Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Clinical Research›Longitudinal Studies
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Longitudinal Studies

Clinical Research · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Studies in which variables relating to an individual or group of individuals are assessed over a period of time.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (789 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Studies in which variables relating to an individual or group of individuals are assessed over a period of time.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Longitudinal Study; Studies, Longitudinal; Study, Longitudinal; Longitudinal Survey; Longitudinal Surveys; Survey, Longitudinal; Surveys, Longitudinal; Bogalusa Heart Study.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Cohort Studies
Narrower topics
Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging; National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 206,221 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Longitudinal Studies” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 69,355 of them (33.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 80,658 records.

Reviews account for 5,351 records (2.6%) and meta-analyses for 1,103. Randomized controlled trials number 6,316 (3.1%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 22,625 records; 2000-2009: 33,583 records; 2010-2019: 80,658 records; 2020 onward: 69,355 records22,625through 199933,5832000-200980,6582010-201969,3552020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199922,625
2000-200933,583
2010-201980,658
2020 onward69,355
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 2.6 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 3.1 percentReviews2.6% (5,351)Meta-analyses0.5% (1,103)Randomized controlled trials3.1% (6,316)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 206,221 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews5,3512.6%
Meta-analyses1,1030.5%
Randomized controlled trials6,3163.1%

Method: PubMed query "Longitudinal Studies"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in clinical research

Research methods determine how much a result can be trusted. Randomized trials guard against confounding, systematic reviews and meta-analyses combine many studies, and observational designs are valuable but can show only association. Reporting standards, trial registration and pre-specified outcomes reduce bias. When reading about a method, ask what problem it is designed to solve and which problems it does not solve.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Adjusting for unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized longitudinal studies: a methodological review
Streeter AJ, Lin NX, Crathorne L, Haasova M, Hyde C, Melzer D, et al.
2017Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
107cc by
PMID 28460857 · DOI · PMC5589113
Erythrocyte long-chain omega-3 fatty acid levels are inversely associated with mortality and with incident cardiovascular disease: The Framingham Heart Study
Harris WS, Tintle NL, Etherton MR, Vasan RS
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
103cc by
PMID 29559306 · DOI · PMC6034629
Operationalising resilience in longitudinal studies: a systematic review of methodological approaches
Cosco TD, Kaushal A, Hardy R, Richards M, Kuh D, Stafford M
2017Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
85cc by
PMID 27502781 · DOI · PMC5256275
Making Multimethod Latent State-Trait Models for Random and Fixed Situations Accessible: A Tutorial
Tinhof DL, Mayer A
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 40521623 · DOI · PMC12421706

Adjusting for unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized longitudinal studies: a methodological review [1]

Review article Streeter AJ, Lin NX, Crathorne L, Haasova M, Hyde C, Melzer D, et al. · · 2017 · cited 107 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectivesMotivated by recent calls to use electronic health records for research, we reviewed the application and development of methods for addressing the bias from unmeasured confounding in longitudinal data.
Closing excerpt
A range of promising new methods have been developed, but further studies are needed to understand their relative performance in different contexts before they can be recommended for widespread use.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (194 words)

ObjectivesMotivated by recent calls to use electronic health records for research, we reviewed the application and development of methods for addressing the bias from unmeasured confounding in longitudinal data.Study design and settingMethodological review of existing literature. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles addressing the threat to causal inference from unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized longitudinal health data through quasi-experimental analysis.ResultsAmong the 121 studies included for review, 84 used instrumental variable analysis (IVA), of which 36 used lagged or historical instruments. Difference-in-differences (DiD) and fixed effects (FE) models were found in 29 studies. Five of these combined IVA with DiD or FE to try to mitigate for time-dependent confounding. Other less frequently used methods included prior event rate ratio adjustment, regression discontinuity nested within pre-post studies, propensity score calibration, perturbation analysis, and negative control outcomes.ConclusionWell-established econometric methods such as DiD and IVA are commonly used to address unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized longitudinal studies, but researchers often fail to take full advantage of available longitudinal information. A range of promising new methods have been developed, but further studies are needed to understand their relative performance in different contexts before they can be recommended for widespread use.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28460857 · DOI · PMC5589113

