Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,289 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Abnormal outpouching in the wall of intracranial blood vessels. Most common are the saccular (berry) aneurysms located at branch points in circle OF willis at the base of the brain. Vessel rupture results in subarachnoid hemorrhage or intracranial hemorrhages. Giant aneurysms (>2.5 cm in diameter) may compress adjacent structures, including the oculomotor nerve. (From Adams et al., Principles of Neurology, 6th ed, p841)
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Aneurysms, Intracranial; Intracranial Aneurysms; Aneurysm, Intracranial; Cerebral Aneurysm; Aneurysms, Cerebral; Cerebral Aneurysms; Aneurysm, Cerebral; Brain Aneurysm.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Intracranial Arterial Diseases; Aneurysm
Related concepts
- Circle
- Willis
- Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
- Intracranial Hemorrhages
- Oculomotor Nerve
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 35,030 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Intracranial Aneurysm” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 6,997 of them (20.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 12,014 records.
Reviews account for 4,003 records (11.4%) and meta-analyses for 589. Randomized controlled trials number 339 (1.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 12,014 |
| 2000-2009 | 6,022 |
| 2010-2019 | 9,997 |
| 2020 onward | 6,997 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 4,003 | 11.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 589 | 1.7% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 339 | 1.0% |
Method: PubMed query "Intracranial Aneurysm"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in cardiovascular medicine
Cardiovascular medicine has an unusually large body of randomized trials, so the type of outcome matters: hard clinical events such as death, heart attack and stroke carry more weight than changes in blood pressure, cholesterol or imaging markers that only predict risk. Observational studies can show associations but are confounded by age, lifestyle and other illness. Check whether a result is about prevention or treatment, the baseline risk of participants, and the absolute rather than only the relative size of any benefit.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Risk [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ImportanceUnruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) affect 3.
- Closing excerpt
- These results support the MLM's potential to assist physicians and patients in UIA treatment decisions.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (446 words)
ImportanceUnruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) affect 3.2% of the general population, and approximately 85% of subarachnoid hemorrhages result from their rupture. Despite their classification as low risk by prediction tools such as PHASES (population, hypertension, age, size of aneurysm, earlier subarachnoid hemorrhage from another aneurysm, and site of aneurysm) and the Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Study (UCAS), UIAs less than 10 mm are susceptible to rupture.ObjectiveTo develop and externally validate a machine-learning model (MLM) predicting rupture risk of UIAs.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective multicenter prognostic study analyzed UIAs from 4 institutions across 3 continents from January 2003 to November 2022. Each UIA was characterized by 29 clinical and 18 morphological variables. For model development, patients with UIAs were drawn from a large institutional cohort. Statistical analysis was performed from April 2024 to March 2025.ExposureAn MLM based on the Light Gradient Boosting Machine algorithm was trained, and performance was assessed for validation externally.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was aneurysm rupture within 2 years after risk evaluation. Model performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with 95% CIs.ResultsDrawing from 11 579 UIAs from multiple institutions of 8846 patients, there were 2750 patients with 3312 UIAs in the development cohort (median [IQR] age, 65.3 [54.9-73.6] years; 1856 females [67.5%]) and 1153 patients with 1501 UIAs in the external cohort (median [IQR] age, 63.6 [53.9-70.9] years; 828 females [71.8%]), for whom the MLM demonstrated a robust performance in risk estimation. In the development cohort, 71 UIAs (2.1%) ruptured during 8.5 years' median follow-up (IQR, 5.1-11.6 years), and in the external cohort, 48 UIAs (3.2%) ruptured during a median (IQR) follow-up of 5.4 (3.7-8.7) years. With a threshold of 0.52 for the MLM, performance in the development cohort for sensitivity was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.67-0.86); specificity, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.80-0.83); PPV, 0.09 (95% CI, 0.07-0.11); NPV, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00); PLR, 4.23 (95% CI, 3.66-4.89); NLR, 0.28 (95% CI, 0.18-0.42); and AUROC, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.92) and in the external cohort, sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-0.95); specificity, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.67-0.72); PPV, 0.09 (95% CI, 0.07-0.12); NPV, 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00); PLR, 2.94 (95% CI, 2.60-3.33); NLR, 0.15 (95% CI, 0.07-0.34); and AUROC, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.94). The MLM performed consistently in UIAs less than 10 mm (AUROC, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.82-0.94]), suggesting potential complementary value to PHASES and the UCAS.Conclusions and relevanceIn this prognostic study, the MLM consistently identified features of UIAs as significantly associated with rupture across different cohorts. These results support the MLM's potential to assist physicians and patients in UIA treatment decisions.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41632142 · DOI · PMC12728650
Factors influencing immediate post-angiographic occlusion outcomes in intracranial aneurysms treated with the woven endobridge device: a multi-center analysis and predictive model from the WorldWideWEB consortium [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device treats wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms, but occlusion rates vary.
