Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Clinical Research›Principal Component Analysis
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Principal Component Analysis

Clinical Research · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Mathematical procedure that transforms a number of possibly correlated variables into a smaller number of uncorrelated variables called principal components.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (648 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Mathematical procedure that transforms a number of possibly correlated variables into a smaller number of uncorrelated variables called principal components.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Analyses, Principal Component; Analysis, Principal Component; Principal Component Analyses.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Dimensionality Reduction

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 33,204 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Principal Component Analysis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 7,235 of them (21.8%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 20,520 records.

Reviews account for 432 records (1.3%) and meta-analyses for 53. Randomized controlled trials number 224 (0.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 5,981 records; 2010-2019: 20,520 records; 2020 onward: 7,235 records0through 19995,9812000-200920,5202010-20197,2352020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20095,981
2010-201920,520
2020 onward7,235
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 1.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.7 percentReviews1.3% (432)Meta-analyses0.2% (53)Randomized controlled trials0.7% (224)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 33,204 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4321.3%
Meta-analyses530.2%
Randomized controlled trials2240.7%

Method: PubMed query "Principal Component Analysis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in clinical research

Research methods determine how much a result can be trusted. Randomized trials guard against confounding, systematic reviews and meta-analyses combine many studies, and observational designs are valuable but can show only association. Reporting standards, trial registration and pre-specified outcomes reduce bias. When reading about a method, ask what problem it is designed to solve and which problems it does not solve.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap
Metsalu T, Vilo J
2015Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
2,694cc by
PMID 25969447 · DOI · PMC4489295
Demixed principal component analysis of neural population data
Kobak D, Brendel W, Constantinidis C, Feierstein CE, Kepecs A, Mainen ZF, et al.
2016Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
526cc by
PMID 27067378 · DOI · PMC4887222
Fast principal component analysis of large-scale genome-wide data
Abraham G, Inouye M
2014Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
257cc by
PMID 24718290 · DOI · PMC3981753
AlignPCA-2D: PCA-reduced Euclidean vector alignment for 2D classification in cryo-EM
Ramírez-Aportela E, Zarrabeitia OL, Fonseca YC, Ceska T, Subramaniam S, Carazo JM, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42257246 · DOI · PMC13317688

ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap [1]

Research article Metsalu T, Vilo J · · 2015 · cited 2,694 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a widely used method of reducing the dimensionality of high-dimensional data, often followed by visualizing two of the components on the scatterplot.
Closing excerpt
ee/clustvis/.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (193 words)

The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a widely used method of reducing the dimensionality of high-dimensional data, often followed by visualizing two of the components on the scatterplot. Although widely used, the method is lacking an easy-to-use web interface that scientists with little programming skills could use to make plots of their own data. The same applies to creating heatmaps: it is possible to add conditional formatting for Excel cells to show colored heatmaps, but for more advanced features such as clustering and experimental annotations, more sophisticated analysis tools have to be used. We present a web tool called ClustVis that aims to have an intuitive user interface. Users can upload data from a simple delimited text file that can be created in a spreadsheet program. It is possible to modify data processing methods and the final appearance of the PCA and heatmap plots by using drop-down menus, text boxes, sliders etc. Appropriate defaults are given to reduce the time needed by the user to specify input parameters. As an output, users can download PCA plot and heatmap in one of the preferred file formats. This web server is freely available at http://biit.cs.ut.ee/clustvis/.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 25969447 · DOI · PMC4489295

Demixed principal component analysis of neural population data [2]

Research article Kobak D, Brendel W, Constantinidis C, Feierstein CE, Kepecs A, Mainen ZF, et al. · · 2016 · cited 526 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Neurons in higher cortical areas, such as the prefrontal cortex, are often tuned to a variety of sensory and motor variables, and are therefore said to display mixed selectivity.
Closing excerpt
In each case, dPCA provides a concise way of visualizing the data that summarizes the task-dependent features of the population response in a single figure.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (148 words)

Neurons in higher cortical areas, such as the prefrontal cortex, are often tuned to a variety of sensory and motor variables, and are therefore said to display mixed selectivity. This complexity of single neuron responses can obscure what information these areas represent and how it is represented. Here we demonstrate the advantages of a new dimensionality reduction technique, demixed principal component analysis (dPCA), that decomposes population activity into a few components. In addition to systematically capturing the majority of the variance of the data, dPCA also exposes the dependence of the neural representation on task parameters such as stimuli, decisions, or rewards. To illustrate our method we reanalyze population data from four datasets comprising different species, different cortical areas and different experimental tasks. In each case, dPCA provides a concise way of visualizing the data that summarizes the task-dependent features of the population response in a single figure.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 27067378 · DOI · PMC4887222

Fast principal component analysis of large-scale genome-wide data [3]

Research article Abraham G, Inouye M · · 2014 · cited 257 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Principal component analysis (PCA) is routinely used to analyze genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data, for detecting population structure and potential outliers.
Closing excerpt
This approach will also help to scale other applications that leverage PCA or eigen-decomposition to substantially larger datasets.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (159 words)

