Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Pregnancy
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Pregnancy

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The status during which female mammals carry their developing young (embryos or fetuses) in utero before birth, beginning from fertilization to birth.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (920 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The status during which female mammals carry their developing young (embryos or fetuses) in utero before birth, beginning from fertilization to birth.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Pregnancies; Gestation.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Reproduction
Narrower topics
Gravidity; Labor, Obstetric; Maternal-Fetal Exchange; Parity; Parturition; Placentation; Pregnancy in Adolescence; Pregnancy Maintenance; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy, Animal; Pregnancy, High-Risk; Pregnancy, Multiple; Pregnancy, Unplanned; Pregnancy, Unwanted
See also
Litter Size; Prenatal Care; Pseudopregnancy; Maternal-Fetal Relations; Pregnant People

Related concepts

  • Embryos
  • Fetus
  • Fertilization
  • Birth

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 1,099,277 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Pregnancy” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 206,232 of them (18.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 482,850 records.

Reviews account for 127,142 records (11.6%) and meta-analyses for 12,214. Randomized controlled trials number 25,696 (2.3%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 482,850 records; 2000-2009: 170,349 records; 2010-2019: 239,846 records; 2020 onward: 206,232 records482,850through 1999170,3492000-2009239,8462010-2019206,2322020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999482,850
2000-2009170,349
2010-2019239,846
2020 onward206,232
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 11.6 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.3 percentReviews11.6% (127,142)Meta-analyses1.1% (12,214)Randomized controlled trials2.3% (25,696)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 1,099,277 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews127,14211.6%
Meta-analyses12,2141.1%
Randomized controlled trials25,6962.3%

Method: PubMed query "Pregnancy"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Comparative primate analysis shows that humans are not unique in having a tight cephalopelvic fit at birth
Torres-Tamayo N, Schlager S, Hirasaki E, Smith TD, Rae TC, Betti L
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 42373910 · DOI · PMC13541611
Gestational Exposure to 10 Classes of Priority Chemicals and Birth Outcomes in the ECHO Cohort
Buckley JP, Pacyga DC, Xun X, Barr DB, Barrett ES, Bastain T, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 42307947 · DOI · PMC13276631
Trimester-specific gestational weight gain and adverse outcomes in GDM women: a retrospective cohort study
Yuan P, Huang J, Wan J, Yu L, Li J, Huang B, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2cc by
PMID 42453500 · DOI · PMC13364531

Comparative primate analysis shows that humans are not unique in having a tight cephalopelvic fit at birth [1]

Research article Torres-Tamayo N, Schlager S, Hirasaki E, Smith TD, Rae TC, Betti L · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Human childbirth is regarded as uniquely difficult among primates, due to a tight cephalopelvic fit thought to result from an evolutionary trade-off between adaptations to bipedal locomotion and increasing brain size.
Closing excerpt
Our findings reveal a diversity of obstetrical dilemmas across primates.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (145 words)

Human childbirth is regarded as uniquely difficult among primates, due to a tight cephalopelvic fit thought to result from an evolutionary trade-off between adaptations to bipedal locomotion and increasing brain size. This impression, however, may be an artefact of past adoption of anthropocentric measurements that underestimate birth challenges in non-human primates. Here we re-evaluate cephalopelvic proportions using species-specific three-dimensional data of the pelvic inlet along with neonatal cranial dimensions from a broad sample of extant primates. Results reveal that maternal body size is a key factor to consider. A tight cephalopelvic fit occurs in species with proportionately larger neonates, smaller pelves or a combination of both. The latter is the case in humans, producing the tightest fit among extant apes, but a similar combination of factors explains much more extreme cephalopelvic proportions in other species. Our findings reveal a diversity of obstetrical dilemmas across primates.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42373910 · DOI · PMC13541611

Gestational Exposure to 10 Classes of Priority Chemicals and Birth Outcomes in the ECHO Cohort [2]

Research article Buckley JP, Pacyga DC, Xun X, Barr DB, Barrett ES, Bastain T, et al. · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ImportanceGestational environmental chemical exposures are widespread.
Closing excerpt
These findings indicate that reducing gestational exposure to chemicals, particularly phthalates or alternative plasticizers and PAHs, could promote healthy deliveries and better child outcomes.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (454 words)

