Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Pharmacology›Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship

Pharmacology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-29 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 4 min read

A quantitative prediction of the biological, ecotoxicological or pharmaceutical activity of a molecule.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (712 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A quantitative prediction of the biological, ecotoxicological or pharmaceutical activity of a molecule. It is based upon structure and activity information gathered from a series of similar compounds.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship; Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships; Relationship, Quantitative Structure-Activity; Relationships, Quantitative Structure-Activity; Structure-Activity Relationship, Quantitative; Structure-Activity Relationships, Quantitative; QSAR; Structure Activity Relationship, Quantitative.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Structure-Activity Relationship

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 14,835 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 3,549 of them (23.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 6,665 records.

Reviews account for 1,364 records (9.2%) and meta-analyses for 10. Randomized controlled trials number 2 (0.0%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 0 records; 2000-2009: 4,833 records; 2010-2019: 6,665 records; 2020 onward: 3,549 records0through 19994,8332000-20096,6652010-20193,5492020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19990
2000-20094,833
2010-20196,665
2020 onward3,549
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 9.2 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.1 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 0.0 percentReviews9.2% (1,364)Meta-analyses0.1% (10)Randomized controlled trials0.0% (2)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 14,835 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1,3649.2%
Meta-analyses100.1%
Randomized controlled trials20.0%

Method: PubMed query "Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.

Reading the evidence in pharmacology

Drug evidence builds in layers: laboratory pharmacology describes how a compound acts, pharmacokinetic studies describe how the body handles it, and randomized trials test whether it helps and what harms it causes. Post-marketing surveillance and observational studies reveal rarer adverse effects but cannot prove causation. This page is educational and is not a recommendation to start, stop or change any medicine; decisions about treatment belong with a qualified clinician.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
A Structure-Based Drug Discovery Paradigm
Batool M, Ahmad B, Choi S
2019Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
387cc by
PMID 31174387 · DOI · PMC6601033
Comprehensive ensemble in QSAR prediction for drug discovery
Kwon S, Bae H, Jo J, Yoon S
2019Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
104cc by
PMID 31655545 · DOI · PMC6815455
A Comprehensive Review of Cholinesterase Modeling and Simulation
De Boer D, Nguyen N, Mao J, Moore J, Sorin EJ
2021Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
73cc by
PMID 33920972 · DOI · PMC8071298
QSAR-Based Ecotoxicological Assessment of Novel Imidazole Derivatives for Sustainable Crop Protection
Kanižai Šarić G, Paurević M, Dandić A, Šrajer Gajdošik M, Rastija V
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 42796454 · DOI · PMC13609507

A Structure-Based Drug Discovery Paradigm [1]

Review article Batool M, Ahmad B, Choi S · · 2019 · cited 387 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Structure-based drug design is becoming an essential tool for faster and more cost-efficient lead discovery relative to the traditional method.
Closing excerpt
In this review, we focus on the currently available methods and algorithms for structure-based drug design including virtual screening and de novo drug design, with a special emphasis on AI- and deep-learning-based methods used for drug discovery.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (133 words)

Structure-based drug design is becoming an essential tool for faster and more cost-efficient lead discovery relative to the traditional method. Genomic, proteomic, and structural studies have provided hundreds of new targets and opportunities for future drug discovery. This situation poses a major problem: the necessity to handle the "big data" generated by combinatorial chemistry. Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning play a pivotal role in the analysis and systemization of larger data sets by statistical machine learning methods. Advanced AI-based sophisticated machine learning tools have a significant impact on the drug discovery process including medicinal chemistry. In this review, we focus on the currently available methods and algorithms for structure-based drug design including virtual screening and de novo drug design, with a special emphasis on AI- and deep-learning-based methods used for drug discovery.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31174387 · DOI · PMC6601033

Comprehensive ensemble in QSAR prediction for drug discovery [2]

