Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Metoprolol
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Metoprolol

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A selective adrenergic beta-1 blocking agent that is commonly used to treat angina pectoris; hypertension; and cardiac arrhythmias.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (816 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A selective adrenergic beta-1 blocking agent that is commonly used to treat angina pectoris; hypertension; and cardiac arrhythmias.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Betaloc; Betaloc-Astra; Betaloc Astra; Spesicor; Spesikor; H 93-26; H 9326; H 93 26.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Phenoxypropanolamines

Related concepts

  • Angina Pectoris
  • Hypertension
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 5,915 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Metoprolol” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 472 of them (8.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,945 records.

Reviews account for 305 records (5.2%) and meta-analyses for 45. Randomized controlled trials number 1,273 (21.5%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,945 records; 2000-2009: 1,330 records; 2010-2019: 1,168 records; 2020 onward: 472 records2,945through 19991,3302000-20091,1682010-20194722020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,945
2000-20091,330
2010-20191,168
2020 onward472
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.2 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.8 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 21.5 percentReviews5.2% (305)Meta-analyses0.8% (45)Randomized controlled trials21.5% (1,273)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 5,915 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews3055.2%
Meta-analyses450.8%
Randomized controlled trials1,27321.5%

Method: PubMed query "Metoprolol"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Neutrophil stunning by metoprolol reduces infarct size
García-Prieto J, Villena-Gutiérrez R, Gómez M, Bernardo E, Pun-García A, García-Lunar I, et al.
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
181cc by
PMID 28416795 · DOI · PMC5399300
Combined milrinone and enteral metoprolol therapy in patients with septic myocardial depression
Schmittinger CA, Dünser MW, Haller M, Ulmer H, Luckner G, Torgersen C, et al.
2008Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
69cc by
PMID 18680591 · DOI · PMC2575588
Metoprolol blunts the time-dependent progression of infarct size
Lobo-Gonzalez M, Galán-Arriola C, Rossello X, González-Del-Hoyo M, Vilchez JP, Higuero-Verdejo MI, et al.
2020Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
38cc by
PMID 32748088 · DOI · PMC7398954
Candesartan, Metoprolol and Rosuvastatin Associated to Lower 30-Days Mortality in Adult COVID-19 Patients - A Register Study in Finland before COVID-19 Vaccines
Hyvärinen A, Helminen M, Broas M, Syrjälä H
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42169481 · DOI · PMC13198641

Neutrophil stunning by metoprolol reduces infarct size [1]

Research article García-Prieto J, Villena-Gutiérrez R, Gómez M, Bernardo E, Pun-García A, García-Lunar I, et al. · · 2017 · cited 181 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The β1-adrenergic-receptor (ADRB1) antagonist metoprolol reduces infarct size in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients.
Closing excerpt
Identification of the relevant role of ADRB1 in haematopoietic cells during acute injury and the protective role upon its modulation offers potential for developing new therapeutic strategies.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (150 words)

The β1-adrenergic-receptor (ADRB1) antagonist metoprolol reduces infarct size in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. The prevailing view has been that metoprolol acts mainly on cardiomyocytes. Here, we demonstrate that metoprolol reduces reperfusion injury by targeting the haematopoietic compartment. Metoprolol inhibits neutrophil migration in an ADRB1-dependent manner. Metoprolol acts during early phases of neutrophil recruitment by impairing structural and functional rearrangements needed for productive engagement of circulating platelets, resulting in erratic intravascular dynamics and blunted inflammation. Depletion of neutrophils, ablation of Adrb1 in haematopoietic cells, or blockade of PSGL-1, the receptor involved in neutrophil-platelet interactions, fully abrogated metoprolol's infarct-limiting effects. The association between neutrophil count and microvascular obstruction is abolished in metoprolol-treated AMI patients. Metoprolol inhibits neutrophil-platelet interactions in AMI patients by targeting neutrophils. Identification of the relevant role of ADRB1 in haematopoietic cells during acute injury and the protective role upon its modulation offers potential for developing new therapeutic strategies.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28416795 · DOI · PMC5399300

Combined milrinone and enteral metoprolol therapy in patients with septic myocardial depression [2]

Research article Schmittinger CA, Dünser MW, Haller M, Ulmer H, Luckner G, Torgersen C, et al. · · 2008 · cited 69 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
IntroductionThe multifactorial etiology of septic cardiomyopathy is not fully elucidated.
Closing excerpt
Future prospective controlled trials on the use of beta blockers for septic cardiomyopathy and their influence on proinflammatory cytokines are warranted.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (247 words)

