Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Clinical Research›Neonatal Screening
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Neonatal Screening

Clinical Research · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

The identification of selected parameters in newborn infants by various tests, examinations, or other procedures.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,265 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The identification of selected parameters in newborn infants by various tests, examinations, or other procedures. Screening may be performed by clinical or laboratory measures. A screening test is designed to sort out healthy neonates (infant, newborn) from those not well, but the screening test is not intended as a diagnostic device, rather instead as epidemiologic.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Neonatal Screenings; Screening, Neonatal; Screenings, Neonatal; Newborn Screening; Newborn Screenings; Screening, Newborn; Screenings, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Screening.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Mass Screening
See also
Prenatal Diagnosis

Related concepts

  • Infant
  • Newborn

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 13,545 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Neonatal Screening” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 3,366 of them (24.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 5,128 records.

Reviews account for 2,223 records (16.4%) and meta-analyses for 74. Randomized controlled trials number 122 (0.9%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,510 records; 2000-2009: 3,541 records; 2010-2019: 5,128 records; 2020 onward: 3,366 records1,510through 19993,5412000-20095,1282010-20193,3662020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,510
2000-20093,541
2010-20195,128
2020 onward3,366
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 16.4 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.9 percentReviews16.4% (2,223)Meta-analyses0.5% (74)Randomized controlled trials0.9% (122)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 13,545 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,22316.4%
Meta-analyses740.5%
Randomized controlled trials1220.9%

Method: PubMed query "Neonatal Screening"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in clinical research

Research methods determine how much a result can be trusted. Randomized trials guard against confounding, systematic reviews and meta-analyses combine many studies, and observational designs are valuable but can show only association. Reporting standards, trial registration and pre-specified outcomes reduce bias. When reading about a method, ask what problem it is designed to solve and which problems it does not solve.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Outcomes of a Population-Based Congenital Cytomegalovirus Screening Program
Dunn JKE, Chakraborty P, Reuvers E, Gallagher L, Kernohan KD, Lacaria M, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
32cc by
PMID 39836409 · DOI · PMC11877178
Comprehensive newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency, X-linked agammaglobulinemia, and spinal muscular atrophy: the Chinese experience
Chen C, Zhang C, Wu DW, Wang BY, Xiao R, Huang XL, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
17cc by
PMID 39500858 · DOI · PMC11634924
Sustainability of newborn screening for sickle cell disease in resource-poor countries: A systematic review
Okeke CO, Okeke C, Asala S, Ofakunrin AOD, Ufelle S, Nnodu OE
2024Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
14cc by
PMID 39241049 · DOI · PMC11379310
Universal Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Using Dried Blood Spot Specimens
Tavakoli NP, Sack V, Handel AS, Giacinto A, Pearce M, Ojukwu I, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
5cc by
PMID 41609826 · DOI · PMC12856680

Outcomes of a Population-Based Congenital Cytomegalovirus Screening Program [1]

Research article Dunn JKE, Chakraborty P, Reuvers E, Gallagher L, Kernohan KD, Lacaria M, et al. · · 2025 · cited 32 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ImportanceDetection of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection has previously relied on targeted screening programs or clinical recognition; however, these approaches miss most cCMV-infected newborns and fail to identify those infants who are asymptomatic at birth but at risk for late-onset sensorineural hearing loss.
Closing excerpt
The program had a much lower than expected prevalence of cCMV-positive screens but still identified many children who would otherwise not have been diagnosed and who would benefit from ongoing audiologic surveillance.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (355 words)

