Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Imipenem
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Imipenem

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Semisynthetic thienamycin that has a wide spectrum of antibacterial activity against gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, including many multiresistant strains.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (807 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Semisynthetic thienamycin that has a wide spectrum of antibacterial activity against gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, including many multiresistant strains. It is stable to beta-lactamases. Clinical studies have demonstrated high efficacy in the treatment of infections of various body systems. Its effectiveness is enhanced when it is administered in combination with cilastatin, a renal dipeptidase inhibitor.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Imipemide; N-Formimidoylthienamycin; N Formimidoylthienamycin; Imipenem, Anhydrous; Anhydrous Imipenem; Imipenem Anhydrous; Anhydrous, Imipenem; MK-0787.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Thienamycins
Narrower topics
Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination

Related concepts

  • Cilastatin

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 4,945 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Imipenem” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 860 of them (17.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,860 records.

Reviews account for 205 records (4.1%) and meta-analyses for 27. Randomized controlled trials number 255 (5.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,860 records; 2000-2009: 1,044 records; 2010-2019: 1,181 records; 2020 onward: 860 records1,860through 19991,0442000-20091,1812010-20198602020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,860
2000-20091,044
2010-20191,181
2020 onward860
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 4.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 5.2 percentReviews4.1% (205)Meta-analyses0.5% (27)Randomized controlled trials5.2% (255)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 4,945 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2054.1%
Meta-analyses270.5%
Randomized controlled trials2555.2%

Method: PubMed query "Imipenem"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Thermo-responsive triple-function nanotransporter for efficient chemo-photothermal therapy of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection
Qing G, Zhao X, Zhao X, Gong N, Chen J, Li X, et al.
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
203cc by
PMID 31551496 · DOI · PMC6760232
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults With Hospital-acquired or Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study)
Titov I, Wunderink RG, Roquilly A, Rodríguez Gonzalez D, David-Wang A, Boucher HW, et al.
2021Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
156cc by
PMID 32785589 · DOI · PMC8662781
A randomized trial of 7-day doripenem versus 10-day imipenem-cilastatin for ventilator-associated pneumonia
Kollef MH, Chastre J, Clavel M, Restrepo MI, Michiels B, Kaniga K, et al.
2012Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
155cc by
PMID 23148736 · DOI · PMC3672596
Porin-Independent Uptake of Small Molecule Antibiotics Facilitated by Escherichia coli Outer Membrane Vesicles
Wu M, Harrower RM, Li Z, Brown AC
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 41042070 · DOI · PMC12699110

Thermo-responsive triple-function nanotransporter for efficient chemo-photothermal therapy of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection [1]

Research article Qing G, Zhao X, Zhao X, Gong N, Chen J, Li X, et al. · · 2019 · cited 203 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
New strategies with high antimicrobial efficacy against multidrug-resistant bacteria are urgently desired.
Closing excerpt
Due to rapid recovery of infected sites and good biosafety we envision a universal antimicrobial platform to fight against multidrug-resistant or extremely drug-resistant bacteria.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (137 words)

New strategies with high antimicrobial efficacy against multidrug-resistant bacteria are urgently desired. Herein, we describe a smart triple-functional nanostructure, namely TRIDENT (Thermo-Responsive-Inspired Drug-Delivery Nano-Transporter), for reliable bacterial eradication. The robust antibacterial effectiveness is attributed to the integrated fluorescence monitoring and synergistic chemo-photothermal killing. We notice that temperature rises generated by near-infrared irradiation did not only melt the nanotransporter via a phase change mechanism, but also irreversibly damaged bacterial membranes to facilitate imipenem permeation, thus interfering with cell wall biosynthesis and eventually leading to rapid bacterial death. Both in vitro and in vivo evidence demonstrate that even low doses of imipenem-encapsulated TRIDENT could eradicate clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, whereas imipenem alone had limited effect. Due to rapid recovery of infected sites and good biosafety we envision a universal antimicrobial platform to fight against multidrug-resistant or extremely drug-resistant bacteria.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31551496 · DOI · PMC6760232

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults With Hospital-acquired or Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study) [2]

Randomized controlled trial Titov I, Wunderink RG, Roquilly A, Rodríguez Gonzalez D, David-Wang A, Boucher HW, et al. · · 2021 · cited 156 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundImipenem combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam has broad antibacterial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens.
Closing excerpt
Clinical trials registrationNCT02493764.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (183 words)