IntroductionThe multifactorial etiology of septic cardiomyopathy is not fully elucidated. Recently, high catecholamine levels have been suggested to contribute to impaired myocardial function.MethodsThis retrospective analysis summarizes our preliminary clinical experience with the combined use of milrinone and enteral metoprolol therapy in 40 patients with septic shock and cardiac depression. Patients with other causes of shock or cardiac failure, patients with beta-blocker therapy initiated more than 48 hours after shock onset, and patients with pre-existent decompensated congestive heart failure were excluded. In all study patients, beta blockers were initiated only after stabilization of cardiovascular function (17.7 +/- 15.5 hours after shock onset or intensive care unit admission) in order to decrease the heart rate to less than 95 beats per minute (bpm). Hemodynamic data and laboratory parameters were extracted from medical charts and documented before and 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after the first metoprolol dosage. Adverse cardiovascular events were documented. Descriptive statistical methods and a linear mixed-effects model were used for statistical analysis.ResultsHeart rate control (65 to 95 bpm) was achieved in 97.5% of patients (n = 39) within 12.2 +/- 12.4 hours. Heart rate, central venous pressure, and norepinephrine, arginine vasopressin, and milrinone dosages decreased (all P ConclusionLow doses of enteral metoprolol in combination with phosphodiesterase inhibitors are feasible in patients with septic shock and cardiac depression but no overt heart failure. Future prospective controlled trials on the use of beta blockers for septic cardiomyopathy and their influence on proinflammatory cytokines are warranted.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 18680591 · DOI · PMC2575588

Metoprolol blunts the time-dependent progression of infarct size [3]

Research article Lobo-Gonzalez M, Galán-Arriola C, Rossello X, González-Del-Hoyo M, Vilchez JP, Higuero-Verdejo MI, et al. · · 2020 · cited 38 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Early metoprolol administration protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, but its effect on infarct size progression (ischemic injury) is unknown.
Closing excerpt
These data identify metoprolol as an intervention ideally suited to the treatment of STEMI patients identified early in the course of infarction and requiring long transport times before primary angioplasty.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (284 words)

Early metoprolol administration protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, but its effect on infarct size progression (ischemic injury) is unknown. Eight groups of pigs (total n = 122) underwent coronary artery occlusion of varying duration (20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, or 60 min) followed by reperfusion. In each group, pigs were randomized to i.v. metoprolol (0.75 mg/kg) or vehicle (saline) 20 min after ischemia onset. The primary outcome measure was infarct size (IS) on day7 cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) normalized to area at risk (AAR, measured by perfusion computed tomography [CT] during ischemia). Metoprolol treatment reduced overall mortality (10% vs 26%, p = 0.03) and the incidence and number of primary ventricular fibrillations during infarct induction. In controls, IS after 20-min ischemia was ≈ 5% of the area AAR. Thereafter, IS progressed exponentially, occupying almost all the AAR after 35 min of ischemia. Metoprolol injection significantly reduced the slope of IS progression (p = 0.004 for final IS). Head-to-head comparison (metoprolol treated vs vehicle treated) showed statistically significant reductions in IS at 30, 35, 40, and 50-min reperfusion. At 60-min reperfusion, IS was 100% of AAR in both groups. Despite more prolonged ischemia, metoprolol-treated pigs reperfused at 50 min had smaller infarcts than control pigs undergoing ischemia for 40 or 45 min and similar-sized infarcts to those undergoing 35-min ischemia. Day-45 LVEF was higher in metoprolol-treated vs vehicle-treated pigs (41.6% vs 36.5%, p = 0.008). In summary, metoprolol administration early during ischemia attenuates IS progression and reduces the incidence of primary ventricular fibrillation. These data identify metoprolol as an intervention ideally suited to the treatment of STEMI patients identified early in the course of infarction and requiring long transport times before primary angioplasty.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 32748088 · DOI · PMC7398954

Candesartan, Metoprolol and Rosuvastatin Associated to Lower 30-Days Mortality in Adult COVID-19 Patients - A Register Study in Finland before COVID-19 Vaccines [4]

Research article Hyvärinen A, Helminen M, Broas M, Syrjälä H · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Elderly people with chronic diseases are at risk for having severe COVID-19 disease.
Closing excerpt
In conclusion, COVID-19 patients who used cardiovascular drugs candesartan, metoprolol or rosuvastatin have lower 30 days all-cause mortality than other COVID-19 patients.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (135 words)