ImportanceDetection of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection has previously relied on targeted screening programs or clinical recognition; however, these approaches miss most cCMV-infected newborns and fail to identify those infants who are asymptomatic at birth but at risk for late-onset sensorineural hearing loss.ObjectiveTo determine the feasibility of using routinely collected newborn dried blood spots (DBS) in a population-based cCMV screen to identify infants at risk for hearing loss and describe outcomes of infants screened.Design, setting, and participantsThis diagnostic study of a population-based screening program in Ontario, Canada, took place from July 29, 2019, to July 31, 2023. All newborns with a DBS sample collected as part of routine care were screened using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis for cCMV as a risk factor for hearing loss. Infants with positive DBS PCR results for cCMV were referred for confirmation of infection by urine PCR (the gold standard), as well as complete medical and audiologic assessments for sequelae of cCMV infection. Infants with possible or confirmed symptomatic cCMV were referred to pediatric infectious disease specialists for evaluation for potential treatment with valganciclovir.ExposureDetection of cCMV by polymerase chain reaction assay on a newborn DBS.Main outcomes and measuresNumber of infants with positive screening results successfully retrieved and confirmed to have cCMV and the timeliness of retrieval and symptomatic evaluation.ResultsOf 565 987 infants born in the screening period, 551 034 (97.4%) received cCMV screening on the DBS (45.7% female, 54.3% male). Of these infants, 689 (0.13%) screened positive for cCMV; 601 (87.2%) had cCMV infection confirmed and a complete assessment of sequelae of their congenital infection. Ninety-six infants with completed assessments (16.0%) were deemed to have cCMV symptoms, and 63 of these (65.6%) began valganciclovir treatment. Sensorineural hearing loss was confirmed in 34 of 96 infants (35.4%).Conclusions and relevanceThis program found acceptable and feasible implementation of a population-based screening program using routinely collected DBS samples, suggesting that it may serve as a template for jurisdictions considering universal cCMV screening. The program had a much lower than expected prevalence of cCMV-positive screens but still identified many children who would otherwise not have been diagnosed and who would benefit from ongoing audiologic surveillance.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39836409 · DOI · PMC11877178

Comprehensive newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency, X-linked agammaglobulinemia, and spinal muscular atrophy: the Chinese experience [2]

Research article Chen C, Zhang C, Wu DW, Wang BY, Xiao R, Huang XL, et al. · · 2024 · cited 17 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundNewborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA), and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) enables early diagnosis and intervention, significantly improving patient outcomes.
Closing excerpt
Our findings suggest that this multiplex assay is an effective screening method for SCID, XLA, and SMA, potentially supporting the universal implementation of NBS programs across China.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (220 words)

BackgroundNewborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA), and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) enables early diagnosis and intervention, significantly improving patient outcomes. Advances in real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology have been instrumental in facilitating their inclusion in NBS programs.MethodsWe employed multiplex real-time PCR to simultaneously detect T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs), kappa-deleting recombination excision circles (KRECs), and the absence of the survival motor neuron (SMN) 1 gene in dried blood spots from 103,240 newborns in Zhejiang Province, China, between July 2021 and December 2022.ResultsOf all the samples, 122 were requested further evaluation. After flow cytometry evaluation and/or genetic diagnostics, we identified one patient with SCID, two patients with XLA, nine patients with SMA [one of whom also had Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome (WAS)], and eight patients with other medical conditions. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of NBS for SCID, XLA, and SMA were 2.44%, 2.78%, and 100%, respectively. The estimated prevalence rates in the Chinese population were 1 in 103,240 for SCID, 1 in 51,620 for XLA, and 1 in 11,471 for SMA.ConclusionThis study represents the first large-scale screening in mainland China using a TREC/KREC/SMN1 multiplex assay, providing valuable epidemiological data. Our findings suggest that this multiplex assay is an effective screening method for SCID, XLA, and SMA, potentially supporting the universal implementation of NBS programs across China.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39500858 · DOI · PMC11634924

Sustainability of newborn screening for sickle cell disease in resource-poor countries: A systematic review [3]

Systematic review Okeke CO, Okeke C, Asala S, Ofakunrin AOD, Ufelle S, Nnodu OE · · 2024 · cited 14 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a worldwide genetic blood disorder.
Closing excerpt
Screening should be tailored to the local context; using DBS on HemoTypeSC could be a game changer for scaling up and expanding the newborn screening program in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (320 words)

