Definition and research guide
This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.
Content available: 4 complete abstracts (777 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.
Definition
The white, opaque, fibrous, outer tunic of the eyeball, covering it entirely excepting the segment covered anteriorly by the cornea. It is essentially avascular but contains apertures for vessels, lymphatics, and nerves. It receives the tendons of insertion of the extraocular muscles and at the corneoscleral junction contains the canal OF schlemm. (From Cline et al., Dictionary of Visual Science, 4th ed)
Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.
Also known as: Scleras; Scleral Spur; Scleral Spurs.
Where it fits in the MeSH classification
- Broader topics
- Eye
- See also
- Scleral Buckling; Sclerostomy; Scleroplasty; Limbus Corneae
Related concepts
- Canal
- Schlemm
Research landscape
PubMed indexes 12,879 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Sclera” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 2,099 of them (16.3%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 6,492 records.
Reviews account for 530 records (4.1%) and meta-analyses for 31. Randomized controlled trials number 218 (1.7%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up only a small share of this literature, so much of what is known comes from laboratory, observational or descriptive work.
Show the data
| Period | Records |
|---|---|
| through 1999 | 6,492 |
| 2000-2009 | 1,746 |
| 2010-2019 | 2,542 |
| 2020 onward | 2,099 |
Publication-type chart data
| Type | Records | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 530 | 4.1% |
| Meta-analyses | 31 | 0.2% |
| Randomized controlled trials | 218 | 1.7% |
Method: PubMed query "Sclera"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.
Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology
Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.
Evidence from open-access studies
These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.
| Study / authors | Year | Source label / design | Europe PMC citations | Licence / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scleral PERK and ATF6 as targets of myopic axial elongation of mouse eyes | 2022 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 70 | cc by PMID 36216837 · DOI · PMC9550863 |
| Altered Structure and Function of Murine Sclera in Form-Deprivation Myopia | 2022 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 38 | cc by PMID 36512347 · DOI · PMC9753793 |
| Posterior scleral birefringence measured by triple-input polarization-sensitive imaging as a biomarker of myopia progression | 2023 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 32 | cc by PMID 37365268 · DOI · PMC10427432 |
| The Effect of Limbal Fenestrations on Scleral Lens-Induced Central Corneal Oedema | 2026 | Research article Design not recorded in structured metadata | 2 | cc by PMID 41803503 · DOI · PMC13368883 |
Scleral PERK and ATF6 as targets of myopic axial elongation of mouse eyes [1]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- Axial length is the primary determinant of eye size, and it is elongated in myopia.
- Closing excerpt
- We demonstrate that scleral ER stress and PERK/ATF6 pathway controls axial elongation during the myopia development in vivo model and 4-PBA eye drop is promising drug for myopia suppression/treatment.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (172 words)
Axial length is the primary determinant of eye size, and it is elongated in myopia. However, the underlying mechanism of the onset and progression of axial elongation remain unclear. Here, we show that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in sclera is an essential regulator of axial elongation in myopia development through activation of both PERK and ATF6 axis followed by scleral collagen remodeling. Mice with lens-induced myopia (LIM) showed ER stress in sclera. Pharmacological interventions for ER stress could induce or inhibit myopia progression. LIM activated all IRE1, PERK and ATF6 axis, and pharmacological inhibition of both PERK and ATF6 suppressed myopia progression, which was confirmed by knocking down above two genes via CRISPR/Cas9 system. LIM dramatically changed the expression of scleral collagen genes responsible for ER stress. Furthermore, collagen fiber thinning and expression of dysregulated collagens in LIM were ameliorated by 4-PBA administration. We demonstrate that scleral ER stress and PERK/ATF6 pathway controls axial elongation during the myopia development in vivo model and 4-PBA eye drop is promising drug for myopia suppression/treatment.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36216837 · DOI · PMC9550863
Altered Structure and Function of Murine Sclera in Form-Deprivation Myopia [2]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- PurposeThe sclera is believed to biomechanically influence eye size, facilitating the excessive axial elongation that occurs during myopigenesis.
- Closing excerpt
- All scleral outcomes generally follow the trends found in other species and support a retina-to-sclera signaling cascade underlying mouse myopigenesis.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (197 words)
PurposeThe sclera is believed to biomechanically influence eye size, facilitating the excessive axial elongation that occurs during myopigenesis. Here, we test the hypothesis that the sclera will be remodeled and exhibit altered biomechanics in the mouse model of form-deprivation (FD) myopia, accompanied by altered retinoid concentrations, a potential signaling molecule involved in the process.MethodsMale C57 Bl/6J mice were subjected to unilateral FD (n = 44 eyes), leaving the contralateral eye untreated (contra; n = 44). Refractive error and ocular biometry were measured in vivo prior to and after 1 or 3 weeks of FD. Ex vivo measurements were made of scleral biomechanical properties (unconfined compression: n = 24), scleral sulfated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) content (dimethylmethylene blue: n = 18, and immunohistochemistry: n = 22), and ocular all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) concentrations (retina and RPE + choroid + sclera, n = 24). Age-matched naïve controls were included for some outcomes (n = 32 eyes).ResultsSignificant myopia developed after 1 (-2.4 ± 1.1 diopters [D], P ConclusionsWe report that biomechanics and GAG content of the mouse sclera are altered during myopigenesis. All scleral outcomes generally follow the trends found in other species and support a retina-to-sclera signaling cascade underlying mouse myopigenesis.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36512347 · DOI · PMC9753793
Posterior scleral birefringence measured by triple-input polarization-sensitive imaging as a biomarker of myopia progression [3]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- In myopic eyes, pathological remodelling of collagen in the posterior sclera has mostly been observed ex vivo.
