Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Sneezing
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Sneezing

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 6 min read

The sudden, forceful, involuntary expulsion of air from the NOSE and mouth caused by irritation to the mucous membranes of the upper respiratory tract.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (1,102 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The sudden, forceful, involuntary expulsion of air from the NOSE and mouth caused by irritation to the mucous membranes of the upper respiratory tract.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Sneezings.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory; Respiratory Physiological Phenomena

Related concepts

  • Mouth
  • Mucous Membrane
  • Respiratory System

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 1,043 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Sneezing” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 145 of them (13.9%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 405 records.

Reviews account for 76 records (7.3%) and meta-analyses for 2. Randomized controlled trials number 124 (11.9%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 405 records; 2000-2009: 243 records; 2010-2019: 250 records; 2020 onward: 145 records405through 19992432000-20092502010-20191452020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999405
2000-2009243
2010-2019250
2020 onward145
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 7.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 11.9 percentReviews7.3% (76)Meta-analyses0.2% (2)Randomized controlled trials11.9% (124)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 1,043 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews767.3%
Meta-analyses20.2%
Randomized controlled trials12411.9%

Method: PubMed query "Sneezing"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols
Tang JW, Nicolle AD, Klettner CA, Pantelic J, Wang L, Suhaimi AB, et al.
2013Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
150cc by
PMID 23560060 · DOI · PMC3613375
A new methodology for studying dynamics of aerosol particles in sneeze and cough using a digital high-vision, high-speed video system and vector analyses
Nishimura H, Sakata S, Kaga A
2013Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
59cc by
PMID 24312206 · DOI · PMC3842286
A numerical assessment of social distancing of preventing airborne transmission of COVID-19 during different breathing and coughing processes
Issakhov A, Zhandaulet Y, Omarova P, Alimbek A, Borsikbayeva A, Mustafayeva A
2021Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
21cc by
PMID 33941805 · DOI · PMC8093201
Stimulus conditions eliciting sneezing in response to bright light
Trinkl J, Bickerstaff L, Munkwitz S, Spitschan M
2025Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
3cc by
PMID 39893297 · DOI · PMC11787254

Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols [1]

Research article Tang JW, Nicolle AD, Klettner CA, Pantelic J, Wang L, Suhaimi AB, et al. · · 2013 · cited 150 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Natural human exhalation flows such as coughing, sneezing and breathing can be considered as 'jet-like' airflows in the sense that they are produced from a single source in a single exhalation effort, with a relatively symmetrical, conical geometry.
Closing excerpt
This is in contrast with some earlier estimates of sneeze velocities, and some reasons for this difference are discussed.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (298 words)

Natural human exhalation flows such as coughing, sneezing and breathing can be considered as 'jet-like' airflows in the sense that they are produced from a single source in a single exhalation effort, with a relatively symmetrical, conical geometry. Although coughing and sneezing have garnered much attention as potential, explosive sources of infectious aerosols, these are relatively rare events during daily life, whereas breathing is necessary for life and is performed continuously. Real-time shadowgraph imaging was used to visualise and capture high-speed images of healthy volunteers sneezing and breathing (through the nose - nasally, and through the mouth - orally). Six volunteers, who were able to respond to the pepper sneeze stimulus, were recruited for the sneezing experiments (2 women: 27.5±6.36 years; 4 men: 29.25±10.53 years). The maximum visible distance over which the sneeze plumes (or puffs) travelled was 0.6 m, the maximum sneeze velocity derived from these measured distances was 4.5 m/s. The maximum 2-dimensional (2-D) area of dissemination of these sneezes was 0.2 m(2). The corresponding derived parameter, the maximum 2-D area expansion rate of these sneezes was 2 m(2)/s. For nasal breathing, the maximum propagation distance and derived velocity were 0.6 m and 1.4 m/s, respectively. The maximum 2-D area of dissemination and derived expansion rate were 0.11 m(2) and 0.16 m(2)/s, respectively. Similarly, for mouth breathing, the maximum propagation distance and derived velocity were 0.8 m and 1.3 m/s, respectively. The maximum 2-D area of dissemination and derived expansion rate were 0.18 m(2) and 0.17 m(2)/s, respectively. Surprisingly, a comparison of the maximum exit velocities of sneezing reported here with those obtained from coughing (published previously) demonstrated that they are relatively similar, and not extremely high. This is in contrast with some earlier estimates of sneeze velocities, and some reasons for this difference are discussed.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 23560060 · DOI · PMC3613375

A new methodology for studying dynamics of aerosol particles in sneeze and cough using a digital high-vision, high-speed video system and vector analyses [2]

