Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Movement
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Movement

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 4 min read

The act, process, or result of passing from one place or position to another.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (652 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The act, process, or result of passing from one place or position to another. It differs from locomotion in that locomotion is restricted to the passing of the whole body from one place to another, while movement encompasses both locomotion but also a change of the position of the whole body or any of its parts. Movement may be used with reference to humans, vertebrate and invertebrate animals, and microorganisms. Differentiate also from motor activity, movement associated with behavior.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Movements.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Physiological Phenomena; Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena
Narrower topics
Locomotion; Organ Motion; Eye Movements; Head Movements; Motor Activity
See also
Immobilization; Motion; Kinesiology, Applied

Related concepts

  • Locomotion
  • Motor Activity

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 739,045 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Movement” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 178,042 of them (24.1%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 269,641 records.

Reviews account for 67,351 records (9.1%) and meta-analyses for 8,359. Randomized controlled trials number 40,541 (5.5%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 145,475 records; 2000-2009: 145,887 records; 2010-2019: 269,641 records; 2020 onward: 178,042 records145,475through 1999145,8872000-2009269,6412010-2019178,0422020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999145,475
2000-2009145,887
2010-2019269,641
2020 onward178,042
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 5.5 percentReviews9.1% (67,351)Meta-analyses1.1% (8,359)Randomized controlled trials5.5% (40,541)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 739,045 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews67,3519.1%
Meta-analyses8,3591.1%
Randomized controlled trials40,5415.5%

Method: PubMed query "Movement"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
The motor pattern of rolling escape locomotion in Drosophila larvae
He L, Borjon LJ, Tracey WD
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
7cc by
PMID 42677474 · DOI · PMC13615696
Tissue flow acts as a guidance cue for immune cell polarization and directional migration
Le HA, Hartmann J, Alert R, Mayor R
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42706384 · DOI · PMC13661273
The effect of increases in physical activity on oral health and function in older adults in Singapore: A longitudinal causal inference study
Tay JRH, Nascimento GG, Malhotra R, Hallal PC, Peres MA
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42664809 · DOI · PMC13545370

The motor pattern of rolling escape locomotion in Drosophila larvae [1]

Research article He L, Borjon LJ, Tracey WD · · 2026 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
When undisturbed, Drosophila larvae move forward through their environment with sweeping waves of caudal to rostral muscle contractions.
Closing excerpt
Finally, an analysis of the connectivity of inputs to larval motor neurons revealed a ring-like network architecture that could support the sequence of activation of the rolling motor pattern.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (249 words)

When undisturbed, Drosophila larvae move forward through their environment with sweeping waves of caudal to rostral muscle contractions. In stark contrast, nociceptive sensory stimuli trigger the larvae to roll across the substrate by corkscrewing around the long body axis. Here, we have determined the detailed timing of muscle activation that generates the body rotation across abdominal segments. To do so, we developed a high-speed confocal time-lapse imaging preparation that allowed us to trigger rolling with nociceptor optogenetics while simultaneously imaging a genetically encoded calcium sensor expressed in the muscles. Of the 30 muscles present in each larval abdominal hemisegment, we found that only 11 muscles are consistently and specifically activated across segments during rolling. Eight additional muscles are more sparsely activated. Importantly, the sequential pattern of muscle recruitment during rolling is completely distinct from that of forward or reverse crawling. A roll involves a wave of muscle activation that propagates around the larval circumference (in the transverse plane of each segment) and involves four co-active muscle groups. A pattern of activation progresses from co-active ventral muscle groups to dorsal groups and then spreads across the midline to the contralateral dorsal muscle groups, then progresses back to the ventral groups. The direction of a roll is determined by the clockwise or counterclockwise order of muscle group activation around the transverse plane. Finally, an analysis of the connectivity of inputs to larval motor neurons revealed a ring-like network architecture that could support the sequence of activation of the rolling motor pattern.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42677474 · DOI · PMC13615696

Tissue flow acts as a guidance cue for immune cell polarization and directional migration [2]

Research article Le HA, Hartmann J, Alert R, Mayor R · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Embryonic myeloid (EM) cells are the first immune-cell population to emerge during development and must disperse throughout the embryo to act as the first line of defence against infection.
Closing excerpt
Our findings reveal that mechanical cues generated by surrounding tissue flows coordinate immune-cell migration during development, highlighting an overlooked mechanism by which collective tissue dynamics guide individual cell behaviour.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (159 words)

Embryonic myeloid (EM) cells are the first immune-cell population to emerge during development and must disperse throughout the embryo to act as the first line of defence against infection. Although EM cells migrate directionally toward wounds, how they navigate through unwounded tissues during early colonization remains unclear. Here we show that EM cell dispersion in Xenopus embryos is driven, at least in part, by cell-on-cell migration, an important yet underappreciated phenomenon, guided by dynamic tissue flows. We have established a new ex vivo EM cell migration system that allows for live imaging, computational analyses and optogenetic manipulation. We find that local ectodermal tissue flows repolarize EM cell protrusions and bias their directional migration. Disrupting these flows, both ex vivo and in vivo, either genetically or mechanically, impairs EM cell dispersion. Our findings reveal that mechanical cues generated by surrounding tissue flows coordinate immune-cell migration during development, highlighting an overlooked mechanism by which collective tissue dynamics guide individual cell behaviour.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42706384 · DOI · PMC13661273

The effect of increases in physical activity on oral health and function in older adults in Singapore: A longitudinal causal inference study [3]

Research article Tay JRH, Nascimento GG, Malhotra R, Hallal PC, Peres MA · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundPhysical activity may benefit oral health, but causal evidence is lacking.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsThese findings support integrating physical activity promotion within oral health strategies for ageing populations.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (244 words)

