Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,125 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
An acute febrile illness caused by rickettsia rickettsii. It is transmitted to humans by bites of infected ticks and occurs only in North and South America. Characteristics include a sudden onset with headache and chills and fever lasting about two to three weeks. A cutaneous rash commonly appears on the extremities and trunk about the fourth day of illness.
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Brazilian Spotted Fever; Fever, Brazilian Spotted; Spotted Fever, Brazilian; Rickettsia rickettsii Infection; Infection, Rickettsia rickettsii; Rickettsia rickettsii Infections; Sao Paulo Typhus; Typhus, Sao Paulo.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiosis
Related concepts
- Rickettsia Rickettsii
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 1,493 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever” (counts retrieved 2026-10-29). 144 of them (9.6%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 952 records.
Reviews account for 143 records (9.6%) and meta-analyses for 1. Randomized controlled trials number 2 (0.1%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 952 |
| 2000-2009 | 172 |
| 2010-2019 | 225 |
| 2020 onward | 144 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 143 | 9.6% |
| Meta-analyses | 1 | 0.1% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 2 | 0.1% |
Method: PubMed query "Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-29.
Reading the evidence in infectious diseases
Infectious disease evidence combines microbiology, epidemiology and clinical trials. Laboratory studies identify pathogens and how they cause harm; surveillance and outbreak investigations describe who is affected and how infection spreads; trials establish whether treatments and vaccines work. Results depend on place and time, because pathogens evolve and resistance patterns and population immunity change. Check when and where the data were collected, how cases were defined and how up to date the evidence is.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
Vital Signs: Trends in Reported Vectorborne Disease Cases - United States and Territories, 2004-2016 [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- IntroductionVectorborne diseases are major causes of death and illness worldwide.
- Closing excerpt
- To effectively reduce transmission and respond to outbreaks will require major national improvement of surveillance, diagnostics, reporting, and vector control, as well as new tools, including vaccines.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (245 words)
IntroductionVectorborne diseases are major causes of death and illness worldwide. In the United States, the most common vectorborne pathogens are transmitted by ticks or mosquitoes, including those causing Lyme disease; Rocky Mountain spotted fever; and West Nile, dengue, and Zika virus diseases. This report examines trends in occurrence of nationally reportable vectorborne diseases during 2004-2016.MethodsData reported to the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System for 16 notifiable vectorborne diseases during 2004-2016 were analyzed; findings were tabulated by disease, vector type, location, and year.ResultsA total 642,602 cases were reported. The number of annual reports of tickborne bacterial and protozoan diseases more than doubled during this period, from >22,000 in 2004 to >48,000 in 2016. Lyme disease accounted for 82% of all tickborne disease reports during 2004-2016. The occurrence of mosquitoborne diseases was marked by virus epidemics. Transmission in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and American Samoa accounted for most reports of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika virus diseases; West Nile virus was endemic, and periodically epidemic, in the continental United States.Conclusions and implications for public health practiceVectorborne diseases are a large and growing public health problem in the United States, characterized by geographic specificity and frequent pathogen emergence and introduction. Differences in distribution and transmission dynamics of tickborne and mosquitoborne diseases are often rooted in biologic differences of the vectors. To effectively reduce transmission and respond to outbreaks will require major national improvement of surveillance, diagnostics, reporting, and vector control, as well as new tools, including vaccines.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29723166 · DOI · PMC5933869
Rickettsial infection in Amblyomma cajennense ticks and capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) in a Brazilian spotted fever-endemic area [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundBrazilian spotted fever (BSF), caused by the bacterium Rickettsia rickettsii, is the deadliest spotted fever of the world.