ImportanceGestational environmental chemical exposures are widespread. Some chemicals are known to adversely affect birth outcomes, but many remain understudied.ObjectiveTo evaluate associations of gestational exposure to a priori identified chemicals in 10 classes with birth outcomes in a large, diverse US cohort.Design, setting, and participantsIn the prospective Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes Cohort study, 5318 mother-child pairs were enrolled from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021, with data on gestational urinary chemical concentrations, gestational age at birth, and birth weight. Statistical analysis was performed from January 2024 to February 2026.ExposuresIn single, midgestation (median, 25 weeks [IQR, 21-30 weeks]) urine samples, concentrations of 113 analytes (chemicals or their metabolites) from 10 chemical classes were simultaneously measured: fungicides and herbicides (n = 11), insecticides (n = 20), halogenated phenols (n = 5), organophosphate esters (n = 10), benzophenones (n = 6), bisphenols (n = 14), parabens (n = 6), antimicrobials (n = 2), phthalates or alternative plasticizers (n = 32), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (n = 7).Main outcomes and measuresLinear mixed-effects regression models with a random effect for site were used to estimate covariate-adjusted differences in gestational age at birth (days) and birth weight-for-gestational age (BW-GA) z scores per IQR increase in urinary analyte concentrations. In secondary analyses, odds ratios (ORs) for preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA) were estimated.ResultsIn the sample of 5318 mother-child pairs, most infants (2667 female [50%]; median gestational age at birth, 39.0 weeks [IQR, 38.0-40.0 weeks]) were born to college-educated (67% [3218 of 4785]), parous (56% [2815 of 5007]) mothers (median age at delivery, 30.7 years [IQR, 26.1-34.3 years]). A total of 43 of 113 analytes (38%) were detected in 50% or more of samples. Multiple phthalates or alternative plasticizers were associated with younger gestational age at birth or lower BW-GA z scores; for example, summed diisononyl phthalate metabolites were associated with a 0.6-day (95% CI, -1.0 to -0.1 days) younger gestational age (preterm birth OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.01-1.34]), and summed phthalate or alternative plasticizers were associated with a 0.06 (95% CI, -0.11 to -0.02) lower BW-GA z score (SGA OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.93-1.27]). Two halogenated phenols, benzophenone 8, bisphenol F, and several PAHs were associated with lower BW-GA z scores; for example, 1- and 9-hydroxphenanthrene were associated with a 0.04 (95% CI, -0.08 to -0.01) lower BW-GA z score (SGA OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.01-1.27]).Conclusions and relevanceThis large cohort study of diverse US pregnancies found widespread exposure to 10 classes of environmental chemicals, many of which were associated with differences in gestational age at birth or lower BW-GA z scores. These findings indicate that reducing gestational exposure to chemicals, particularly phthalates or alternative plasticizers and PAHs, could promote healthy deliveries and better child outcomes.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42307947 · DOI · PMC13276631

Trimester-specific gestational weight gain and adverse outcomes in GDM women: a retrospective cohort study [3]

Research article Yuan P, Huang J, Wan J, Yu L, Li J, Huang B, et al. · · 2026 · cited 2 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
AimsGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common metabolic disorders during pregnancy and is associated with an increased risk of multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs).
Closing excerpt
These findings suggest that weight management strategies tailored to both pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational stage may help optimize pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (321 words)

AimsGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common metabolic disorders during pregnancy and is associated with an increased risk of multiple adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs). Gestational weight gain (GWG) is an important indicator for disease monitoring and intervention; however, evidence regarding the associations between trimester-specific GWG patterns stratified by pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and APOs among Chinese women with GDM remains limited.Materials and methodsRetrospective cohort study of 8, 562 singleton GDM pregnancies delivered at Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (Feb 2021-Sep 2025). Women were classified into underweight, normal-weight, overweight, and obesity groups by pre-pregnancy BMI. GWG in early pregnancy, before Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT), and after OGTT was categorized as inadequate, adequate, or excessive per National Health Commission guidelines for GDM. Multivariable logistic regression with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) correction and generalized additive models (GAM) were used to assess associations and nonlinear relationships with APOs.ResultsThe associations between GWG and APOs differed significantly across pre-pregnancy BMI categories. Specifically, excessive GWG before OGTT diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of LGA among normal-weight and overweight women (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.38-2.13; and aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.26-2.37, respectively). Excessive GWG after OGTT diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia (aOR 4.06, 95% CI 2.69-6.12; and aOR 2.49, 95% CI 1.46-4.24, respectively). In addition, excessive GWG before OGTT diagnosis was associated with a lower risk of SGA (aOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.62) in women with underweight. In women with obesity, no significant associations were observed between GWG and APOs, although the directional trends were generally consistent with those in the overweight group. GAM analyses further supported nonlinear associations between GWG and several APOs.ConclusionStage-specific GWG patterns in GDM pregnancies showed heterogeneous associations with APOs across pre-pregnancy BMI categories. These findings suggest that weight management strategies tailored to both pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational stage may help optimize pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42453500 · DOI · PMC13364531

