Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Nasal Cavity
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Nasal Cavity

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

The proximal portion of the respiratory passages on either side of the nasal septum.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (706 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The proximal portion of the respiratory passages on either side of the nasal septum. Nasal cavities, extending from the nares to the nasopharynx, are lined with ciliated nasal mucosa.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Cavities, Nasal; Cavity, Nasal; Nasal Cavities.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Nose

Related concepts

  • Nasal Septum
  • Nasopharynx
  • Nasal Mucosa

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 13,404 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Nasal Cavity” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,844 of them (13.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 4,296 records.

Reviews account for 1,152 records (8.6%) and meta-analyses for 63. Randomized controlled trials number 376 (2.8%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 4,296 records; 2000-2009: 3,137 records; 2010-2019: 4,127 records; 2020 onward: 1,844 records4,296through 19993,1372000-20094,1272010-20191,8442020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19994,296
2000-20093,137
2010-20194,127
2020 onward1,844
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 8.6 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.8 percentReviews8.6% (1,152)Meta-analyses0.5% (63)Randomized controlled trials2.8% (376)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 13,404 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,1528.6%
Meta-analyses630.5%
Randomized controlled trials3762.8%

Method: PubMed query "Nasal Cavity"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
An alternative pathway of enteric PEDV dissemination from nasal cavity to intestinal mucosa in swine
Li Y, Wu Q, Huang L, Yuan C, Wang J, Yang Q
2018Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
146cc by
PMID 30232333 · DOI · PMC6145876
The effect of cigarette smoking on the oral and nasal microbiota
Yu G, Phillips S, Gail MH, Goedert JJ, Humphrys MS, Ravel J, et al.
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
135cc by
PMID 28095925 · DOI · PMC5240432
Olfactory Cleft Measurements and COVID-19-Related Anosmia
Altundag A, Yıldırım D, Tekcan Sanli DE, Cayonu M, Kandemirli SG, Sanli AN, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
44cc by
PMID 33045908 · DOI · PMC7554408
Nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage promotes depressive behaviour in mice via sex hormone degradation
Xiang G, Wang Y, Ni K, Luo H, Liu Q, Song Y, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
13cc by
PMID 40983700 · DOI · PMC12488488

An alternative pathway of enteric PEDV dissemination from nasal cavity to intestinal mucosa in swine [1]

Research article Li Y, Wu Q, Huang L, Yuan C, Wang J, Yang Q · · 2018 · cited 146 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) has catastrophic impacts on the global pig industry.
Closing excerpt
Our study provides evidence for airborne transmission of a gastrointestinal infected coronavirus and illustrates the mechanism of its transport from the entry site to the pathogenic site.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (123 words)

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) has catastrophic impacts on the global pig industry. Although the fecal-oral route is generally accepted, an increased number of reports indicate that airborne transmission may contribute to PEDV outbreak. Here, we show that PEDV could cause typical diarrhea in piglets through a nasal spray. Firstly, PEDV can develop a transient nasal epithelium infection. Subsequently, PEDV-carrying dendritic cells (DCs) allow the virus to be transferred to CD3+ T cells via the virological synapse. Finally, virus-loaded CD3+ T cells reach the intestine through the blood circulation, leading to intestinal infection via cell-to-cell contact. Our study provides evidence for airborne transmission of a gastrointestinal infected coronavirus and illustrates the mechanism of its transport from the entry site to the pathogenic site.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30232333 · DOI · PMC6145876

The effect of cigarette smoking on the oral and nasal microbiota [2]

Research article Yu G, Phillips S, Gail MH, Goedert JJ, Humphrys MS, Ravel J, et al. · · 2017 · cited 135 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThe goal of the study was to investigate whether cigarette smoking alters oral and nasal microbial diversity, composition, and structure.
Closing excerpt
The marked heterogeneity of the oral microbial ecosystem that we found may contribute to the stability of the oral microbiota in most sites when facing environmental perturbations such as that caused by cigarette smoking.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (168 words)

