Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Molecular Biology›Membrane Fusion
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Membrane Fusion

Molecular Biology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

The adherence and merging of cell membranes, intracellular membranes, or artificial membranes to each other or to viruses, parasites, or interstitial particles through a variety of chemical and physical processes.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (808 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The adherence and merging of cell membranes, intracellular membranes, or artificial membranes to each other or to viruses, parasites, or interstitial particles through a variety of chemical and physical processes.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Fusion, Membrane; Fusions, Membrane; Membrane Fusions.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Cell Physiological Phenomena
See also
HIV Fusion Inhibitors

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 9,279 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Membrane Fusion” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 1,110 of them (12.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 3,161 records.

Reviews account for 1,522 records (16.4%) and meta-analyses for 0. Randomized controlled trials number 2 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,669 records; 2000-2009: 3,161 records; 2010-2019: 2,339 records; 2020 onward: 1,110 records2,669through 19993,1612000-20092,3392010-20191,1102020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,669
2000-20093,161
2010-20192,339
2020 onward1,110
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 16.4 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.0 percentReviews16.4% (1,522)Meta-analyses0.0% (0)Randomized controlled trials0.0% (2)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 9,279 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,52216.4%
Meta-analyses00.0%
Randomized controlled trials20.0%

Method: PubMed query "Membrane Fusion"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in molecular biology

Molecular biology establishes mechanisms through controlled experiments, often in simplified systems such as purified proteins, cultured cells or model organisms. Such work can show what is possible in a defined system, but whether a pathway matters in a whole organism or in human disease needs further evidence. Check the experimental system, whether findings were reproduced by independent groups, and whether the authors tested the mechanism directly or inferred it from correlation.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release
Hessvik NP, Llorente A
2018Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1,940cc by
PMID 28733901 · DOI · PMC5756260
Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion
Xia S, Liu M, Wang C, Xu W, Lan Q, Feng S, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1,084cc by
PMID 32231345 · DOI · PMC7104723
Altered TMPRSS2 usage by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron impacts infectivity and fusogenicity
Meng B, Abdullahi A, Ferreira IATM, Goonawardane N, Saito A, Kimura I, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
993cc by
PMID 35104837 · DOI · PMC8942856
Atg23 prevents aberrant fusion of Atg9 vesicles during delivery to autophagosome formation sites
Kimura T, Shima T, Kotani T, Nakatogawa H
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42477132 · DOI · PMC13534743

Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release [1]

Review article Hessvik NP, Llorente A · · 2018 · cited 1,940 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Exosomes are nanosized membrane vesicles released by fusion of an organelle of the endocytic pathway, the multivesicular body, with the plasma membrane.
Closing excerpt
Finally, methodological aspects related to exosome release studies are discussed.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (165 words)

Exosomes are nanosized membrane vesicles released by fusion of an organelle of the endocytic pathway, the multivesicular body, with the plasma membrane. This process was discovered more than 30 years ago, and during these years, exosomes have gone from being considered as cellular waste disposal to mediate a novel mechanism of cell-to-cell communication. The exponential interest in exosomes experienced during recent years is due to their important roles in health and disease and to their potential clinical application in therapy and diagnosis. However, important aspects of the biology of exosomes remain unknown. To explore the use of exosomes in the clinic, it is essential that the basic molecular mechanisms behind the transport and function of these vesicles are better understood. We have here summarized what is presently known about how exosomes are formed and released by cells. Moreover, other cellular processes related to exosome biogenesis and release, such as autophagy and lysosomal exocytosis are presented. Finally, methodological aspects related to exosome release studies are discussed.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28733901 · DOI · PMC5756260

Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion [2]

Research article Xia S, Liu M, Wang C, Xu W, Lan Q, Feng S, et al. · · 2020 · cited 1,084 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The recent outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan, China has posed a serious threat to global public health.
Closing excerpt
Intranasal application of EK1C4 before or after challenge with HCoV-OC43 protected mice from infection, suggesting that EK1C4 could be used for prevention and treatment of infection by the currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 and other emerging SARSr-CoVs.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (260 words)

