Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Penicillins
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Penicillins

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A group of antibiotics that contain 6-aminopenicillanic acid with a side chain attached to the 6-amino group.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (999 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A group of antibiotics that contain 6-aminopenicillanic acid with a side chain attached to the 6-amino group. The penicillin nucleus is the chief structural requirement for biological activity. The side-chain structure determines many of the antibacterial and pharmacological characteristics. (Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 8th ed, p1065)

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Antibiotics, Penicillin; Penicillin Antibiotics; Penicillin.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
beta-Lactams
Narrower topics
Amdinocillin; Cyclacillin; Methicillin; Nafcillin; Oxacillin; Penicillanic Acid; Penicillin G; Penicillin V; Sulbactam; Ticarcillin

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 88,517 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Penicillins” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 7,942 of them (9.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 59,053 records.

Reviews account for 4,756 records (5.4%) and meta-analyses for 429. Randomized controlled trials number 4,675 (5.3%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 59,053 records; 2000-2009: 10,198 records; 2010-2019: 11,324 records; 2020 onward: 7,942 records59,053through 199910,1982000-200911,3242010-20197,9422020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 199959,053
2000-200910,198
2010-201911,324
2020 onward7,942
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 5.4 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.5 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 5.3 percentReviews5.4% (4,756)Meta-analyses0.5% (429)Randomized controlled trials5.3% (4,675)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 88,517 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4,7565.4%
Meta-analyses4290.5%
Randomized controlled trials4,6755.3%

Method: PubMed query "Penicillins"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Revisiting mutational resistance to ampicillin and cefotaxime in Haemophilus influenzae
Diricks M, Petersen S, Bartels L, Lâm TT, Claus H, Bajanca-Lavado MP, et al.
2024Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
17cc by
PMID 39633433 · DOI · PMC11616347
Valine potentiates cefoperazone-sulbactam to kill methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Li S-h, Tao Y, Yang Z-c, Fu H-z, Lin H-y, Peng X-x, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
14cc by
PMID 39692510 · DOI · PMC11748551
Safety and Tolerability of Pivmecillinam During More Than Four Decades of Clinical Experience: A Systematic Review
Kaye KS, Santerre Henriksen A, Sommer M, Frimodt-Møller N
2025Systematic review
Design not recorded in structured metadata
13cc by
PMID 39835818 · DOI · PMC11848268
Cefazolin for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) Trial Group, Lee TC, Barina LA, Walls G, Goodman AL, Yahav D, et al.
2026Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
10cc by
PMID 42308484 · DOI · PMC7619232

Revisiting mutational resistance to ampicillin and cefotaxime in Haemophilus influenzae [1]

Meta-analysis Diricks M, Petersen S, Bartels L, Lâm TT, Claus H, Bajanca-Lavado MP, et al. · · 2024 · cited 17 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundHaemophilus influenzae is an opportunistic bacterial pathogen that can cause severe respiratory tract and invasive infections.
Closing excerpt
The implications on treatment outcome and bacterial fitness of other extended PBP3 substitution patterns and novel candidate genes need to be determined.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (222 words)

BackgroundHaemophilus influenzae is an opportunistic bacterial pathogen that can cause severe respiratory tract and invasive infections. The emergence of β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) strains and unclear correlations between genotypic (i.e., gBLNAR) and phenotypic resistance are challenging empirical treatments and patient management. Thus, we sought to revisit molecular resistance mechanisms and to identify new resistance determinants of H. influenzae.MethodsWe performed a systematic meta-analysis of H. influenzae isolates (n = 291) to quantify the association of phenotypic ampicillin and cefotaxime resistance with previously defined resistance groups, i.e., specific substitution patterns of the penicillin binding protein PBP3, encoded by ftsI. Using phylogenomics and a genome-wide association study (GWAS), we investigated evolutionary trajectories and novel resistance determinants in a public global cohort (n = 555) and a new clinical cohort from three European centers (n = 298), respectively.ResultsOur meta-analysis confirmed that PBP3 group II- and group III-related isolates were significantly associated with phenotypic resistance to ampicillin (p ConclusionsGradient agar diffusion strips and broth microdilution assays do not consistently classify isolates from PBP3 groups as phenotypically resistant. Consequently, when the minimum inhibitory concentration is close to the clinical breakpoints, and genotypic data is available, PBP3 resistance groups should be prioritized over susceptible phenotypic results for ampicillin. The implications on treatment outcome and bacterial fitness of other extended PBP3 substitution patterns and novel candidate genes need to be determined.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39633433 · DOI · PMC11616347

Valine potentiates cefoperazone-sulbactam to kill methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [2]

