Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Oropharynx
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Oropharynx

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The middle portion of the pharynx that lies posterior to the mouth, inferior to the soft palate, and superior to the base of the tongue and epiglottis.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (973 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The middle portion of the pharynx that lies posterior to the mouth, inferior to the soft palate, and superior to the base of the tongue and epiglottis. It has a digestive function as food passes from the mouth into the oropharynx before entering esophagus.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Oropharynxs.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Pharynx
Narrower topics
Palatine Tonsil

Related concepts

  • Soft Palate
  • Epiglottis
  • Esophagus

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 16,180 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Oropharynx” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 1,895 of them (11.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 8,085 records.

Reviews account for 893 records (5.5%) and meta-analyses for 93. Randomized controlled trials number 410 (2.5%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 8,085 records; 2000-2009: 2,845 records; 2010-2019: 3,355 records; 2020 onward: 1,895 records8,085through 19992,8452000-20093,3552010-20191,8952020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19998,085
2000-20092,845
2010-20193,355
2020 onward1,895
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.6 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.5 percentReviews5.5% (893)Meta-analyses0.6% (93)Randomized controlled trials2.5% (410)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 16,180 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews8935.5%
Meta-analyses930.6%
Randomized controlled trials4102.5%

Method: PubMed query "Oropharynx"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
An atlas of cells in the human tonsil
Massoni-Badosa R, Aguilar-Fernández S, Nieto JC, Soler-Vila P, Elosua-Bayes M, Marchese D, et al.
2024Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
186cc by
PMID 38301653 · DOI · PMC10869140
Metagenomic analysis reveals oropharyngeal microbiota alterations in patients with COVID-19
Ma S, Zhang F, Zhou F, Li H, Ge W, Gan R, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
121cc by
PMID 33986253 · DOI · PMC8116522
Signatures of COVID-19 Severity and Immune Response in the Respiratory Tract Microbiome
Merenstein C, Liang G, Whiteside SA, Cobián-Güemes AG, Merlino MS, Taylor LJ, et al.
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
112cc by
PMID 34399607 · DOI · PMC8406335
A tonsil organoid model reveals Epstein-Barr virus-infected germinal center B cell states during primary infection
Mitul MT, Sun Y, Yates TB, Sureshchandra S, Kastenschmidt JM, Sorn AM, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 42594281 · DOI · PMC13486580

An atlas of cells in the human tonsil [1]

Research article Massoni-Badosa R, Aguilar-Fernández S, Nieto JC, Soler-Vila P, Elosua-Bayes M, Marchese D, et al. · · 2024 · cited 186 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Palatine tonsils are secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs) representing the first line of immunological defense against inhaled or ingested pathogens.
Closing excerpt
We demonstrate the value of this resource by annotating cells from B cell-derived mantle cell lymphomas, linking transcriptional heterogeneity to normal B cell differentiation states of the human tonsil.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (154 words)

Palatine tonsils are secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs) representing the first line of immunological defense against inhaled or ingested pathogens. We generated an atlas of the human tonsil composed of >556,000 cells profiled across five different data modalities, including single-cell transcriptome, epigenome, proteome, and immune repertoire sequencing, as well as spatial transcriptomics. This census identified 121 cell types and states, defined developmental trajectories, and enabled an understanding of the functional units of the tonsil. Exemplarily, we stratified myeloid slan-like subtypes, established a BCL6 enhancer as locally active in follicle-associated T and B cells, and identified SIX5 as putative transcriptional regulator of plasma cell maturation. Analyses of a validation cohort confirmed the presence, annotation, and markers of tonsillar cell types and provided evidence of age-related compositional shifts. We demonstrate the value of this resource by annotating cells from B cell-derived mantle cell lymphomas, linking transcriptional heterogeneity to normal B cell differentiation states of the human tonsil.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38301653 · DOI · PMC10869140

Metagenomic analysis reveals oropharyngeal microbiota alterations in patients with COVID-19 [2]

Research article Ma S, Zhang F, Zhou F, Li H, Ge W, Gan R, et al. · · 2021 · cited 121 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
COVID-19 remains a serious emerging global health problem, and little is known about the role of oropharynx commensal microbes in infection susceptibility and severity.
Closing excerpt
In conclusion, we found that oropharyngeal microbiota alterations and functional differences were associated with COVID-19 severity.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (277 words)