The recent outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan, China has posed a serious threat to global public health. To develop specific anti-coronavirus therapeutics and prophylactics, the molecular mechanism that underlies viral infection must first be defined. Therefore, we herein established a SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein-mediated cell-cell fusion assay and found that SARS-CoV-2 showed a superior plasma membrane fusion capacity compared to that of SARS-CoV. We solved the X-ray crystal structure of six-helical bundle (6-HB) core of the HR1 and HR2 domains in the SARS-CoV-2 S protein S2 subunit, revealing that several mutated amino acid residues in the HR1 domain may be associated with enhanced interactions with the HR2 domain. We previously developed a pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor, EK1, which targeted the HR1 domain and could inhibit infection by divergent human coronaviruses tested, including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Here we generated a series of lipopeptides derived from EK1 and found that EK1C4 was the most potent fusion inhibitor against SARS-CoV-2 S protein-mediated membrane fusion and pseudovirus infection with IC50s of 1.3 and 15.8 nM, about 241- and 149-fold more potent than the original EK1 peptide, respectively. EK1C4 was also highly effective against membrane fusion and infection of other human coronavirus pseudoviruses tested, including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, as well as SARSr-CoVs, and potently inhibited the replication of 5 live human coronaviruses examined, including SARS-CoV-2. Intranasal application of EK1C4 before or after challenge with HCoV-OC43 protected mice from infection, suggesting that EK1C4 could be used for prevention and treatment of infection by the currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 and other emerging SARSr-CoVs.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32231345 · DOI · PMC7104723

Altered TMPRSS2 usage by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron impacts infectivity and fusogenicity [3]

Research article Meng B, Abdullahi A, Ferreira IATM, Goonawardane N, Saito A, Kimura I, et al. · · 2022 · cited 993 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.
Closing excerpt
The less efficient spike cleavage of Omicron at S1/S2 is associated with a shift in cellular tropism away from TMPRSS2-expressing cells, with implications for altered pathogenesis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (253 words)

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 variant emerged in 20211 and has multiple mutations in its spike protein2. Here we show that the spike protein of Omicron has a higher affinity for ACE2 compared with Delta, and a marked change in its antigenicity increases Omicron's evasion of therapeutic monoclonal and vaccine-elicited polyclonal neutralizing antibodies after two doses. mRNA vaccination as a third vaccine dose rescues and broadens neutralization. Importantly, the antiviral drugs remdesivir and molnupiravir retain efficacy against Omicron BA.1. Replication was similar for Omicron and Delta virus isolates in human nasal epithelial cultures. However, in lung cells and gut cells, Omicron demonstrated lower replication. Omicron spike protein was less efficiently cleaved compared with Delta. The differences in replication were mapped to the entry efficiency of the virus on the basis of spike-pseudotyped virus assays. The defect in entry of Omicron pseudotyped virus to specific cell types effectively correlated with higher cellular RNA expression of TMPRSS2, and deletion of TMPRSS2 affected Delta entry to a greater extent than Omicron. Furthermore, drug inhibitors targeting specific entry pathways3 demonstrated that the Omicron spike inefficiently uses the cellular protease TMPRSS2, which promotes cell entry through plasma membrane fusion, with greater dependency on cell entry through the endocytic pathway. Consistent with suboptimal S1/S2 cleavage and inability to use TMPRSS2, syncytium formation by the Omicron spike was substantially impaired compared with the Delta spike. The less efficient spike cleavage of Omicron at S1/S2 is associated with a shift in cellular tropism away from TMPRSS2-expressing cells, with implications for altered pathogenesis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35104837 · DOI · PMC8942856

Atg23 prevents aberrant fusion of Atg9 vesicles during delivery to autophagosome formation sites [4]

Research article Kimura T, Shima T, Kotani T, Nakatogawa H · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Autophagosome biogenesis depends on the accurate delivery of membrane lipids to the pre-autophagosomal structure.
Closing excerpt
Together, these findings reveal an Atg1-dependent phosphorylation switch that regulates Atg9 vesicle dynamics during autophagosome biogenesis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (130 words)