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a worldwide genetic blood disorder. Roughly 400,000 babies are born with SCD each year worldwide. More than 75% of these births occur in sub-Saharan Africa. The establishment of sustainable newborn screening NBS programs is an excellent approach to improving the health of persons living with SCD. The need to set up such programs in Africa cannot be overemphasized. However, initial implementation does not guarantee sustainability. More than 500 children with sickle cell anaemia (SCA) die every day due to lack of access to early diagnosis and related treatment. We systematically highlighted suggestions proffered so far, for the sustainability of NBS in low income, high burden countries. We searched online databases, PubMed, and Google Scholar for literature on sustainability of newborn screening (NBS) published between 2012 and 2022. Articles were included if they reported as outcome; sustainability, government participation, scaling up and expansion of NBS, improved patient enrolment in the newborn screening programe. Articles not suggesting same were excluded. Data were extracted from published reports. Primary outcome was government participation and enhanced patient enrolment in the NBS programe. Thematic content analysis was applied using inductive and deductive codes. We came up with 9 major themes. This study is registered with PROSPERO with registration number as CRD42023381821. Literature search yielded 918 articles (including manual searching). After screening, nine (9) publications were suitable for data extraction and analysis. Two more articles were added by manual searching, making a total of eleven (11) articles. The most frequently addressed core elements of sustainability in these papers were complete integration of services into national health care systems for sustainability of NBS programs in Low-income high-burden countries, funding and engagement from government partners from the very beginning of program development should be prioritized. Screening should be tailored to the local context; using DBS on HemoTypeSC could be a game changer for scaling up and expanding the newborn screening program in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39241049 · DOI · PMC11379310

Universal Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Using Dried Blood Spot Specimens [4]

Research article Tavakoli NP, Sack V, Handel AS, Giacinto A, Pearce M, Ojukwu I, et al. · · 2026 · cited 5 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ImportanceCongenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is the most common nongenetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss in children and a cause of long-term neurological disabilities.
Closing excerpt
Further studies that incorporate long-term data are needed to better understand the impact of cCMV identification among newborns with asymptomatic infection.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (370 words)

ImportanceCongenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is the most common nongenetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss in children and a cause of long-term neurological disabilities. In the absence of universal screening, cCMV disease in many newborns will go undiagnosed and untreated.ObjectiveTo determine the feasibility, screen-positive rate, and parental acceptance of newborn screening for cCMV using dried blood spot (DBS) specimens.Design, setting, and participantsIn this population-based diagnostic study, newborns whose DBS specimens were submitted to the New York State Newborn Screening Program from October 2, 2023, through September 30, 2024, for routine screening were also screened for CMV. Parents were given the option to opt out of receiving CMV results. Infectious disease specialists at designated medical centers performed follow-up of referred newborns. Of the 208 322 newborns whose specimens were submitted, 245 (0.1%) were opted out of the CMV screen by their parents; 22 families did so after CMV results were released.ExposureDBS screening of newborns.Main outcomes and measuresCMV was detected in DBS specimens from newborns using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. Appropriate follow-up and treatment were provided to referred newborns.ResultsOf the 208 099 newborns (48.6% female and 51.0% male; mean [SD] age at specimen collection, 3.5 [12.3] days [median, 1.0 days]) whose CMV results were reported, 529 had positive CMV screen results (0.3%). Following referral and initial diagnostic evaluation, 276 of the 529 newborns (52.2%) were diagnosed with cCMV (overall rate of 0.1%). Among the 276 newborns with cCMV, 68 (24.6%) had symptomatic cCMV disease, 197 (71.4%) had asymptomatic infection, and 11 (4.0%) had isolated sensorineural hearing loss. Additionally, 131 of the 529 referred newborns (24.8%) had likely acquired CMV postnatally, 17 (3.2%) had false-positive screen results, 43 (8.1%) had unknown CMV classification, and 62 (11.7%) were lost to follow-up or their parents declined follow-up. Of the 68 newborns with symptomatic cCMV disease, 48 (70.6%) were treated with antiviral medication.Conclusions and relevanceIn this diagnostic study, early identification of cCMV allowed newborns to be evaluated, which provided an opportunity for improved outcomes. Although the intent of the screening was to detect cCMV, a sizeable minority of cases identified had postnatally acquired CMV infections. Further studies that incorporate long-term data are needed to better understand the impact of cCMV identification among newborns with asymptomatic infection.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41609826 · DOI · PMC12856680