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Association of endometriosis and adenomyosis with pregnancy and infertility [4]
    Vercellini P, Viganò P, Bandini V, Buggio L, Berlanda N, Somigliana E · Fertil Steril · 2023 · cited 156 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis [5]
    Cimadomo D, Rienzi L, Conforti A, Forman E, Canosa S, Innocenti F, et al. · Hum Reprod Update · 2023 · cited 100 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome [6]
    Bahri Khomami M, Shorakae S, Hashemi S, Harrison CL, Piltonen TT, Romualdi D, et al. · Nat Commun · 2024 · cited 88 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin and singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis [7]
    Greco E, Calanducci M, Nicolaides KH, Barry EVH, Huda MSB, Iliodromiti S · Am J Obstet Gynecol · 2024 · cited 51 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Association between the Maternal Mediterranean Diet and Perinatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [8]
    Xu J, Wang H, Bian J, Xu M, Jiang N, Luo W, et al. · Adv Nutr · 2024 · cited 45 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Pregnancy outcome predictors in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis [9]
    Wind M, Fierro JJ, Bloemenkamp KWM, de Leeuw K, Lely AT, Limper M, et al. · Lancet Rheumatol · 2024 · cited 40 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Torres-Tamayo N, Schlager S, Hirasaki E, Smith TD, Rae TC, Betti L. Comparative primate analysis shows that humans are not unique in having a tight cephalopelvic fit at birth. . 2026. PMID 42373910 · DOI · PMC13541611
  2. Buckley JP, Pacyga DC, Xun X, Barr DB, Barrett ES, Bastain T, et al.. Gestational Exposure to 10 Classes of Priority Chemicals and Birth Outcomes in the ECHO Cohort. . 2026. PMID 42307947 · DOI · PMC13276631
  3. Yuan P, Huang J, Wan J, Yu L, Li J, Huang B, et al.. Trimester-specific gestational weight gain and adverse outcomes in GDM women: a retrospective cohort study. . 2026. PMID 42453500 · DOI · PMC13364531
  4. Vercellini P, Viganò P, Bandini V, Buggio L, Berlanda N, Somigliana E. Association of endometriosis and adenomyosis with pregnancy and infertility. Fertil Steril. 2023. PMID 36948440 · DOI
  5. Cimadomo D, Rienzi L, Conforti A, Forman E, Canosa S, Innocenti F, et al.. Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2023. PMID 37192834 · DOI
  6. Bahri Khomami M, Shorakae S, Hashemi S, Harrison CL, Piltonen TT, Romualdi D, et al.. Systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID 38965226 · DOI · PMC11224312
  7. Greco E, Calanducci M, Nicolaides KH, Barry EVH, Huda MSB, Iliodromiti S. Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin and singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID 37595821 · DOI
  8. Xu J, Wang H, Bian J, Xu M, Jiang N, Luo W, et al.. Association between the Maternal Mediterranean Diet and Perinatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv Nutr. 2024. PMID 38042258 · DOI · PMC10801312
  9. Wind M, Fierro JJ, Bloemenkamp KWM, de Leeuw K, Lely AT, Limper M, et al.. Pregnancy outcome predictors in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Rheumatol. 2024. PMID 39153486 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Pregnancy OutcomeAnatomy and Physiology
  • Term BirthAnatomy and Physiology
  • Acrosome ReactionAnatomy and Physiology
  • Cervical RipeningAnatomy and Physiology
  • FertilizationAnatomy and Physiology
  • Live BirthAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

1,099,277
PubMed records on this heading
19%
published since 2020
127,142
review articles
25,696
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Pregnancy OutcomeAnatomy and Physiology
  • Term BirthAnatomy and Physiology
  • Acrosome ReactionAnatomy and Physiology
  • Cervical RipeningAnatomy and Physiology
  • FertilizationAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support