Research article Kwon S, Bae H, Jo J, Yoon S · · 2019 · cited 104 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundQuantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) is a computational modeling method for revealing relationships between structural properties of chemical compounds and biological activities.
Closing excerpt
The proposed individual models did not show impressive results as a single model, but it was considered the most important predictor when combined, according to the interpretation of the meta-learning.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (185 words)

BackgroundQuantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) is a computational modeling method for revealing relationships between structural properties of chemical compounds and biological activities. QSAR modeling is essential for drug discovery, but it has many constraints. Ensemble-based machine learning approaches have been used to overcome constraints and obtain reliable predictions. Ensemble learning builds a set of diversified models and combines them. However, the most prevalent approach random forest and other ensemble approaches in QSAR prediction limit their model diversity to a single subject.ResultsThe proposed ensemble method consistently outperformed thirteen individual models on 19 bioassay datasets and demonstrated superiority over other ensemble approaches that are limited to a single subject. The comprehensive ensemble method is publicly available at http://data.snu.ac.kr/QSAR/ .ConclusionsWe propose a comprehensive ensemble method that builds multi-subject diversified models and combines them through second-level meta-learning. In addition, we propose an end-to-end neural network-based individual classifier that can automatically extract sequential features from a simplified molecular-input line-entry system (SMILES). The proposed individual models did not show impressive results as a single model, but it was considered the most important predictor when combined, according to the interpretation of the meta-learning.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31655545 · DOI · PMC6815455

A Comprehensive Review of Cholinesterase Modeling and Simulation [3]

Review article De Boer D, Nguyen N, Mao J, Moore J, Sorin EJ · · 2021 · cited 73 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The present article reviews published efforts to study acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase structure and function using computer-based modeling and simulation techniques.
Closing excerpt
This review also explores the inhibitory properties of several other organic and biological moieties, as well as advancements in virtual screening methodologies with respect to these enzymes.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (198 words)

The present article reviews published efforts to study acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase structure and function using computer-based modeling and simulation techniques. Structures and models of both enzymes from various organisms, including rays, mice, and humans, are discussed to highlight key structural similarities in the active site gorges of the two enzymes, such as flexibility, binding site location, and function, as well as differences, such as gorge volume and binding site residue composition. Catalytic studies are also described, with an emphasis on the mechanism of acetylcholine hydrolysis by each enzyme and novel mutants that increase catalytic efficiency. The inhibitory activities of myriad compounds have been computationally assessed, primarily through Monte Carlo-based docking calculations and molecular dynamics simulations. Pharmaceutical compounds examined herein include FDA-approved therapeutics and their derivatives, as well as several other prescription drug derivatives. Cholinesterase interactions with both narcotics and organophosphate compounds are discussed, with the latter focusing primarily on molecular recognition studies of potential therapeutic value and on improving our understanding of the reactivation of cholinesterases that are bound to toxins. This review also explores the inhibitory properties of several other organic and biological moieties, as well as advancements in virtual screening methodologies with respect to these enzymes.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33920972 · DOI · PMC8071298

QSAR-Based Ecotoxicological Assessment of Novel Imidazole Derivatives for Sustainable Crop Protection [4]

Research article Kanižai Šarić G, Paurević M, Dandić A, Šrajer Gajdošik M, Rastija V · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Imidazoles have been proven to be very effective pesticides, especially against phytopathogenic fungi and insects.
Closing excerpt
Molecular docking studies indicated the possible mechanism of action of the antifungal, herbicidal, insecticidal, and antibacterial activities of the observed compounds and revealed structural features important for binding to specific receptors.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (196 words)

