Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Illicit Drugs
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Illicit Drugs

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

Drugs that are manufactured, obtained, or sold illegally.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,095 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Drugs that are manufactured, obtained, or sold illegally. They include prescription drugs obtained or sold without prescription and non-prescription drugs. Illicit drugs are widely distributed, tend to be grossly impure and may cause unexpected toxicity.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Drugs, Illicit; Illicit Drug; Drug, Illicit; Illegal Drug; Drug, Illegal; Illegal Drugs; Drugs, Illegal; Street Drugs.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Narrower topics
Crack Cocaine
See also
Designer Drugs; Substance-Related Disorders

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 15,358 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Illicit Drugs” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 2,827 of them (18.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 5,752 records.

Reviews account for 2,078 records (13.5%) and meta-analyses for 63. Randomized controlled trials number 274 (1.8%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 3,453 records; 2000-2009: 3,326 records; 2010-2019: 5,752 records; 2020 onward: 2,827 records3,453through 19993,3262000-20095,7522010-20192,8272020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19993,453
2000-20093,326
2010-20195,752
2020 onward2,827
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 13.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.8 percentReviews13.5% (2,078)Meta-analyses0.4% (63)Randomized controlled trials1.8% (274)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 15,358 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,07813.5%
Meta-analyses630.4%
Randomized controlled trials2741.8%

Method: PubMed query "Illicit Drugs"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Drugs of abuse hijack a mesolimbic pathway that processes homeostatic need
Tan B, Browne CJ, Nöbauer T, Vaziri A, Friedman JM, Nestler EJ
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
58cc by
PMID 38669575 · DOI · PMC11077477
Molecular Insights and Clinical Outcomes of Drugs of Abuse Adulteration: New Trends and New Psychoactive Substances
Di Trana A, Berardinelli D, Montanari E, Berretta P, Basile G, Huestis MA, et al.
2022Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
31cc by
PMID 36498947 · DOI · PMC9739917
The utilization and delivery of safer smoking practices and services: a narrative synthesis of the literature
Tapper A, Ahern C, Graveline-Long Z, Newberger NG, Hughto JMW
2023Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
28cc by
PMID 37891658 · DOI · PMC10612300
Proportion of Fentanyl Reports in Illicit Drug Seizures and Opioid Mortality
Dahlen A, Lei F, Agyabeng K, Chen R, Johnson CE, Amaro G, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
8cc by
PMID 41543838 · DOI · PMC12811803

Drugs of abuse hijack a mesolimbic pathway that processes homeostatic need [1]

Research article Tan B, Browne CJ, Nöbauer T, Vaziri A, Friedman JM, Nestler EJ · · 2024 · cited 58 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Drugs of abuse are thought to promote addiction in part by "hijacking" brain reward systems, but the underlying mechanisms remain undefined.
Closing excerpt
These findings characterize the dynamic, molecular and circuit basis of a common reward pathway, wherein drugs of abuse interfere with the fulfillment of innate needs.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (129 words)

Drugs of abuse are thought to promote addiction in part by "hijacking" brain reward systems, but the underlying mechanisms remain undefined. Using whole-brain FOS mapping and in vivo single-neuron calcium imaging, we found that drugs of abuse augment dopaminoceptive ensemble activity in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and disorganize overlapping ensemble responses to natural rewards in a cell type-specific manner. Combining FOS-Seq, CRISPR-perturbation, and single-nucleus RNA sequencing, we identified Rheb as a molecular substrate that regulates cell type-specific signal transduction in NAc while enabling drugs to suppress natural reward consumption. Mapping NAc-projecting regions activated by drugs of abuse revealed input-specific effects on natural reward consumption. These findings characterize the dynamic, molecular and circuit basis of a common reward pathway, wherein drugs of abuse interfere with the fulfillment of innate needs.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38669575 · DOI · PMC11077477

Molecular Insights and Clinical Outcomes of Drugs of Abuse Adulteration: New Trends and New Psychoactive Substances [2]

Review article Di Trana A, Berardinelli D, Montanari E, Berretta P, Basile G, Huestis MA, et al. · · 2022 · cited 31 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Adulteration is a well-known practice of drug manufacturers at different stages of drug production.
Closing excerpt
It is essential to constantly monitor adulterants due to their changing availability that may threaten drug consumers' health.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (254 words)

