Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Procarbazine
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Procarbazine

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed9 referencesApproximately 4 min read

An antineoplastic agent used primarily in combination with mechlorethamine, vincristine, and prednisone (the MOPP protocol) in the treatment of Hodgkin's disease.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 3 complete abstracts (850 words), 9 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

An antineoplastic agent used primarily in combination with mechlorethamine, vincristine, and prednisone (the MOPP protocol) in the treatment of Hodgkin's disease.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Natulan; Procarbazine Monohydrobromide; Monohydrobromide, Procarbazine; Procarbazine Hydrochloride; Hydrochloride, Procarbazine; Procarbazine Monohydrochloride; Monohydrochloride, Procarbazine; Matulane.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Benzamides

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 3,348 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Procarbazine” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 97 of them (2.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 2,458 records.

Reviews account for 337 records (10.1%) and meta-analyses for 8. Randomized controlled trials number 380 (11.4%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,458 records; 2000-2009: 452 records; 2010-2019: 341 records; 2020 onward: 97 records2,458through 19994522000-20093412010-2019972020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,458
2000-2009452
2010-2019341
2020 onward97
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 10.1 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 11.4 percentReviews10.1% (337)Meta-analyses0.2% (8)Randomized controlled trials11.4% (380)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 3,348 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews33710.1%
Meta-analyses80.2%
Randomized controlled trials38011.4%

Method: PubMed query "Procarbazine"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse
Yung WK, Albright RE, Olson J, Fredericks R, Fink K, Prados MD, et al.
2000Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
653cc by
PMID 10944597 · DOI · PMC2363506
Integrated In Vivo Genotoxicity Assessment of Procarbazine Hydrochloride Demonstrates Induction of Pig-a and LacZ Mutations, and Micronuclei, in MutaMouse Hematopoietic Cells
Maurice C, Dertinger SD, Yauk CL, Marchetti F
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
8cc by
PMID 30592561 · DOI · PMC6618172
Colorectal cancer surveillance in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors at increased risk of therapy-related colorectal cancer: study design
Rigter LS, Spaander MC, Moons LM, Bisseling TM, Aleman BM, de Boer JP, et al.
2017Clinical trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
8cc by
PMID 28173773 · DOI · PMC5297162

A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse [1]

Randomized controlled trial Yung WK, Albright RE, Olson J, Fredericks R, Fink K, Prados MD, et al. · · 2000 · cited 653 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
A randomized, multicentre, open-label, phase II study compared temozolomide (TMZ), an oral second-generation alkylating agent, and procarbazine (PCB) in 225 patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse.
Closing excerpt
TMZ had an acceptable safety profile; most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (236 words)

A randomized, multicentre, open-label, phase II study compared temozolomide (TMZ), an oral second-generation alkylating agent, and procarbazine (PCB) in 225 patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Primary objectives were to determine progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and safety for TMZ and PCB in adult patients who failed conventional treatment. Secondary objectives were to assess overall survival and health-related quality of life (HRQL). TMZ was given orally at 200 mg/m(2)/day or 150 mg/m(2)/day (prior chemotherapy) for 5 days, repeated every 28 days. PCB was given orally at 150 mg/m(2)/day or 125 mg/m(2)/day (prior chemotherapy) for 28 days, repeated every 56 days. HRQL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 [+3]) and the Brain Cancer Module 20 (BCM20). The 6-month PFS rate for patients who received TMZ was 21%, which met the protocol objective. The 6-month PFS rate for those who received PCB was 8% (P = 0.008, for the comparison). Overall PFS significantly improved with TMZ, with a median PFS of 12.4 weeks in the TMZ group and 8.32 weeks in the PCB group (P = 0.0063). The 6-month overall survival rate for TMZ patients was 60% vs. 44% for PCB patients (P = 0.019). Freedom from disease progression was associated with maintenance of HRQL, regardless of treatment received. TMZ had an acceptable safety profile; most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 10944597 · DOI · PMC2363506