Research article Nishimura H, Sakata S, Kaga A · · 2013 · cited 59 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Microbial pathogens of respiratory infectious diseases are often transmitted through particles in sneeze and cough.
Closing excerpt
2 s, suggesting that data relating to the dynamics of sneeze and cough became available by calculation.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (298 words)

Microbial pathogens of respiratory infectious diseases are often transmitted through particles in sneeze and cough. Therefore, understanding the particle movement is important for infection control. Images of a sneeze induced by nasal cavity stimulation by healthy adult volunteers, were taken by a digital high-vision, high-speed video system equipped with a computer system and treated as a research model. The obtained images were enhanced electronically, converted to digital images every 1/300 s, and subjected to vector analysis of the bioparticles contained in the whole sneeze cloud using automatic image processing software. The initial velocity of the particles or their clusters in the sneeze was greater than 6 m/s, but decreased as the particles moved forward; the momentums of the particles seemed to be lost by 0.15-0.20 s and started a diffusion movement. An approximate equation of a function of elapsed time for their velocity was obtained from the vector analysis to represent the dynamics of the front-line particles. This methodology was also applied for a cough. Microclouds contained in a smoke exhaled with a voluntary cough by a volunteer after smoking one breath of cigarette, were traced as the visible, aerodynamic surrogates for invisible bioparticles of cough. The smoke cough microclouds had an initial velocity greater than 5 m/s. The fastest microclouds were located at the forefront of cloud mass that moving forward; however, their velocity clearly decreased after 0.05 s and they began to diffuse in the environmental airflow. The maximum direct reaches of the particles and microclouds driven by sneezing and coughing unaffected by environmental airflows were estimated by calculations using the obtained equations to be about 84 cm and 30 cm from the mouth, respectively, both achieved in about 0.2 s, suggesting that data relating to the dynamics of sneeze and cough became available by calculation.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 24312206 · DOI · PMC3842286

A numerical assessment of social distancing of preventing airborne transmission of COVID-19 during different breathing and coughing processes [3]

Research article Issakhov A, Zhandaulet Y, Omarova P, Alimbek A, Borsikbayeva A, Mustafayeva A · · 2021 · cited 21 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The spread of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues to show that geographic barriers alone cannot contain the virus.
Closing excerpt
The conclusions made in this work show that, given the environmental conditions, the two meter social distance recommended by WHO is insufficient.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (229 words)

The spread of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues to show that geographic barriers alone cannot contain the virus. Asymptomatic carriers play a critical role in the nature of this virus, which is rapidly escalating into a global pandemic. Asymptomatic carriers can inadvertently transmit the virus through the air stream. Many diseases can infect human bodies with tiny droplets or particles that carry various viruses and bacteria that are generated by the respiratory system of infected patients. This article presents the numerical results of the spread of droplets or particles in a room. The proposed numerical model in this work takes into account the sedimentation of particles or droplets under the action of gravitational sedimentation and transport in the room during the process of breathing and sneezing or coughing. Three different cases are numerically investigated taking into account normal breathing and coughing or sneezing, respectively, and three different rates of particle ejection from the mouth are considered. Navier-Stokes equations for incompressible flows were used to describe three-dimensional air flow inside ventilated rooms. The influence of ventilation rate on social distancing is also computationally investigated. It was found that particles can move up to 5 m with a decrease in concentration in the direction of the air flow. The conclusions made in this work show that, given the environmental conditions, the two meter social distance recommended by WHO is insufficient.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 33941805 · DOI · PMC8093201

Stimulus conditions eliciting sneezing in response to bright light [4]

Review article Trinkl J, Bickerstaff L, Munkwitz S, Spitschan M · · 2025 · cited 3 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
The photic sneeze reflex (PSR) is an involuntary sneezing response to bright light exposure, affecting approximately 25% of the population.
Closing excerpt
Future studies should focus on standardized, parametric investigations to elucidate the light-sensitive mechanisms of the PSR.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (277 words)