Adulteration is a well-known practice of drug manufacturers at different stages of drug production. The intentional addition of active ingredients to adulterate the primary drug may enhance or mask pharmacological effects or may produce more potent drugs to increase the number of available doses and the dealer's profit. Adulterants found in different drugs change over time in response to different factors. A systematic literature search in PubMed and Scopus databases and official international organizations' websites according to PRISMA guidelines was performed. A total of 724 studies were initially screened, with 145 articles from PubMed and 462 from Scopus excluded according to the criteria described in the Method Section. The remaining 117 records were further assessed for eligibility to exclude articles without sufficient data. Finally, 79 studies were classified as "non-biological" (n = 35) or "biological" (n = 35 case reports; n = 9 case series) according to the samples investigated. Although the seized samples analyses revealed the presence of well-established adulterants such as levamisole for cocaine or paracetamol/acetaminophen for heroin, the reported data disclosed new adulteration practices, such as the use of NPS as cutting agents for classic drugs of abuse and other NPS. For example, heroin adulterated with synthetic cannabinoids or cocaine adulterated with fentanyl/fentalogues raised particular concern. Notably, adulterants play a role in some adverse effects commonly associated with the primary drug, such as levamisole-adulterated cocaine that may induce vasculitis via an autoimmune process. It is essential to constantly monitor adulterants due to their changing availability that may threaten drug consumers' health.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36498947 · DOI · PMC9739917

The utilization and delivery of safer smoking practices and services: a narrative synthesis of the literature [3]

Systematic review Tapper A, Ahern C, Graveline-Long Z, Newberger NG, Hughto JMW · · 2023 · cited 28 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundProviding sterile drug smoking materials to people who use drugs can prevent the acquisition of infectious diseases and reduce overdose risk.
Closing excerpt
and other similar countries, where such practices are being implemented but have not been empirically studied in the literature.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (340 words)

BackgroundProviding sterile drug smoking materials to people who use drugs can prevent the acquisition of infectious diseases and reduce overdose risk. However, there is a lack of understanding of how these practices are being implemented and received by people who use drugs globally.MethodsA systematic review of safer smoking practices was conducted by searching PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase for relevant peer-reviewed, English-language publications from inception or the availability of online manuscripts through December 2022.ResultsOverall, 32 peer-reviewed papers from six countries were included. 30 studies exclusively included people who use drugs as participants (n = 11 people who use drugs; generally, n = 17 people who smoke drugs, n = 2 people who inject drugs). One study included program staff serving people who use drugs, and one study included staff and people who use drugs. Sharing smoking equipment (e.g., pipes) was reported in 25 studies. People who use drugs in several studies reported that pipe sharing occurred for multiple reasons, including wanting to accumulate crack resin and protect themselves from social harms, such as police harassment. Across studies, smoking drugs, as opposed to injecting drugs, were described as a crucial method to reduce the risk of overdose, disease acquisition, and societal harms such as police violence. Ten studies found that when people who use drugs were provided with safer smoking materials, they engaged in fewer risky drug use behaviors (e.g., pipe sharing, using broken pipes) and showed improved health outcomes. However, participants across 11 studies reported barriers to accessing safer smoking services. Solutions to overcoming safer smoking access barriers were described in 17 studies and included utilizing peer workers and providing safer smoking materials to those who asked.ConclusionThis global review found that safer smoking practices are essential forms of harm reduction. International policies must be amended to help increase access to these essential tools. Additional research is also needed to evaluate the efficacy of and access to safer smoking services, particularly in the U.S. and other similar countries, where such practices are being implemented but have not been empirically studied in the literature.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37891658 · DOI · PMC10612300

Proportion of Fentanyl Reports in Illicit Drug Seizures and Opioid Mortality [4]

Research article Dahlen A, Lei F, Agyabeng K, Chen R, Johnson CE, Amaro G, et al. · · 2026 · cited 8 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ImportanceThe monthly opioid overdose death rate in the US has declined by 50% from its peak in the summer of 2023 through fall of 2024, and the factors associated with this decline are not fully understood.
Closing excerpt
Additional contributing factors may include other shifts in the drug supply not captured by fentanyl prevalence in illicit drug seizures, shifts in drug use behavior, and the effect of public health programs, interventions, and policies.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (372 words)

ImportanceThe monthly opioid overdose death rate in the US has declined by 50% from its peak in the summer of 2023 through fall of 2024, and the factors associated with this decline are not fully understood.ObjectiveTo examine the association between the proportion of fentanyl reports in illicit drug seizures and opioid overdose deaths during periods of rising and falling mortality.Design and settingThis secondary analysis of state-month level panel data from the National Forensic Laboratory Information System and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) was conducted from January 2018 to September 2024 and included all 50 US states and Washington, DC. CDC WONDER data were collected from recorded death certificates; National Forensic Laboratory Information System data were obtained from drug reports submitted by forensic laboratories. The data were analyzed from July to August 2025.ExposurePercentage of illicit drug seizures that contained fentanyl or fentanyl-related compounds. Illicit drug seizures were defined as seizures that contained any of the following: fentanyl or fentanyl-related compounds, heroin, methamphetamine, cocaine, and xylazine.Main outcomes and measuresThe monthly count of opioid overdose deaths, given by uniform claim descriptor codes X40 to 44, X60 to 64, X85, and Y10 to Y14, with additional multiple cause of death codes of T40.0 to 4 and T40.6. Death rates were calculated using yearly population estimates from the American Community Survey.ResultsFrom a peak in the summer of 2023 through the fall of 2024, the monthly opioid overdose death rate declined by 50%, from 2.2 to 1.1 per 100 000. This decline was was accompanied by a decline in the fentanyl reports as a proportion of total illicit drug seizures from 28.8% to 23.2%. In a 2-way, fixed-effects model, a 1-percentage point reduction in fentanyl prevalence was associated with 0.018 fewer overdose deaths per 100 000 population per month (95% CI, 0.016-0.019; P Conclusions and relevanceThe study results suggest that current decline in the proportion of fentanyl reports in illicit drug seizures is associated with 9.2% of the total observed decline in mortality. Additional contributing factors may include other shifts in the drug supply not captured by fentanyl prevalence in illicit drug seizures, shifts in drug use behavior, and the effect of public health programs, interventions, and policies.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41543838 · DOI · PMC12811803

