Octreotide

PurposeTo present data from an interim analysis of a Phase II trial designed to determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of individualising treatment based on renal dosimetry, by giving as many cycles as possible within a maximum renal biologically effective dose (BED).MethodTreatment was given with repeated cycles of 7.4 GBq 177Lu-DOTATATE at 8-12-week intervals. Detailed dosimetry was performed in all patients after each cycle using a hybrid method (SPECT + planar imaging). All patients received treatment up to a renal BED of 27 ± 2 Gy (α/β = 2.6 Gy) (Step 1). Selected patients were offered further treatment up to a renal BED of 40 ± 2 Gy (Step 2). Renal function was followed by estimation and measurement of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR).ResultsFifty-one patients were included in the present analysis. Among the patients who received treatment as planned, the median number of cycles in Step 1 was 5 (range 3-7), and for those who completed Step 2 it was 7 (range 5-8); 73% were able to receive >4 cycles. Although GFR decreased in most patients after the completion of treatment, no grade 3-4 toxicity was observed. Patients with a reduced baseline GFR seemed to have an increased risk of GFR decline. Five patients received treatment in Step 2, none of whom exhibited a significant reduction in renal function.ConclusionsIndividualising PRRT using renal dosimetry seems feasible and safe and leads to an increased number of cycles in the majority of patients. The trial will continue as planned.

In recent decades, the incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has steadily increased. Due to the slow-growing nature of these tumors and the lack of early symptoms, most cases are diagnosed at advanced stages, when curative treatment options are no longer available. Prognosis and survival of patients with NETs are determined by the location of the primary lesion, biochemical functional status, differentiation, initial staging, and response to treatment. Somatostatin analogue (SSA) therapy has been a mainstay of antisecretory therapy in functioning neuroendocrine tumors, which cause various clinical symptoms depending on hormonal hypersecretion. Beyond symptomatic management, recent research demonstrates that SSAs exert antiproliferative effects and inhibit tumor growth via the somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2). Both the PROMID (placebo-controlled, prospective, randomized study in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors) and the CLARINET (controlled study of lanreotide antiproliferative response in neuroendocrine tumors) trial showed a statistically significant prolongation of time to progression/progression-free survival (TTP/PFS) upon SSA treatment, compared to placebo. Moreover, the combination of SSA with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in small intestinal NETs has proven efficacy in the phase 3 neuroendocrine tumours therapy (NETTER 1) trial. PRRT is currently being tested for enteropancreatic NETs versus everolimus in the COMPETE trial, and the potential of SSTR-antagonists in PRRT is now being evaluated in early phase I/II clinical trials. This review provides a synopsis on the pharmacological development of SSAs and their use as antisecretory drugs. Moreover, this review highlights the clinical evidence of SSAs in monotherapy, and in combination with other treatment modalities, as applied to the antiproliferative management of neuroendocrine tumors with special attention to recent high-quality phase III trials.

ContextThe somatostatin analogues octreotide LAR and lanreotide Autogel have been evaluated for the treatment of acromegaly in numerous clinical trials, with considerable heterogeneity in reported biochemical response rates. This review examines and attempts to account for these differences in response rates reported in the literature.Evidence acquisitionPubMed was searched for English-language studies of a minimum duration of 24 weeks that evaluated ≥10 patients with acromegaly treated with octreotide LAR or lanreotide Autogel from 1990 to March 2015 and reported GH and/or IGF-1 data as the primary objective of the study.Evidence synthesisOf the 190 clinical trials found, 18 octreotide LAR and 15 lanreotide Autogel studies fulfilled the criteria for analysis. It is evident from the protocols of these studies that multiple factors are capable of impacting on reported response rates. Prospective studies reporting an intention-to-treat analysis that evaluated medically naïve patients and used the composite endpoint of both GH and IGF-1 control were associated with lower response rates. The use of non-composite biochemical control endpoints, heterogeneous patient populations, analyses that exclude treatment non-responders, assay variability and prior responsiveness to medical therapy are just a few of the factors identified that likely contribute to higher success rates.ConclusionsThe wide range of reported response rates with somatostatin analogues may be confusing and could lead to misinterpretation by both the patient and the physician in certain situations. Understanding the factors that potentially drive the variation in response rates should allow clinicians to better gauge treatment expectations in specific patients.

There are no established treatment options for patients with meningioma recurring after surgery and radiotherapy. Somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2) is highly expressed in meningiomas, and SSTR2-targeting radionuclide therapy with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE has shown potential activity in the treatment of meningioma in uncontrolled and small studies. Methods: EORTC-2334-BTG (LUMEN-1, NCT06326190) is a randomized, multicenter, phase II trial in patients with recurrent World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1, 2, or 3 meningioma. In total, 136 patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE (≤4 doses of 7.4 GBq given every 4 wk) or local standard of care (hydroxyurea, bevacizumab, sunitinib, octreotide, everolimus, or observation). The main eligibility criteria include age 18 y or older; neuropathologically confirmed meningioma of WHO grade 1, 2, or 3; WHO performance score of 0-2; measurable disease on MRI (≥10 × 10 mm); radiologically documented progression of any existing tumor (growth > 25% or new lesions) or appearance of new lesions within the last 2 y; SSTR positivity by PET imaging (SUVmax > 2.3); at least 1 prior surgery and at least 1 line of radiotherapy; and no prior systemic therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint is locally assessed progression-free survival according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology MRI meningioma criteria, and secondary endpoints include radiologic response rate, overall survival, safety, health-related quality of life, and neurologic function. The trial protocol includes a comprehensive exploratory translational research program with dosimetry and imaging-based and tissue-based investigations. LUMEN-1 was activated in March 2025 and will enroll patients in 35 sites in 10 countries across Europe, with primary endpoint collection planned after 2 y and study completion after 5 y. To our knowledge, EORTC-2334-BTG (LUMEN-1, NCT06326190) is the first prospective randomized trial investigating the efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in patients with recurrent meningioma.