BackgroundImipenem combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam has broad antibacterial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens. We evaluated efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in treating hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP).MethodsThis was a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial. Adults with HABP/VABP were randomized 1:1 to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 500 mg/500 mg/250 mg or piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/500 mg, intravenously every 6 hours for 7-14 days. The primary endpoint was day 28 all-cause mortality in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population (patients who received study therapy, excluding those with only gram-positive cocci at baseline). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response 7-14 days after completing therapy in the MITT population.ResultsOf 537 randomized patients (from 113 hospitals in 27 countries), the MITT population comprised 264 imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 267 piperacillin/tazobactam patients; 48.6% had ventilated HABP/VABP, 47.5% APACHE II score ≥15, 24.7% moderate/severe renal impairment, 42.9% were ≥65 years old, and 66.1% were in the intensive care unit. The most common baseline pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.9%). Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior (P ConclusionsImipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an appropriate treatment option for gram-negative HABP/VABP, including in critically ill, high-risk patients.Clinical trials registrationNCT02493764.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32785589 · DOI · PMC8662781

A randomized trial of 7-day doripenem versus 10-day imipenem-cilastatin for ventilator-associated pneumonia [3]

Randomized controlled trial Kollef MH, Chastre J, Clavel M, Restrepo MI, Michiels B, Kaniga K, et al. · · 2012 · cited 155 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
IntroductionThe aim of this study was to compare a 7-day course of doripenem to a 10-day course of imipenem-cilastatin for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to Gram-negative bacteria.
Closing excerpt
gov: NCT00589693.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (288 words)

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to compare a 7-day course of doripenem to a 10-day course of imipenem-cilastatin for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to Gram-negative bacteria.MethodsThis was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial comparing a fixed 7-day course of doripenem one gram as a four-hour infusion every eight hours with a fixed 10-day course of imipenem-cilastatin one gram as a one-hour infusion every eight hours (April 2008 through June 2011).ResultsThe study was stopped prematurely at the recommendation of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee that was blinded to treatment arm assignment and performed a scheduled review of data which showed signals that were close to the pre-specified stopping limits. The final analyses included 274 randomized patients. The clinical cure rate at the end of therapy (EOT) in the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population was numerically lower for patients in the doripenem arm compared to the imipenem-cilastatin arm (45.6% versus 56.8%; 95% CI, -26.3% to 3.8%). Similarly, the clinical cure rate at EOT was numerically lower for patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa VAP, the most common Gram-negative pathogen, in the doripenem arm compared to the imipenem-cilastatin arm (41.2% versus 60.0%; 95% CI, -57.2 to 19.5). All cause 28-day mortality in the MITT group was numerically greater for patients in the doripenem arm compared to the imipenem-cilastatin arm (21.5% versus 14.8%; 95% CI, -5.0 to 18.5) and for patients with P. aeruginosa VAP (35.3% versus 0.0%; 95% CI, 12.6 to 58.0).ConclusionsAmong patients with microbiologically confirmed late-onset VAP, a fixed 7-day course of doripenem was found to have non-significant higher rates of clinical failure and mortality compared to a fixed 10-day course of imipenem-cilastatin. Consideration should be given to treating patients with VAP for more than seven days to optimize clinical outcome.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00589693.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 23148736 · DOI · PMC3672596

Porin-Independent Uptake of Small Molecule Antibiotics Facilitated by Escherichia coli Outer Membrane Vesicles [4]

Research article Wu M, Harrower RM, Li Z, Brown AC · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The development of novel antimicrobial agents that are effective against Gram-negative bacteria is hindered by the dual membrane cell envelope of these bacteria.
Closing excerpt
Together, our results demonstrate the potential of OMVs as novel antibiotic delivery vehicles to treat antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections by improving drug uptake.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)