COVID-19 remains a serious emerging global health problem, and little is known about the role of oropharynx commensal microbes in infection susceptibility and severity. Here, we present the oropharyngeal microbiota characteristics identified by shotgun metagenomic sequencing analyses of oropharynx swab specimens from 31 COVID-19 patients, 29 influenza B patients, and 28 healthy controls. Our results revealed a distinct oropharyngeal microbiota composition in the COVID-19 patients, characterized by enrichment of opportunistic pathogens such as Veillonella and Megasphaera and depletion of Pseudopropionibacterium, Rothia, and Streptococcus. Based on the relative abundance of the oropharyngeal microbiome, we built a microbial classifier to distinguish COVID-19 patients from flu patients and healthy controls with an AUC of 0.889, in which Veillonella was identified as the most prominent biomarker for COVID-19 group. Several members of the genus Veillonella, especially Veillonella parvula which was highly enriched in the oropharynx of our COVID-19 patients, were also overrepresented in the BALF of COVID-19 patients, indicating that the oral cavity acts as a natural reservoir for pathogens to induce co-infections in the lungs of COVID-19 patients. We also found the increased ratios of Klebsiella sp., Acinetobacter sp., and Serratia sp. were correlated with both disease severity and elevated systemic inflammation markers (neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, NLR), suggesting that these oropharynx microbiota alterations may impact COVID-19 severity by influencing the inflammatory response. Moreover, the oropharyngeal microbiome of COVID-19 patients exhibited a significant enrichment in amino acid metabolism and xenobiotic biodegradation and metabolism. In addition, all 26 drug classes of antimicrobial resistance genes were detected in the COVID-19 group, and were significantly enriched in critical cases. In conclusion, we found that oropharyngeal microbiota alterations and functional differences were associated with COVID-19 severity.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33986253 · DOI · PMC8116522

Signatures of COVID-19 Severity and Immune Response in the Respiratory Tract Microbiome [3]

Research article Merenstein C, Liang G, Whiteside SA, Cobián-Güemes AG, Merlino MS, Taylor LJ, et al. · · 2021 · cited 112 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Viral infection of the respiratory tract can be associated with propagating effects on the airway microbiome, and microbiome dysbiosis may influence viral disease.
Closing excerpt
These findings raise questions about the mechanisms linking SARS-CoV-2 infection and other microbial inhabitants of the airway, including whether the microbiome might regulate severity of COVID-19 disease and/or whether early microbiome features might serve as biomarkers to discriminate disease severity.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (394 words)

Viral infection of the respiratory tract can be associated with propagating effects on the airway microbiome, and microbiome dysbiosis may influence viral disease. Here, we investigated the respiratory tract microbiome in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its relationship to disease severity, systemic immunologic features, and outcomes. We examined 507 oropharyngeal, nasopharyngeal, and endotracheal samples from 83 hospitalized COVID-19 patients as well as non-COVID patients and healthy controls. Bacterial communities were interrogated using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and the commensal DNA viruses Anelloviridae and Redondoviridae were quantified by qPCR. We found that COVID-19 patients had upper respiratory microbiome dysbiosis and greater change over time than critically ill patients without COVID-19. Oropharyngeal microbiome diversity at the first time point correlated inversely with disease severity during hospitalization. Microbiome composition was also associated with systemic immune parameters in blood, as measured by lymphocyte/neutrophil ratios and immune profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Intubated patients showed patient-specific lung microbiome communities that were frequently highly dynamic, with prominence of Staphylococcus. Anelloviridae and Redondoviridae showed more frequent colonization and higher titers in severe disease. Machine learning analysis demonstrated that integrated features of the microbiome at early sampling points had high power to discriminate ultimate level of COVID-19 severity. Thus, the respiratory tract microbiome and commensal viruses are disturbed in COVID-19 and correlate with systemic immune parameters, and early microbiome features discriminate disease severity. Future studies should address clinical consequences of airway dysbiosis in COVID-19, its possible use as biomarkers, and the role of bacterial and viral taxa identified here in COVID-19 pathogenesis. IMPORTANCE COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection of the respiratory tract, results in highly variable outcomes ranging from minimal illness to death, but the reasons for this are not well understood. We investigated the respiratory tract bacterial microbiome and small commensal DNA viruses in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and found that each was markedly abnormal compared to that in healthy people and differed from that in critically ill patients without COVID-19. Early airway samples tracked with the level of COVID-19 illness reached during hospitalization, and the airway microbiome also correlated with immune parameters in blood. These findings raise questions about the mechanisms linking SARS-CoV-2 infection and other microbial inhabitants of the airway, including whether the microbiome might regulate severity of COVID-19 disease and/or whether early microbiome features might serve as biomarkers to discriminate disease severity.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 34399607 · DOI · PMC8406335

A tonsil organoid model reveals Epstein-Barr virus-infected germinal center B cell states during primary infection [4]

Research article Mitul MT, Sun Y, Yates TB, Sureshchandra S, Kastenschmidt JM, Sorn AM, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) colonizes secondary lymphoid tissues to establish persistent infection and is strongly associated with malignancy and autoimmunity.
Closing excerpt
Our findings demonstrate human tonsil organoids as a physiologically relevant model to investigate key aspects of EBV immunity and pathogenesis.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (148 words)

