Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (802 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
An inherited neurological developmental disorder that is associated with x-linked inheritance and may be lethal in utero to hemizygous males. The affected female is normal until the age of 6-25 months when progressive loss of voluntary control of hand movements and communication skills; ataxia; seizures; autistic behavior; intermittent hyperventilation; and hyperammonemia appear. (From Menkes, Textbook of Child Neurology, 5th ed, p199)
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Syndrome, Rett; Autism-Dementia-Ataxia-Loss of Purposeful Hand Use Syndrome; Autism Dementia Ataxia Loss of Purposeful Hand Use Syndrome; Rett's Syndrome; Retts Syndrome; Syndrome, Rett's; Rett Disorder; Rett's Disorder.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- X-Linked Intellectual Disability
- See also
- Intellectual Disability
Related concepts
- X-Linked Inheritance
- Ataxia
- Seizures
- Hyperventilation
- Hyperammonemia
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 3,291 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Rett Syndrome” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 710 of them (21.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2010-2019 with 1,205 records.
Reviews account for 575 records (17.5%) and meta-analyses for 8. Randomized controlled trials number 24 (0.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 470 |
| 2000-2009 | 906 |
| 2010-2019 | 1,205 |
| 2020 onward | 710 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 575 | 17.5% |
| Meta-analyses | 8 | 0.2% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 24 | 0.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Rett Syndrome"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in rare and inherited diseases
Rare conditions are difficult to study: few patients means small studies, case reports and registries are common, and randomized trials are the exception. Small samples limit precision and can exaggerate effects, and cases reported in the literature may be the most severe or unusual. Evidence from many small studies is best read together. Check how patients were identified, how many were included and how long they were followed.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: a randomized phase 3 study | 2023 | Randomized controlled trial Design not recorded in structured metadata | 154 | cc by PMID 37291210 · DOI · PMC10287558 |
| Global prevalence of Rett syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis | 2023 | Meta-analysis Design not recorded in structured metadata | 88 | cc by PMID 36642718 · DOI · PMC9841621 |
| Treating Rett syndrome: from mouse models to human therapies | 2019 | Review article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 87 | cc by PMID 30820643 · DOI · PMC6606665 |
| Modulating alternative splicing of MECP2 is a potential therapeutic strategy for Rett syndrome | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 3 | cc by PMID 41779872 · DOI · PMC13061089 |
Trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: a randomized phase 3 study [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Rett syndrome is a rare, genetic neurodevelopmental disorder.
- Closing excerpt
- Significant improvement for trofinetide compared with placebo was observed for the coprimary efficacy endpoints, suggesting that trofinetide provides benefit in treating the core symptoms of Rett syndrome.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (206 words)
Rett syndrome is a rare, genetic neurodevelopmental disorder. Trofinetide is a synthetic analog of glycine-proline-glutamate, the N-terminal tripeptide of the insulin-like growth factor 1 protein, and has demonstrated clinical benefit in phase 2 studies in Rett syndrome. In this phase 3 study ( https://clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04181723 ), females with Rett syndrome received twice-daily oral trofinetide (n = 93) or placebo (n = 94) for 12 weeks. For the coprimary efficacy endpoints, least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to week 12 in the Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire for trofinetide versus placebo was -4.9 versus -1.7 (P = 0.0175; Cohen's d effect size, 0.37), and LSM Clinical Global Impression-Improvement at week 12 was 3.5 versus 3.8 (P = 0.0030; effect size, 0.47). For the key secondary efficacy endpoint, LSM change from baseline to week 12 in the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile Infant-Toddler Checklist Social Composite score was -0.1 versus -1.1 (P = 0.0064; effect size, 0.43). Common treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea (80.6% for trofinetide versus 19.1% for placebo), which was mostly mild to moderate in severity. Significant improvement for trofinetide compared with placebo was observed for the coprimary efficacy endpoints, suggesting that trofinetide provides benefit in treating the core symptoms of Rett syndrome.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37291210 · DOI · PMC10287558
Global prevalence of Rett syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundRett syndrome is a rare, severe neurodevelopmental disorder.
- Closing excerpt
- 5, heterogeneity p ConclusionThese findings may facilitate planning of therapeutic trials in this indication in terms of target sample size and accrual times.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (197 words)
BackgroundRett syndrome is a rare, severe neurodevelopmental disorder. Almost all cases occur in girls, in association with spontaneous (non-inherited) mutations involving the methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 gene located on the X chromosome. Diagnostic criteria for typical Rett syndrome require a period of regression, followed by recovery or stabilization, and fulfillment of all four main criteria (loss of purposeful hand skills, loss of spoken language, gait abnormalities, and stereotypic hand movements). Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of Rett syndrome in the general population, stratified by sex.MethodsWe conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and LIVIVO to retrieve studies published in English between Jan. 1, 2000, and June 30, 2021. Pooled prevalence with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis based on a generalized linear mixed model with a logit link.ResultsTen eligible studies were identified (all in females), with a combined sample size of 9.57 million women and 673 Rett syndrome cases. The pooled prevalence estimate (random effects) was 7.1 per 100,000 females (95% CI: 4.8, 10.5, heterogeneity p ConclusionThese findings may facilitate planning of therapeutic trials in this indication in terms of target sample size and accrual times.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36642718 · DOI · PMC9841621
Treating Rett syndrome: from mouse models to human therapies [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Rare diseases are very difficult to study mechanistically and to develop therapies for because of the scarcity of patients.