Integrated In Vivo Genotoxicity Assessment of Procarbazine Hydrochloride Demonstrates Induction of Pig-a and LacZ Mutations, and Micronuclei, in MutaMouse Hematopoietic Cells [2]

Research article Maurice C, Dertinger SD, Yauk CL, Marchetti F · · 2019 · cited 8 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Procarbazine hydrochloride (PCH) is a DNA-reactive hematopoietic carcinogen with potent and well-characterized clastogenic activity.
Closing excerpt
© 2018 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (264 words)

Procarbazine hydrochloride (PCH) is a DNA-reactive hematopoietic carcinogen with potent and well-characterized clastogenic activity. However, there is a paucity of in vivo mutagenesis data for PCH, and in vitro assays often fail to detect the genotoxic effects of PCH due to the complexity of its metabolic activation. We comprehensively evaluated the in vivo genotoxicity of PCH on hematopoietic cells of male MutaMouse transgenic rodents using a study design that facilitated assessments of micronuclei and Pig-a mutation in circulating erythrocytes, and lacZ mutant frequencies in bone marrow. Mice were orally exposed to PCH (0, 6.25, 12.5, and 25 mg/kg/day) for 28 consecutive days. Blood samples collected 2 days after cessation of treatment exhibited significant dose-related induction of micronuclei in both immature and mature erythrocytes. Bone marrow and blood collected 3 and 70 days after cessation of treatment also showed significantly elevated mutant frequencies in both the lacZ and Pig-a assays even at the lowest dose tested. PCH-induced lacZ and Pig-a (immature and mature erythrocytes) mutant frequencies were highly correlated, with R2 values ≥0.956, with the exception of lacZ vs. Pig-a mutants in mature erythrocytes at the 70-day time point (R2 = 0.902). These results show that PCH is genotoxic in vivo and demonstrate that the complex metabolism and resulting genotoxicity of PCH is best evaluated in intact animal models. Our results further support the concept that multiple biomarkers of genotoxicity, especially hematopoietic cell genotoxicity, can be readily combined into one study provided that adequate attention is given to manifestation times. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 60:505-512, 2019. © 2018 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30592561 · DOI · PMC6618172

Colorectal cancer surveillance in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors at increased risk of therapy-related colorectal cancer: study design [3]

Clinical trial Rigter LS, Spaander MC, Moons LM, Bisseling TM, Aleman BM, de Boer JP, et al. · · 2017 · cited 8 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundSecond primary malignancies are a major cause of excess morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors.
Closing excerpt
Trial registrationRegistered at the Dutch Trial Registry (NTR): NTR4961 .
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (350 words)

BackgroundSecond primary malignancies are a major cause of excess morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors. Hodgkin lymphoma survivors who were treated with infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy and/or high-dose procarbazine have an increased risk to develop colorectal cancer. Colonoscopy surveillance plays an important role in colorectal cancer prevention by removal of the precursor lesions (adenomas) and early detection of cancer, resulting in improved survival rates. Therefore, Hodgkin lymphoma survivors treated with infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy and/or high-dose procarbazine could benefit from colonoscopy, or other surveillance modalities, which are expected to reduce colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Current knowledge on clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of therapy-related colorectal cancer is limited. The pathogenesis of such colorectal cancers might be different from the pathogenesis in the general population and therefore these patients might require a different clinical approach. We designed a study with the primary aim to assess the diagnostic yield of a first surveillance colonoscopy among Hodgkin lymphoma survivors at increased risk of colorectal cancer and to compare these results with different screening modalities in the general population. Secondary aims include assessment of the test characteristics of stool tests and evaluation of burden, acceptance and satisfaction of CRC surveillance through two questionnaires.Methods/designThis prospective multicenter cohort study will include Hodgkin lymphoma survivors who survived ≥8 years after treatment with infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy and/or procarbazine (planned inclusion of 259 participants). Study procedures will consist of a surveillance colonoscopy with removal of precursor lesions (adenomas) and 6-8 normal colonic tissue biopsies, a fecal immunochemical test and a stool DNA test. All neoplastic lesions encountered will be classified using relevant histomorphological, immunohistochemical and molecular analyses in order to obtain more insight into colorectal carcinogenesis in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. The Miscan-model will be used for cost-effectiveness analyses.DiscussionEvaluation of the diagnostic performance, patient acceptance and burden of colorectal cancer surveillance is necessary for future implementation of an individualized colorectal cancer surveillance program for Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. In addition, more insight into treatment-induced colorectal carcinogenesis will provide the first step towards prevention and personalized treatment. This information may be extrapolated to other groups of cancer survivors.Trial registrationRegistered at the Dutch Trial Registry (NTR): NTR4961 .

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 28173773 · DOI · PMC5297162

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article The emerging role of reactive oxygen species in cancer therapy [4]
    Renschler MF · Eur J Cancer · 2004 · cited 168 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Practice changing mature results of RTOG study 9802: another positive PCV trial makes adjuvant chemotherapy part of standard of care in low-grade glioma [5]
    van den Bent MJ · Neuro Oncol · 2014 · cited 91 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Drugs 5 years later: procarbazine [6]
    Spivack SD · Ann Intern Med · 1974 · cited 59 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Reevaluation of procarbazine for the treatment of recurrent malignant central nervous system tumors [7]
    Rodriguez LA, Prados M, Silver P, Levin VA · Cancer · 1989 · cited 47 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Mutagenicity, carcinogenicity and teratogenicity of procarbazine [8]
    Lee IP, Dixon RL · Mutat Res · 1978 · cited 33 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Combination chemotherapy of advanced Hodgkin's disease. A review [9]
    Goldsmith MA, Carter SK · Cancer · 1974 · cited 32 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Yung WK, Albright RE, Olson J, Fredericks R, Fink K, Prados MD, et al.. A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. . 2000. PMID 10944597 · DOI · PMC2363506
  2. Maurice C, Dertinger SD, Yauk CL, Marchetti F. Integrated In Vivo Genotoxicity Assessment of Procarbazine Hydrochloride Demonstrates Induction of Pig-a and LacZ Mutations, and Micronuclei, in MutaMouse Hematopoietic Cells. . 2019. PMID 30592561 · DOI · PMC6618172
  3. Rigter LS, Spaander MC, Moons LM, Bisseling TM, Aleman BM, de Boer JP, et al.. Colorectal cancer surveillance in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors at increased risk of therapy-related colorectal cancer: study design. . 2017. PMID 28173773 · DOI · PMC5297162
  4. Renschler MF. The emerging role of reactive oxygen species in cancer therapy. Eur J Cancer. 2004. PMID 15315800 · DOI
  5. van den Bent MJ. Practice changing mature results of RTOG study 9802: another positive PCV trial makes adjuvant chemotherapy part of standard of care in low-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2014. PMID 25355680 · DOI · PMC4232091
  6. Spivack SD. Drugs 5 years later: procarbazine. Ann Intern Med. 1974. PMID 4611297 · DOI
  7. Rodriguez LA, Prados M, Silver P, Levin VA. Reevaluation of procarbazine for the treatment of recurrent malignant central nervous system tumors. Cancer. 1989. PMID 2555038 · DOI
  8. Lee IP, Dixon RL. Mutagenicity, carcinogenicity and teratogenicity of procarbazine. Mutat Res. 1978. PMID 105288 · DOI
  9. Goldsmith MA, Carter SK. Combination chemotherapy of advanced Hodgkin's disease. A review. Cancer. 1974. PMID 4129559 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Imatinib MesylateDrugs and Chemicals
  • RacloprideDrugs and Chemicals
  • SulpirideDrugs and Chemicals
  • MinocyclineDrugs and Chemicals
  • PuromycinDrugs and Chemicals
  • NortriptylineDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

3,348
PubMed records on this heading
3%
published since 2020
337
review articles
380
randomized trials
9
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Imatinib MesylateDrugs and Chemicals
  • RacloprideDrugs and Chemicals
  • SulpirideDrugs and Chemicals
  • MinocyclineDrugs and Chemicals
  • PuromycinDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support