Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (855 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The amounts of various substances in food needed by an organism to sustain healthy life.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Nutritional Requirement; Requirement, Nutritional; Requirements, Nutritional; Nutrition Requirements; Nutrition Requirement; Requirement, Nutrition; Requirements, Nutrition; Dietary Requirements.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
- Narrower topics
- Recommended Dietary Allowances
- See also
- Food; Sustenance
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 22,765 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Nutritional Requirements” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,601 of them (7.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 10,958 records.
Reviews account for 6,099 records (26.8%) and meta-analyses for 128. Randomized controlled trials number 708 (3.1%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 10,958 |
| 2000-2009 | 4,609 |
| 2010-2019 | 5,597 |
| 2020 onward | 1,601 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 6,099 | 26.8% |
| Meta-analyses | 128 | 0.6% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 708 | 3.1% |
Method: PubMed query "Nutritional Requirements"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Review of Micronutrients and the Immune System-Working in Harmony to Reduce the Risk of Infection | 2020 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 757 | cc by PMID 31963293 · DOI · PMC7019735 |
| Food Components and Dietary Habits: Keys for a Healthy Gut Microbiota Composition | 2019 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 444 | cc by PMID 31591348 · DOI · PMC6835969 |
| Immune Function and Micronutrient Requirements Change over the Life Course | 2018 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 367 | cc by PMID 30336639 · DOI · PMC6212925 |
| Protein Nutrition for Endurance Athletes: A Metabolic Focus on Promoting Recovery and Training Adaptation | 2025 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 16 | cc by PMID 40117058 · DOI · PMC12152099 |
A Review of Micronutrients and the Immune System-Working in Harmony to Reduce the Risk of Infection [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Immune support by micronutrients is historically based on vitamin C deficiency and supplementation in scurvy in early times.
- Closing excerpt
- Better design of human clinical studies addressing dosage and combinations of micronutrients in different populations are required to substantiate the benefits of micronutrient supplementation against infection.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (194 words)
Immune support by micronutrients is historically based on vitamin C deficiency and supplementation in scurvy in early times. It has since been established that the complex, integrated immune system needs multiple specific micronutrients, including vitamins A, D, C, E, B6, and B12, folate, zinc, iron, copper, and selenium, which play vital, often synergistic roles at every stage of the immune response. Adequate amounts are essential to ensure the proper function of physical barriers and immune cells; however, daily micronutrient intakes necessary to support immune function may be higher than current recommended dietary allowances. Certain populations have inadequate dietary micronutrient intakes, and situations with increased requirements (e.g., infection, stress, and pollution) further decrease stores within the body. Several micronutrients may be deficient, and even marginal deficiency may impair immunity. Although contradictory data exist, available evidence indicates that supplementation with multiple micronutrients with immune-supporting roles may modulate immune function and reduce the risk of infection. Micronutrients with the strongest evidence for immune support are vitamins C and D and zinc. Better design of human clinical studies addressing dosage and combinations of micronutrients in different populations are required to substantiate the benefits of micronutrient supplementation against infection.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31963293 · DOI · PMC7019735
Food Components and Dietary Habits: Keys for a Healthy Gut Microbiota Composition [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The gut microbiota is a changing ecosystem, containing trillions of bacteria, continuously shaped by many factors, such as dietary habits, seasonality, lifestyle, stress, antibiotics use, or diseases.
- Closing excerpt
- , vegan and vegetarian, gluten-free, ketogenic, high sugar, low FODMAP, Western-type, and Mediterranean diets) on gut microbiota composition in order to define the optimal diet for a healthy modulation of gut microbiota.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (189 words)
The gut microbiota is a changing ecosystem, containing trillions of bacteria, continuously shaped by many factors, such as dietary habits, seasonality, lifestyle, stress, antibiotics use, or diseases. A healthy host-microorganisms balance must be respected in order to optimally maintain the intestinal barrier and immune system functions and, consequently, prevent disease development. In the past several decades, the adoption of modern dietary habits has become a growing health concern, as it is strongly associated with obesity and related metabolic diseases, promoting inflammation and both structural and behavioral changes in gut microbiota. In this context, novel dietary strategies are emerging to prevent diseases and maintain health. However, the consequences of these different diets on gut microbiota modulation are still largely unknown, and could potentially lead to alterations of gut microbiota, intestinal barrier, and the immune system. The present review aimed to focus on the impact of single food components (macronutrients and micronutrients), salt, food additives, and different dietary habits (i.e., vegan and vegetarian, gluten-free, ketogenic, high sugar, low FODMAP, Western-type, and Mediterranean diets) on gut microbiota composition in order to define the optimal diet for a healthy modulation of gut microbiota.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31591348 · DOI · PMC6835969
Immune Function and Micronutrient Requirements Change over the Life Course [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- As humans age, the risk and severity of infections vary in line with immune competence according to how the immune system develops, matures, and declines.