BackgroundThe goal of the study was to investigate whether cigarette smoking alters oral and nasal microbial diversity, composition, and structure. Twenty-three current smokers and 20 never smokers were recruited. From each subject, nine samples including supra and subgingiva plaque scrapes, saliva, swabs from five soft oral tissue sites, and one nasal swab from both the anterior nares were collected. 16S rRNA V3-V4 region was sequenced for microbial profiles.ResultsWe found that alpha diversity was lower in smokers than in nonsmokers in the buccal mucosa, but in other sample sites, microbial diversity and composition were not significantly different by smoking status. Microbial profiles differed significantly among eight oral sites.ConclusionsThis study investigates the effect of cigarette smoking on different sites of the oral cavity and shows a potential effect of cigarette smoking on the buccal mucosa microbiota. The marked heterogeneity of the oral microbial ecosystem that we found may contribute to the stability of the oral microbiota in most sites when facing environmental perturbations such as that caused by cigarette smoking.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28095925 · DOI · PMC5240432

Olfactory Cleft Measurements and COVID-19-Related Anosmia [3]

Research article Altundag A, Yıldırım D, Tekcan Sanli DE, Cayonu M, Kandemirli SG, Sanli AN, et al. · · 2021 · cited 44 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the differences in olfactory cleft (OC) morphology in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) anosmia compared to control subjects and postviral anosmia related to infection other than severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Closing excerpt
Level of evidenceLevel 4.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (260 words)

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the differences in olfactory cleft (OC) morphology in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) anosmia compared to control subjects and postviral anosmia related to infection other than severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).Study designProspective.SettingThis study comprises 91 cases, including 24 cases with anosmia due to SARS-CoV-2, 38 patients with olfactory dysfunction (OD) due to viral infection other than SARS-CoV-2, and a control group of 29 normosmic cases.MethodsAll cases had paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT), and cases with OD had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) dedicated to the olfactory nerve. The OC width and volumes were measured on CT, and T2-weighted signal intensity (SI), olfactory bulb volumes, and olfactory sulcus depths were assessed on MRI.ResultsThis study showed 3 major findings: the right and left OC widths were significantly wider in anosmic patients due to SARS-CoV-2 (group 1) or OD due to non-SARS-CoV-2 viral infection (group 2) when compared to healthy controls. OC volumes were significantly higher in group 1 or 2 than in healthy controls, and T2 SI of OC area was higher in groups 1 and 2 than in healthy controls. There was no significant difference in olfactory bulb volumes and olfactory sulcus depths on MRI among groups 1 and 2.ConclusionIn this study, patients with COVID-19 anosmia had higher OC widths and volumes compared to control subjects. In addition, there was higher T2 SI of the olfactory bulb in COVID-19 anosmia compared to control subjects, suggesting underlying inflammatory changes. There was a significant negative correlation between these morphological findings and threshold discrimination identification scores.Level of evidenceLevel 4.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33045908 · DOI · PMC7554408

Nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage promotes depressive behaviour in mice via sex hormone degradation [4]

Research article Xiang G, Wang Y, Ni K, Luo H, Liu Q, Song Y, et al. · · 2025 · cited 13 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The human microbiome has a pronounced impact on human physiology and behaviour.
Closing excerpt
These findings reveal a nasal commensal that influences depressive behaviour and provides insights into the nose-brain axis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (155 words)

