Skip to content
EvidenceHelixEvidenceLib · Scientific Encyclopedia
⌘ K

Scientific library

EvidenceLib encyclopediaAll articles A–Z2,100Open textbooks2Cancer study catalog458How it is made

My workspace this browser

Saved pages0Notes & annotations0

Recently viewed

Explore by field

Cancer and Oncology107Genetics and Genomics95Neuroscience110Cardiovascular Medicine105Immunology90Pharmacology99Molecular Biology100Infectious Diseases102Rare and Inherited Diseases106Clinical Research98Anatomy and Physiology542Drugs and Chemicals546
Plans & pricingCompare EvidenceHelix workspace plans
Library›EvidenceLib›Drugs and Chemicals›Sulfadoxine
Explore more with EvidenceHelix Workspace

Compare studies, analyze evidence and create research reports with premium tools.

Explore Researcher plans

Research reading room

Sulfadoxine

Drugs and Chemicals · NLM MeSH · updated 2026-10-31 · version 1

Citations verified against PubMedNot yet clinician-reviewed10 referencesApproximately 5 min read

A long acting sulfonamide that is used, usually in combination with other drugs, for respiratory, urinary tract, and malarial infections.

Table of Contents

1. Definition2. Research landscape3. Reading the evidence4. Open-access studies5. Key reviews6. References7. About this article

Definition and research guide

This page combines a MeSH definition, publication statistics and selected research abstracts. It is a starting point for reading the literature, not a medical textbook or a systematic evidence review.

Content available: 4 complete abstracts (941 words), 10 references. Full article text is not stored or reproduced here; follow the PMID, DOI or PMC links to read the original sources and their access terms.

Definition

A long acting sulfonamide that is used, usually in combination with other drugs, for respiratory, urinary tract, and malarial infections.

Definition: NLM Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) scope note (Public domain (U.S. National Library of Medicine); attribution requested). View the MeSH record.

Also known as: Sulformethoxine; Sulphorthodimethoxine; Sulformetoxine; Sulphormetoxin; Sulforthomidine; Ro 4-4393; Ro 44393; Ro 4 4393.

Where it fits in the MeSH classification

Broader topics
Benzenesulfonamides; Sulfanilamides

Research landscape

PubMed indexes 2,586 records tagged with the MeSH heading “Sulfadoxine” (counts retrieved 2026-10-31). 375 of them (14.5%) were published from 2020 onward, and the busiest period so far is 2000-2009 with 788 records.

Reviews account for 164 records (6.3%) and meta-analyses for 49. Randomized controlled trials number 470 (18.2%) as a share of all records on the topic. Randomized trials make up a comparatively large share of this literature, which means many treatment questions have been tested directly.

PubMed records by publication periodthrough 1999: 783 records; 2000-2009: 788 records; 2010-2019: 640 records; 2020 onward: 375 records783through 19997882000-20096402010-20193752020 onward
Records in PubMed indexed with this heading, by publication period. Real counts from NCBI E-utilities; the final period covers only part of the current year. Volume reflects how much has been published, not how strong the evidence is.
Show the data
PeriodRecords
through 1999783
2000-2009788
2010-2019640
2020 onward375
Share of records by publication typeReviews: 6.3 percent; Meta-analyses: 1.9 percent; Randomized controlled trials: 18.2 percentReviews6.3% (164)Meta-analyses1.9% (49)Randomized controlled trials18.2% (470)
Share of all PubMed records on this heading that carry each publication type. Types overlap with other records, so the shares do not sum to 100%.
Publication-type chart data
Publication types among 2,586 PubMed records
TypeRecordsShare
Reviews1646.3%
Meta-analyses491.9%
Randomized controlled trials47018.2%

Method: PubMed query "Sulfadoxine"[MeSH Terms] with publication-type and date filters, retrieved 2026-10-31.