Erythrocyte long-chain omega-3 fatty acid levels are inversely associated with mortality and with incident cardiovascular disease: The Framingham Heart Study [2]

Research article Harris WS, Tintle NL, Etherton MR, Vasan RS · · 2018 · cited 103 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThe extent to which omega-3 fatty acid status is related to risk for death from any cause and for incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains controversial.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsA higher Omega-3 Index was associated with reduced risk of both CVD and all-cause mortality.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (211 words)

BackgroundThe extent to which omega-3 fatty acid status is related to risk for death from any cause and for incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains controversial.ObjectiveTo examine these associations in the Framingham Heart Study.DesignProspective and observational.SettingFramingham Heart Study Offspring cohort.MeasurementsThe exposure marker was red blood cell levels of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids (the Omega-3 Index) measured at baseline. Outcomes included mortality (total, CVD, cancer, and other) and total CVD events in participants free of CVD at baseline. Follow-up was for a median of 7.3 years. Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for 18 variables (demographic, clinical status, therapeutic, and CVD risk factors).ResultsAmong the 2500 participants (mean age 66 years, 54% women), there were 350 deaths (58 from CVD, 146 from cancer, 128 from other known causes, and 18 from unknown causes). There were 245 CVD events. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, a higher Omega-3 Index was associated with significantly lower risks (P-values for trends across quintiles) for total mortality (P = .02), for non-CVD and non-cancer mortality (P = .009), and for total CVD events (P = .008). Those in the highest (>6.8%) compared to those in the lowest Omega-3 Index quintiles (LimitationsRelatively short follow-up time and one-time exposure assessment.ConclusionsA higher Omega-3 Index was associated with reduced risk of both CVD and all-cause mortality.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29559306 · DOI · PMC6034629

Operationalising resilience in longitudinal studies: a systematic review of methodological approaches [3]

Systematic review Cosco TD, Kaushal A, Hardy R, Richards M, Kuh D, Stafford M · · 2017 · cited 85 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Over the life course, we are invariably faced with some form of adversity.
Closing excerpt
Acknowledging the strengths and limitations of each operationalisation is integral to the appropriate application of these methods to life course and longitudinal resilience research.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (202 words)

Over the life course, we are invariably faced with some form of adversity. The process of positively adapting to adverse events is known as 'resilience'. Despite the acknowledgement of 2 common components of resilience, that is, adversity and positive adaptation, no consensus operational definition has been agreed. Resilience operationalisations have been reviewed in a cross-sectional context; however, a review of longitudinal methods of operationalising resilience has not been conducted. The present study conducts a systematic review across Scopus and Web of Science capturing studies of ageing that posited operational definitions of resilience in longitudinal studies of ageing. Thirty-six studies met inclusion criteria. Non-acute events, for example, cancer, were the most common form of adversity identified and psychological components, for example, the absence of depression, the most common forms of positive adaptation. Of the included studies, 4 used psychometrically driven methods, that is, repeated administration of established resilience metrics, 9 used definition-driven methods, that is, a priori establishment of resilience components and criteria, and 23 used data-driven methods, that is, techniques that identify resilient individuals using latent variable models. Acknowledging the strengths and limitations of each operationalisation is integral to the appropriate application of these methods to life course and longitudinal resilience research.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27502781 · DOI · PMC5256275

Making Multimethod Latent State-Trait Models for Random and Fixed Situations Accessible: A Tutorial [4]

Research article Tinhof DL, Mayer A · · 2025

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectiveAs more researchers employ longitudinal research designs, which integrate multiple methods and multiple (fixed) situations, the need for appropriate analytical methods arises.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionThe shiny app facilitates the analysis of data from longitudinal study designs implementing multiple methods and (fixed) situations, helping researchers gain a deeper understanding of psychological constructs.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (182 words)