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) colonizes secondary lymphoid tissues to establish persistent infection and is strongly associated with malignancy and autoimmunity. Our understanding of EBV infection biology is hindered by a lack of models that capture infected B cell activity in the lymphoid tissue microenvironment. We therefore developed an EBV human tonsil organoid model to evaluate key B cell states and antiviral responses, including after primary infection. EBV promoted B cell differentiation into germinal center-like phenotypes and transcriptomic analyses highlighted numerous B cell transcriptional programs unique to EBV-infected cells. B cell receptor repertoire analysis revealed that most EBV+ B cells underwent class switching but only rarely participated in somatic hypermutation. CD4 T cells, highly activated by organoid infection, limited EBV+ B cell outgrowth in both primary and secondary EBV infection. Our findings demonstrate human tonsil organoids as a physiologically relevant model to investigate key aspects of EBV immunity and pathogenesis.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42594281 · DOI · PMC13486580

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Pathophysiology of T follicular helper cells in humans and mice [5]
    Ueno H, Ueno H, Banchereau J, Vinuesa CG · Nat Immunol · 2015 · cited 369 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [6]
    Lee RA, Herigon JC, Benedetti A, Pollock NR, Denkinger CM · J Clin Microbiol · 2021 · cited 245 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Effect of selective decontamination on antimicrobial resistance in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
    Daneman N, Sarwar S, Fowler RA, Cuthbertson BH, SuDDICU Canadian Study Group · Lancet Infect Dis · 2013 · cited 197 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Selective digestive or oropharyngeal decontamination and topical oropharyngeal chlorhexidine for prevention of death in general intensive care: systematic review and network meta-analysis [8]
    Price R, MacLennan G, Glen J, SuDDICU Collaboration · BMJ · 2014 · cited 177 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article SARS-CoV-2 detection in different respiratory sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
    Mohammadi A, Esmaeilzadeh E, Li Y, Bosch RJ, Li JZ · EBioMedicine · 2020 · cited 109 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Swallowing physiology and pathophysiology [10]
    Logemann JA · Otolaryngol Clin North Am · 1988 · cited 101 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Massoni-Badosa R, Aguilar-Fernández S, Nieto JC, Soler-Vila P, Elosua-Bayes M, Marchese D, et al.. An atlas of cells in the human tonsil. . 2024. PMID 38301653 · DOI · PMC10869140
  2. Ma S, Zhang F, Zhou F, Li H, Ge W, Gan R, et al.. Metagenomic analysis reveals oropharyngeal microbiota alterations in patients with COVID-19. . 2021. PMID 33986253 · DOI · PMC8116522
  3. Merenstein C, Liang G, Whiteside SA, Cobián-Güemes AG, Merlino MS, Taylor LJ, et al.. Signatures of COVID-19 Severity and Immune Response in the Respiratory Tract Microbiome. . 2021. PMID 34399607 · DOI · PMC8406335
  4. Mitul MT, Sun Y, Yates TB, Sureshchandra S, Kastenschmidt JM, Sorn AM, et al.. A tonsil organoid model reveals Epstein-Barr virus-infected germinal center B cell states during primary infection. . 2026. PMID 42594281 · DOI · PMC13486580
  5. Ueno H, Ueno H, Banchereau J, Vinuesa CG. Pathophysiology of T follicular helper cells in humans and mice. Nat Immunol. 2015. PMID 25594465 · DOI · PMC4459756
  6. Lee RA, Herigon JC, Benedetti A, Pollock NR, Denkinger CM. Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2021. PMID 33504593 · DOI · PMC8091856
  7. Daneman N, Sarwar S, Fowler RA, Cuthbertson BH, SuDDICU Canadian Study Group. Effect of selective decontamination on antimicrobial resistance in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013. PMID 23352693 · DOI
  8. Price R, MacLennan G, Glen J, SuDDICU Collaboration. Selective digestive or oropharyngeal decontamination and topical oropharyngeal chlorhexidine for prevention of death in general intensive care: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014. PMID 24687313 · DOI · PMC3970764
  9. Mohammadi A, Esmaeilzadeh E, Li Y, Bosch RJ, Li JZ. SARS-CoV-2 detection in different respiratory sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EBioMedicine. 2020. PMID 32718896 · DOI · PMC7380223
  10. Logemann JA. Swallowing physiology and pathophysiology. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1988. PMID 3054716 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • NasopharynxAnatomy and Physiology
  • StomachAnatomy and Physiology
  • PharynxAnatomy and Physiology
  • Esophageal MucosaAnatomy and Physiology
  • PalateAnatomy and Physiology
  • Esophagogastric JunctionAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

16,180
PubMed records on this heading
12%
published since 2020
893
review articles
410
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • NasopharynxAnatomy and Physiology
  • StomachAnatomy and Physiology
  • PharynxAnatomy and Physiology
  • Esophageal MucosaAnatomy and Physiology
  • PalateAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support