- Closing excerpt
- rickettsii.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (341 words)
BackgroundBrazilian spotted fever (BSF), caused by the bacterium Rickettsia rickettsii, is the deadliest spotted fever of the world. In most of the BSF-endemic areas, capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) are the principal host for the tick Amblyomma cajennense, which is the main vector of BSF.MethodsIn 2012, a BSF case was confirmed in a child that was bitten by ticks in a residential park area inhabited by A. cajennense-infested capybaras in Itú municipality, southeastern Brazil. Host questing A. cajennense adult ticks were collected in the residential park and brought alive to the laboratory, where they were macerated and intraperitoneally inoculated into guinea pigs. A tick-inoculated guinea pig that presented high fever was euthanized and its internal organs were macerated and inoculated into additional guinea pigs (guinea pig passage). Tissue samples from guinea pig passages were also used to inoculate Vero cells through the shell vial technique. Infected cells were used for molecular characterization of the rickettsial isolate through PCR and DNA sequencing of fragments of three rickettsial genes (gltA, ompA, and ompB). Blood serum samples were collected from 172 capybaras that inhabited the residential park. Sera were tested through the immunofluorescence assay using R. rickettsii antigen.ResultsA tick-inoculated guinea pig presented high fever accompanied by scrotal reactions (edema and marked redness). These signs were reproduced by consecutive guinea pig passages. Rickettsia was successfully isolated in Vero cells that were inoculated with brain homogenate derived from a 3rd passage-febrile guinea pig. Molecular characterization of this rickettsial isolate (designated as strain ITU) yielded DNA sequences that were all 100% identical to corresponding sequences of R. rickettsii in Genbank. A total of 83 (48.3%) out of 172 capybaras were seroreactive to R. rickettsii, with endpoint titers ranging from 64 to 8192.ConclusionsA viable isolate of R. rickettsii was obtained from the tick A. cajennense, comprising the first viable R. rickettsi isolate from this tick species during the last 60 years. Nearly half of the capybara population of the residential park was seroreactive to R. rickettsii, corroborating the findings that the local A. cajennense population was infected by R. rickettsii.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 24387674 · DOI · PMC3892071
Epidemiology of capybara-associated Brazilian spotted fever [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- BackgroundBrazilian spotted fever (BSF), caused by the bacterium Rickettsia rickettsii, has been associated with the transmission by the tick Amblyomma sculptum, and one of its main hosts, the capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris).
- Closing excerpt
- dubitatum populations.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (293 words)
BackgroundBrazilian spotted fever (BSF), caused by the bacterium Rickettsia rickettsii, has been associated with the transmission by the tick Amblyomma sculptum, and one of its main hosts, the capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris).MethodsDuring 2015-2019, we captured capybaras and ticks in seven highly anthropic areas of São Paulo state (three endemic and four nonendemic for BSF) and in two natural areas of the Pantanal biome, all with established populations of capybaras.ResultsThe BSF-endemic areas were characterized by much higher tick burdens on both capybaras and in the environment, when compared to the BSF-nonendemic areas. Only two tick species (A. sculptum and Amblyomma dubitatum) were found in the anthropic areas; however, with a great predominance of A. sculptum (≈90% of all ticks) in the endemic areas, in contrast to a slight predominance of A. dubitatum (≈60%) in the nonendemic areas. Tick species richness was higher in the natural areas, where six species were found, albeit with a predominance of A. sculptum (≈95% of all ticks) and environmental tick burdens much lower than in the anthropic areas. The BSF-endemic areas were characterized by overgrowth populations of A. sculptum that were sustained chiefly by capybaras, and decreased populations of A. dubitatum. In contrast, the BSF-nonendemic areas with landscape similar to the endemic areas differed by having lower tick burdens and a slight predominance of A. dubitatum over A.sculptum, both sustained chiefly by capybaras. While multiple medium- to large-sized mammals have been incriminated as important hosts for A. sculptum in the natural areas, the capybara was the only important host for this tick in the anthropic areas.ConclusionsThe uneven distribution of R. rickettsii infection among A. sculptum populations in highly anthropic areas of São Paulo state could be related to the tick population size and its proportion to sympatric A. dubitatum populations.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 31490924 · DOI · PMC6750615
Spatial and temporal distribution of Brazilian spotted fever in an endemic area: epidemiological profile of a zoonosis in constant adaptation to anthropogenic actions [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- ObjectiveTo analyze the spatial and temporal distribution of probable infection sites (PIS) for Brazilian spotted fever (BSF) and to evaluate changes in the occurrence pattern in an endemic area in the interior of the state of São Paulo.
