Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Clinical Research›Latent Class Analysis
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Latent Class Analysis

Clinical Research · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A statistical algorithm used to analyze clusters of observed variables by constructing categorical unobserved or latent segment based on weighted analysis and the average probabilities.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (995 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A statistical algorithm used to analyze clusters of observed variables by constructing categorical unobserved or latent segment based on weighted analysis and the average probabilities. Such latent classes are used to infer variables whose relationships are not directly observed. In biomedical research, it is often used to categorize data that allows the determination of symptom clusters.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Latent Class Analyses; Latent Variable Modeling; Latent Variable Modelings; Modeling, Latent Variable; Variable Modeling, Latent; Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis; Latent Class Model; Latent Class Models.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Cluster Analysis; Algorithms

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 5,407 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Latent Class Analysis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 4,694 of them (86.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2020 onward with 4,694 records.

Reviews account for 107 records (2.0%) and meta-analyses for 67. Randomized controlled trials number 75 (1.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 0 records; 2010-2019: 888 records; 2020 onward: 4,694 records0through 199902000-20098882010-20194,6942020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20090
2010-2019888
2020 onward4,694
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 2.0 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.4 percentReviews2.0% (107)Meta-analyses1.2% (67)Randomized controlled trials1.4% (75)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 5,407 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1072.0%
Meta-analyses671.2%
Randomized controlled trials751.4%

Method: PubMed query "Latent Class Analysis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in clinical research

Research methods determine how much a result can be trusted. Randomized trials guard against confounding, systematic reviews and meta-analyses combine many studies, and observational designs are valuable but can show only association. Reporting standards, trial registration and pre-specified outcomes reduce bias. When reading about a method, ask what problem it is designed to solve and which problems it does not solve.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Framework to construct and interpret latent class trajectory modelling
Lennon H, Kelly S, Sperrin M, Buchan I, Cross AJ, Leitzmann M, et al.
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
339cc by
PMID 29982203 · DOI · PMC6042544
COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Discussion on Twitter: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis
Lyu JC, Han EL, Luli GK
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
156cc by
PMID 34115608 · DOI · PMC8244724
Noradrenergic-dependent functions are associated with age-related locus coeruleus signal intensity differences
Liu KY, Kievit RA, Tsvetanov KA, Betts MJ, Düzel E, Rowe JB, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
114cc by
PMID 32249849 · DOI · PMC7136271
Exploratory structural equation modeling and the curse of dimensionality
Le TT, Vermunt JK, Ballhausen N, Van Deun K
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 41814057 · DOI · PMC12979312

Framework to construct and interpret latent class trajectory modelling [1]

Research article Lennon H, Kelly S, Sperrin M, Buchan I, Cross AJ, Leitzmann M, et al. · · 2018 · cited 339 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectivesLatent class trajectory modelling (LCTM) is a relatively new methodology in epidemiology to describe life-course exposures, which simplifies heterogeneous populations into homogeneous patterns or classes.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionWe propose a framework to construct and select a 'core' LCTM, which will facilitate generalisability of results in future studies.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (268 words)

ObjectivesLatent class trajectory modelling (LCTM) is a relatively new methodology in epidemiology to describe life-course exposures, which simplifies heterogeneous populations into homogeneous patterns or classes. However, for a given dataset, it is possible to derive scores of different models based on number of classes, model structure and trajectory property. Here, we rationalise a systematic framework to derive a 'core' favoured model.MethodsWe developed an eight-step framework: step 1: a scoping model; step 2: refining the number of classes; step 3: refining model structure (from fixed-effects through to a flexible random-effect specification); step 4: model adequacy assessment; step 5: graphical presentations; step 6: use of additional discrimination tools ('degree of separation'; Elsensohn's envelope of residual plots); step 7: clinical characterisation and plausibility; and step 8: sensitivity analysis. We illustrated these steps using data from the NIH-AARP cohort of repeated determinations of body mass index (BMI) at baseline (mean age: 62.5 years), and BMI derived by weight recall at ages 18, 35 and 50 years.ResultsFrom 288 993 participants, we derived a five-class model for each gender (men: 177 455; women: 111 538). From seven model structures, the favoured model was a proportional random quadratic structure (model F). Favourable properties were also noted for the unrestricted random quadratic structure (model G). However, class proportions varied considerably by model structure-concordance between models F and G were moderate (Cohen κ: men, 0.57; women, 0.65) but poor with other models. Model adequacy assessments, evaluations using discrimination tools, clinical plausibility and sensitivity analyses supported our model selection.ConclusionWe propose a framework to construct and select a 'core' LCTM, which will facilitate generalisability of results in future studies.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29982203 · DOI · PMC6042544

COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Discussion on Twitter: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis [2]

Research article Lyu JC, Han EL, Luli GK · · 2021 · cited 156 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundVaccination is a cornerstone of the prevention of communicable infectious diseases; however, vaccines have traditionally met with public fear and hesitancy, and COVID-19 vaccines are no exception.
Closing excerpt
The increasingly positive sentiment around COVID-19 vaccines and the dominant emotion of trust shown in the social media discussion may imply higher acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines compared with previous vaccines.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (393 words)

BackgroundVaccination is a cornerstone of the prevention of communicable infectious diseases; however, vaccines have traditionally met with public fear and hesitancy, and COVID-19 vaccines are no exception. Social media use has been demonstrated to play a role in the low acceptance of vaccines.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to identify the topics and sentiments in the public COVID-19 vaccine-related discussion on social media and discern the salient changes in topics and sentiments over time to better understand the public perceptions, concerns, and emotions that may influence the achievement of herd immunity goals.MethodsTweets were downloaded from a large-scale COVID-19 Twitter chatter data set from March 11, 2020, the day the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic, to January 31, 2021. We used R software to clean the tweets and retain tweets that contained the keywords vaccination, vaccinations, vaccine, vaccines, immunization, vaccinate, and vaccinated. The final data set included in the analysis consisted of 1,499,421 unique tweets from 583,499 different users. We used R to perform latent Dirichlet allocation for topic modeling as well as sentiment and emotion analysis using the National Research Council of Canada Emotion Lexicon.ResultsTopic modeling of tweets related to COVID-19 vaccines yielded 16 topics, which were grouped into 5 overarching themes. Opinions about vaccination (227,840/1,499,421 tweets, 15.2%) was the most tweeted topic and remained a highly discussed topic during the majority of the period of our examination. Vaccine progress around the world became the most discussed topic around August 11, 2020, when Russia approved the world's first COVID-19 vaccine. With the advancement of vaccine administration, the topic of instruction on getting vaccines gradually became more salient and became the most discussed topic after the first week of January 2021. Weekly mean sentiment scores showed that despite fluctuations, the sentiment was increasingly positive in general. Emotion analysis further showed that trust was the most predominant emotion, followed by anticipation, fear, sadness, etc. The trust emotion reached its peak on November 9, 2020, when Pfizer announced that its vaccine is 90% effective.ConclusionsPublic COVID-19 vaccine-related discussion on Twitter was largely driven by major events about COVID-19 vaccines and mirrored the active news topics in mainstream media. The discussion also demonstrated a global perspective. The increasingly positive sentiment around COVID-19 vaccines and the dominant emotion of trust shown in the social media discussion may imply higher acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines compared with previous vaccines.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34115608 · DOI · PMC8244724

Noradrenergic-dependent functions are associated with age-related locus coeruleus signal intensity differences [3]

Research article Liu KY, Kievit RA, Tsvetanov KA, Betts MJ, Düzel E, Rowe JB, et al. · · 2020 · cited 114 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The locus coeruleus (LC), the origin of noradrenergic modulation of cognitive and behavioral function, may play an important role healthy ageing and in neurodegenerative conditions.
Closing excerpt
Our findings support the concept that age-related reduction of LC structural integrity is associated with impaired cognitive and behavioral function.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (146 words)

The locus coeruleus (LC), the origin of noradrenergic modulation of cognitive and behavioral function, may play an important role healthy ageing and in neurodegenerative conditions. We investigated the functional significance of age-related differences in mean normalized LC signal intensity values (LC-CR) in magnetization-transfer (MT) images from the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) cohort - an open-access, population-based dataset. Using structural equation modelling, we tested the pre-registered hypothesis that putatively noradrenergic (NA)-dependent functions would be more strongly associated with LC-CR in older versus younger adults. A unidimensional model (within which LC-CR related to a single factor representing all cognitive and behavioral measures) was a better fit with the data than the a priori two-factor model (within which LC-CR related to separate NA-dependent and NA-independent factors). Our findings support the concept that age-related reduction of LC structural integrity is associated with impaired cognitive and behavioral function.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32249849 · DOI · PMC7136271

Exploratory structural equation modeling and the curse of dimensionality [4]

Research article Le TT, Vermunt JK, Ballhausen N, Van Deun K · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The next-generation approach to research in the behavioral sciences is based on intensive collections of data and complex models characterized by many parameters for a limited sample size.
Closing excerpt
com/trale97/regularizedESEM .
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (188 words)

