Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Cancer and Oncology›Leukemia
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Leukemia

Cancer and Oncology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 3 min read

A progressive, malignant disease of the blood-forming organs, characterized by distorted proliferation and development of leukocytes and their precursors in the blood and bone marrow.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (576 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A progressive, malignant disease of the blood-forming organs, characterized by distorted proliferation and development of leukocytes and their precursors in the blood and bone marrow. Leukemias were originally termed acute or chronic based on life expectancy but now are classified according to cellular maturity. Acute leukemias consist of predominately immature cells; chronic leukemias are composed of more mature cells. (From The Merck Manual, 2006)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Leukemias; Leucocythaemia; Leucocythaemias; Leucocythemia; Leucocythemias.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Neoplasms by Histologic Type; Hematologic Diseases
Narrower topics
Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm; Enzootic Bovine Leukosis; Leukemia, Experimental; Leukemia, Feline; Leukemia, Hairy Cell; Leukemia, Lymphoid; Leukemia, Mast-Cell; Leukemia, Myeloid; Leukemia, Plasma Cell; Leukemia, Radiation-Induced
See also
Leukemic Infiltration

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 270,380 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Leukemia” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 38,381 of them (14.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 128,661 records.

Reviews account for 30,385 records (11.2%) and meta-analyses for 1,052. Randomized controlled trials number 3,685 (1.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 128,661 records; 2000-2009: 45,740 records; 2010-2019: 57,598 records; 2020 onward: 38,381 records128,661through 199945,7402000-200957,5982010-201938,3812020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999128,661
2000-200945,740
2010-201957,598
2020 onward38,381
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 11.2 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.4 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 1.4 percentReviews11.2% (30,385)Meta-analyses0.4% (1,052)Randomized controlled trials1.4% (3,685)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 270,380 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews30,38511.2%
Meta-analyses1,0520.4%
Randomized controlled trials3,6851.4%

Method: PubMed query "Leukemia"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in cancer and oncology

Cancer research spans very different kinds of evidence. Laboratory studies in cell lines and animal models reveal mechanisms but often do not translate to patients. Early-phase trials mainly test safety and dosing, while phase 3 randomized trials and their meta-analyses are the usual basis for treatment conclusions. Outcomes also differ in meaning: tumour shrinkage, progression-free survival and overall survival are not interchangeable, and screening studies can be distorted by lead-time and overdiagnosis. When reading a result, check the cancer type and stage studied, the comparison treatment, and which outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Optimizing venetoclax duration with hypomethylating agents for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: impact on response and survival
Ginosyan AA, Ashouri K, Cheng J, Ford L, Baya M, Humayun L, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 42734838 · DOI · PMC13574922
Five-year follow-up of OPTIC: long-term efficacy, safety, and mutation analyses of ponatinib in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia from a randomized phase 2 trial
Kantarjian H, Deininger M, Apperley JF, Arthur CK, Chuah C, Hochhaus A, et al.
2026Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 42498834 · DOI · PMC13506327
Targeting oncogenic FLT3 uncovers a ferroptosis vulnerability through selenocysteine recoding in acute myeloid leukaemia
Li M, Zhu Y, Kageyama Y, Furudate K, Kitano A, Tan T, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42576015 · DOI · PMC13457094

Optimizing venetoclax duration with hypomethylating agents for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: impact on response and survival [1]

Research article Ginosyan AA, Ashouri K, Cheng J, Ford L, Baya M, Humayun L, et al. · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The addition of venetoclax to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is standard for older adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Closing excerpt
These findings support further prospective evaluation of reduced VEN durations in this population.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (229 words)

