized controlled trial Fuchs M, Jacob AS, Kaul H, Kobe C, Kuhnert G, Pabst T, et al. · · 2024 · cited 14 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The primary analysis of the GHSG HD16 trial indicated a significant loss of tumor control with PET-guided omission of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).
Closing excerpt
Taken together, CMT should be considered standard treatment for early-stage favorable HL irrespective of the PET-2-result.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (229 words)

The primary analysis of the GHSG HD16 trial indicated a significant loss of tumor control with PET-guided omission of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This analysis reports long-term outcomes. Overall, 1150 patients aged 18-75 years with newly diagnosed early-stage favorable HL were randomized between standard combined-modality treatment (CMT) (2x ABVD followed by PET/CT [PET-2] and 20 Gy involved-field RT) and PET-2-guided treatment omitting RT in case of PET-2 negativity (Deauville score [DS] < 3). The study aimed at excluding inferiority of PET-2-guided treatment and assessing the prognostic impact of PET-2 in patients receiving CMT. At a median follow-up of 64 months, PET-2-negative patients had a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 94.2% after CMT (n = 328) and 86.7% after ABVD alone (n = 300; HR = 2.05 [1.20-3.51]; p = 0.0072). 5-year OS was 98.3% and 98.8%, respectively (p = 0.14); 4/12 documented deaths were caused by second primary malignancies and only one by HL. Among patients assigned to CMT, 5-year PFS was better in PET-2-negative (n = 353; 94.0%) than in PET-2-positive patients (n = 340; 90.3%; p = 0.012). The difference was more pronounced when using DS4 as cut-off (DS 1-3: n = 571; 94.0% vs. DS ≥ 4: n = 122; 83.6%; p < 0.0001). Taken together, CMT should be considered standard treatment for early-stage favorable HL irrespective of the PET-2-result.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37845285 · DOI · PMC10776396

Epstein-Barr virus orchestrates spatial reorganization and immunomodulation in the classic Hodgkin lymphoma tumor microenvironment [4]

Research article Yeo YY, Qiu H, Bai Y, Zhu B, Chang Y, Iannelli F, et al. · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is composed of rare malignant Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells within a T-cell-rich tumor microenvironment (TME).
Closing excerpt
This spatial framework dissects viral-mediated immune evasion in the cHL TME, highlighting potential therapeutic opportunities to target virus-associated T cell dysfunction for precision immunotherapy in virus-associated malignancies.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (148 words)

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is composed of rare malignant Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells within a T-cell-rich tumor microenvironment (TME). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is present in ∼25% of cases, but its contribution to pathogenesis and immunomodulation remains unclear due to technical barriers. Using complementary spatial proteomics and transcriptomics across multi-institutional cohorts, we systematically map key EBV-linked TME reorganization. EBV-positive cHL exhibits distinct immunological features, including memory CD8 T cell enrichment, heightened T cell dysfunction spatially correlated with HRS proximity, and terminally exhausted T cell signatures contrasting with progenitor-exhausted patterns in EBV-negative disease. We identify EBV-encoded LMP1 as a factor in T cell dysfunction through enhanced HRS:CD8 interactions, and its expression level correlates with T cell terminal exhaustion in a distance-dependent manner. This spatial framework dissects viral-mediated immune evasion in the cHL TME, highlighting potential therapeutic opportunities to target virus-associated T cell dysfunction for precision immunotherapy in virus-associated malignancies.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41923627 · DOI · PMC13130692

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Molecular biology of Hodgkin lymphoma [5]
    Weniger MA, Küppers R · Leukemia · 2021 · cited 203 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Hodgkin lymphoma [6]
    Connors JM, Cozen W, Steidl C, Carbone A, Hoppe RT, Flechtner HH, et al. · Nat Rev Dis Primers · 2020 · cited 163 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Tislelizumab: First Approval [7]
    Lee A, Keam SJ · Drugs · 2020 · cited 154 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Hodgkin Lymphoma, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology [8]
    Hoppe RT, Advani RH, Ai WZ, Ambinder RF, Armand P, Bello CM, et al. · J Natl Compr Canc Netw · 2020 · cited 120 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Epstein-Barr virus and its association with disease - a review of relevance to general practice [9]
    Fugl A, Andersen CL · BMC Fam Pract · 2019 · cited 118 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Classical Hodgkin lymphoma [10]
    Brice P, de Kerviler E, Friedberg JW · Lancet · 2021 · cited 115 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Williams AM, Mandelblatt JS, Wang M, Dong Q, Armstrong GT, Bhakta N, et al.. Deficit Accumulation Index and Biological Markers of Aging in Survivors of Childhood Cancer. . 2023. PMID 37983031 · DOI · PMC10660189
  2. Lo AC, Liu A, Liu Q, Yasui Y, Castellino SM, Kelly KM, et al.. Late Cardiac Toxic Effects Associated With Treatment Protocols for Hodgkin Lymphoma in Children. . 2024. PMID 38241048 · DOI · PMC10799264
  3. Fuchs M, Jacob AS, Kaul H, Kobe C, Kuhnert G, Pabst T, et al.. Follow-up of the GHSG HD16 trial of PET-guided treatment in early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma. . 2024. PMID 37845285 · DOI · PMC10776396
  4. Yeo YY, Qiu H, Bai Y, Zhu B, Chang Y, Iannelli F, et al.. Epstein-Barr virus orchestrates spatial reorganization and immunomodulation in the classic Hodgkin lymphoma tumor microenvironment. . 2026. PMID 41923627 · DOI · PMC13130692
  5. Weniger MA, Küppers R. Molecular biology of Hodgkin lymphoma. Leukemia. 2021. PMID 33686198 · DOI · PMC8024192
  6. Connors JM, Cozen W, Steidl C, Carbone A, Hoppe RT, Flechtner HH, et al.. Hodgkin lymphoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020. PMID 32703953 · DOI
  7. Lee A, Keam SJ. Tislelizumab: First Approval. Drugs. 2020. PMID 32185681 · DOI
  8. Hoppe RT, Advani RH, Ai WZ, Ambinder RF, Armand P, Bello CM, et al.. Hodgkin Lymphoma, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020. PMID 32502987 · DOI
  9. Fugl A, Andersen CL. Epstein-Barr virus and its association with disease - a review of relevance to general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2019. PMID 31088382 · DOI · PMC6518816
  10. Brice P, de Kerviler E, Friedberg JW. Classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Lancet. 2021. PMID 33493434 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Sezary SyndromeCancer and Oncology
  • Burkitt LymphomaCancer and Oncology
  • Mycosis FungoidesCancer and Oncology
  • LymphangioleiomyomatosisCancer and Oncology
  • Castleman DiseaseImmunology
  • Immunoblastic LymphadenopathyImmunology

All 107 articles in Cancer and Oncology →

At a glance

36,890
PubMed records on this heading
7%
published since 2020
4,100
review articles
606
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Sezary SyndromeCancer and Oncology
  • Burkitt LymphomaCancer and Oncology
  • Mycosis FungoidesCancer and Oncology
  • LymphangioleiomyomatosisCancer and Oncology
  • Castleman DiseaseImmunology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support