Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Anatomy and Physiology›Sphincter of Oddi
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Sphincter of Oddi

Anatomy and Physiology · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

The sphincter of the hepatopancreatic ampulla within the duodenal papilla.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (904 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

The sphincter of the hepatopancreatic ampulla within the duodenal papilla. The common bile duct and main pancreatic duct pass through this sphincter.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Oddi Sphincter; Oddi's Sphincter; Oddis Sphincter; Sphincter, Oddi's.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Ampulla of Vater
See also
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Sphincterotomy, Transduodenal; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic

Related concepts

  • Common Bile Duct

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 2,284 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Sphincter of Oddi” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 46 of them (2.0%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is through 1999 with 1,720 records.

Reviews account for 248 records (10.9%) and meta-analyses for 5. Randomized controlled trials number 48 (2.1%) as a share of all records on the topic.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 1,720 records; 2000-2009: 373 records; 2010-2019: 145 records; 2020 onward: 46 records1,720through 19993732000-20091452010-2019462020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 19991,720
2000-2009373
2010-2019145
2020 onward46
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 10.9 percent; Meta-analyses: 0.2 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 2.1 percentReviews10.9% (248)Meta-analyses0.2% (5)Randomized controlled trials2.1% (48)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 2,284 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews24810.9%
Meta-analyses50.2%
Randomized controlled trials482.1%

Method: PubMed query "Sphincter of Oddi"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in anatomy and physiology

Anatomy describes how body structures are built and physiology describes how they normally work, so most findings here are descriptive or mechanistic rather than evidence about treatment. Much of what is known comes from dissection, imaging, tissue studies and experiments in animals, and measurements in healthy volunteers can differ from those in people with disease or at different ages. Normal ranges vary between individuals and populations. Check whether a result was measured in people or in another species, the age and health of the participants, and the method used.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Management of patients with biliary sphincter of Oddi disorder without sphincter of Oddi manometry
Kalaitzakis E, Ambrose T, Phillips-Hughes J, Collier J, Chapman RW
2010Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
27cc by
PMID 20969779 · DOI · PMC2975654
Effect of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on the abundance of biliary microbiota (biliary microecology) in patients with common bile duct stones
Liu L, Zhao Z, Hou X, Wu J
2022Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
11cc by
PMID 36569207 · DOI · PMC9768453
Bi-directional regulation of acupuncture on extrahepatic biliary system: An approach in guinea pigs
Zhao J, Yu Y, Luo M, Li L, Rong P
2017Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
11cc by
PMID 29070912 · DOI · PMC5656652
Prospective pilot study of functional assessment of the Sphincter of Oddi via cine-dynamic MRCP with selective inversion recovery pulse
Oka Y, Sakai A, Masuda A, Sofue K, Ashina S, Kobayashi T, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
0cc by
PMID 41572038 · DOI · PMC13048933

Management of patients with biliary sphincter of Oddi disorder without sphincter of Oddi manometry [1]

Research article Kalaitzakis E, Ambrose T, Phillips-Hughes J, Collier J, Chapman RW · · 2010 · cited 27 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundThe paucity of controlled data for the treatment of most biliary sphincter of Oddi disorder (SOD) types and the incomplete response to therapy seen in clinical practice and several trials has generated controversy as to the best course of management of these patients.
Closing excerpt
The results of this approach with regards to symptomatic relief and ERCP complication rate are comparable to those previously published in the literature in cohorts of patients assessed by manometry.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (297 words)

BackgroundThe paucity of controlled data for the treatment of most biliary sphincter of Oddi disorder (SOD) types and the incomplete response to therapy seen in clinical practice and several trials has generated controversy as to the best course of management of these patients. In this observational study we aimed to assess the outcome of patients with biliary SOD managed without sphincter of Oddi manometry.MethodsFifty-nine patients with biliary SOD (14% type I, 51% type II, 35% type III) were prospectively enrolled. All patients with a dilated common bile duct were offered endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincterotomy whereas all others were offered medical treatment alone. Patients were followed up for a median of 15 months and were assessed clinically for response to treatment.ResultsAt follow-up 15.3% of patients reported complete symptom resolution, 59.3% improvement, 22% unchanged symptoms, and 3.4% deterioration. Fifty-one percent experienced symptom resolution/improvement on medical treatment only, 12% after sphincterotomy, and 10% after both medical treatment/sphincterotomy. Twenty percent experienced at least one recurrence of symptoms after initial response to medical and/or endoscopic treatment. Fifty ERCP procedures were performed in 24 patients with an 18% complication rate (16% post-ERCP pancreatitis). The majority of complications occurred in the first ERCP these patients had. Most complications were mild and treated conservatively. Age, gender, comorbidity, SOD type, dilated common bile duct, presence of intact gallbladder, or opiate use were not related to the effect of treatment at the end of follow-up (p > 0.05 for all).ConclusionsPatients with biliary SOD may be managed with a combination of endoscopic sphincterotomy (performed in those with dilated common bile duct) and medical therapy without manometry. The results of this approach with regards to symptomatic relief and ERCP complication rate are comparable to those previously published in the literature in cohorts of patients assessed by manometry.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 20969779 · DOI · PMC2975654