Elderly people with chronic diseases are at risk for having severe COVID-19 disease. We were interested whether the drugs prescribed for the chronic diseases are associated with lower mortality in COVID-19 patients.We used Finnish national registry data for analysis of potential associations of 73 prescription drugs to mortality among 6082 adult COVID-19 patients between 1.1.2020 and 30.6.2020, before COVID-19 vaccinations were available. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95 percent confidence intervals (95% CIs) for different medications are presented.The use of three cardiovascular drugs was associated with lower 30 days all-cause mortality rate: candesartan (aOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.72, p=0.005), metoprolol (aOR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.88, p=0.024) and rosuvastatin (aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.94, p=0.034).In conclusion, COVID-19 patients who used cardiovascular drugs candesartan, metoprolol or rosuvastatin have lower 30 days all-cause mortality than other COVID-19 patients.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42169481 · DOI · PMC13198641

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Comparative effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure: results of a meta-analysis [5]
    Packer M, Antonopoulos GV, Berlin JA, Chittams J, Konstam MA, Udelson JE · Am Heart J · 2001 · cited 141 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Metoprolol-induced reduction in postinfarction mortality: pooled results from five double-blind randomized trials [6]
    Olsson G, Wikstrand J, Warnold I, Manger Cats V, McBoyle D, Herlitz J, et al. · Eur Heart J · 1992 · cited 130 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A meta-analysis of CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype and metoprolol pharmacokinetics [7]
    Blake CM, Kharasch ED, Schwab M, Nagele P · Clin Pharmacol Ther · 2013 · cited 99 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Clinical pharmacokinetics of metoprolol [8]
    Regårdh CG, Johnsson G · Clin Pharmacokinet · 1980 · cited 98 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Metoprolol. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and related cardiovascular disorders [9]
    Benfield P, Clissold SP, Brogden RN · Drugs · 1986 · cited 79 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Drug therapy: metoprolol [10]
    Koch-Weser J · N Engl J Med · 1979 · cited 78 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. García-Prieto J, Villena-Gutiérrez R, Gómez M, Bernardo E, Pun-García A, García-Lunar I, et al.. Neutrophil stunning by metoprolol reduces infarct size. . 2017. PMID 28416795 · DOI · PMC5399300
  2. Schmittinger CA, Dünser MW, Haller M, Ulmer H, Luckner G, Torgersen C, et al.. Combined milrinone and enteral metoprolol therapy in patients with septic myocardial depression. . 2008. PMID 18680591 · DOI · PMC2575588
  3. Lobo-Gonzalez M, Galán-Arriola C, Rossello X, González-Del-Hoyo M, Vilchez JP, Higuero-Verdejo MI, et al.. Metoprolol blunts the time-dependent progression of infarct size. . 2020. PMID 32748088 · DOI · PMC7398954
  4. Hyvärinen A, Helminen M, Broas M, Syrjälä H. Candesartan, Metoprolol and Rosuvastatin Associated to Lower 30-Days Mortality in Adult COVID-19 Patients - A Register Study in Finland before COVID-19 Vaccines. . 2026. PMID 42169481 · DOI · PMC13198641
  5. Packer M, Antonopoulos GV, Berlin JA, Chittams J, Konstam MA, Udelson JE. Comparative effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure: results of a meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2001. PMID 11376302 · DOI
  6. Olsson G, Wikstrand J, Warnold I, Manger Cats V, McBoyle D, Herlitz J, et al.. Metoprolol-induced reduction in postinfarction mortality: pooled results from five double-blind randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 1992. PMID 1533587 · DOI
  7. Blake CM, Kharasch ED, Schwab M, Nagele P. A meta-analysis of CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype and metoprolol pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013. PMID 23665868 · DOI · PMC3818912
  8. Regårdh CG, Johnsson G. Clinical pharmacokinetics of metoprolol. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1980. PMID 7002420 · DOI
  9. Benfield P, Clissold SP, Brogden RN. Metoprolol. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and related cardiovascular disorders. Drugs. 1986. PMID 2940080 · DOI
  10. Koch-Weser J. Drug therapy: metoprolol. N Engl J Med. 1979. PMID 225665 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • CarvedilolDrugs and Chemicals
  • PropranololDrugs and Chemicals
  • AtenololDrugs and Chemicals
  • EphedrineDrugs and Chemicals
  • PindololDrugs and Chemicals
  • TimololDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

5,915
PubMed records on this heading
8%
published since 2020
305
review articles
1,273
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • CarvedilolDrugs and Chemicals
  • PropranololDrugs and Chemicals
  • AtenololDrugs and Chemicals
  • EphedrineDrugs and Chemicals
  • PindololDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support