BackgroundPhysical activity may benefit oral health, but causal evidence is lacking. This study estimated the effect of modifying physical activity on self-rated oral health and masticatory function impairment in older adults using longitudinal modified treatment policies.MethodsData from three waves (2016-2024) of THE SIGNS Study, a nationally representative cohort of community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and above in Singapore (N = 3981), were analysed. Ten physical activity scenarios were emulated, including upward, downward, and stochastic shifts in weekly metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes (WHO guideline: ≥600MET-min/week). Causal parameters were estimated using targeted maximum likelihood estimation with Super Learner.ResultsFor poor self-rated oral health, raising all participants to at least 450 MET-min/week (equivalent to 112.5 min per week of moderate-intensity physical activity) produced the largest risk reduction (RR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.82-0.95). Even raising participants below 150 MET-min/week toward 150 MET-min/week reduced risk by 7% (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88-0.99). For masticatory function impairment, reducing physical activity increased risk in a dose-response manner: eliminating all activity increased risk by 21% (RR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.10-1.33), while raising 50% of inactive participants toward 600 MET-min/week reduced risk by 6% (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.99). A stricter masticatory function impairment definition produced consistent but stronger effects. Estimates were robust across estimators and under extreme attrition assumptions. Increasing physical activity may reduce the risk of poor self-rated oral health, while reducing physical activity may increase masticatory function impairment.ConclusionsThese findings support integrating physical activity promotion within oral health strategies for ageing populations.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42664809 · DOI · PMC13545370

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Deaths potentially averted by small changes in physical activity and sedentary time: an individual participant data meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies [4]
    Ekelund U, Tarp J, Ding D, Sanchez-Lastra MA, Dalene KE, Anderssen SA, et al. · Lancet · 2026 · cited 36 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Effect of exercise on depression and anxiety symptoms: systematic umbrella review with meta-meta-analysis [5]
    Munro NR, Teague S, Somoray K, Simpson A, Budden T, Jackson B, et al. · Br J Sports Med · 2026 · cited 10 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Circulating Myokine Responses to Acute Endurance Exercise and Their Role in Immunoregulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [6]
    Ringleb M, Fabritius F, Godde J, Puta C, Bloch W, Javelle F · FASEB J · 2026 · cited 10 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Can wearable real-time biofeedback gait training devices improve gait speed, balance, functional mobility and activities of daily living (ADL) in individuals post-stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [7]
    Wang FY, Xu Y, Luo LY, Liang HB, Jiang YP, Bai ZQ, et al. · J Neuroeng Rehabil · 2025 · cited 7 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The Optimal Dosage of Isometric Handgrip Exercise for Blood Pressure Reduction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [8]
    Lin CW, Jun IB, Igbo V, Babaniamansour A, Meng L, Lin CF, et al. · J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) · 2026 · cited 4 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Physical Activity Improves Quality of Life in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [9]
    Kasznár E, Csendes B, Gergő D, Hegyi P, Tóth R, Fogarasi A, et al. · J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle · 2026 · cited 4 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. He L, Borjon LJ, Tracey WD. The motor pattern of rolling escape locomotion in Drosophila larvae. . 2026. PMID 42677474 · DOI · PMC13615696
  2. Le HA, Hartmann J, Alert R, Mayor R. Tissue flow acts as a guidance cue for immune cell polarization and directional migration. . 2026. PMID 42706384 · DOI · PMC13661273
  3. Tay JRH, Nascimento GG, Malhotra R, Hallal PC, Peres MA. The effect of increases in physical activity on oral health and function in older adults in Singapore: A longitudinal causal inference study. . 2026. PMID 42664809 · DOI · PMC13545370
  4. Ekelund U, Tarp J, Ding D, Sanchez-Lastra MA, Dalene KE, Anderssen SA, et al.. Deaths potentially averted by small changes in physical activity and sedentary time: an individual participant data meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Lancet. 2026. PMID 41544645 · DOI
  5. Munro NR, Teague S, Somoray K, Simpson A, Budden T, Jackson B, et al.. Effect of exercise on depression and anxiety symptoms: systematic umbrella review with meta-meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2026. PMID 41667154 · DOI
  6. Ringleb M, Fabritius F, Godde J, Puta C, Bloch W, Javelle F. Circulating Myokine Responses to Acute Endurance Exercise and Their Role in Immunoregulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. FASEB J. 2026. PMID 41661185 · DOI · PMC12885107
  7. Wang FY, Xu Y, Luo LY, Liang HB, Jiang YP, Bai ZQ, et al.. Can wearable real-time biofeedback gait training devices improve gait speed, balance, functional mobility and activities of daily living (ADL) in individuals post-stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025. PMID 41457231 · DOI · PMC12853913
  8. Lin CW, Jun IB, Igbo V, Babaniamansour A, Meng L, Lin CF, et al.. The Optimal Dosage of Isometric Handgrip Exercise for Blood Pressure Reduction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2026. PMID 41922197 · DOI · PMC13045435
  9. Kasznár E, Csendes B, Gergő D, Hegyi P, Tóth R, Fogarasi A, et al.. Physical Activity Improves Quality of Life in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2026. PMID 41621812 · DOI · PMC12861554

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • LocomotionAnatomy and Physiology
  • ChemotaxisMolecular Biology
  • Cell MovementMolecular Biology
  • TissuesAnatomy and Physiology
  • Structure-Activity RelationshipPharmacology
  • AntioxidantsPharmacology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

739,045
PubMed records on this heading
24%
published since 2020
67,351
review articles
40,541
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • LocomotionAnatomy and Physiology
  • ChemotaxisMolecular Biology
  • Cell MovementMolecular Biology
  • TissuesAnatomy and Physiology
  • Structure-Activity RelationshipPharmacology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support