Effect of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on the abundance of biliary microbiota (biliary microecology) in patients with common bile duct stones [2]

Research article Liu L, Zhao Z, Hou X, Wu J · · 2022 · cited 11 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
ObjectiveBiliary calculi, a common benign disease of the gastrointestinal tract, are affected by multiple factors, including diet, lifestyle, living environment, and personal and genetic background.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsThe systemic inflammatory response of patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is more severe, and their microbial community significantly differs from that of patients with normal sphincter of Oddi, which makes biliary tract infection more likely; furthermore, the biliary tract of patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction has more gallstone-related bacterial communities.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (236 words)

ObjectiveBiliary calculi, a common benign disease of the gastrointestinal tract, are affected by multiple factors, including diet, lifestyle, living environment, and personal and genetic background. Its occurrence is believed to be related to a change in biliary microbiota. Approximately 10%-20% of symptomatic patients with cholecystolithiasis have choledocholithiasis, resulting in infection, abdominal pain, jaundice, and biliary pancreatitis. This study aimed to determine whether a dysfunction in the sphincter of Oddi, which controls the outflow of bile and separates the bile duct from the intestine, leads to a change in biliary microbiota and the occurrence of biliary calculi.MethodsForty patients with cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis were prospectively recruited. Bile specimens were obtained, and biliary pressure was measured during and after surgery. The collected specimens were analyzed with 16S rRNA gene to characterize the biliary microbiota. The risk factors of common bile duct calculi were analyzed numerically combined with the pressure in the sphincter of Oddi.ResultsDifferent biliary microbiota were found in all cases. Patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction had significantly increased biliary microbiota as well as significantly higher level of systemic inflammation than patients with normal sphincter of Oddi.ConclusionsThe systemic inflammatory response of patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is more severe, and their microbial community significantly differs from that of patients with normal sphincter of Oddi, which makes biliary tract infection more likely; furthermore, the biliary tract of patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction has more gallstone-related bacterial communities.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 36569207 · DOI · PMC9768453

Bi-directional regulation of acupuncture on extrahepatic biliary system: An approach in guinea pigs [3]

Research article Zhao J, Yu Y, Luo M, Li L, Rong P · · 2017 · cited 11 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Clinically, acupuncture affects the motility of the extrahepatic biliary tract, but the underlining mechanisms are still unknown.
Closing excerpt
In summary, acupuncture has bi-directional effects to gallbladder pressure and SO function, which probably due to autonomic reflex and somatovisceral interactions.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (136 words)

Clinically, acupuncture affects the motility of the extrahepatic biliary tract, but the underlining mechanisms are still unknown. We applied manual acupuncture (MA) and electrical acupuncture (EA) separately at acupoints Tianshu (ST25), Qimen (LR14), Yanglingquan (GB34), and Yidan (CO11) in forty guinea pigs (4 groups) with or without atropinization under anesthesia while Sphincter of Oddi (SO) myoelectric activities and gallbladder pressure were monitored. In both MA and EA groups, stimulation at ST25 or LR14 significantly increased the frequency and amplitude of SO myoelectrical activities and simultaneously decreased the gallbladder pressure as compared to the pre-MA and pre-EA (P 0.05), although significant myoelectricity increases were still inducible with MA or EA stimulation at CO11 (P < 0.05). In summary, acupuncture has bi-directional effects to gallbladder pressure and SO function, which probably due to autonomic reflex and somatovisceral interactions.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 29070912 · DOI · PMC5656652

Prospective pilot study of functional assessment of the Sphincter of Oddi via cine-dynamic MRCP with selective inversion recovery pulse [4]

Research article Oka Y, Sakai A, Masuda A, Sofue K, Ashina S, Kobayashi T, et al. · · 2026

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundSphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) can cause unexplained biliary pain and idiopathic pancreatitis.
Closing excerpt
5 [4-17] in PSOD, p ConclusionsCine-dynamic MRCP enables non-invasive visualization and quantification of bile and pancreatic juice flow, providing functional assessment of the sphincter of Oddi.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (235 words)

BackgroundSphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) can cause unexplained biliary pain and idiopathic pancreatitis. Although Rome IV criteria recommend sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM) for diagnosis, SOM is invasive and carries pancreatitis risk. We hypothesized that cine-dynamic magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) could non-invasively visualize bile and pancreatic juice flow, enabling functional papillary assessment.MethodsIn this prospective observational study, 40 participants were enrolled, and 29 were included in the final analysis after excluding 11 participants who did not meet the Rome IV criteria (10 healthy controls, 7 with suspected biliary-type SOD [BSOD], and 12 with suspected pancreatic-type SOD [PSOD]). Cine-dynamic MRCP was performed with 20 sequential frames over 5 min. Two quantitative indices were assessed: flow frequency and secretion grade (distance traveled by bile or pancreatic juice).ResultsBile flow frequency and secretion grade were significantly lower in both BSOD and PSOD than in controls: frequency (median [range], 13.5 [6-19] in controls vs. 2.0 [1-17] in BSOD, p = 0.006; vs. 8.0 [3-14] in PSOD, p = 0.008) and secretion grade (1.6 [0.3-2.05] in controls vs. 0.2 [0.1-1.3] in BSOD, p = 0.001; vs. 0.5 [0.15-1.75] in PSOD, p = 0.03). Pancreatic juice flow showed no significant difference between BSOD and controls but was significantly reduced in PSOD: frequency (16 [14-19] in controls vs. 9.5 [4-17] in PSOD, p ConclusionsCine-dynamic MRCP enables non-invasive visualization and quantification of bile and pancreatic juice flow, providing functional assessment of the sphincter of Oddi.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41572038 · DOI · PMC13048933

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Functional gallbladder and sphincter of oddi disorders [5]
    Behar J, Corazziari E, Guelrud M, Hogan W, Sherman S, Toouli J · Gastroenterology · 2006 · cited 170 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Narcotic analgesic effects on the sphincter of Oddi: a review of the data and therapeutic implications in treating pancreatitis [6]
    Thompson DR · Am J Gastroenterol · 2001 · cited 95 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Endoscopic balloon sphincter dilation (sphincteroplasty) versus sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones [7]
    Weinberg BM, Shindy W, Lo S · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2006 · cited 71 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article An evidence-based review of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: part I, presentations with "objective" biliary findings (types I and II) [8]
    Petersen BT · Gastrointest Endosc · 2004 · cited 70 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Functional disorders of the biliary tract and pancreas [9]
    Corazziari E, Shaffer EA, Hogan WJ, Sherman S, Toouli J · Gut · 1999 · cited 64 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a clinical controversy [10]
    Steinberg WM · Gastroenterology · 1988 · cited 58 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Kalaitzakis E, Ambrose T, Phillips-Hughes J, Collier J, Chapman RW. Management of patients with biliary sphincter of Oddi disorder without sphincter of Oddi manometry. . 2010. PMID 20969779 · DOI · PMC2975654
  2. Liu L, Zhao Z, Hou X, Wu J. Effect of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on the abundance of biliary microbiota (biliary microecology) in patients with common bile duct stones. . 2022. PMID 36569207 · DOI · PMC9768453
  3. Zhao J, Yu Y, Luo M, Li L, Rong P. Bi-directional regulation of acupuncture on extrahepatic biliary system: An approach in guinea pigs. . 2017. PMID 29070912 · DOI · PMC5656652
  4. Oka Y, Sakai A, Masuda A, Sofue K, Ashina S, Kobayashi T, et al.. Prospective pilot study of functional assessment of the Sphincter of Oddi via cine-dynamic MRCP with selective inversion recovery pulse. . 2026. PMID 41572038 · DOI · PMC13048933
  5. Behar J, Corazziari E, Guelrud M, Hogan W, Sherman S, Toouli J. Functional gallbladder and sphincter of oddi disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006. PMID 16678563 · DOI
  6. Thompson DR. Narcotic analgesic effects on the sphincter of Oddi: a review of the data and therapeutic implications in treating pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001. PMID 11316181 · DOI
  7. Weinberg BM, Shindy W, Lo S. Endoscopic balloon sphincter dilation (sphincteroplasty) versus sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. PMID 17054222 · DOI · PMC8855932
  8. Petersen BT. An evidence-based review of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: part I, presentations with "objective" biliary findings (types I and II). Gastrointest Endosc. 2004. PMID 15044889 · DOI
  9. Corazziari E, Shaffer EA, Hogan WJ, Sherman S, Toouli J. Functional disorders of the biliary tract and pancreas. Gut. 1999. PMID 10457045 · DOI · PMC1766688
  10. Steinberg WM. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a clinical controversy. Gastroenterology. 1988. PMID 3049221 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • Ampulla of VaterAnatomy and Physiology
  • Cystic DuctAnatomy and Physiology
  • DuodenumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Common Bile DuctAnatomy and Physiology
  • Bile DuctsAnatomy and Physiology
  • PylorusAnatomy and Physiology

All 542 articles in Anatomy and Physiology →

At a glance

2,284
PubMed records on this heading
2%
published since 2020
248
review articles
48
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • Ampulla of VaterAnatomy and Physiology
  • Cystic DuctAnatomy and Physiology
  • DuodenumAnatomy and Physiology
  • Common Bile DuctAnatomy and Physiology
  • Bile DuctsAnatomy and Physiology

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support