Principal component analysis (PCA) is routinely used to analyze genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data, for detecting population structure and potential outliers. However, the size of SNP datasets has increased immensely in recent years and PCA of large datasets has become a time consuming task. We have developed flashpca, a highly efficient PCA implementation based on randomized algorithms, which delivers identical accuracy in extracting the top principal components compared with existing tools, in substantially less time. We demonstrate the utility of flashpca on both HapMap3 and on a large Immunochip dataset. For the latter, flashpca performed PCA of 15,000 individuals up to 125 times faster than existing tools, with identical results, and PCA of 150,000 individuals using flashpca completed in 4 hours. The increasing size of SNP datasets will make tools such as flashpca essential as traditional approaches will not adequately scale. This approach will also help to scale other applications that leverage PCA or eigen-decomposition to substantially larger datasets.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 24718290 · DOI · PMC3981753

AlignPCA-2D: PCA-reduced Euclidean vector alignment for 2D classification in cryo-EM [4]

Research article Ramírez-Aportela E, Zarrabeitia OL, Fonseca YC, Ceska T, Subramaniam S, Carazo JM, et al. · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has transformed structural biology by enabling the high-resolution reconstruction of macromolecular complexes from noisy projection images.
Closing excerpt
This approach provides a lightweight alternative for large-scale 2D classification tasks, and its modular design makes it compatible with existing cryo-EM processing pipelines.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (148 words)

Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has transformed structural biology by enabling the high-resolution reconstruction of macromolecular complexes from noisy projection images. However, the intrinsic heterogeneity and low signal-to-noise ratio of cryo-EM datasets make 2D classification a critical and computationally demanding step in the processing workflow. Here, we introduce AlignPCA-2D, a principal component analysis (PCA)-space Euclidean vector alignment method for fast, interpretable 2D classification in cryo-EM. By projecting particle images and class representations into a compressed latent PCA space, AlignPCA-2D reduces data dimensionality while preserving meaningful structural variability. The image-to-class assignment is then performed using Euclidean distance, enabling efficient and accurate classification. We benchmark AlignPCA-2D against established cryo-EM software, such as RELION and CryoSPARC, and demonstrate that it achieves competitive alignment accuracy while substantially reducing computational cost. This approach provides a lightweight alternative for large-scale 2D classification tasks, and its modular design makes it compatible with existing cryo-EM processing pipelines.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42257246 · DOI · PMC13317688

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data [5]
    Calhoun VD, Liu J, Adali T · Neuroimage · 2009 · cited 812 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article PCA in studying coordination and variability: a tutorial [6]
    Daffertshofer A, Lamoth CJ, Meijer OG, Beek PJ · Clin Biomech (Bristol) · 2004 · cited 367 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what is noise? [7]
    McKeown MJ, Hansen LK, Sejnowsk TJ · Curr Opin Neurobiol · 2003 · cited 242 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The use of principal component analysis and discriminant analysis in differential sensing routines [8]
    Stewart S, Ivy MA, Anslyn EV · Chem Soc Rev · 2014 · cited 209 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Modelling with independent components [9]
    Beckmann CF · Neuroimage · 2012 · cited 177 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The application of principal component analysis to drug discovery and biomedical data [10]
    Giuliani A · Drug Discov Today · 2017 · cited 160 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Metsalu T, Vilo J. ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap. . 2015. PMID 25969447 · DOI · PMC4489295
  2. Kobak D, Brendel W, Constantinidis C, Feierstein CE, Kepecs A, Mainen ZF, et al.. Demixed principal component analysis of neural population data. . 2016. PMID 27067378 · DOI · PMC4887222
  3. Abraham G, Inouye M. Fast principal component analysis of large-scale genome-wide data. . 2014. PMID 24718290 · DOI · PMC3981753
  4. Ramírez-Aportela E, Zarrabeitia OL, Fonseca YC, Ceska T, Subramaniam S, Carazo JM, et al.. AlignPCA-2D: PCA-reduced Euclidean vector alignment for 2D classification in cryo-EM. . 2026. PMID 42257246 · DOI · PMC13317688
  5. Calhoun VD, Liu J, Adali T. A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data. Neuroimage. 2009. PMID 19059344 · DOI · PMC2651152
  6. Daffertshofer A, Lamoth CJ, Meijer OG, Beek PJ. PCA in studying coordination and variability: a tutorial. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2004. PMID 15109763 · DOI
  7. McKeown MJ, Hansen LK, Sejnowsk TJ. Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what is noise?. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003. PMID 14630228 · DOI · PMC2925426
  8. Stewart S, Ivy MA, Anslyn EV. The use of principal component analysis and discriminant analysis in differential sensing routines. Chem Soc Rev. 2014. PMID 23995750 · DOI
  9. Beckmann CF. Modelling with independent components. Neuroimage. 2012. PMID 22369997 · DOI
  10. Giuliani A. The application of principal component analysis to drug discovery and biomedical data. Drug Discov Today. 2017. PMID 28111329 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Discriminant AnalysisClinical Research
  • Multivariate AnalysisClinical Research
  • Survival AnalysisClinical Research
  • Cluster AnalysisClinical Research
  • Spatial AnalysisClinical Research
  • ChemometricsClinical Research

All 98 articles in Clinical Research →

At a glance

33,204
PubMed records on this heading
22%
published since 2020
432
review articles
224
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Discriminant AnalysisClinical Research
  • Multivariate AnalysisClinical Research
  • Survival AnalysisClinical Research
  • Cluster AnalysisClinical Research
  • Spatial AnalysisClinical Research

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support