Research article Li S-h, Tao Y, Yang Z-c, Fu H-z, Lin H-y, Peng X-x, et al. · · 2025 · cited 14 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Metabolic state-reprogramming approach was extended from Gram-negative bacteria to Gram-positive bacterium methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for identifying desired reprogramming metabolites to synergize existing antibiotic killing to MRSA.
Closing excerpt
Therefore, the combination of valine and SCF is a new drug candidate effective against MRSA.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (362 words)

Metabolic state-reprogramming approach was extended from Gram-negative bacteria to Gram-positive bacterium methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for identifying desired reprogramming metabolites to synergize existing antibiotic killing to MRSA. Metabolomics comparison between MRSA and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus showed a depressed metabolic state in MRSA. Valine was identified as the most depressed metabolite/biomarker, and valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis as the most enriched metabolic pathway. Thus, valine was used as a reprogramming metabolite to potentiate existing antibiotic killing to MRSA. Among the tested antibiotics, valine synergized cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCF) to produce the greatest killing effect. The combined effect of SCF and valine was demonstrated in clinical MRSA isolates and in mouse systemic and thigh infection models. Underlying mechanisms were attributed to valine-induced the activation of the pyruvate cycle/the TCA cycle and fatty acid biosynthesis. The activated pyruvate cycle/the TCA cycle elevated proton motive force by NADH and the activated fatty acid biosynthesis promoted membrane permeability by lauric acid. Both together increased cefoperazone uptake, which outpaces efflux action and thereby intracellular drug is elevated to effectively kill MRSA. These results provide the combination of valine and SCF to produce a new drug candidate effective against MRSA.ImportanceMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is possibly the most infamous example of antibiotic resistance and new antibiotics are urgently needed to control it. The present study used metabolic state-reprogramming approach to identify an ideal biomarker as an antibiotic adjuvant for reversing the metabolic state of MRSA. The most repressed valine was identified as the adjuvant. Exogenous valine most effectively potentiated cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCF) to kill MRSA in vitro and in vivo. Viability of 18 clinical MRSA isolates was reduced by the top 276.64-fold in the presence of valine and SCF. In mouse models, lower bacterial load in liver, spleen, kidney, thigh, and higher survival were determined in the SCF + valine than valine or SCF alone. Valine promoted MRSA to increase SCF uptake that overcomes the efflux and enzymatic hydrolysis. It also extended the PAE of SCF. These occur because valine activates the pyruvate cycle to elevate proton motive force by NADH and increases membrane permeability by lauric acid. Therefore, the combination of valine and SCF is a new drug candidate effective against MRSA.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39692510 · DOI · PMC11748551

Safety and Tolerability of Pivmecillinam During More Than Four Decades of Clinical Experience: A Systematic Review [3]

Systematic review Kaye KS, Santerre Henriksen A, Sommer M, Frimodt-Møller N · · 2025 · cited 13 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of pivmecillinam-an oral prodrug of the amidinopenicillin antibiotic mecillinam-presents a valuable opportunity to address the need for new treatments for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI).
Closing excerpt
Together with the evidence for efficacy of, and minimal resistance to, pivmecillinam, the findings of this review support the position of pivmecillinam as a first-line treatment for uUTI.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (147 words)

The recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of pivmecillinam-an oral prodrug of the amidinopenicillin antibiotic mecillinam-presents a valuable opportunity to address the need for new treatments for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI). We report findings of a systematic literature review of the safety profile of pivmecillinam/mecillinam based on more than 40 years' experience, mainly in Europe and Canada, to describe its tolerability profile and identify any important safety signals. In total, 110 eligible publications were identified describing use of pivmecillinam/mecillinam as monotherapy or in combination, for treatment of uUTI or other infectious conditions. These studies revealed a benign safety and tolerability profile, awareness of which will inform treatment decisions as pivmecillinam is made available in the United States. Together with the evidence for efficacy of, and minimal resistance to, pivmecillinam, the findings of this review support the position of pivmecillinam as a first-line treatment for uUTI.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39835818 · DOI · PMC11848268

Cefazolin for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia [4]

Randomized controlled trial Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) Trial Group, Lee TC, Barina LA, Walls G, Goodman AL, Yahav D, et al. · · 2026 · cited 10 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundStaphylococcus aureus bacteremia is associated with high mortality.
Closing excerpt
).
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (268 words)