The human microbiome has a pronounced impact on human physiology and behaviour. Despite its unique anatomical connection to the brain, the role of the nasal microbiome in neurological diseases is understudied. Here, using human data and experiments in mice, we show that nasal Staphylococcus aureus is linked to depression. Nasal microbiome analyses revealed a positive correlation between depression scores and S. aureus abundance among patients with depression and healthy controls. Metabolomics of the nasal cavity showed decreased sex hormones, estradiol and testosterone in patients with depression versus controls. Nasal microbiota transplants from patients reproduced depression-like behaviour in mice with differential abundance of S. aureus. Further homology and mutational analysis uncovered an S. aureus sex hormone-degrading enzyme, 17b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (Hsd12), which degraded testosterone and estradiol in mice, leading to lower levels of dopamine and serotonin in the murine brain. These findings reveal a nasal commensal that influences depressive behaviour and provides insights into the nose-brain axis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40983700 · DOI · PMC12488488

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Nasal drug delivery--possibilities, problems and solutions [5]
    Illum L · J Control Release · 2003 · cited 636 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Evaluation of intranasal delivery route of drug administration for brain targeting [6]
    Erdő F, Bors LA, Farkas D, Bajza Á, Gizurarson S · Brain Res Bull · 2018 · cited 496 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Esthesioneuroblastoma: a meta-analysis and review [7]
    Dulguerov P, Allal AS, Calcaterra TC · Lancet Oncol · 2001 · cited 384 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The risk of infection after nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus [8]
    Safdar N, Bradley EA · Am J Med · 2008 · cited 221 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Anatomical and histological factors affecting intranasal drug and vaccine delivery [9]
    Gizurarson S · Curr Drug Deliv · 2012 · cited 181 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Olfactory neuroblastoma [10]
    Thompson LD · Head Neck Pathol · 2009 · cited 159 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Li Y, Wu Q, Huang L, Yuan C, Wang J, Yang Q. An alternative pathway of enteric PEDV dissemination from nasal cavity to intestinal mucosa in swine. . 2018. PMID 30232333 · DOI · PMC6145876
  2. Yu G, Phillips S, Gail MH, Goedert JJ, Humphrys MS, Ravel J, et al.. The effect of cigarette smoking on the oral and nasal microbiota. . 2017. PMID 28095925 · DOI · PMC5240432
  3. Altundag A, Yıldırım D, Tekcan Sanli DE, Cayonu M, Kandemirli SG, Sanli AN, et al.. Olfactory Cleft Measurements and COVID-19-Related Anosmia. . 2021. PMID 33045908 · DOI · PMC7554408
  4. Xiang G, Wang Y, Ni K, Luo H, Liu Q, Song Y, et al.. Nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage promotes depressive behaviour in mice via sex hormone degradation. . 2025. PMID 40983700 · DOI · PMC12488488
  5. Illum L. Nasal drug delivery--possibilities, problems and solutions. J Control Release. 2003. PMID 12618035 · DOI
  6. Erdő F, Bors LA, Farkas D, Bajza Á, Gizurarson S. Evaluation of intranasal delivery route of drug administration for brain targeting. Brain Res Bull. 2018. PMID 30449731 · DOI
  7. Dulguerov P, Allal AS, Calcaterra TC. Esthesioneuroblastoma: a meta-analysis and review. Lancet Oncol. 2001. PMID 11902539 · DOI
  8. Safdar N, Bradley EA. The risk of infection after nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Med. 2008. PMID 18374690 · DOI
  9. Gizurarson S. Anatomical and histological factors affecting intranasal drug and vaccine delivery. Curr Drug Deliv. 2012. PMID 22788696 · DOI · PMC3480721
  10. Thompson LD. Olfactory neuroblastoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2009. PMID 20596981 · DOI · PMC2811627

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Nasal SeptumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Nasal MucosaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Pleural CavityAnatomy and Physiology
  • Sphenoid SinusAnatomy and Physiology
  • PharynxAnatomy and Physiology
  • Paranasal SinusesAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

13,404
PubMed records on this heading
14%
published since 2020
1,152
review articles
376
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Nasal SeptumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Nasal MucosaAnatomy and Physiology
  • Pleural CavityAnatomy and Physiology
  • Sphenoid SinusAnatomy and Physiology
  • PharynxAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support