Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Molecular Biology›Proteolysis
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Proteolysis

Molecular Biology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Cleavage of proteins into smaller peptides or amino acids either by proteases or non-enzymatically (e.g., Hydrolysis).

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (841 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Cleavage of proteins into smaller peptides or amino acids either by proteases or non-enzymatically (e.g., Hydrolysis). It does not include Protein Processing, Post-Translational.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Proteolyses; Protein Degradation; Degradation, Protein; Degradations, Protein; Protein Degradations; Protein Digestion; Digestion, Protein; Digestions, Protein.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Biochemical Phenomena; Metabolism

Related concepts

  • Proteases

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 26,100 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Proteolysis” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 9,736 of them (37.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 16,222 records.

Reviews account for 2,993 records (11.5%) and meta-analyses for 7. Randomized controlled trials number 41 (0.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 128 records; 2000-2009: 14 records; 2010-2019: 16,222 records; 2020 onward: 9,736 records128through 1999142000-200916,2222010-20199,7362020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999128
2000-200914
2010-201916,222
2020 onward9,736
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 11.5 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.2 percentReviews11.5% (2,993)Meta-analyses0.0% (7)Randomized controlled trials0.2% (41)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 26,100 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews2,99311.5%
Meta-analyses70.0%
Randomized controlled trials410.2%

Method: PubMed query "Proteolysis"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in molecular biology

Molecular biology establishes mechanisms through controlled experiments, often in simplified systems such as purified proteins, cultured cells or model organisms. Such work can show what is possible in a defined system, but whether a pathway matters in a whole organism or in human disease needs further evidence. Check the experimental system, whether findings were reproduced by independent groups, and whether the authors tested the mechanism directly or inferred it from correlation.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Targeted protein degradation: advances in drug discovery and clinical practice
Zhong G, Chang X, Xie W, Zhou X
2024Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
251cc by
PMID 39500878 · DOI · PMC11539257
Designed endocytosis-inducing proteins degrade targets and amplify signals
Huang B, Abedi M, Ahn G, Coventry B, Sappington I, Tang C, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
135cc by
PMID 39322662 · DOI · PMC11839401
PROTAC-DB 3.0: an updated database of PROTACs with extended pharmacokinetic parameters
Ge J, Li S, Weng G, Wang H, Fang M, Sun H, et al.
2025Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
109cc by
PMID 39225044 · DOI · PMC11701630
Inhibitors supercharge kinase turnover through native proteolytic circuits
Scholes NS, Bertoni M, Comajuncosa-Creus A, Kladnik K, Guo X, Frommelt F, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
18cc by
PMID 41299171 · DOI · PMC12823440

Targeted protein degradation: advances in drug discovery and clinical practice [1]

Review article Zhong G, Chang X, Xie W, Zhou X · · 2024 · cited 251 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Targeted protein degradation (TPD) represents a revolutionary therapeutic strategy in disease management, providing a stark contrast to traditional therapeutic approaches like small molecule inhibitors that primarily focus on inhibiting protein function.
Closing excerpt
By offering a comprehensive overview of the current innovations and the challenges faced, this review assesses the transformative potential of TPD in revolutionizing drug development and disease management, setting the stage for a new era in medical therapy.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (234 words)

Targeted protein degradation (TPD) represents a revolutionary therapeutic strategy in disease management, providing a stark contrast to traditional therapeutic approaches like small molecule inhibitors that primarily focus on inhibiting protein function. This advanced technology capitalizes on the cell's intrinsic proteolytic systems, including the proteasome and lysosomal pathways, to selectively eliminate disease-causing proteins. TPD not only enhances the efficacy of treatments but also expands the scope of protein degradation applications. Despite its considerable potential, TPD faces challenges related to the properties of the drugs and their rational design. This review thoroughly explores the mechanisms and clinical advancements of TPD, from its initial conceptualization to practical implementation, with a particular focus on proteolysis-targeting chimeras and molecular glues. In addition, the review delves into emerging technologies and methodologies aimed at addressing these challenges and enhancing therapeutic efficacy. We also discuss the significant clinical trials and highlight the promising therapeutic outcomes associated with TPD drugs, illustrating their potential to transform the treatment landscape. Furthermore, the review considers the benefits of combining TPD with other therapies to enhance overall treatment effectiveness and overcome drug resistance. The future directions of TPD applications are also explored, presenting an optimistic perspective on further innovations. By offering a comprehensive overview of the current innovations and the challenges faced, this review assesses the transformative potential of TPD in revolutionizing drug development and disease management, setting the stage for a new era in medical therapy.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39500878 · DOI · PMC11539257

Designed endocytosis-inducing proteins degrade targets and amplify signals [2]

Research article Huang B, Abedi M, Ahn G, Coventry B, Sappington I, Tang C, et al. · · 2025 · cited 135 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Endocytosis and lysosomal trafficking of cell surface receptors can be triggered by endogenous ligands.
Closing excerpt
EndoTags have considerable therapeutic potential as targeted degradation inducers, signalling activators for endocytosis-dependent pathways, and cellular uptake inducers for targeted antibody-drug and antibody-RNA conjugates.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (237 words)

Endocytosis and lysosomal trafficking of cell surface receptors can be triggered by endogenous ligands. Therapeutic approaches such as lysosome-targeting chimaeras1,2 (LYTACs) and cytokine receptor-targeting chimeras3 (KineTACs) have used this to target specific proteins for degradation by fusing modified native ligands to target binding proteins. Although powerful, these approaches can be limited by competition with native ligands and requirements for chemical modification that limit genetic encodability and can complicate manufacturing, and, more generally, there may be no native ligands that stimulate endocytosis through a given receptor. Here we describe computational design approaches for endocytosis-triggering binding proteins (EndoTags) that overcome these challenges. We present EndoTags for insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (IGF2R) and asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR), sortilin and transferrin receptors, and show that fusing these tags to soluble or transmembrane target protein binders leads to lysosomal trafficking and target degradation. As these receptors have different tissue distributions, the different EndoTags could enable targeting of degradation to different tissues. EndoTag fusion to a PD-L1 antibody considerably increases efficacy in a mouse tumour model compared to antibody alone. The modularity and genetic encodability of EndoTags enables AND gate control for higher-specificity targeted degradation, and the localized secretion of degraders from engineered cells. By promoting endocytosis, EndoTag fusion increases signalling through an engineered ligand-receptor system by nearly 100-fold. EndoTags have considerable therapeutic potential as targeted degradation inducers, signalling activators for endocytosis-dependent pathways, and cellular uptake inducers for targeted antibody-drug and antibody-RNA conjugates.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39322662 · DOI · PMC11839401

PROTAC-DB 3.0: an updated database of PROTACs with extended pharmacokinetic parameters [3]

Research article Ge J, Li S, Weng G, Wang H, Fang M, Sun H, et al. · · 2025 · cited 109 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) is an emerging therapeutic technology that leverages the ubiquitin-proteasome system to target protein degradation.
Closing excerpt
cn/protacdb/.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (157 words)

Proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) is an emerging therapeutic technology that leverages the ubiquitin-proteasome system to target protein degradation. Due to its event-driven mechanistic characteristics, PROTAC has the potential to regulate traditionally non-druggable targets. Recently, AI-aided drug design has accelerated the development of PROTAC drugs. However, the rational design of PROTACs remains a considerable challenge. Here, we present an updated online database, PROTAC-DB 3.0. In this third version, we have expanded the database to include 6111 PROTACs (87% increase compared to the 2.0 version). Additionally, the database now contains 569 warheads (small molecules targeting the protein), 2753 linkers, and 107 E3 ligands (small molecules recruiting E3 ligases). The number of target-PROTAC-E3 ternary complex structures has also increased to 959. Recognizing the importance of druggability in PROTAC design, we have incorporated pharmacokinetic data to PROTAC-DB 3.0. To enhance user experience, we have added features for sorting based on molecular similarity and literature publication date. PROTAC-DB 3.0 is accessible at http://cadd.zju.edu.cn/protacdb/.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39225044 · DOI · PMC11701630

Inhibitors supercharge kinase turnover through native proteolytic circuits [4]

Research article Scholes NS, Bertoni M, Comajuncosa-Creus A, Kladnik K, Guo X, Frommelt F, et al. · · 2026 · cited 18 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Targeted protein degradation is a pharmacological strategy that relies on small molecules such as proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) or molecular glues, which induce proximity between a target protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase to prompt target ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation1.
Closing excerpt
Collectively, our data suggest that inhibitor-induced kinase degradation is a common event and positions supercharging of endogenous degradation circuits as an alternative to classical proximity-inducing degraders.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (213 words)

Targeted protein degradation is a pharmacological strategy that relies on small molecules such as proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) or molecular glues, which induce proximity between a target protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase to prompt target ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation1. Sporadic reports indicated that ligands designed to inhibit a target can also induce its destabilization2-4. Among others, this has repeatedly been observed for kinase inhibitors5-7. However, we lack an understanding of the frequency, generalizability and mechanistic underpinnings of these phenomena. Here, to address this knowledge gap, we generated dynamic abundance profiles of 98 kinases after cellular perturbations with 1,570 kinase inhibitors, revealing 160 selective instances of inhibitor-induced kinase destabilization. Kinases prone to degradation are frequently annotated as HSP90 clients, therefore affirming chaperone deprivation as an important route of destabilization. However, detailed investigation of inhibitor-induced degradation of LYN, BLK and RIPK2 revealed a differentiated, common mechanistic logic whereby inhibitors function by inducing a kinase state that is more efficiently cleared by endogenous degradation mechanisms. Mechanistically, effects can manifest by ligand-induced changes in cellular activity, localization or higher-order assemblies, which may be triggered by direct target engagement or network effects. Collectively, our data suggest that inhibitor-induced kinase degradation is a common event and positions supercharging of endogenous degradation circuits as an alternative to classical proximity-inducing degraders.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41299171 · DOI · PMC12823440

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue [5]
    Békés M, Langley DR, Crews CM · Nat Rev Drug Discov · 2022 · cited 2,725 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article The proteostasis network and its decline in ageing [6]
    Hipp MS, Kasturi P, Hartl FU · Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol · 2019 · cited 1,431 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cellular quality control by the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy [7]
    Pohl C, Dikic I · Science · 2019 · cited 1,032 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras as Therapeutics and Tools for Biological Discovery [8]
    Burslem GM, Crews CM · Cell · 2020 · cited 886 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs) - Past, present and future [9]
    Pettersson M, Crews CM · Drug Discov Today Technol · 2019 · cited 630 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Advancing targeted protein degradation for cancer therapy [10]
    Dale B, Cheng M, Park KS, Kaniskan HÜ, Xiong Y, Jin J · Nat Rev Cancer · 2021 · cited 554 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Zhong G, Chang X, Xie W, Zhou X. Targeted protein degradation: advances in drug discovery and clinical practice. . 2024. PMID 39500878 · DOI · PMC11539257
  2. Huang B, Abedi M, Ahn G, Coventry B, Sappington I, Tang C, et al.. Designed endocytosis-inducing proteins degrade targets and amplify signals. . 2025. PMID 39322662 · DOI · PMC11839401
  3. Ge J, Li S, Weng G, Wang H, Fang M, Sun H, et al.. PROTAC-DB 3.0: an updated database of PROTACs with extended pharmacokinetic parameters. . 2025. PMID 39225044 · DOI · PMC11701630
  4. Scholes NS, Bertoni M, Comajuncosa-Creus A, Kladnik K, Guo X, Frommelt F, et al.. Inhibitors supercharge kinase turnover through native proteolytic circuits. . 2026. PMID 41299171 · DOI · PMC12823440
  5. Békés M, Langley DR, Crews CM. PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022. PMID 35042991 · DOI · PMC8765495
  6. Hipp MS, Kasturi P, Hartl FU. The proteostasis network and its decline in ageing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019. PMID 30733602 · DOI
  7. Pohl C, Dikic I. Cellular quality control by the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy. Science. 2019. PMID 31727826 · DOI
  8. Burslem GM, Crews CM. Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras as Therapeutics and Tools for Biological Discovery. Cell. 2020. PMID 31955850 · DOI · PMC7319047
  9. Pettersson M, Crews CM. PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs) - Past, present and future. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2019. PMID 31200855 · DOI · PMC6578591
  10. Dale B, Cheng M, Park KS, Kaniskan HÜ, Xiong Y, Jin J. Advancing targeted protein degradation for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021. PMID 34131295 · DOI · PMC8463487

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Protein CDrugs and Chemicals
  • Protein StabilityMolecular Biology
  • Protein BindingMolecular Biology
  • Protein DomainsMolecular Biology
  • Protein ConformationMolecular Biology
  • ProteostasisMolecular Biology

All 100 articles in Molecular Biology →

At a glance

26,100
PubMed records on this heading
37%
published since 2020
2,993
review articles
41
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Protein CDrugs and Chemicals
  • Protein StabilityMolecular Biology
  • Protein BindingMolecular Biology
  • Protein DomainsMolecular Biology
  • Protein ConformationMolecular Biology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support