ObjectiveAs more researchers employ longitudinal research designs, which integrate multiple methods and multiple (fixed) situations, the need for appropriate analytical methods arises.MethodMultimethod latent state-trait models for random and fixed situations (MM-LST-RF; Hintz et al. 2019) provide a means with which person characteristics, (fixed) situation, and method effects, as well as their interactions can be studied. While these models are very versatile, their complexity poses a significant hurdle to their implementation.ResultsThis tutorial helps facilitate the application of MM-LST-RF models. First, we present two simpler methodological approaches in which the full MM-LST-RF model is broken down into its (a) multimethod and (b) random and fixed situation components. Key parameters and model coefficients are highlighted using a motivational example. Second, we present a user-friendly shiny app based on a newly developed R function. Users are walked through the process of specifying, estimating, and interpreting an MM-LST-RF model guided by detailed explanations of all specification options and practical use recommendations.ConclusionThe shiny app facilitates the analysis of data from longitudinal study designs implementing multiple methods and (fixed) situations, helping researchers gain a deeper understanding of psychological constructs.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40521623 · DOI · PMC12421706

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Using the general linear mixed model to analyse unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data [5]
    Cnaan A, Laird NM, Slasor P · Stat Med · 1997 · cited 909 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data [6]
    McArdle JJ · Annu Rev Psychol · 2009 · cited 839 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Adolescent Depression and Long-Term Psychosocial Outcomes [7]
    Clayborne ZM, Varin M, Colman I · J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry · 2019 · cited 525 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Infantile spasms: a U.S. consensus report [8]
    Pellock JM, Hrachovy R, Shinnar S, Baram TZ, Bettis D, Dlugos DJ, et al. · Epilepsia · 2010 · cited 336 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies [9]
    Chatfield MD, Brayne CE, Matthews FE · J Clin Epidemiol · 2005 · cited 329 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Basic concepts and methods for joint models of longitudinal and survival data [10]
    Ibrahim JG, Chu H, Chen LM · J Clin Oncol · 2010 · cited 298 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Streeter AJ, Lin NX, Crathorne L, Haasova M, Hyde C, Melzer D, et al.. Adjusting for unmeasured confounding in nonrandomized longitudinal studies: a methodological review. . 2017. PMID 28460857 · DOI · PMC5589113
  2. Harris WS, Tintle NL, Etherton MR, Vasan RS. Erythrocyte long-chain omega-3 fatty acid levels are inversely associated with mortality and with incident cardiovascular disease: The Framingham Heart Study. . 2018. PMID 29559306 · DOI · PMC6034629
  3. Cosco TD, Kaushal A, Hardy R, Richards M, Kuh D, Stafford M. Operationalising resilience in longitudinal studies: a systematic review of methodological approaches. . 2017. PMID 27502781 · DOI · PMC5256275
  4. Tinhof DL, Mayer A. Making Multimethod Latent State-Trait Models for Random and Fixed Situations Accessible: A Tutorial. . 2025. PMID 40521623 · DOI · PMC12421706
  5. Cnaan A, Laird NM, Slasor P. Using the general linear mixed model to analyse unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Stat Med. 1997. PMID 9351170 · DOI
  6. McArdle JJ. Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009. PMID 18817479 · DOI
  7. Clayborne ZM, Varin M, Colman I. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Adolescent Depression and Long-Term Psychosocial Outcomes. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019. PMID 30577941 · DOI
  8. Pellock JM, Hrachovy R, Shinnar S, Baram TZ, Bettis D, Dlugos DJ, et al.. Infantile spasms: a U.S. consensus report. Epilepsia. 2010. PMID 20608959 · DOI
  9. Chatfield MD, Brayne CE, Matthews FE. A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005. PMID 15649666 · DOI
  10. Ibrahim JG, Chu H, Chen LM. Basic concepts and methods for joint models of longitudinal and survival data. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID 20439643 · DOI · PMC4503792

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Cross-Sectional StudiesClinical Research
  • Feasibility StudiesClinical Research
  • Prospective StudiesClinical Research
  • Retrospective StudiesClinical Research
  • Follow-Up StudiesClinical Research
  • Cohort StudiesClinical Research

All 98 articles in Clinical Research →

At a glance

206,221
PubMed records on this heading
34%
published since 2020
5,351
review articles
6,316
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Cross-Sectional StudiesClinical Research
  • Feasibility StudiesClinical Research
  • Prospective StudiesClinical Research
  • Retrospective StudiesClinical Research
  • Follow-Up StudiesClinical Research

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support