Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (807 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Semisynthetic thienamycin that has a wide spectrum of antibacterial activity against gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, including many multiresistant strains. It is stable to beta-lactamases. Clinical studies have demonstrated high efficacy in the treatment of infections of various body systems. Its effectiveness is enhanced when it is administered in combination with cilastatin, a renal dipeptidase inhibitor.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Imipemide; N-Formimidoylthienamycin; N Formimidoylthienamycin; Imipenem, Anhydrous; Anhydrous Imipenem; Imipenem Anhydrous; Anhydrous, Imipenem; MK-0787.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Thienamycins
- Narrower topics
- Cilastatin, Imipenem Drug Combination
Related concepts
- Cilastatin
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 4,945 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Imipenem” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 860 of them (17.4%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,860 records.
Reviews account for 205 records (4.1%) and meta-analyses for 27. Randomized controlled trials number 255 (5.2%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 1,860 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,044 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,181 |
| 2020 onward | 860 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 205 | 4.1% |
| Meta-analyses | 27 | 0.5% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 255 | 5.2% |
Method: PubMed query "Imipenem"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Thermo-responsive triple-function nanotransporter for efficient chemo-photothermal therapy of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- New strategies with high antimicrobial efficacy against multidrug-resistant bacteria are urgently desired.
- Closing excerpt
- Due to rapid recovery of infected sites and good biosafety we envision a universal antimicrobial platform to fight against multidrug-resistant or extremely drug-resistant bacteria.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (137 words)
New strategies with high antimicrobial efficacy against multidrug-resistant bacteria are urgently desired. Herein, we describe a smart triple-functional nanostructure, namely TRIDENT (Thermo-Responsive-Inspired Drug-Delivery Nano-Transporter), for reliable bacterial eradication. The robust antibacterial effectiveness is attributed to the integrated fluorescence monitoring and synergistic chemo-photothermal killing. We notice that temperature rises generated by near-infrared irradiation did not only melt the nanotransporter via a phase change mechanism, but also irreversibly damaged bacterial membranes to facilitate imipenem permeation, thus interfering with cell wall biosynthesis and eventually leading to rapid bacterial death. Both in vitro and in vivo evidence demonstrate that even low doses of imipenem-encapsulated TRIDENT could eradicate clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, whereas imipenem alone had limited effect. Due to rapid recovery of infected sites and good biosafety we envision a universal antimicrobial platform to fight against multidrug-resistant or extremely drug-resistant bacteria.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31551496 · DOI · PMC6760232
A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults With Hospital-acquired or Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study) [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundImipenem combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam has broad antibacterial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens.
- Closing excerpt
- Clinical trials registrationNCT02493764.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (183 words)
BackgroundImipenem combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam has broad antibacterial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens. We evaluated efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in treating hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP).MethodsThis was a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial. Adults with HABP/VABP were randomized 1:1 to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 500 mg/500 mg/250 mg or piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/500 mg, intravenously every 6 hours for 7-14 days. The primary endpoint was day 28 all-cause mortality in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population (patients who received study therapy, excluding those with only gram-positive cocci at baseline). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response 7-14 days after completing therapy in the MITT population.ResultsOf 537 randomized patients (from 113 hospitals in 27 countries), the MITT population comprised 264 imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 267 piperacillin/tazobactam patients; 48.6% had ventilated HABP/VABP, 47.5% APACHE II score ≥15, 24.7% moderate/severe renal impairment, 42.9% were ≥65 years old, and 66.1% were in the intensive care unit. The most common baseline pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.9%). Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior (P ConclusionsImipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an appropriate treatment option for gram-negative HABP/VABP, including in critically ill, high-risk patients.Clinical trials registrationNCT02493764.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32785589 · DOI · PMC8662781
A randomized trial of 7-day doripenem versus 10-day imipenem-cilastatin for ventilator-associated pneumonia [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- IntroductionThe aim of this study was to compare a 7-day course of doripenem to a 10-day course of imipenem-cilastatin for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to Gram-negative bacteria.