- Closing excerpt
- Precision medicine is warranted to provide the best efficacy to individually treat RTT patients.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (155 words)
Rare diseases are very difficult to study mechanistically and to develop therapies for because of the scarcity of patients. Here, the rare neuro-metabolic disorder Rett syndrome (RTT) is discussed as a prototype for precision medicine, demonstrating how mouse models have led to an understanding of the development of symptoms. RTT is caused by mutations in the X-linked gene methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2). Mecp2-mutant mice are being used in preclinical studies that target the MECP2 gene directly, or its downstream pathways. Importantly, this work may improve the health of RTT patients. Clinical presentation may vary widely among individuals based on their mutation, but also because of the degree of X chromosome inactivation and the presence of modifier genes. Because it is a complex disorder involving many organ systems, it is likely that recovery of RTT patients will involve a combination of treatments. Precision medicine is warranted to provide the best efficacy to individually treat RTT patients.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 30820643 · DOI · PMC6606665
Modulating alternative splicing of MECP2 is a potential therapeutic strategy for Rett syndrome [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Rett syndrome (RTT) is a neurological disorder caused by loss-of-function mutations in methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2), which encodes a transcriptional regulator essential for maintenance of normal neuronal function.
- Closing excerpt
- These data set the stage for a potential therapeutic strategy using antisense oligonucleotides to promote isoform switching in patients with RTT who carry partially functioning alleles of MECP2.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (244 words)
Rett syndrome (RTT) is a neurological disorder caused by loss-of-function mutations in methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2), which encodes a transcriptional regulator essential for maintenance of normal neuronal function. The current US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for RTT, trofinetide, mildly alleviates some symptoms. In contrast, reintroducing MeCP2 or increasing its amount through transgenesis in mouse RTT models improves most neurological phenotypes and enhances survival. Here, we devised a therapeutic strategy to moderately increase MeCP2 protein by modulating the alternative splicing of MECP2 to switch the less efficiently translated e2 to the more efficiently translated e1 isoform. We deleted Mecp2 exon 2 (unique to e2), leading to production of only e1 mRNA, and showed that this up-regulated MeCP2 by 50 to 60% in mice. Next, we investigated the consequences of isoform switching in two independent RTT induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neuron models harboring mutations that reduce both MeCP2 expression and function. Exon 2 deletion in neurons derived from patients with MeCP2-G118E up-regulated MeCP2, ameliorated morphological and electrophysiological changes, and corrected the dysregulated transcriptome in these neurons. Isoform switching in neurons derived from patients with MeCP2-G118E, modeling a severe RTT mutation, only modestly affected MeCP2 protein abundance and, despite this, led to a partial transcriptomic rescue. Last, an exon 2-skipping morpholino up-regulated MeCP2-E1 in vivo in mice. These data set the stage for a potential therapeutic strategy using antisense oligonucleotides to promote isoform switching in patients with RTT who carry partially functioning alleles of MECP2.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41779872 · DOI · PMC13061089
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Clinical manifestations and stages of Rett syndrome [5]
- Research article Rett syndrome: insights into genetic, molecular and circuit mechanisms [6]
- Research article MeCP2 dysfunction in Rett syndrome and related disorders [7]
- Research article MECP2 disorders: from the clinic to mice and back [8]
- Research article Clinical and biological progress over 50 years in Rett syndrome [9]
- Research article BDNF deregulation in Rett syndrome [10]
References
- Neul JL, Percy AK, Benke TA, Berry-Kravis EM, Glaze DG, Marsh ED, et al.. Trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: a randomized phase 3 study. . 2023. PMID 37291210 · DOI · PMC10287558
- Petriti U, Dudman DC, Scosyrev E, Lopez-Leon S. Global prevalence of Rett syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2023. PMID 36642718 · DOI · PMC9841621
- Vashi N, Justice MJ. Treating Rett syndrome: from mouse models to human therapies. . 2019. PMID 30820643 · DOI · PMC6606665
- Tirumala HP, Wang L, Li Y, Bajikar SS, Anderson AG, Wang W, et al.. Modulating alternative splicing of MECP2 is a potential therapeutic strategy for Rett syndrome. . 2026. PMID 41779872 · DOI · PMC13061089
- Hagberg B. Clinical manifestations and stages of Rett syndrome. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002. PMID 12112728 · DOI
- Ip JPK, Mellios N, Sur M. Rett syndrome: insights into genetic, molecular and circuit mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018. PMID 29740174 · DOI · PMC6402579
- Moretti P, Zoghbi HY. MeCP2 dysfunction in Rett syndrome and related disorders. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006. PMID 16647848 · DOI
- Lombardi LM, Baker SA, Zoghbi HY. MECP2 disorders: from the clinic to mice and back. J Clin Invest. 2015. PMID 26237041 · DOI · PMC4563741
- Leonard H, Cobb S, Downs J. Clinical and biological progress over 50 years in Rett syndrome. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017. PMID 27934853 · DOI
- Li W, Pozzo-Miller L. BDNF deregulation in Rett syndrome. Neuropharmacology. 2014. PMID 23597512 · DOI · PMC3773283
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.