- Closing excerpt
- Careful evaluation of patient demographics and specific aneurysm characteristics may help improve the outcomes of intracranial aneurysms treated with WEB device.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (262 words)
The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device treats wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms, but occlusion rates vary. This study aims to identify factors associated with immediate WEB device occlusion. Data from patients treated with WEB devices across 36 sites were analyzed. Machine learning algorithms and ordinal regression models were developed to predict immediate incomplete occlusion for ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. The study included 1565 patients, with 436 ruptured and 1129 unruptured aneurysms. Immediate complete occlusion was achieved in 38.3% of ruptured and 32.8% of unruptured aneurysms. For ruptured aneurysms, the CatBoost classifier achieved an AUROC of 0.69. Key predictors of incomplete occlusion included pretreatment mRS, aneurysm diameter, and MCA location. Ordinal regression revealed that smoking history (OR: 1.95, p < 0.001), neck diameter (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.50, p < 0.001), and presence of a branch from the aneurysm (OR: 2.06, p = 0.016) were associated with incomplete, while bifurcation aneurysms (OR: 0.55, p = 0.017) were associated with complete immediate occlusion. For unruptured aneurysms, the CatBoost classifier achieved an AUROC of 0.68. Significant predictors of immediate incomplete occlusion included aneurysm neck width, MCA location, and presence of daughter sac. Ordinal regression revealed that smoking history (OR: 1.29, p = 0.032), neck diameter (OR: 1.24, p < 0.001), and presence of a daughter sac (OR: 1.53, p = 0.005) were associated with incomplete, while bifurcation aneurysms (OR: 0.71, p = 0.02) and posterior circulation location (OR: 0.68, p = 0.01) were associated with complete immediate occlusion. Careful evaluation of patient demographics and specific aneurysm characteristics may help improve the outcomes of intracranial aneurysms treated with WEB device.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41326865 · DOI · PMC12669363
Fetal-type posterior communicating artery increases hemodynamic stress in posterior communicating artery bifurcation aneurysms: a CFD-based analysis [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackroundThe flow characteristics of bifurcation aneurysms in the posterior communicating artery (PCOM) have rarely been studied.
- Closing excerpt
- In particular, the presence of an fPCOM has an unfavorable effect on the intra-aneurysmal flow dynamics.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (246 words)
BackroundThe flow characteristics of bifurcation aneurysms in the posterior communicating artery (PCOM) have rarely been studied. The likelihood of a complete PCOM aneurysm occlusion after endovascular treatment is reduced with the presence of a fetal posterior communicating artery (fPCOM). As a result, anatomical variations in PCOM aneurysms represent a major challenge for the endovascular treatment. This study addresses hemodynamic variations in PCOM aneurysms of either fetal or adult type.Methods3D-DSA data of 14 patients with bifurcation aneurysms located in the PCOM junction were collected. Nine patients presented with a fPCOM and five patients an adult PCOM (aPCOM). Patient-specific 3D models containing at least one bifurcation distal the aneurysm in the anterior circulation as well as the PCOM itself were extracted using image-based blood flow simulations. Seven hemodynamic parameters were calculated for all aneurysm models to characterize the intra-aneurysmal blood flow. The PCOM outflow was artificially varied to represent both fPCOM and aPCOM conditions for each model resulting in 28 simulations.ResultsFetal‑type PCOM showed higher intra‑aneurysmal mean velocity (median 0.09 vs. 0.06 m/s), maximum velocity (0.17 vs. 0.14 m/s), averaged wall shear stress (1.67 vs. 1.27 Pa), neck inflow rate (40.9 vs. 22.4 ml/min), and inflow concentration index (0.56 vs. 0.40), with lower pulsatility index (1.73 vs. 1.89). Those differences were significant whereas mean oscillatory shear index did not differ significantly.ConclusionThe presence of anatomical variations affects the hemodynamic parameters of PCOM bifurcation aneurysms. In particular, the presence of an fPCOM has an unfavorable effect on the intra-aneurysmal flow dynamics.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40974399 · DOI · PMC12546534
Comparative outcomes of surpass streamline and evolve flow diverters in intracranial aneurysms: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of location, size, and morphology [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The Surpass flow diverter, including Streamline and Evolve, features a unique design optimized for improved conformability, opening, and wall apposition.