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Drug-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and cardiotoxicity [5]
    Varga ZV, Ferdinandy P, Liaudet L, Pacher P · Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol · 2015 · cited 393 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Chemsex behaviours among men who have sex with men: A systematic review of the literature [6]
    Maxwell S, Shahmanesh M, Gafos M · Int J Drug Policy · 2019 · cited 349 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Validity of Timeline Follow-Back for self-reported use of cannabis and other illicit substances--systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
    Hjorthøj CR, Hjorthøj AR, Nordentoft M · Addict Behav · 2012 · cited 284 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article False-positive interferences of common urine drug screen immunoassays: a review [8]
    Saitman A, Park HD, Fitzgerald RL · J Anal Toxicol · 2014 · cited 191 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Frequency of health-care utilization by adults who use illicit drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
    Lewer D, Freer J, King E, Larney S, Degenhardt L, Tweed EJ, et al. · Addiction · 2020 · cited 138 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Health outcomes associated with crack-cocaine use: Systematic review and meta-analyses [10]
    Butler AJ, Rehm J, Fischer B · Drug Alcohol Depend · 2017 · cited 125 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Tan B, Browne CJ, Nöbauer T, Vaziri A, Friedman JM, Nestler EJ. Drugs of abuse hijack a mesolimbic pathway that processes homeostatic need. . 2024. PMID 38669575 · DOI · PMC11077477
  2. Di Trana A, Berardinelli D, Montanari E, Berretta P, Basile G, Huestis MA, et al.. Molecular Insights and Clinical Outcomes of Drugs of Abuse Adulteration: New Trends and New Psychoactive Substances. . 2022. PMID 36498947 · DOI · PMC9739917
  3. Tapper A, Ahern C, Graveline-Long Z, Newberger NG, Hughto JMW. The utilization and delivery of safer smoking practices and services: a narrative synthesis of the literature. . 2023. PMID 37891658 · DOI · PMC10612300
  4. Dahlen A, Lei F, Agyabeng K, Chen R, Johnson CE, Amaro G, et al.. Proportion of Fentanyl Reports in Illicit Drug Seizures and Opioid Mortality. . 2026. PMID 41543838 · DOI · PMC12811803
  5. Varga ZV, Ferdinandy P, Liaudet L, Pacher P. Drug-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and cardiotoxicity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015. PMID 26386112 · DOI · PMC4666974
  6. Maxwell S, Shahmanesh M, Gafos M. Chemsex behaviours among men who have sex with men: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Drug Policy. 2019. PMID 30513473 · DOI
  7. Hjorthøj CR, Hjorthøj AR, Nordentoft M. Validity of Timeline Follow-Back for self-reported use of cannabis and other illicit substances--systematic review and meta-analysis. Addict Behav. 2012. PMID 22143002 · DOI
  8. Saitman A, Park HD, Fitzgerald RL. False-positive interferences of common urine drug screen immunoassays: a review. J Anal Toxicol. 2014. PMID 24986836 · DOI
  9. Lewer D, Freer J, King E, Larney S, Degenhardt L, Tweed EJ, et al.. Frequency of health-care utilization by adults who use illicit drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction. 2020. PMID 31705770 · DOI · PMC7210080
  10. Butler AJ, Rehm J, Fischer B. Health outcomes associated with crack-cocaine use: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017. PMID 28982092 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • ProdrugsDrugs and Chemicals
  • Pharmaceutical PreparationsDrugs and Chemicals
  • Protective AgentsPharmacology
  • Drug CombinationsDrugs and Chemicals
  • Calcium Channel BlockersPharmacology
  • Neuroprotective AgentsPharmacology

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

15,358
PubMed records on this heading
18%
published since 2020
2,078
review articles
274
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • ProdrugsDrugs and Chemicals
  • Pharmaceutical PreparationsDrugs and Chemicals
  • Protective AgentsPharmacology
  • Drug CombinationsDrugs and Chemicals
  • Calcium Channel BlockersPharmacology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support