The next-generation approach to research in the behavioral sciences is based on intensive collections of data and complex models characterized by many parameters for a limited sample size. This introduces new challenges for traditional latent-variable methods, as they are found to fail or yield unstable solutions when the number of variables is large relative to the sample size. To tackle this issue, we propose a two-stage regularized approach for exploratory structural equation modeling. In the first stage, we introduce a novel (exploratory) approximate factor analysis technique that not only estimates the measurement model but also the factor scores; indeterminacy of the measurement model is addressed by imposing simple structure through regularizing techniques (LASSO penalty and cardinality constraint). The factor scores can then be used to estimate the structural model in the second stage. An extensive simulation shows that the proposed method outperforms other approaches in recovering the underlying simple structure of the measurement model in both low-dimension high-sample-size and high-dimension low-sample-size settings. The use of the method is demonstrated on two empirical datasets. An implementation of the proposed method in the R software is publicly available: https://github.com/trale97/regularizedESEM .

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41814057 · DOI · PMC12979312

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Practitioner's Guide to Latent Class Analysis: Methodological Considerations and Common Pitfalls [5]
    Sinha P, Calfee CS, Delucchi KL · Crit Care Med · 2021 · cited 882 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The use of latent class analysis for identifying subtypes of depression: A systematic review [6]
    Ulbricht CM, Chrysanthopoulou SA, Levin L, Lapane KL · Psychiatry Res · 2018 · cited 96 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Model Setting and Interpretation of Results in Research Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Checklist with Guiding Questions for Reporting [7]
    Kang H, Ahn JW · Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) · 2021 · cited 81 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Reinforcement sensitivity, depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis and meta-analytic structural equation model [8]
    Katz BA, Matanky K, Aviram G, Yovel I · Clin Psychol Rev · 2020 · cited 61 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A systematic review of structural equation modelling in nursing research [9]
    Sharif SP, Mostafiz I, Guptan V · Nurse Res · 2019 · cited 27 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The happy personality revisited: Re-examining associations between Big Five personality traits and subjective well-being using meta-analytic structural equation modeling [10]
    Busseri MA, Erb EM · J Pers · 2024 · cited 23 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Lennon H, Kelly S, Sperrin M, Buchan I, Cross AJ, Leitzmann M, et al.. Framework to construct and interpret latent class trajectory modelling. . 2018. PMID 29982203 · DOI · PMC6042544
  2. Lyu JC, Han EL, Luli GK. COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Discussion on Twitter: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis. . 2021. PMID 34115608 · DOI · PMC8244724
  3. Liu KY, Kievit RA, Tsvetanov KA, Betts MJ, Düzel E, Rowe JB, et al.. Noradrenergic-dependent functions are associated with age-related locus coeruleus signal intensity differences. . 2020. PMID 32249849 · DOI · PMC7136271
  4. Le TT, Vermunt JK, Ballhausen N, Van Deun K. Exploratory structural equation modeling and the curse of dimensionality. . 2026. PMID 41814057 · DOI · PMC12979312
  5. Sinha P, Calfee CS, Delucchi KL. Practitioner's Guide to Latent Class Analysis: Methodological Considerations and Common Pitfalls. Crit Care Med. 2021. PMID 33165028 · DOI · PMC7746621
  6. Ulbricht CM, Chrysanthopoulou SA, Levin L, Lapane KL. The use of latent class analysis for identifying subtypes of depression: A systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 2018. PMID 29605104 · DOI · PMC6345275
  7. Kang H, Ahn JW. Model Setting and Interpretation of Results in Research Using Structural Equation Modeling: A Checklist with Guiding Questions for Reporting. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2021. PMID 34144201 · DOI
  8. Katz BA, Matanky K, Aviram G, Yovel I. Reinforcement sensitivity, depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis and meta-analytic structural equation model. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020. PMID 32179341 · DOI
  9. Sharif SP, Mostafiz I, Guptan V. A systematic review of structural equation modelling in nursing research. Nurse Res. 2019. PMID 30207432 · DOI
  10. Busseri MA, Erb EM. The happy personality revisited: Re-examining associations between Big Five personality traits and subjective well-being using meta-analytic structural equation modeling. J Pers. 2024. PMID 37462061 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Discriminant AnalysisClinical Research
  • Multivariate AnalysisClinical Research
  • Survival AnalysisClinical Research
  • Cluster AnalysisClinical Research
  • Regression AnalysisClinical Research
  • Linear ModelsClinical Research

All 98 articles in Clinical Research →

At a glance

5,407
PubMed records on this heading
87%
published since 2020
107
review articles
75
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Discriminant AnalysisClinical Research
  • Multivariate AnalysisClinical Research
  • Survival AnalysisClinical Research
  • Cluster AnalysisClinical Research
  • Regression AnalysisClinical Research

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support