- Closing excerpt
- Triple-input polarization-sensitive OCT may help establish posterior scleral birefringence as a non-invasive biomarker for assessing the progression of myopia.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (113 words)
In myopic eyes, pathological remodelling of collagen in the posterior sclera has mostly been observed ex vivo. Here we report the development of triple-input polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (OCT) for measuring posterior scleral birefringence. In guinea pigs and humans, the technique offers superior imaging sensitivities and accuracies than dual-input polarization-sensitive OCT. In 8-week-long studies with young guinea pigs, scleral birefringence was positively correlated with spherical equivalent refractive errors and predicted the onset of myopia. In a cross-sectional study involving adult individuals, scleral birefringence was associated with myopia status and negatively correlated with refractive errors. Triple-input polarization-sensitive OCT may help establish posterior scleral birefringence as a non-invasive biomarker for assessing the progression of myopia.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 37365268 · DOI · PMC10427432
The Effect of Limbal Fenestrations on Scleral Lens-Induced Central Corneal Oedema [4]
Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
- Opening excerpt
- PurposePersistent corneal oedema can lead to reduced visual performance and longer-term ocular complications in eyes with reduced endothelial cell function.
- Closing excerpt
- Clinical trialThis study was registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Registration number 12622001164785p), date of registration 24 August, 2022.
- Interpretation limits
- Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (295 words)
PurposePersistent corneal oedema can lead to reduced visual performance and longer-term ocular complications in eyes with reduced endothelial cell function. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of incorporating limbal scleral lens fenestrations on central corneal oedema.MethodsTwenty young healthy adults (mean age ± standard deviation 32 ± 11 years) with normal corneas wore non-fenestrated and fenestrated (3 × 1 mm limbal fenestrations separated by 120°) OneFitMed+ scleral lenses in both eyes (on separate days) for 3 h. All other scleral lens parameters were held constant except for the addition of the fenestrations. Central fluid reservoir thickness and corneal oedema were quantified using optical coherence tomography, and corrections were made for small thickness variations between lens conditions.ResultsThe corrected central corneal oedema was significantly reduced following fenestrated lens wear (0.80 ± 0.93%) compared to non-fenestrated lens wear (1.32 ± 0.81%; a 39% relative reduction, p = 0.02). The reduction in central corneal oedema with the fenestrated lens was slightly greater for participants without an air bubble in the fluid reservoir (n = 10, 0.73 ± 0.80% less oedema, 45% relative reduction) compared to those with an air bubble (n = 10, 0.30 ± 1.05% less oedema, 30% relative reduction) but was not statistically significant (p = 0.31).ConclusionThe incorporation of three 1 mm diameter limbal fenestrations separated by 120° reduced the magnitude of central corneal oedema by 39% on average in healthy eyes compared to a non-fenestrated scleral lens. A reduction in central corneal oedema was still observed without the presence of an air bubble within the fluid reservoir. Future studies investigating the long-term efficacy of different fenestration configurations in clinical populations are warranted.Clinical trialThis study was registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Registration number 12622001164785p), date of registration 24 August, 2022.
Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41803503 · DOI · PMC13368883
Key reviews and meta-analyses
The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.
- Research article Role of the sclera in the development and pathological complications of myopia [5]
- Research article Anatomy of cornea and ocular surface [6]
- Research article The sclera and myopia [7]
- Research article Concept and application of limbal stem cells [8]
- Research article Permeability of cornea, sclera, and conjunctiva: a literature analysis for drug delivery to the eye [9]
- Research article Scleral structure and biomechanics [10]
References
- Ikeda SI, Kurihara T, Jiang X, Miwa Y, Lee D, Serizawa N, et al.. Scleral PERK and ATF6 as targets of myopic axial elongation of mouse eyes. . 2022. PMID 36216837 · DOI · PMC9550863
- Brown DM, Kowalski MA, Paulus QM, Yu J, Kumar P, Kane MA, et al.. Altered Structure and Function of Murine Sclera in Form-Deprivation Myopia. . 2022. PMID 36512347 · DOI · PMC9753793
- Liu X, Jiang L, Ke M, Sigal IA, Chua J, Hoang QV, et al.. Posterior scleral birefringence measured by triple-input polarization-sensitive imaging as a biomarker of myopia progression. . 2023. PMID 37365268 · DOI · PMC10427432
- Fisher D, Alonso-Caneiro D, Vincent SJ. The Effect of Limbal Fenestrations on Scleral Lens-Induced Central Corneal Oedema. . 2026. PMID 41803503 · DOI · PMC13368883
- McBrien NA, Gentle A. Role of the sclera in the development and pathological complications of myopia. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003. PMID 12852489 · DOI
- Sridhar MS. Anatomy of cornea and ocular surface. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID 29380756 · DOI · PMC5819093
- Rada JA, Shelton S, Norton TT. The sclera and myopia. Exp Eye Res. 2006. PMID 16202407 · DOI
- Tseng SC. Concept and application of limbal stem cells. Eye (Lond). 1989. PMID 2695347 · DOI
- Prausnitz MR, Noonan JS. Permeability of cornea, sclera, and conjunctiva: a literature analysis for drug delivery to the eye. J Pharm Sci. 1998. PMID 10189253 · DOI
- Boote C, Sigal IA, Grytz R, Hua Y, Nguyen TD, Girard MJA. Scleral structure and biomechanics. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2020. PMID 31412277 · DOI · PMC7187923
About this article
- Sources
- NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
- Verification
- Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
- Review state
- automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
- Version
- 1, last updated 2026-10-31.
See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.
Evidence strength
EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.