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Screening Examination of Premature Infants for Retinopathy of Prematurity [5]
    Fierson WM, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS Section on Ophthalmology, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY AND STRABISMUS, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CERTIFIED ORTHOPTISTS · Pediatrics · 2018 · cited 459 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Genomic newborn screening for rare diseases [6]
    Stark Z, Scott RH · Nat Rev Genet · 2023 · cited 189 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Advances in Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy - New Phenotypes, New Challenges, New Implications for Care [7]
    Schorling DC, Pechmann A, Kirschner J · J Neuromuscul Dis · 2020 · cited 185 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A genome sequencing system for universal newborn screening, diagnosis, and precision medicine for severe genetic diseases [8]
    Kingsmore SF, Smith LD, Kunard CM, Bainbridge M, Batalov S, Benson W, et al. · Am J Hum Genet · 2022 · cited 140 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Inborn Errors of Metabolism Overview: Pathophysiology, Manifestations, Evaluation, and Management [9]
    Saudubray JM, Garcia-Cazorla À · Pediatr Clin North Am · 2018 · cited 124 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency and T-cell lymphopenia [10]
    Puck JM · Immunol Rev · 2019 · cited 121 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Dunn JKE, Chakraborty P, Reuvers E, Gallagher L, Kernohan KD, Lacaria M, et al.. Outcomes of a Population-Based Congenital Cytomegalovirus Screening Program. . 2025. PMID 39836409 · DOI · PMC11877178
  2. Chen C, Zhang C, Wu DW, Wang BY, Xiao R, Huang XL, et al.. Comprehensive newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency, X-linked agammaglobulinemia, and spinal muscular atrophy: the Chinese experience. . 2024. PMID 39500858 · DOI · PMC11634924
  3. Okeke CO, Okeke C, Asala S, Ofakunrin AOD, Ufelle S, Nnodu OE. Sustainability of newborn screening for sickle cell disease in resource-poor countries: A systematic review. . 2024. PMID 39241049 · DOI · PMC11379310
  4. Tavakoli NP, Sack V, Handel AS, Giacinto A, Pearce M, Ojukwu I, et al.. Universal Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Using Dried Blood Spot Specimens. . 2026. PMID 41609826 · DOI · PMC12856680
  5. Fierson WM, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS Section on Ophthalmology, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY AND STRABISMUS, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CERTIFIED ORTHOPTISTS. Screening Examination of Premature Infants for Retinopathy of Prematurity. Pediatrics. 2018. PMID 30478242 · DOI
  6. Stark Z, Scott RH. Genomic newborn screening for rare diseases. Nat Rev Genet. 2023. PMID 37386126 · DOI
  7. Schorling DC, Pechmann A, Kirschner J. Advances in Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy - New Phenotypes, New Challenges, New Implications for Care. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2020. PMID 31707373 · DOI · PMC7029319
  8. Kingsmore SF, Smith LD, Kunard CM, Bainbridge M, Batalov S, Benson W, et al.. A genome sequencing system for universal newborn screening, diagnosis, and precision medicine for severe genetic diseases. Am J Hum Genet. 2022. PMID 36007526 · DOI · PMC9502059
  9. Saudubray JM, Garcia-Cazorla À. Inborn Errors of Metabolism Overview: Pathophysiology, Manifestations, Evaluation, and Management. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2018. PMID 29502909 · DOI
  10. Puck JM. Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency and T-cell lymphopenia. Immunol Rev. 2019. PMID 30565242 · DOI · PMC6324582

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Mass ScreeningClinical Research
  • Genetic TestingGenetics and Genomics
  • Abbreviated Injury ScaleClinical Research
  • APACHEClinical Research
  • Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemClinical Research
  • Data CollectionClinical Research

All 98 articles in Clinical Research →

At a glance

13,545
PubMed records on this heading
25%
published since 2020
2,223
review articles
122
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Mass ScreeningClinical Research
  • Genetic TestingGenetics and Genomics
  • Abbreviated Injury ScaleClinical Research
  • APACHEClinical Research
  • Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemClinical Research

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support