The addition of venetoclax to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is standard for older adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, prolonged venetoclax (VEN) exposure can cause cytopenias and infections, raising questions about optimal duration. We conducted a single‑center retrospective study of 102 patients treated between 2018 and 2025 with azacitidine or decitabine plus VEN administered for 14 (n = 22), 21 (n = 48), or 28 (n = 32) days per 28‑day cycle. Baseline cytogenetic and molecular profiling, responses by 2022/2024 ELN criteria, measurable residual disease (MRD), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), disease‑free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using competing‑risks regression and Cox models. Median age was 68 years and patients received a median of 4 cycles. Composite remission (CR/CRi/CRh/MLFS) was 66.7%, with MRD negativity in 75.0% of responders. Remission and MRD negativity rates did not differ significantly across VEN‑duration cohorts. Median OS and DFS were 17.3 and 12.3 months, respectively, with no significant differences in OS, DFS, and CIR between 14‑, 21‑, and 28‑day cohorts. Grade ≥ 3 cytopenias and transfusion independence rates also did not differ significantly. In this cohort, shortening VEN exposure to 14 or 21 days did not show a significant difference in response, survival, relapse risk, and toxicity profiles relative to a 28‑day schedule in our cohort. These findings support further prospective evaluation of reduced VEN durations in this population.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42734838 · DOI · PMC13574922

Five-year follow-up of OPTIC: long-term efficacy, safety, and mutation analyses of ponatinib in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia from a randomized phase 2 trial [2]

Randomized controlled trial Kantarjian H, Deininger M, Apperley JF, Arthur CK, Chuah C, Hochhaus A, et al. · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The primary analysis of the phase 2 OPTIC trial (NCT02467270) demonstrated optimal benefit:risk with response-based ponatinib dosing (45 mg once daily (QD) reduced to 15 mg QD) upon achieving ≤1% BCR::ABL1IS in patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant or T315I-positive chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML).
Closing excerpt
These findings support long-term clinical benefit of response-based ponatinib dosing in third-line CP-CML, especially in patients with the T315I mutation.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (201 words)

The primary analysis of the phase 2 OPTIC trial (NCT02467270) demonstrated optimal benefit:risk with response-based ponatinib dosing (45 mg once daily (QD) reduced to 15 mg QD) upon achieving ≤1% BCR::ABL1IS in patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant or T315I-positive chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). Here, we report 5-year long-term outcomes. Overall, 283 patients were randomized to 45-mg, 30-mg, or 15-mg QD starting doses (n = 94, 95, and 94, respectively), with dose reduction to 15 mg QD upon response in the 45-mg and 30-mg cohorts. At data cutoff, 61 patients remained on trial. Median follow-up time was 75-78 months. By 5 years, 60%, 41%, and 40% of patients in the 45-mg, 30-mg, and 15-mg cohorts, respectively, achieved ≤1% BCR::ABL1IS. Five-year progression-free survival rates were 63%, 57%, and 60%, respectively, by cohort; overall survival rates exceeded 80%. In patients with a T315I mutation, 5-year rates of ≤1% BCR::ABL1IS, PFS, and OS were highest in the 45-mg cohort. Exposure-adjusted rates of adjudicated arterial occlusive events were 4.1, 3.8, and 2.0 patients per 100 patient-years, respectively, by cohort; results were comparable in T315I-positive patients. These findings support long-term clinical benefit of response-based ponatinib dosing in third-line CP-CML, especially in patients with the T315I mutation.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42498834 · DOI · PMC13506327

Targeting oncogenic FLT3 uncovers a ferroptosis vulnerability through selenocysteine recoding in acute myeloid leukaemia [3]

Research article Li M, Zhu Y, Kageyama Y, Furudate K, Kitano A, Tan T, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of cell death driven by lipid peroxidation, has emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy for therapy-resistant cancers.
Closing excerpt
This study highlights ferroptosis as a vulnerability in FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukaemia and suggests that high vitamin E intake may compromise tyrosine kinase inhibitor efficacy partly by suppressing ferroptosis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (146 words)

Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of cell death driven by lipid peroxidation, has emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy for therapy-resistant cancers. Glutathione peroxidase 4 and the selenoprotein biosynthesis pathway essential for its translation are key regulators of ferroptosis but lack effective therapeutic targeting. In a drug screening using a selenoprotein translation reporter, here we identify FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors as suppressors of selenoprotein translation that induce ferroptosis in FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukaemia. Mechanistically, FLT3 inhibition disrupts selenocysteine recoding, in which a UGA stop codon is recoded as selenocysteine via the SECIS element and associated binding proteins. Notably, the antileukemic efficacy of the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib was markedly reduced by dietary vitamin E, which attenuated ferroptosis. This study highlights ferroptosis as a vulnerability in FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukaemia and suggests that high vitamin E intake may compromise tyrosine kinase inhibitor efficacy partly by suppressing ferroptosis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42576015 · DOI · PMC13457094

