Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (770 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
Projection neurons in the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus. Pyramidal cells have a pyramid-shaped soma with the apex and an apical dendrite pointed toward the pial surface and other dendrites and an axon emerging from the base. The axons may have local collaterals but also project outside their cortical region.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Cell, Pyramidal; Cells, Pyramidal; Pyramidal Cell; Pyramidal Neurons; Neuron, Pyramidal; Neurons, Pyramidal; Pyramidal Neuron.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Neurons
- Narrower topics
- Place Cells
- See also
- CA1 Region, Hippocampal; CA2 Region, Hippocampal; CA3 Region, Hippocampal
Related concepts
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 13,083 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Pyramidal Cells” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 2,386 of them (18.2%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 4,263 records.
Reviews account for 449 records (3.4%) and meta-analyses for 2. Randomized controlled trials number 4 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 2,361 |
| 2000-2009 | 4,263 |
| 2010-2019 | 4,073 |
| 2020 onward | 2,386 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 449 | 3.4% |
| Meta-analyses | 2 | 0.0% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 4 | 0.0% |
Method: PubMed query "Pyramidal Cells"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in neuroscience
Neuroscience draws on tools with different strengths: cellular and animal work can manipulate circuits directly, while human imaging and electrophysiology observe the living brain at lower resolution. Small imaging studies are prone to false positives, and findings in animals do not always carry over to people. Clinical neurology and psychiatry rely on trials and cohort studies whose outcomes are often symptom scales. Check the species, the sample size, how the outcome was measured and whether results were replicated.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hippocampal place cells have goal-oriented vector fields during navigation | 2022 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 114 | cc by PMID 35794477 · DOI · PMC9329099 |
| Binary and analog variation of synapses between cortical pyramidal neurons | 2022 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 104 | cc by PMID 36382887 · DOI · PMC9704804 |
| Pyramidal cell types drive functionally distinct cortical activity patterns during decision-making | 2023 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 98 | cc by PMID 36690900 · DOI · PMC9991922 |
| Layer 6 is a hub for cholinergic modulation in the mouse auditory cortex | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 5 | cc by PMID 41569342 · DOI · PMC12825313 |
Hippocampal place cells have goal-oriented vector fields during navigation [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- The hippocampal cognitive map supports navigation towards, or away from, salient locations in familiar environments1.
- Closing excerpt
- The results suggest that the hippocampus creates a vector-based model to support flexible navigation, allowing animals to select optimal paths to destinations from any location in the environment.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (192 words)
The hippocampal cognitive map supports navigation towards, or away from, salient locations in familiar environments1. Although much is known about how the hippocampus encodes location in world-centred coordinates, how it supports flexible navigation is less well understood. We recorded CA1 place cells while rats navigated to a goal on the honeycomb maze2. The maze tests navigation via direct and indirect paths to the goal and allows the directionality of place cells to be assessed at each choice point. Place fields showed strong directional polarization characterized by vector fields that converged to sinks distributed throughout the environment. The distribution of these 'convergence sinks' (ConSinks) was centred near the goal location and the population vector field converged on the goal, providing a strong navigational signal. Changing the goal location led to movement of ConSinks and vector fields towards the new goal. The honeycomb maze allows independent assessment of spatial representation and spatial action in place cell activity and shows how the latter relates to the former. The results suggest that the hippocampus creates a vector-based model to support flexible navigation, allowing animals to select optimal paths to destinations from any location in the environment.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35794477 · DOI · PMC9329099
Binary and analog variation of synapses between cortical pyramidal neurons [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Learning from experience depends at least in part on changes in neuronal connections.
- Closing excerpt
- We discuss the implications for the longstanding hypothesis that activity-dependent plasticity switches synapses between bistable states.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (236 words)
Learning from experience depends at least in part on changes in neuronal connections. We present the largest map of connectivity to date between cortical neurons of a defined type (layer 2/3 [L2/3] pyramidal cells in mouse primary visual cortex), which was enabled by automated analysis of serial section electron microscopy images with improved handling of image defects (250 × 140 × 90 μm3 volume). We used the map to identify constraints on the learning algorithms employed by the cortex. Previous cortical studies modeled a continuum of synapse sizes by a log-normal distribution. A continuum is consistent with most neural network models of learning, in which synaptic strength is a continuously graded analog variable. Here, we show that synapse size, when restricted to synapses between L2/3 pyramidal cells, is well modeled by the sum of a binary variable and an analog variable drawn from a log-normal distribution. Two synapses sharing the same presynaptic and postsynaptic cells are known to be correlated in size. We show that the binary variables of the two synapses are highly correlated, while the analog variables are not. Binary variation could be the outcome of a Hebbian or other synaptic plasticity rule depending on activity signals that are relatively uniform across neuronal arbors, while analog variation may be dominated by other influences such as spontaneous dynamical fluctuations. We discuss the implications for the longstanding hypothesis that activity-dependent plasticity switches synapses between bistable states.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36382887 · DOI · PMC9704804
Pyramidal cell types drive functionally distinct cortical activity patterns during decision-making [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Understanding how cortical circuits generate complex behavior requires investigating the cell types that comprise them.