BackgroundStaphylococcus aureus bacteremia is associated with high mortality. Whether cefazolin or an antistaphylococcal penicillin should be preferred for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteremia is unclear.MethodsIn an ongoing international Bayesian adaptive platform trial, we conducted an open-label, randomized comparison of cefazolin with an antistaphylococcal penicillin (flucloxacillin or cloxacillin) in adult patients with penicillin-resistant, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteremia. The primary outcome, which was evaluated with a hierarchical Bayesian logistic-regression model, was death from any cause within 90 days after enrollment in the platform. We assessed the posterior probability of the noninferiority of cefazolin to flucloxacillin or cloxacillin (with the criterion for noninferiority prespecified as an adjusted odds ratio of ResultsThis domain of the ongoing trial was conducted between February 17, 2022, and August 7, 2024, by which time the criterion for noninferiority had been met. Mortality at 90 days among adults who could be evaluated was 15.0% (97 deaths among 645 patients) in the cefazolin group and 17.0% (109 deaths among 642 patients) in the antistaphylococcal-penicillin group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81; 95% credible interval, 0.59 to 1.12; probability of noninferiority, 99.2%; probability of superiority, 89.8%). Acute kidney injury occurred in 92 of 660 patients (13.9%) in the cefazolin group, as compared with 127 of 648 (19.6%) in the antistaphylococcal-penicillin group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.67; 95% credible interval, 0.50 to 0.89; probability of superiority, 99.7%).ConclusionsIn patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteremia, cefazolin was noninferior to flucloxacillin or cloxacillin with respect to 90-day mortality and was associated with a lower incidence of acute kidney injury. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and others; SNAP ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05137119.).

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42308484 · DOI · PMC7619232

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research [5]
    Turner NA, Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Maskarinec SA, Eichenberger EM, Shah PP, Carugati M, et al. · Nat Rev Microbiol · 2019 · cited 1,397 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Overview of Changes to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100, 31st Edition [6]
    Humphries R, Bobenchik AM, Hindler JA, Schuetz AN · J Clin Microbiol · 2021 · cited 1,320 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [7]
    Lee AS, de Lencastre H, Garau J, Kluytmans J, Malhotra-Kumar S, Peschel A, et al. · Nat Rev Dis Primers · 2018 · cited 1,017 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article β-Lactams and β-Lactamase Inhibitors: An Overview [8]
    Bush K, Bradford PA · Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med · 2016 · cited 967 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review [9]
    Shenoy ES, Macy E, Rowe T, Blumenthal KG · JAMA · 2019 · cited 596 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Antibiotic allergy [10]
    Blumenthal KG, Peter JG, Trubiano JA, Phillips EJ · Lancet · 2019 · cited 449 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Diricks M, Petersen S, Bartels L, Lâm TT, Claus H, Bajanca-Lavado MP, et al.. Revisiting mutational resistance to ampicillin and cefotaxime in Haemophilus influenzae. . 2024. PMID 39633433 · DOI · PMC11616347
  2. Li S-h, Tao Y, Yang Z-c, Fu H-z, Lin H-y, Peng X-x, et al.. Valine potentiates cefoperazone-sulbactam to kill methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. . 2025. PMID 39692510 · DOI · PMC11748551
  3. Kaye KS, Santerre Henriksen A, Sommer M, Frimodt-Møller N. Safety and Tolerability of Pivmecillinam During More Than Four Decades of Clinical Experience: A Systematic Review. . 2025. PMID 39835818 · DOI · PMC11848268
  4. Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) Trial Group, Lee TC, Barina LA, Walls G, Goodman AL, Yahav D, et al.. Cefazolin for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. . 2026. PMID 42308484 · DOI · PMC7619232
  5. Turner NA, Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Maskarinec SA, Eichenberger EM, Shah PP, Carugati M, et al.. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019. PMID 30737488 · DOI · PMC6939889
  6. Humphries R, Bobenchik AM, Hindler JA, Schuetz AN. Overview of Changes to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100, 31st Edition. J Clin Microbiol. 2021. PMID 34550809 · DOI · PMC8601225
  7. Lee AS, de Lencastre H, Garau J, Kluytmans J, Malhotra-Kumar S, Peschel A, et al.. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018. PMID 29849094 · DOI
  8. Bush K, Bradford PA. β-Lactams and β-Lactamase Inhibitors: An Overview. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016. PMID 27329032 · DOI · PMC4968164
  9. Shenoy ES, Macy E, Rowe T, Blumenthal KG. Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review. JAMA. 2019. PMID 30644987 · DOI
  10. Blumenthal KG, Peter JG, Trubiano JA, Phillips EJ. Antibiotic allergy. Lancet. 2019. PMID 30558872 · DOI · PMC6563335

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • MethicillinDrugs and Chemicals
  • CarbenicillinDrugs and Chemicals
  • Penicillin GDrugs and Chemicals
  • AmoxicillinDrugs and Chemicals
  • AztreonamDrugs and Chemicals
  • PiperacillinDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

88,517
PubMed records on this heading
9%
published since 2020
4,756
review articles
4,675
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • MethicillinDrugs and Chemicals
  • CarbenicillinDrugs and Chemicals
  • Penicillin GDrugs and Chemicals
  • AmoxicillinDrugs and Chemicals
  • AztreonamDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support