Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (854 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
A glucocorticoid with the general properties of the corticosteroids. It is the drug of choice for all conditions in which routine systemic corticosteroid therapy is indicated, except adrenal deficiency states.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Di-Adreson-F; DiAdresonF; Di Adreson F; Predate; Predonine.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Pregnadienetriols
- Narrower topics
- Fluprednisolone; Methylprednisolone; Prednimustine
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 55,883 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Prednisolone” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 4,879 of them (8.7%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 27,467 records.
Reviews account for 3,579 records (6.4%) and meta-analyses for 262. Randomized controlled trials number 3,665 (6.6%) as a share of all records on the topic.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 27,467 |
| 2000-2009 | 11,969 |
| 2010-2019 | 11,568 |
| 2020 onward | 4,879 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 3,579 | 6.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 262 | 0.5% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 3,665 | 6.6% |
Method: PubMed query "Prednisolone"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals
Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Cytokine Release Syndrome in Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Case Series of 25 Patients and Review of the Literature [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a phenomenon of immune hyperactivation described in the setting of immunotherapy.
- Closing excerpt
- These parameters may be used to predict which patients are likely to develop severe CRS.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (245 words)
Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a phenomenon of immune hyperactivation described in the setting of immunotherapy. Unlike other immune-related adverse events, CRS triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is not well described. The clinical characteristics and course of 25 patients with ICI-induced CRS from 2 tertiary hospitals were abstracted retrospectively from the medical records and analyzed. CRS events were confirmed by 2 independent reviewers and graded using the Lee et al. scale. The median duration of CRS was 15.0 days (Q1; Q3 6.3; 29.8) and 10 (40.0%) had multiple episodes of CRS flares. Comparing the clinical factors and biomarkers in Grades 1-2 and 3-5 CRS, we found that patients with Grades 3-5 CRS had following: (i) had longer time to fever onset [25.0 days (Q1; Q3 13.0; 136.5) vs. 3.0 days (Q1; Q3 0.0; 18.0), p=0.027]; (ii) more cardiovascular (p=0.002), neurologic (p=0.001), pulmonary (p=0.044) and rheumatic (p=0.037) involvement; (iii) lower platelet count (p=0.041) and higher urea (p=0.041) at presentation compared to patients with Grades 1-2 CRS. 7 patients (28.0%) with Grades 1-2 CRS were rechallenged using ICIs without event. 9 patients (36.0%) were treated with pulse methylprednisolone and 6 patients (24.0%) were treated with tocilizumab. Despite this, 3 patients (50%) who received tocilizumab had fatal (Grade 5) outcomes from ICI-induced CRS. Longer time to fever onset, lower platelet count and higher urea at presentation were associated with Grade 3-5 CRS. These parameters may be used to predict which patients are likely to develop severe CRS.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35154124 · DOI · PMC8831742
11β-HSD1 inhibition in men mitigates prednisolone-induced adverse effects in a proof-of-concept randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Glucocorticoids prescribed to limit inflammation, have significant adverse effects.
- Closing excerpt
- Here we show that co-administration of AZD4017 with prednisolone in men is a potential strategy to limit adverse glucocorticoid effects.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (181 words)
Glucocorticoids prescribed to limit inflammation, have significant adverse effects. As 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) regenerates active glucocorticoid, we investigated whether 11β-HSD1 inhibition with AZD4017 could mitigate adverse glucocorticoid effects without compromising their anti-inflammatory actions. We conducted a proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study at Research Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK (NCT03111810). 32 healthy male volunteers were randomized to AZD4017 or placebo, alongside prednisolone treatment. Although the primary endpoint of the study (change in glucose disposal during a two-step hyperinsulinemic, normoglycemic clamp) wasn't met, hepatic insulin sensitivity worsened in the placebo-treated but not in the AZD4017-treated group. Protective effects of AZD4017 on markers of lipid metabolism and bone turnover were observed. Night-time blood pressure was higher in the placebo-treated but not in the AZD4017-treated group. Urinary (5aTHF+THF)/THE ratio was lower in the AZD4017-treated but remained the same in the placebo-treated group. Most anti-inflammatory actions of prednisolone persisted with AZD4017 co-treatment. Four adverse events were reported with AZD4017 and no serious adverse events. Here we show that co-administration of AZD4017 with prednisolone in men is a potential strategy to limit adverse glucocorticoid effects.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36823106 · DOI · PMC9950480
Magnetic Nanoparticles and Methylprednisolone Based Physico-Chemical Bifunctional Neural Stem Cells Delivery System for Spinal Cord Injury Repair [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Neural stem cells (NSCs) transplantation is an attractive and promising treatment strategy for spinal cord injury (SCI).