- Closing excerpt
- Our results reveal that rich, cell-type-specific cortical dynamics shape perceptual decisions.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (148 words)
Understanding how cortical circuits generate complex behavior requires investigating the cell types that comprise them. Functional differences across pyramidal neuron (PyN) types have been observed within cortical areas, but it is not known whether these local differences extend throughout the cortex, nor whether additional differences emerge when larger-scale dynamics are considered. We used genetic and retrograde labeling to target pyramidal tract, intratelencephalic and corticostriatal projection neurons and measured their cortex-wide activity. Each PyN type drove unique neural dynamics, both at the local and cortex-wide scales. Cortical activity and optogenetic inactivation during an auditory decision task revealed distinct functional roles. All PyNs in parietal cortex were recruited during perception of the auditory stimulus, but, surprisingly, pyramidal tract neurons had the largest causal role. In frontal cortex, all PyNs were required for accurate choices but showed distinct choice tuning. Our results reveal that rich, cell-type-specific cortical dynamics shape perceptual decisions.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36690900 · DOI · PMC9991922
Layer 6 is a hub for cholinergic modulation in the mouse auditory cortex [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs) densely innervate auditory cortex (ACtx), conveying signals linked to internal brain states and external sensory cues.
- Closing excerpt
- By recruiting distinct receptor mechanisms and circuit motifs in L1 and L6, BFCNs may engage parallel pathways of cholinergic control that couple fast, transient modulation with slower, sustained regulation to shape cortical perception and plasticity.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (194 words)
Basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs) densely innervate auditory cortex (ACtx), conveying signals linked to internal brain states and external sensory cues. Acetylcholine (ACh) is known to rapidly modulate cortical circuits through nicotinic ACh receptor (nAChR)-mediated activation of layer 1 inhibitory neurons (L1-INs). However, BFCN terminals are also abundant in deeper layers, where their functional impact has received less attention. Using multi-plex in situ labeling across cortical layers and cell types, we found that layer 6 pyramidal neurons (L6-PNs) are highly enriched in diverse transcripts for nAChR subunits and muscarinic ACh receptors (mAChRs). In vivo optogenetic activation of BFCN axons revealed persistent modulation of regular spiking units in L2-6 but a rapid phasic activation only in L6. In acute slices, optogenetic activation of BFCN axons elicited fast nAChR-mediated excitatory post-synaptic potentials in L6-PNs, comparable to responses in L1-INs, and slower mAChR-mediated inhibitory responses. These findings identify L1-INs and excitatory L6-PNs as two major hubs for BFCN modulation of cortical circuits. By recruiting distinct receptor mechanisms and circuit motifs in L1 and L6, BFCNs may engage parallel pathways of cholinergic control that couple fast, transient modulation with slower, sustained regulation to shape cortical perception and plasticity.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41569342 · DOI · PMC12825313
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Neuronal diversity and temporal dynamics: the unity of hippocampal circuit operations [5]
- Research article Pyramidal neurons: dendritic structure and synaptic integration [6]
- Research article Cell migration in the forebrain [7]
- Research article A Brief History of Long-Term Potentiation [8]
- Research article Structural dynamics of dendritic spines in memory and cognition [9]
- Research article Active properties of neuronal dendrites [10]
References
- Ormond J, O'Keefe J. Hippocampal place cells have goal-oriented vector fields during navigation. . 2022. PMID 35794477 · DOI · PMC9329099
- Dorkenwald S, Turner NL, Macrina T, Lee K, Lu R, Wu J, et al.. Binary and analog variation of synapses between cortical pyramidal neurons. . 2022. PMID 36382887 · DOI · PMC9704804
- Musall S, Sun XR, Mohan H, An X, Gluf S, Li SJ, et al.. Pyramidal cell types drive functionally distinct cortical activity patterns during decision-making. . 2023. PMID 36690900 · DOI · PMC9991922
- Vattino LG, Clayton KK, Hackett TA, Polley DB, Takesian AE. Layer 6 is a hub for cholinergic modulation in the mouse auditory cortex. . 2026. PMID 41569342 · DOI · PMC12825313
- Klausberger T, Somogyi P. Neuronal diversity and temporal dynamics: the unity of hippocampal circuit operations. Science. 2008. PMID 18599766 · DOI · PMC4487503
- Spruston N. Pyramidal neurons: dendritic structure and synaptic integration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008. PMID 18270515 · DOI
- Marín O, Rubenstein JL. Cell migration in the forebrain. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003. PMID 12626695 · DOI
- Nicoll RA. A Brief History of Long-Term Potentiation. Neuron. 2017. PMID 28103477 · DOI
- Kasai H, Fukuda M, Watanabe S, Hayashi-Takagi A, Noguchi J. Structural dynamics of dendritic spines in memory and cognition. Trends Neurosci. 2010. PMID 20138375 · DOI
- Johnston D, Magee JC, Colbert CM, Cristie BR. Active properties of neuronal dendrites. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1996. PMID 8833440 · DOI
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.