- Closing excerpt
- gov: NCT00589693.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (288 words)
IntroductionThe aim of this study was to compare a 7-day course of doripenem to a 10-day course of imipenem-cilastatin for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to Gram-negative bacteria.MethodsThis was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial comparing a fixed 7-day course of doripenem one gram as a four-hour infusion every eight hours with a fixed 10-day course of imipenem-cilastatin one gram as a one-hour infusion every eight hours (April 2008 through June 2011).ResultsThe study was stopped prematurely at the recommendation of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee that was blinded to treatment arm assignment and performed a scheduled review of data which showed signals that were close to the pre-specified stopping limits. The final analyses included 274 randomized patients. The clinical cure rate at the end of therapy (EOT) in the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population was numerically lower for patients in the doripenem arm compared to the imipenem-cilastatin arm (45.6% versus 56.8%; 95% CI, -26.3% to 3.8%). Similarly, the clinical cure rate at EOT was numerically lower for patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa VAP, the most common Gram-negative pathogen, in the doripenem arm compared to the imipenem-cilastatin arm (41.2% versus 60.0%; 95% CI, -57.2 to 19.5). All cause 28-day mortality in the MITT group was numerically greater for patients in the doripenem arm compared to the imipenem-cilastatin arm (21.5% versus 14.8%; 95% CI, -5.0 to 18.5) and for patients with P. aeruginosa VAP (35.3% versus 0.0%; 95% CI, 12.6 to 58.0).ConclusionsAmong patients with microbiologically confirmed late-onset VAP, a fixed 7-day course of doripenem was found to have non-significant higher rates of clinical failure and mortality compared to a fixed 10-day course of imipenem-cilastatin. Consideration should be given to treating patients with VAP for more than seven days to optimize clinical outcome.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00589693.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 23148736 · DOI · PMC3672596
Porin-Independent Uptake of Small Molecule Antibiotics Facilitated by Escherichia coli Outer Membrane Vesicles [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The development of novel antimicrobial agents that are effective against Gram-negative bacteria is hindered by the dual membrane cell envelope of these bacteria.
- Closing excerpt
- Together, our results demonstrate the potential of OMVs as novel antibiotic delivery vehicles to treat antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections by improving drug uptake.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)
The development of novel antimicrobial agents that are effective against Gram-negative bacteria is hindered by the dual membrane cell envelope of these bacteria. To reach their intracellular targets, most small-molecule antibiotics must first pass through protein channels called porins; however, a common mechanism of acquired resistance is decreased expression of these outer membrane proteins. Additionally, parameters such as size, shape, and charge regulate passage of antibiotics through porins, further limiting the design space of novel antibiotic molecules. Inspired by the ability of bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) to deliver cargo to the bacterial cytosol, we hypothesized that encapsulation of small molecule antibiotics within OMVs would improve the activity of the drugs by facilitating uptake. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the ability of imipenem-encapsulated OMVs to inhibit the growth of several Gram-negative bacteria, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) clinical isolates. Our results demonstrated that encapsulation within OMVs significantly lowers the effective concentration of imipenem in several MDR isolates. Using a panel of porin knockout strains, we further demonstrated that this mechanism of antibiotic delivery does not require porin expression. Together, our results demonstrate the potential of OMVs as novel antibiotic delivery vehicles to treat antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections by improving drug uptake.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41042070 · DOI · PMC12699110
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Imipenem-Relebactam and Meropenem-Vaborbactam: Two Novel Carbapenem-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations [5]
- Research article Two decades of imipenem therapy [6]
- Research article Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam: A Review in Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections [7]
- Research article Imipenem/cilastatin. A reappraisal of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy [8]
- Research article Carbapenems and monobactams: imipenem, meropenem, and aztreonam [9]
- Research article Resistance to imipenem in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical experience and biochemical mechanisms [10]
References
- Qing G, Zhao X, Zhao X, Gong N, Chen J, Li X, et al.. Thermo-responsive triple-function nanotransporter for efficient chemo-photothermal therapy of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection. . 2019. PMID 31551496 · DOI · PMC6760232
- Titov I, Wunderink RG, Roquilly A, Rodríguez Gonzalez D, David-Wang A, Boucher HW, et al.. A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults With Hospital-acquired or Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study). . 2021. PMID 32785589 · DOI · PMC8662781
- Kollef MH, Chastre J, Clavel M, Restrepo MI, Michiels B, Kaniga K, et al.. A randomized trial of 7-day doripenem versus 10-day imipenem-cilastatin for ventilator-associated pneumonia. . 2012. PMID 23148736 · DOI · PMC3672596
- Wu M, Harrower RM, Li Z, Brown AC. Porin-Independent Uptake of Small Molecule Antibiotics Facilitated by Escherichia coli Outer Membrane Vesicles. . 2026. PMID 41042070 · DOI · PMC12699110
- Zhanel GG, Lawrence CK, Adam H, Schweizer F, Zelenitsky S, Zhanel M, et al.. Imipenem-Relebactam and Meropenem-Vaborbactam: Two Novel Carbapenem-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations. Drugs. 2018. PMID 29230684 · DOI
- Rodloff AC, Goldstein EJ, Torres A. Two decades of imipenem therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006. PMID 16997845 · DOI
- Heo YA. Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam: A Review in Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections. Drugs. 2021. PMID 33630278 · DOI · PMC7905759
- Buckley MM, Brogden RN, Barradell LB, Goa KL. Imipenem/cilastatin. A reappraisal of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 1992. PMID 1382937 · DOI
- Hellinger WC, Brewer NS. Carbapenems and monobactams: imipenem, meropenem, and aztreonam. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999. PMID 10221472 · DOI
- Quinn JP, Studemeister AE, DiVincenzo CA, Lerner SA. Resistance to imipenem in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical experience and biochemical mechanisms. Rev Infect Dis. 1988. PMID 3142013 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.