- Closing excerpt
- ConclusionThe findings indicate an eco-epidemiological alert scenario associated with the proximity between high densities of vectors, amplifying hosts, and human populations, reinforcing the need for intensified surveillance and targeted health education starting in the second quarter of the year.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (246 words)
ObjectiveTo analyze the spatial and temporal distribution of probable infection sites (PIS) for Brazilian spotted fever (BSF) and to evaluate changes in the occurrence pattern in an endemic area in the interior of the state of São Paulo.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 40 confirmed cases of BSF (2007-2024) with identified PIS in the municipality of Americana, São Paulo. Data were obtained from the Notifiable Diseases Information System (Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação), epidemiological investigation reports, and acarological surveys. For each georeferenced PIS, data on microclimate, altimetry, slope, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and proximity to water bodies were analyzed.ResultsCases were atypically concentrated in the first half of the year, differing from the expected pattern for areas of transmission by Amblyomma sculptum, influenced by the outbreak recorded in 2018. PIS were concentrated near water bodies, in areas of degraded riparian forest and microclimates characterized by mild temperatures and high humidity, with low NDVI values, low altitude, and low slope. Spatial clustering was observed, along with an expansion of transmission toward urbanized areas over the study period: initially (2007-2015, nine cases) in the northern/northeastern portion of the municipality, in bordering regions, and more recently (2016-2024, 25 cases) advancing toward central areas, with the formation of large clusters.ConclusionThe findings indicate an eco-epidemiological alert scenario associated with the proximity between high densities of vectors, amplifying hosts, and human populations, reinforcing the need for intensified surveillance and targeted health education starting in the second quarter of the year.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 42138871 · DOI · PMC13159492
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Update on tick-borne rickettsioses around the world: a geographic approach [5]
- Research article Rocky Mountain spotted fever [6]
- Research article Rocky Mountain spotted fever in Mexico: past, present, and future [7]
- Research article Natural history of Rickettsia rickettsii [8]
- Research article A review of Rocky Mountain spotted fever (tick-borne typhus), its agent, and its tick vectors in the United States [9]
- Research article Rocky Mountain spotted fever: a disease in need of microbiological concern [10]
References
- Rosenberg R, Lindsey NP, Fischer M, Gregory CJ, Hinckley AF, Mead PS, et al.. Vital Signs: Trends in Reported Vectorborne Disease Cases - United States and Territories, 2004-2016. . 2018. PMID 29723166 · DOI · PMC5933869
- Krawczak FS, Nieri-Bastos FA, Nunes FP, Soares JF, Moraes-Filho J, Labruna MB. Rickettsial infection in Amblyomma cajennense ticks and capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) in a Brazilian spotted fever-endemic area. . 2014. PMID 24387674 · DOI · PMC3892071
- Luz HR, Costa FB, Benatti HR, Ramos VN, de A Serpa MC, Martins TF, et al.. Epidemiology of capybara-associated Brazilian spotted fever. . 2019. PMID 31490924 · DOI · PMC6750615
- Brasil J, Pinter A, Angerami RN, Donalisio MR. Spatial and temporal distribution of Brazilian spotted fever in an endemic area: epidemiological profile of a zoonosis in constant adaptation to anthropogenic actions. . 2026. PMID 42138871 · DOI · PMC13159492
- Parola P, Paddock CD, Socolovschi C, Labruna MB, Mediannikov O, Kernif T, et al.. Update on tick-borne rickettsioses around the world: a geographic approach. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013. PMID 24092850 · DOI · PMC3811236
- Dantas-Torres F. Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007. PMID 17961858 · DOI
- Álvarez-Hernández G, Roldán JFG, Milan NSH, Lash RR, Behravesh CB, Paddock CD. Rocky Mountain spotted fever in Mexico: past, present, and future. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017. PMID 28365226 · DOI
- McDade JE, Newhouse VF. Natural history of Rickettsia rickettsii. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1986. PMID 3096192 · DOI
- Burgdorfer W. A review of Rocky Mountain spotted fever (tick-borne typhus), its agent, and its tick vectors in the United States. J Med Entomol. 1975. PMID 810584 · DOI
- Walker DH. Rocky Mountain spotted fever: a disease in need of microbiological concern. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989. PMID 2504480 · DOI · PMC358117
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-29.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.