- Closing excerpt
- This review looks at immune considerations specific to each life stage, the consequent risk of infection, micronutrient requirements and deficiencies exhibited over the life course, and the available evidence regarding the effects of micronutrient supplementation on immune function and infection.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (199 words)
As humans age, the risk and severity of infections vary in line with immune competence according to how the immune system develops, matures, and declines. Several factors influence the immune system and its competence, including nutrition. A bidirectional relationship among nutrition, infection and immunity exists: changes in one component affect the others. For example, distinct immune features present during each life stage may affect the type, prevalence, and severity of infections, while poor nutrition can compromise immune function and increase infection risk. Various micronutrients are essential for immunocompetence, particularly vitamins A, C, D, E, B2, B6, and B12, folic acid, iron, selenium, and zinc. Micronutrient deficiencies are a recognized global public health issue, and poor nutritional status predisposes to certain infections. Immune function may be improved by restoring deficient micronutrients to recommended levels, thereby increasing resistance to infection and supporting faster recovery when infected. Diet alone may be insufficient and tailored micronutrient supplementation based on specific age-related needs necessary. This review looks at immune considerations specific to each life stage, the consequent risk of infection, micronutrient requirements and deficiencies exhibited over the life course, and the available evidence regarding the effects of micronutrient supplementation on immune function and infection.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30336639 · DOI · PMC6212925
Protein Nutrition for Endurance Athletes: A Metabolic Focus on Promoting Recovery and Training Adaptation [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an evidence-based update on the protein needs of endurance athletes with a focus on high-quality metabolic studies conducted on the topics of recovery and training adaptation over the past decade.
- Closing excerpt
- However, recent evidence suggests a role for protein nutrition in optimising the adaptive metabolic response to endurance training under conditions of low carbohydrate and/or energy availability that represent increasingly popular periodised strategies for endurance athletes.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (273 words)
The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an evidence-based update on the protein needs of endurance athletes with a focus on high-quality metabolic studies conducted on the topics of recovery and training adaptation over the past decade. We use the term 'protein needs' to delineate between the concepts of a daily protein requirement and per meal protein recommendations when devising scientific evidence-based protein guidelines for the endurance athlete to promote post-exercise recovery, enhance the adaptive response to endurance training and improve endurance performance. A habitual protein intake of 1.5 g/kg of body mass (BM)-1·day-1 is typical in male and female endurance athletes. Based on findings from a series of contemporary protein requirement studies, the evidence suggests a daily protein intake of ~ 1.8 g·kgBM-1·day-1 should be advocated for endurance athletes, with the caveat that the protein requirement may be further elevated in excess of 2.0 g·kgBM-1·day-1 during periods of carbohydrate-restricted training and on rest days. Regarding protein recommendations, the current lack of metabolic studies that determine the dose response of muscle protein synthesis to protein ingestion in relation to endurance exercise makes it difficult to present definitive guidelines on optimal per meal protein intakes for endurance athletes. Moreover, there remains no compelling evidence that co-ingesting protein with carbohydrate before or during endurance exercise confers any performance advantage, nor facilitates the resynthesis of liver or muscle glycogen stores during recovery, at least when carbohydrate recommendations are met. However, recent evidence suggests a role for protein nutrition in optimising the adaptive metabolic response to endurance training under conditions of low carbohydrate and/or energy availability that represent increasingly popular periodised strategies for endurance athletes.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 40117058 · DOI · PMC12152099
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients [5]
- Research article Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group [6]
- Research article American College of Sports Medicine Joint Position Statement. Nutrition and Athletic Performance [7]
- Research article Global Consensus Recommendations on Prevention and Management of Nutritional Rickets [8]
- Research article Complementary Feeding: A Position Paper by the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Committee on Nutrition [9]
- Research article Discovery of human zinc deficiency: its impact on human health and disease [10]
References
- Gombart AF, Pierre A, Maggini S. A Review of Micronutrients and the Immune System-Working in Harmony to Reduce the Risk of Infection. . 2020. PMID 31963293 · DOI · PMC7019735
- Rinninella E, Cintoni M, Raoul P, Lopetuso LR, Scaldaferri F, Pulcini G, et al.. Food Components and Dietary Habits: Keys for a Healthy Gut Microbiota Composition. . 2019. PMID 31591348 · DOI · PMC6835969
- Maggini S, Pierre A, Calder PC. Immune Function and Micronutrient Requirements Change over the Life Course. . 2018. PMID 30336639 · DOI · PMC6212925
- Witard OC, Hearris M, Morgan PT. Protein Nutrition for Endurance Athletes: A Metabolic Focus on Promoting Recovery and Training Adaptation. . 2025. PMID 40117058 · DOI · PMC12152099
- Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H, Bozzetti F, et al.. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr. 2017. PMID 27637832 · DOI
- Bauer J, Biolo G, Cederholm T, Cesari M, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Morley JE, et al.. Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013. PMID 23867520 · DOI
- Thomas DT, Erdman KA, Burke LM. American College of Sports Medicine Joint Position Statement. Nutrition and Athletic Performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016. PMID 26891166 · DOI
- Munns CF, Shaw N, Kiely M, Specker BL, Thacher TD, Ozono K, et al.. Global Consensus Recommendations on Prevention and Management of Nutritional Rickets. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016. PMID 26745253 · DOI · PMC4880117
- Fewtrell M, Bronsky J, Campoy C, Domellöf M, Embleton N, Fidler Mis N, et al.. Complementary Feeding: A Position Paper by the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017. PMID 28027215 · DOI
- Prasad AS. Discovery of human zinc deficiency: its impact on human health and disease. Adv Nutr. 2013. PMID 23493534 · DOI · PMC3649098
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.