The development of novel antimicrobial agents that are effective against Gram-negative bacteria is hindered by the dual membrane cell envelope of these bacteria. To reach their intracellular targets, most small-molecule antibiotics must first pass through protein channels called porins; however, a common mechanism of acquired resistance is decreased expression of these outer membrane proteins. Additionally, parameters such as size, shape, and charge regulate passage of antibiotics through porins, further limiting the design space of novel antibiotic molecules. Inspired by the ability of bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) to deliver cargo to the bacterial cytosol, we hypothesized that encapsulation of small molecule antibiotics within OMVs would improve the activity of the drugs by facilitating uptake. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the ability of imipenem-encapsulated OMVs to inhibit the growth of several Gram-negative bacteria, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) clinical isolates. Our results demonstrated that encapsulation within OMVs significantly lowers the effective concentration of imipenem in several MDR isolates. Using a panel of porin knockout strains, we further demonstrated that this mechanism of antibiotic delivery does not require porin expression. Together, our results demonstrate the potential of OMVs as novel antibiotic delivery vehicles to treat antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections by improving drug uptake.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41042070 · DOI · PMC12699110

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Imipenem-Relebactam and Meropenem-Vaborbactam: Two Novel Carbapenem-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations [5]
    Zhanel GG, Lawrence CK, Adam H, Schweizer F, Zelenitsky S, Zhanel M, et al. · Drugs · 2018 · cited 312 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Two decades of imipenem therapy [6]
    Rodloff AC, Goldstein EJ, Torres A · J Antimicrob Chemother · 2006 · cited 110 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam: A Review in Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections [7]
    Heo YA · Drugs · 2021 · cited 78 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Imipenem/cilastatin. A reappraisal of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy [8]
    Buckley MM, Brogden RN, Barradell LB, Goa KL · Drugs · 1992 · cited 67 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Carbapenems and monobactams: imipenem, meropenem, and aztreonam [9]
    Hellinger WC, Brewer NS · Mayo Clin Proc · 1999 · cited 60 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Resistance to imipenem in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical experience and biochemical mechanisms [10]
    Quinn JP, Studemeister AE, DiVincenzo CA, Lerner SA · Rev Infect Dis · 1988 · cited 42 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Qing G, Zhao X, Zhao X, Gong N, Chen J, Li X, et al.. Thermo-responsive triple-function nanotransporter for efficient chemo-photothermal therapy of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection. . 2019. PMID 31551496 · DOI · PMC6760232
  2. Titov I, Wunderink RG, Roquilly A, Rodríguez Gonzalez D, David-Wang A, Boucher HW, et al.. A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults With Hospital-acquired or Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study). . 2021. PMID 32785589 · DOI · PMC8662781
  3. Kollef MH, Chastre J, Clavel M, Restrepo MI, Michiels B, Kaniga K, et al.. A randomized trial of 7-day doripenem versus 10-day imipenem-cilastatin for ventilator-associated pneumonia. . 2012. PMID 23148736 · DOI · PMC3672596
  4. Wu M, Harrower RM, Li Z, Brown AC. Porin-Independent Uptake of Small Molecule Antibiotics Facilitated by Escherichia coli Outer Membrane Vesicles. . 2026. PMID 41042070 · DOI · PMC12699110
  5. Zhanel GG, Lawrence CK, Adam H, Schweizer F, Zelenitsky S, Zhanel M, et al.. Imipenem-Relebactam and Meropenem-Vaborbactam: Two Novel Carbapenem-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations. Drugs. 2018. PMID 29230684 · DOI
  6. Rodloff AC, Goldstein EJ, Torres A. Two decades of imipenem therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006. PMID 16997845 · DOI
  7. Heo YA. Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam: A Review in Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections. Drugs. 2021. PMID 33630278 · DOI · PMC7905759
  8. Buckley MM, Brogden RN, Barradell LB, Goa KL. Imipenem/cilastatin. A reappraisal of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 1992. PMID 1382937 · DOI
  9. Hellinger WC, Brewer NS. Carbapenems and monobactams: imipenem, meropenem, and aztreonam. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999. PMID 10221472 · DOI
  10. Quinn JP, Studemeister AE, DiVincenzo CA, Lerner SA. Resistance to imipenem in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical experience and biochemical mechanisms. Rev Infect Dis. 1988. PMID 3142013 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • ErtapenemDrugs and Chemicals
  • MeropenemDrugs and Chemicals
  • CeftriaxoneDrugs and Chemicals
  • CeftazidimeDrugs and Chemicals
  • AmoxicillinDrugs and Chemicals
  • AztreonamDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

4,945
PubMed records on this heading
17%
published since 2020
205
review articles
255
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • ErtapenemDrugs and Chemicals
  • MeropenemDrugs and Chemicals
  • CeftriaxoneDrugs and Chemicals
  • CeftazidimeDrugs and Chemicals
  • AmoxicillinDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support