- Closing excerpt
- Together, this bifunctional NSCs delivery system combined physical mechanical stimulation and chemical drug therapy is demonstrated to be effective, which provides new treatment insights into clinical transformation of SCI repair.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (191 words)
Neural stem cells (NSCs) transplantation is an attractive and promising treatment strategy for spinal cord injury (SCI). Various pathological processes including the severe inflammatory cascade and difficulty in stable proliferation and differentiation of NSCs limit its application and translation. Here, a novel physico-chemical bifunctional neural stem cells delivery system containing magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs and methylprednisolone (MP) is designed to repair SCI, the former regulates NSCs differentiation through magnetic mechanical stimulation in the chronic phase, while the latter alleviates inflammatory response in the acute phase. The delivery system releases MP to promote microglial M2 polarization, inhibit M1 polarization, and reduce neuronal apoptosis. Meanwhile, NSCs tend to differentiate into functional neurons with magnetic mechanical stimulation generated by MNPs in the static magnetic field, which is related to the activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. SCI mice achieve better functional recovery after receiving NSCs transplantation via physico-chemical bifunctional delivery system, which has milder inflammation, higher number of M2 microglia, more functional neurons, and axonal regeneration. Together, this bifunctional NSCs delivery system combined physical mechanical stimulation and chemical drug therapy is demonstrated to be effective, which provides new treatment insights into clinical transformation of SCI repair.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 38516757 · DOI · PMC11151057
Losartan and prednisolone for post-COVID syndrome and cardiac inflammation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Persistent cardiac symptoms are common in post-COVID syndrome, even without structural heart disease.
- Closing excerpt
- Trial registration: EudraCT 2022-001682-12; NCT05619653.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (237 words)
Persistent cardiac symptoms are common in post-COVID syndrome, even without structural heart disease. Evidence implicates immune dysregulation, endothelial dysfunction and low-grade cardiovascular inflammation. Yet no targeted treatment exists. Myoflame-19 is a multicenter, double-blind clinical trial of 279 participants with inflammatory cardiac involvement defined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, randomized 1:1 to losartan plus prednisolone (n = 139) or matching placebos (n = 140) for 16 weeks. The modified intention-to-treat population comprised 124 and 122 participants. The primary endpoint, change in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, was neutral: between-group difference 0.74 percentage points (pp), 95%CI -0.14 to 1.62, p = 0.10, unpaired t-test; supportive baseline-adjusted ANCOVA 0.99, 95%CI 0.15-1.83, p = 0.021. Among prespecified secondary endpoints, several symptom and imaging measures showed numerical differences favoring intervention, including Average Symptom Score components (modified Canadian Chest Pain Scale -4.8 pp, 95%CI -17.3 to 7.6; NYHA class -8.1 pp, -20.6 to 4.3; Long COVID symptom burden -7.7 pp, -18.9 to 3.6), native T1 and T2 values (native T1 -2.46 ms, -8.35 to 3.42; native T2 -0.31 ms, -1.16 to 0.53), and LV end-diastolic volume ( + 1.45 ml/m², -0.09 to 3.00); however, confidence intervals included the null value and these findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating.Treatment was safe and well-tolerated. These findings indicate a neutral treatment effect on the primary endpoint. They inform targeted immunomodulation and design of future trials in post-COVID syndrome and inflammatory cardiac involvement. Trial registration: EudraCT 2022-001682-12; NCT05619653.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42533000 · DOI · PMC13424660
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article The epidemiology of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a meta-analysis [5]
- Research article Abiraterone acetate and prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of primary results from two randomised controlled phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol [6]
- Research article A randomized trial of prednisolone in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis [7]
- Research article Consensus statement on the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with primary adrenal insufficiency [8]
- Research article High-dose methylprednisolone for acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis [9]
- Research article Methylprednisolone for acute spinal cord injury: an inappropriate standard of care [10]
References
- Tay SH, Toh MMX, Thian YL, Vellayappan BA, Fairhurst AM, Chan YH, et al.. Cytokine Release Syndrome in Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Case Series of 25 Patients and Review of the Literature. . 2022. PMID 35154124 · DOI · PMC8831742
- Othonos N, Pofi R, Arvaniti A, White S, Bonaventura I, Nikolaou N, et al.. 11β-HSD1 inhibition in men mitigates prednisolone-induced adverse effects in a proof-of-concept randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. . 2023. PMID 36823106 · DOI · PMC9950480
- Zhang W, Liu M, Ren J, Han S, Zhou X, Zhang D, et al.. Magnetic Nanoparticles and Methylprednisolone Based Physico-Chemical Bifunctional Neural Stem Cells Delivery System for Spinal Cord Injury Repair. . 2024. PMID 38516757 · DOI · PMC11151057
- Puntmann VO, Nagel E, Beitzke D, Kammerlander A, Voges I, Doerr M, et al.. Losartan and prednisolone for post-COVID syndrome and cardiac inflammation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. . 2026. PMID 42533000 · DOI · PMC13424660
- van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Cooper C. The epidemiology of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2002. PMID 12378366 · DOI
- Attard G, Murphy L, Clarke NW, Cross W, Jones RJ, Parker CC, et al.. Abiraterone acetate and prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of primary results from two randomised controlled phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol. Lancet. 2022. PMID 34953525 · DOI · PMC8811484
- Ramond MJ, Poynard T, Rueff B, Mathurin P, Théodore C, Chaput JC, et al.. A randomized trial of prednisolone in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis. N Engl J Med. 1992. PMID 1531090 · DOI
- Husebye ES, Allolio B, Arlt W, Badenhoop K, Bensing S, Betterle C, et al.. Consensus statement on the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with primary adrenal insufficiency. J Intern Med. 2014. PMID 24330030 · DOI
- Liu Z, Yang Y, He L, Pang M, Luo C, Liu B, et al.. High-dose methylprednisolone for acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis. Neurology. 2019. PMID 31358617 · DOI
- Hurlbert RJ. Methylprednisolone for acute spinal cord injury: an inappropriate standard of care. J Neurosurg. 2000. PMID 10879751 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.