Imidazoles have been proven to be very effective pesticides, especially against phytopathogenic fungi and insects. Due to their negative effects on the environment, only a few imidazoles have been approved for use by the European Commission (EC). There is an urgent need to develop new imidazole derivatives with high efficiency and a wide spectrum of action against numerous pests that are, at the same time, safe for the environment and beneficial for organisms and humans. In order to reduce expensive and time-consuming experiments, an in silico approach based on quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models is valuable for predicting the toxicity of new or untested chemicals. In this study, we used the Vega and ChemFREE web platforms to evaluate the pesticide similarity, environmental risk properties, and ecotoxicological effects of imidazole derivatives designed for potential synthesis. Adamantane-, alkyl-, and triazole-amide, ester, carbamate, and ketone derivatives were filtered for the evaluated properties, and four alkyl-amides were highlighted as potentially effective and environmentally safe antifungal, herbicidal, and insecticidal agents. Molecular docking studies indicated the possible mechanism of action of the antifungal, herbicidal, insecticidal, and antibacterial activities of the observed compounds and revealed structural features important for binding to specific receptors.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42796454 · DOI · PMC13609507

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative [5]
    Ong SE, Mann M · Nat Chem Biol · 2005 · cited 1,129 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps [6]
    Leach AR, Shoichet BK, Peishoff CE · J Med Chem · 2006 · cited 424 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article 3D-QSAR in drug design--a review [7]
    Verma J, Khedkar VM, Coutinho EC · Curr Top Med Chem · 2010 · cited 398 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Mixture toxicity and its modeling by quantitative structure-activity relationships [8]
    Altenburger R, Nendza M, Schüürmann G · Environ Toxicol Chem · 2003 · cited 282 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article QSRR: quantitative structure-(chromatographic) retention relationships [9]
    Kaliszan R · Chem Rev · 2007 · cited 271 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods? [10]
    Sheridan RP, Kearsley SK · Drug Discov Today · 2002 · cited 258 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Batool M, Ahmad B, Choi S. A Structure-Based Drug Discovery Paradigm. . 2019. PMID 31174387 · DOI · PMC6601033
  2. Kwon S, Bae H, Jo J, Yoon S. Comprehensive ensemble in QSAR prediction for drug discovery. . 2019. PMID 31655545 · DOI · PMC6815455
  3. De Boer D, Nguyen N, Mao J, Moore J, Sorin EJ. A Comprehensive Review of Cholinesterase Modeling and Simulation. . 2021. PMID 33920972 · DOI · PMC8071298
  4. Kanižai Šarić G, Paurević M, Dandić A, Šrajer Gajdošik M, Rastija V. QSAR-Based Ecotoxicological Assessment of Novel Imidazole Derivatives for Sustainable Crop Protection. . 2026. PMID 42796454 · DOI · PMC13609507
  5. Ong SE, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat Chem Biol. 2005. PMID 16408053 · DOI
  6. Leach AR, Shoichet BK, Peishoff CE. Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps. J Med Chem. 2006. PMID 17004700 · DOI
  7. Verma J, Khedkar VM, Coutinho EC. 3D-QSAR in drug design--a review. Curr Top Med Chem. 2010. PMID 19929826 · DOI
  8. Altenburger R, Nendza M, Schüürmann G. Mixture toxicity and its modeling by quantitative structure-activity relationships. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003. PMID 12924589 · DOI
  9. Kaliszan R. QSRR: quantitative structure-(chromatographic) retention relationships. Chem Rev. 2007. PMID 17595149 · DOI
  10. Sheridan RP, Kearsley SK. Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods?. Drug Discov Today. 2002. PMID 12546933 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-29.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Structure-Activity RelationshipPharmacology
  • Down-RegulationPharmacology
  • Drug InteractionsPharmacology
  • Drug ResistancePharmacology
  • Drug TolerancePharmacology
  • HormesisPharmacology

All 99 articles in Pharmacology →

At a glance

14,835
PubMed records on this heading
24%
published since 2020
1,364
review articles
2
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-29; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Structure-Activity RelationshipPharmacology
  • Down-RegulationPharmacology
  • Drug InteractionsPharmacology
  • Drug ResistancePharmacology
  • Drug TolerancePharmacology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support