The photic sneeze reflex (PSR) is an involuntary sneezing response to bright light exposure, affecting approximately 25% of the population. Despite its long history in scientific literature, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Several theories, including optic-trigeminal summation, parasympathetic hypersensitivity, and parasympathetic generalization, have been proposed, but none have been conclusively validated. Reproducing the PSR reliably in a laboratory setting is crucial for understanding its neural underpinnings, yet the specific light parameters that trigger PSR are not well-defined. This mini-review aims to consolidate current knowledge on the light stimulus parameters (intensity, spectral composition, wavelength, duration, timing, spatial configuration) that elicit the PSR. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), Google Scholar, Google Books, and Google, employing terms related to photic sneezing in multiple languages. Articles from 2020 to 2024 were screened, resulting in 167 records, with seven studies focusing on stimulus parameters included in this review. The reviewed studies, including four case reports and three laboratory experiments, consistently support that bright light can induce sneezing in susceptible individuals. However, there is significant variability in the methodologies and outcomes, limiting comparability and indicating a need for systematic investigation. No study has yet examined the parametric relationship between light parameters and the PSR. The heterogeneity of methods and findings in the existing literature highlights the lack of standardized research on the specific light parameters that trigger the PSR. This review underscores the need for controlled experiments to clarify these relationships and improve our understanding of the underlying neural mechanisms. Existing research on photic sneezing stimulus parameters is fragmented and lacks systematic approaches. Future studies should focus on standardized, parametric investigations to elucidate the light-sensitive mechanisms of the PSR.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 39893297 · DOI · PMC11787254

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Coughs and Sneezes: Their Role in Transmission of Respiratory Viral Infections, Including SARS-CoV-2 [5]
    Dhand R, Li J · Am J Respir Crit Care Med · 2020 · cited 232 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Aerosol transmission of infectious disease [6]
    Jones RM, Brosseau LM · J Occup Environ Med · 2015 · cited 224 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Breathing, speaking, coughing or sneezing: What drives transmission of SARS-CoV-2? [7]
    Stadnytskyi V, Anfinrud P, Bax A · J Intern Med · 2021 · cited 85 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Nasonasal reflexes, the nasal cycle, and sneeze [8]
    Baraniuk JN, Kim D · Curr Allergy Asthma Rep · 2007 · cited 59 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Pathophysiology of itching and sneezing in allergic rhinitis [9]
    Pfaar O, Raap U, Holz M, Hörmann K, Klimek L · Swiss Med Wkly · 2009 · cited 37 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article A role for capsaicin sensitive, tachykinin containing nerves in chronic coughing and sneezing but not in asthma: a hypothesis [10]
    Karlsson JA · Thorax · 1993 · cited 36 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Tang JW, Nicolle AD, Klettner CA, Pantelic J, Wang L, Suhaimi AB, et al.. Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols. . 2013. PMID 23560060 · DOI · PMC3613375
  2. Nishimura H, Sakata S, Kaga A. A new methodology for studying dynamics of aerosol particles in sneeze and cough using a digital high-vision, high-speed video system and vector analyses. . 2013. PMID 24312206 · DOI · PMC3842286
  3. Issakhov A, Zhandaulet Y, Omarova P, Alimbek A, Borsikbayeva A, Mustafayeva A. A numerical assessment of social distancing of preventing airborne transmission of COVID-19 during different breathing and coughing processes. . 2021. PMID 33941805 · DOI · PMC8093201
  4. Trinkl J, Bickerstaff L, Munkwitz S, Spitschan M. Stimulus conditions eliciting sneezing in response to bright light. . 2025. PMID 39893297 · DOI · PMC11787254
  5. Dhand R, Li J. Coughs and Sneezes: Their Role in Transmission of Respiratory Viral Infections, Including SARS-CoV-2. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID 32543913 · DOI · PMC7462404
  6. Jones RM, Brosseau LM. Aerosol transmission of infectious disease. J Occup Environ Med. 2015. PMID 25816216 · DOI
  7. Stadnytskyi V, Anfinrud P, Bax A. Breathing, speaking, coughing or sneezing: What drives transmission of SARS-CoV-2?. J Intern Med. 2021. PMID 34105202 · DOI · PMC8242678
  8. Baraniuk JN, Kim D. Nasonasal reflexes, the nasal cycle, and sneeze. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2007. PMID 17437680 · DOI
  9. Pfaar O, Raap U, Holz M, Hörmann K, Klimek L. Pathophysiology of itching and sneezing in allergic rhinitis. Swiss Med Wkly. 2009. PMID 19169901 · DOI
  10. Karlsson JA. A role for capsaicin sensitive, tachykinin containing nerves in chronic coughing and sneezing but not in asthma: a hypothesis. Thorax. 1993. PMID 8511740 · DOI · PMC464441

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Respiratory SystemAnatomy and Physiology
  • Mucous MembraneAnatomy and Physiology
  • Gastrointestinal TractAnatomy and Physiology
  • Goblet CellsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Digestive SystemAnatomy and Physiology
  • MembranesAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

1,043
PubMed records on this heading
14%
published since 2020
76
review articles
124
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Respiratory SystemAnatomy and Physiology
  • Mucous MembraneAnatomy and Physiology
  • Gastrointestinal TractAnatomy and Physiology
  • Goblet CellsAnatomy and Physiology
  • Digestive SystemAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support