Reading the evidence in drugs and chemicals

Studies of a chemical or drug can answer very different questions: what it is and how it behaves in cells and animals, how the body handles it, and whether it changes outcomes in people. Laboratory and animal findings often do not carry over to patients, and observational studies of exposures are confounded by who uses a substance and why. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to use, avoid, start or stop any substance or medicine; talk to a qualified clinician or pharmacist about your own situation. Check the dose, the species, the comparison group and whether a patient-relevant outcome was measured.

Evidence from open-access studies

These open-access studies come from PubMed’s best-match results for this heading (papers whose main topic it is), ranked here by citation count, with one recent addition. Each abstract is reproduced in full under its recorded open licence so that you can read the authors’ own words. They illustrate the literature; they are not a systematic summary of it. Citation counts measure attention, not reliability or clinical benefit.

Study comparison — selected abstracts, not a systematic review
Study / authorsYearSource label / designEurope PMC citationsLicence / source
Factors affecting the delivery, access, and use of interventions to prevent malaria in pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hill J, Hoyt J, van Eijk AM, D'Mello-Guyett L, Ter Kuile FO, Steketee R, et al.
2013Meta-analysis
Design not recorded in structured metadata
208cc by
PMID 23935459 · DOI · PMC3720261
Malaria chemoprevention and drug resistance: a review of the literature and policy implications
Plowe CV
2022Review article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
139cc by
PMID 35331231 · DOI · PMC8943514
Primaquine clears submicroscopic Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes that persist after treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine and artesunate
Shekalaghe S, Drakeley C, Gosling R, Ndaro A, van Meegeren M, Enevold A, et al.
2007Randomized controlled trial
Design not recorded in structured metadata
105cc by
PMID 17925871 · DOI · PMC1995753
Parasitological efficacy of seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Nampula, northern Mozambique
Bonnington C, Sitoe M, Pulido Tarquino IA, Enosse SM, Sararat C, Suwannasin K, et al.
2026Research article
Design not recorded in structured metadata
1cc by
PMID 41229392 · DOI · PMC13017671

Factors affecting the delivery, access, and use of interventions to prevent malaria in pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis [1]

Meta-analysis Hill J, Hoyt J, van Eijk AM, D'Mello-Guyett L, Ter Kuile FO, Steketee R, et al. · · 2013 · cited 208 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundMalaria in pregnancy has important consequences for mother and baby.
Closing excerpt
Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (326 words)

BackgroundMalaria in pregnancy has important consequences for mother and baby. Coverage with the World Health Organization-recommended prevention strategy for pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa of intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) is low. We conducted a systematic review to explore factors affecting delivery, access, and use of IPTp and ITNs among healthcare providers and women.Methods and resultsWe searched the Malaria in Pregnancy Library and Global Health Database from 1 January 1990 to 23 April 2013, without language restriction. Data extraction was performed by two investigators independently, and data was appraised for quality and content. Data on barriers and facilitators, and the effect of interventions, were explored using content analysis and narrative synthesis. We conducted a meta-analysis of determinants of IPTp and ITN uptake using random effects models, and performed subgroup analysis to evaluate consistency across interventions and study populations, countries, and enrolment sites. We did not perform a meta-ethnography of qualitative data. Ninety-eight articles were included, of which 20 were intervention studies. Key barriers to the provision of IPTp and ITNs were unclear policy and guidance on IPTp; general healthcare system issues, such as stockouts and user fees; health facility issues stemming from poor organisation, leading to poor quality of care; poor healthcare provider performance, including confusion over the timing of each IPTp dose; and women's poor antenatal attendance, affecting IPTp uptake. Key determinants of IPTp coverage were education, knowledge about malaria/IPTp, socio-economic status, parity, and number and timing of antenatal clinic visits. Key determinants of ITN coverage were employment status, education, knowledge about malaria/ITNs, age, and marital status. Predictors showed regional variations.ConclusionsDelivery of ITNs through antenatal clinics presents fewer problems than delivery of IPTp. