Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Neuroscience›Pyramidal Cells
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Pyramidal Cells

Neuroscience · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

Projection neurons in the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (770 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

Projection neurons in the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus. Pyramidal cells have a pyramid-shaped soma with the apex and an apical dendrite pointed toward the pial surface and other dendrites and an axon emerging from the base. The axons may have local collaterals but also project outside their cortical region.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Cell, Pyramidal; Cells, Pyramidal; Pyramidal Cell; Pyramidal Neurons; Neuron, Pyramidal; Neurons, Pyramidal; Pyramidal Neuron.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Neurons
Narrower topics
Place Cells
See also
CA1 Region, Hippocampal; CA2 Region, Hippocampal; CA3 Region, Hippocampal

Related concepts

  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Hippocampus

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 13,083 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Pyramidal Cells” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 2,386 of them (18.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 4,263 records.

Reviews account for 449 records (3.4%) and meta-analyses for 2. Randomized controlled trials number 4 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 2,361 records; 2000-2009: 4,263 records; 2010-2019: 4,073 records; 2020 onward: 2,386 records2,361through 19994,2632000-20094,0732010-20192,3862020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19992,361
2000-20094,263
2010-20194,073
2020 onward2,386
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 3.4 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.0 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.0 percentReviews3.4% (449)Meta-analyses0.0% (2)Randomized controlled trials0.0% (4)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 13,083 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews4493.4%
Meta-analyses20.0%
Randomized controlled trials40.0%

Method: PubMed query "Pyramidal Cells"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in neuroscience

Neuroscience draws on tools with different strengths: cellular and animal work can manipulate circuits directly, while human imaging and electrophysiology observe the living brain at lower resolution. Small imaging studies are prone to false positives, and findings in animals do not always carry over to people. Clinical neurology and psychiatry rely on trials and cohort studies whose outcomes are often symptom scales. Check the species, the sample size, how the outcome was measured and whether results were replicated.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Hippocampal place cells have goal-oriented vector fields during navigation
Ormond J, O'Keefe J
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
114cc by
PMID 35794477 · DOI · PMC9329099
Binary and analog variation of synapses between cortical pyramidal neurons
Dorkenwald S, Turner NL, Macrina T, Lee K, Lu R, Wu J, et al.
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
104cc by
PMID 36382887 · DOI · PMC9704804
Pyramidal cell types drive functionally distinct cortical activity patterns during decision-making
Musall S, Sun XR, Mohan H, An X, Gluf S, Li SJ, et al.
2023Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
98cc by
PMID 36690900 · DOI · PMC9991922
Layer 6 is a hub for cholinergic modulation in the mouse auditory cortex
Vattino LG, Clayton KK, Hackett TA, Polley DB, Takesian AE
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
5cc by
PMID 41569342 · DOI · PMC12825313

Hippocampal place cells have goal-oriented vector fields during navigation [1]

Research article Ormond J, O'Keefe J · · 2022 · cited 114 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The hippocampal cognitive map supports navigation towards, or away from, salient locations in familiar environments1.
Closing excerpt
The results suggest that the hippocampus creates a vector-based model to support flexible navigation, allowing animals to select optimal paths to destinations from any location in the environment.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (192 words)

The hippocampal cognitive map supports navigation towards, or away from, salient locations in familiar environments1. Although much is known about how the hippocampus encodes location in world-centred coordinates, how it supports flexible navigation is less well understood. We recorded CA1 place cells while rats navigated to a goal on the honeycomb maze2. The maze tests navigation via direct and indirect paths to the goal and allows the directionality of place cells to be assessed at each choice point. Place fields showed strong directional polarization characterized by vector fields that converged to sinks distributed throughout the environment. The distribution of these 'convergence sinks' (ConSinks) was centred near the goal location and the population vector field converged on the goal, providing a strong navigational signal. Changing the goal location led to movement of ConSinks and vector fields towards the new goal. The honeycomb maze allows independent assessment of spatial representation and spatial action in place cell activity and shows how the latter relates to the former. The results suggest that the hippocampus creates a vector-based model to support flexible navigation, allowing animals to select optimal paths to destinations from any location in the environment.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35794477 · DOI · PMC9329099

Binary and analog variation of synapses between cortical pyramidal neurons [2]

Research article Dorkenwald S, Turner NL, Macrina T, Lee K, Lu R, Wu J, et al. · · 2022 · cited 104 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Learning from experience depends at least in part on changes in neuronal connections.
Closing excerpt
We discuss the implications for the longstanding hypothesis that activity-dependent plasticity switches synapses between bistable states.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (236 words)

Learning from experience depends at least in part on changes in neuronal connections. We present the largest map of connectivity to date between cortical neurons of a defined type (layer 2/3 [L2/3] pyramidal cells in mouse primary visual cortex), which was enabled by automated analysis of serial section electron microscopy images with improved handling of image defects (250 × 140 × 90 μm3 volume). We used the map to identify constraints on the learning algorithms employed by the cortex. Previous cortical studies modeled a continuum of synapse sizes by a log-normal distribution. A continuum is consistent with most neural network models of learning, in which synaptic strength is a continuously graded analog variable. Here, we show that synapse size, when restricted to synapses between L2/3 pyramidal cells, is well modeled by the sum of a binary variable and an analog variable drawn from a log-normal distribution. Two synapses sharing the same presynaptic and postsynaptic cells are known to be correlated in size. We show that the binary variables of the two synapses are highly correlated, while the analog variables are not. Binary variation could be the outcome of a Hebbian or other synaptic plasticity rule depending on activity signals that are relatively uniform across neuronal arbors, while analog variation may be dominated by other influences such as spontaneous dynamical fluctuations. We discuss the implications for the longstanding hypothesis that activity-dependent plasticity switches synapses between bistable states.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36382887 · DOI · PMC9704804

Pyramidal cell types drive functionally distinct cortical activity patterns during decision-making [3]

Research article Musall S, Sun XR, Mohan H, An X, Gluf S, Li SJ, et al. · · 2023 · cited 98 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Understanding how cortical circuits generate complex behavior requires investigating the cell types that comprise them.
Closing excerpt
Our results reveal that rich, cell-type-specific cortical dynamics shape perceptual decisions.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (148 words)

Understanding how cortical circuits generate complex behavior requires investigating the cell types that comprise them. Functional differences across pyramidal neuron (PyN) types have been observed within cortical areas, but it is not known whether these local differences extend throughout the cortex, nor whether additional differences emerge when larger-scale dynamics are considered. We used genetic and retrograde labeling to target pyramidal tract, intratelencephalic and corticostriatal projection neurons and measured their cortex-wide activity. Each PyN type drove unique neural dynamics, both at the local and cortex-wide scales. Cortical activity and optogenetic inactivation during an auditory decision task revealed distinct functional roles. All PyNs in parietal cortex were recruited during perception of the auditory stimulus, but, surprisingly, pyramidal tract neurons had the largest causal role. In frontal cortex, all PyNs were required for accurate choices but showed distinct choice tuning. Our results reveal that rich, cell-type-specific cortical dynamics shape perceptual decisions.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36690900 · DOI · PMC9991922

Layer 6 is a hub for cholinergic modulation in the mouse auditory cortex [4]

Research article Vattino LG, Clayton KK, Hackett TA, Polley DB, Takesian AE · · 2026 · cited 5 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs) densely innervate auditory cortex (ACtx), conveying signals linked to internal brain states and external sensory cues.
Closing excerpt
By recruiting distinct receptor mechanisms and circuit motifs in L1 and L6, BFCNs may engage parallel pathways of cholinergic control that couple fast, transient modulation with slower, sustained regulation to shape cortical perception and plasticity.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (194 words)

Basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs) densely innervate auditory cortex (ACtx), conveying signals linked to internal brain states and external sensory cues. Acetylcholine (ACh) is known to rapidly modulate cortical circuits through nicotinic ACh receptor (nAChR)-mediated activation of layer 1 inhibitory neurons (L1-INs). However, BFCN terminals are also abundant in deeper layers, where their functional impact has received less attention. Using multi-plex in situ labeling across cortical layers and cell types, we found that layer 6 pyramidal neurons (L6-PNs) are highly enriched in diverse transcripts for nAChR subunits and muscarinic ACh receptors (mAChRs). In vivo optogenetic activation of BFCN axons revealed persistent modulation of regular spiking units in L2-6 but a rapid phasic activation only in L6. In acute slices, optogenetic activation of BFCN axons elicited fast nAChR-mediated excitatory post-synaptic potentials in L6-PNs, comparable to responses in L1-INs, and slower mAChR-mediated inhibitory responses. These findings identify L1-INs and excitatory L6-PNs as two major hubs for BFCN modulation of cortical circuits. By recruiting distinct receptor mechanisms and circuit motifs in L1 and L6, BFCNs may engage parallel pathways of cholinergic control that couple fast, transient modulation with slower, sustained regulation to shape cortical perception and plasticity.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41569342 · DOI · PMC12825313

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Neuronal diversity and temporal dynamics: the unity of hippocampal circuit operations [5]
    Klausberger T, Somogyi P · Science · 2008 · cited 1,686 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Pyramidal neurons: dendritic structure and synaptic integration [6]
    Spruston N · Nat Rev Neurosci · 2008 · cited 1,276 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Cell migration in the forebrain [7]
    Marín O, Rubenstein JL · Annu Rev Neurosci · 2003 · cited 726 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A Brief History of Long-Term Potentiation [8]
    Nicoll RA · Neuron · 2017 · cited 678 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Structural dynamics of dendritic spines in memory and cognition [9]
    Kasai H, Fukuda M, Watanabe S, Hayashi-Takagi A, Noguchi J · Trends Neurosci · 2010 · cited 662 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Active properties of neuronal dendrites [10]
    Johnston D, Magee JC, Colbert CM, Cristie BR · Annu Rev Neurosci · 1996 · cited 402 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Ormond J, O'Keefe J. Hippocampal place cells have goal-oriented vector fields during navigation. . 2022. PMID 35794477 · DOI · PMC9329099
  2. Dorkenwald S, Turner NL, Macrina T, Lee K, Lu R, Wu J, et al.. Binary and analog variation of synapses between cortical pyramidal neurons. . 2022. PMID 36382887 · DOI · PMC9704804
  3. Musall S, Sun XR, Mohan H, An X, Gluf S, Li SJ, et al.. Pyramidal cell types drive functionally distinct cortical activity patterns during decision-making. . 2023. PMID 36690900 · DOI · PMC9991922
  4. Vattino LG, Clayton KK, Hackett TA, Polley DB, Takesian AE. Layer 6 is a hub for cholinergic modulation in the mouse auditory cortex. . 2026. PMID 41569342 · DOI · PMC12825313
  5. Klausberger T, Somogyi P. Neuronal diversity and temporal dynamics: the unity of hippocampal circuit operations. Science. 2008. PMID 18599766 · DOI · PMC4487503
  6. Spruston N. Pyramidal neurons: dendritic structure and synaptic integration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008. PMID 18270515 · DOI
  7. Marín O, Rubenstein JL. Cell migration in the forebrain. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003. PMID 12626695 · DOI
  8. Nicoll RA. A Brief History of Long-Term Potentiation. Neuron. 2017. PMID 28103477 · DOI
  9. Kasai H, Fukuda M, Watanabe S, Hayashi-Takagi A, Noguchi J. Structural dynamics of dendritic spines in memory and cognition. Trends Neurosci. 2010. PMID 20138375 · DOI
  10. Johnston D, Magee JC, Colbert CM, Cristie BR. Active properties of neuronal dendrites. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1996. PMID 8833440 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • NeuronsNeuroscience
  • Schwann CellsNeuroscience
  • NeocortexNeuroscience
  • MicrogliaNeuroscience
  • NeurogenesisNeuroscience
  • InterneuronsNeuroscience

All 110 articles in Neuroscience →

At a glance

13,083
PubMed records on this heading
18%
published since 2020
449
review articles
4
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • NeuronsNeuroscience
  • Schwann CellsNeuroscience
  • NeocortexNeuroscience
  • MicrogliaNeuroscience
  • NeurogenesisNeuroscience

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support