- Closing excerpt
- The surpass Evolve was associated with a lower incidence of major complications.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (335 words)
The Surpass flow diverter, including Streamline and Evolve, features a unique design optimized for improved conformability, opening, and wall apposition. Its unique pore structure allows for deployment across a wide range of arterial diameters, contributing to its high occlusion rates. The current study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of the Surpass Streamline and Evolve in treating intracranial aneurysms, with a focus on location, size, and morphology. A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines, utilizing PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase, from inception to August 1st, 2024. Relevant data were extracted, and data synthesis was performed using STATA v.17. The analysis included 27 studies with 1,826 patients (76.7% female; ages 28-84 years) and 2,006 intracranial aneurysms (1,743 anterior, 222 posterior; 28 blister, 20 dissecting, 116 fusiform, and 1,597 saccular). The pooled complete occlusion rate at the final follow-up was 77%, with no significant differences between anterior (80%) and posterior (64%) circulation aneurysms (P = 0.15) or small (70%) and large/giant (79%) aneurysms (P = 0.36). Morphological analysis revealed that blister, dissecting, saccular, and fusiform aneurysms had 100%, 65%, 55%, and 79% complete occlusion rates, respectively (P < 0.001). Surpass Streamline had 81% complete occlusion success versus 69% for Evolve (P = 0.04). The overall adequate occlusion rate was 90%, with Streamline at 92% and Evolve at 88% (P = 0.35). Higher occlusion rates were observed in posterior aneurysms (100% vs. 92%; P < 0.001). Large/giant aneurysms had a higher rate of adequate occlusion (100% vs. 88%; P = 0.12). Morphological analysis showed that blister and dissecting aneurysms had 100% adequate occlusion, fusiform aneurysms had 75% adequate occlusion, and saccular aneurysms had 96% adequate occlusion (P = 0.04). Mortality, complications and in-stent thrombosis were significantly reduced with Evolve (P = 0.03, 0.001 and 0.000, respectively). Our study indicates the efficacy and safety of the Surpass flow diverter for treating intracranial aneurysms, offering a satisfactory occlusion rate. The surpass Evolve was associated with a lower incidence of major complications.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41563595 · DOI · PMC12823732
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Worldwide Incidence of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage According to Region, Time Period, Blood Pressure, and Smoking Prevalence in the Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [5]
- Research article Procedural Clinical Complications, Case-Fatality Risks, and Risk Factors in Endovascular and Neurosurgical Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [6]
- Research article Risk Factors for Growth of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [7]
- Research article Patient- and Aneurysm-Specific Risk Factors for Intracranial Aneurysm Growth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [8]
- Research article Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Flow-Diverter Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [9]
- Research article Association of Hemodynamic Factors With Intracranial Aneurysm Formation and Rupture: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [10]
References
- Fujimura S, Yanagisawa T, Kudo G, Koshiba T, Suzuki M, Takao H, et al.. Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Risk. . 2025. PMID 41632142 · DOI · PMC12728650
- Essibayi MA, Jabal MS, Jamil H, Salim HA, Musmar B, Adeeb N, et al.. Factors influencing immediate post-angiographic occlusion outcomes in intracranial aneurysms treated with the woven endobridge device: a multi-center analysis and predictive model from the WorldWideWEB consortium. . 2025. PMID 41326865 · DOI · PMC12669363
- Schwab R, Janiszewski R, Fuchs E, Thormann M, Neyazi B, Swiatek VM, et al.. Fetal-type posterior communicating artery increases hemodynamic stress in posterior communicating artery bifurcation aneurysms: a CFD-based analysis. . 2025. PMID 40974399 · DOI · PMC12546534
- Rashidi F, Habibi MA, Sabahi M, Arshadi MR, Mirjnani MS, Javadnia P, et al.. Comparative outcomes of surpass streamline and evolve flow diverters in intracranial aneurysms: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of location, size, and morphology. . 2026. PMID 41563595 · DOI · PMC12823732
- Etminan N, Chang HS, Hackenberg K, de Rooij NK, Vergouwen MDI, Rinkel GJE, et al.. Worldwide Incidence of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage According to Region, Time Period, Blood Pressure, and Smoking Prevalence in the Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2019. PMID 30659573 · DOI · PMC6515606
- Algra AM, Lindgren A, Vergouwen MDI, Greving JP, van der Schaaf IC, van Doormaal TPC, et al.. Procedural Clinical Complications, Case-Fatality Risks, and Risk Factors in Endovascular and Neurosurgical Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2019. PMID 30592482 · DOI · PMC6439725
- Brinjikji W, Zhu YQ, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Murad MH, Wang Z, et al.. Risk Factors for Growth of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016. PMID 26611992 · DOI · PMC7960173
- Backes D, Rinkel GJ, Laban KG, Algra A, Vergouwen MD. Patient- and Aneurysm-Specific Risk Factors for Intracranial Aneurysm Growth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2016. PMID 26906920 · DOI
- Cagnazzo F, di Carlo DT, Cappucci M, Lefevre PH, Costalat V, Perrini P. Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Flow-Diverter Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018. PMID 30049721 · DOI · PMC7655299
- Can A, Du R. Association of Hemodynamic Factors With Intracranial Aneurysm Formation and Rupture: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2016. PMID 26516819 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.