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Association of Measurable Residual Disease With Survival Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [4]
    Short NJ, Zhou S, Fu C, Berry DA, Walter RB, Freeman SD, et al. · JAMA Oncol · 2020 · cited 312 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article CT Scans and Cancer Risks: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis [5]
    Cao CF, Ma KL, Shan H, Liu TF, Zhao SQ, Wan Y, et al. · BMC Cancer · 2022 · cited 123 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Association between Outdoor Air Pollution and Childhood Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis [6]
    Filippini T, Hatch EE, Rothman KJ, Heck JE, Park AS, Crippa A, et al. · Environ Health Perspect · 2019 · cited 112 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Ultra-processed food consumption and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
    Isaksen IM, Dankel SN · Clin Nutr · 2023 · cited 101 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Therapy for children and adults with mixed phenotype acute leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis [8]
    Maruffi M, Sposto R, Oberley MJ, Kysh L, Orgel E · Leukemia · 2018 · cited 93 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of minimal residual disease as a prognostic indicator in adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia [9]
    Bassan R, Brüggemann M, Radcliffe HS, Hartfield E, Kreuzbauer G, Wetten S · Haematologica · 2019 · cited 80 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Ginosyan AA, Ashouri K, Cheng J, Ford L, Baya M, Humayun L, et al.. Optimizing venetoclax duration with hypomethylating agents for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: impact on response and survival. . 2026. PMID 42734838 · DOI · PMC13574922
  2. Kantarjian H, Deininger M, Apperley JF, Arthur CK, Chuah C, Hochhaus A, et al.. Five-year follow-up of OPTIC: long-term efficacy, safety, and mutation analyses of ponatinib in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia from a randomized phase 2 trial. . 2026. PMID 42498834 · DOI · PMC13506327
  3. Li M, Zhu Y, Kageyama Y, Furudate K, Kitano A, Tan T, et al.. Targeting oncogenic FLT3 uncovers a ferroptosis vulnerability through selenocysteine recoding in acute myeloid leukaemia. . 2026. PMID 42576015 · DOI · PMC13457094
  4. Short NJ, Zhou S, Fu C, Berry DA, Walter RB, Freeman SD, et al.. Association of Measurable Residual Disease With Survival Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2020. PMID 33030517 · DOI · PMC7545346
  5. Cao CF, Ma KL, Shan H, Liu TF, Zhao SQ, Wan Y, et al.. CT Scans and Cancer Risks: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2022. PMID 36451138 · DOI · PMC9710150
  6. Filippini T, Hatch EE, Rothman KJ, Heck JE, Park AS, Crippa A, et al.. Association between Outdoor Air Pollution and Childhood Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2019. PMID 31017485 · DOI · PMC6785230
  7. Isaksen IM, Dankel SN. Ultra-processed food consumption and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2023. PMID 37087831 · DOI
  8. Maruffi M, Sposto R, Oberley MJ, Kysh L, Orgel E. Therapy for children and adults with mixed phenotype acute leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Leukemia. 2018. PMID 29550836 · DOI · PMC7508489
  9. Bassan R, Brüggemann M, Radcliffe HS, Hartfield E, Kreuzbauer G, Wetten S. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of minimal residual disease as a prognostic indicator in adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2019. PMID 30890593 · DOI · PMC6886415

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Avian LeukosisCancer and Oncology
  • Blast CrisisCancer and Oncology
  • Burkitt LymphomaCancer and Oncology
  • Jurkat CellsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Philadelphia ChromosomeGenetics and Genomics
  • Adenocarcinoma in SituCancer and Oncology

All 107 articles in Cancer and Oncology →

At a glance

270,380
PubMed records on this heading
14%
published since 2020
30,385
review articles
3,685
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Avian LeukosisCancer and Oncology
  • Blast CrisisCancer and Oncology
  • Burkitt LymphomaCancer and Oncology
  • Jurkat CellsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Philadelphia ChromosomeGenetics and Genomics

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support