Autophagosome biogenesis depends on the accurate delivery of membrane lipids to the pre-autophagosomal structure. Golgi/endosome-derived Atg9 vesicles provide the membrane seed for this process, but how they are trafficked through the cytoplasm while avoiding inappropriate fusion remains unclear. Here we show that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the soluble Atg9-interacting protein Atg23 remains associated with Atg9 vesicles after their biogenesis. This association shields Atg9 vesicles from aberrant SNARE-dependent fusion as they diffuse through the cytoplasm en route to the autophagosome formation site. We further show that upon vesicle arrival at the site, Atg9 phosphorylation by the autophagy initiation kinase Atg1 releases Atg23, facilitating recruitment of the downstream factor Atg2, a lipid transfer protein for membrane expansion. Together, these findings reveal an Atg1-dependent phosphorylation switch that regulates Atg9 vesicle dynamics during autophagosome biogenesis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42477132 · DOI · PMC13534743

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress [5]
    Youle RJ, van der Bliek AM · Science · 2012 · cited 3,087 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article SNAREs--engines for membrane fusion [6]
    Jahn R, Scheller RH · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2006 · cited 2,034 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Structure, Function, and Evolution of Coronavirus Spike Proteins [7]
    Li F · Annu Rev Virol · 2016 · cited 1,994 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Membrane fusion: grappling with SNARE and SM proteins [8]
    Südhof TC, Rothman JE · Science · 2009 · cited 1,656 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Mitochondrial fusion and fission in cell life and death [9]
    Westermann B · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2010 · cited 1,654 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Lysosomes: fusion and function [10]
    Luzio JP, Pryor PR, Bright NA · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2007 · cited 1,310 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Hessvik NP, Llorente A. Current knowledge on exosome biogenesis and release. . 2018. PMID 28733901 · DOI · PMC5756260
  2. Xia S, Liu M, Wang C, Xu W, Lan Q, Feng S, et al.. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion. . 2020. PMID 32231345 · DOI · PMC7104723
  3. Meng B, Abdullahi A, Ferreira IATM, Goonawardane N, Saito A, Kimura I, et al.. Altered TMPRSS2 usage by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron impacts infectivity and fusogenicity. . 2022. PMID 35104837 · DOI · PMC8942856
  4. Kimura T, Shima T, Kotani T, Nakatogawa H. Atg23 prevents aberrant fusion of Atg9 vesicles during delivery to autophagosome formation sites. . 2026. PMID 42477132 · DOI · PMC13534743
  5. Youle RJ, van der Bliek AM. Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science. 2012. PMID 22936770 · DOI · PMC4762028
  6. Jahn R, Scheller RH. SNAREs--engines for membrane fusion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006. PMID 16912714 · DOI
  7. Li F. Structure, Function, and Evolution of Coronavirus Spike Proteins. Annu Rev Virol. 2016. PMID 27578435 · DOI · PMC5457962
  8. Südhof TC, Rothman JE. Membrane fusion: grappling with SNARE and SM proteins. Science. 2009. PMID 19164740 · DOI · PMC3736821
  9. Westermann B. Mitochondrial fusion and fission in cell life and death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010. PMID 21102612 · DOI
  10. Luzio JP, Pryor PR, Bright NA. Lysosomes: fusion and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007. PMID 17637737 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Cell FusionMolecular Biology
  • Mitochondrial DynamicsMolecular Biology
  • ExocytosisMolecular Biology
  • Membrane FluidityMolecular Biology
  • NecroptosisMolecular Biology
  • Secretory PathwayMolecular Biology

All 100 articles in Molecular Biology →

At a glance

9,279
PubMed records on this heading
12%
published since 2020
1,522
review articles
2
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Cell FusionMolecular Biology
  • Mitochondrial DynamicsMolecular Biology
  • ExocytosisMolecular Biology
  • Membrane FluidityMolecular Biology
  • NecroptosisMolecular Biology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support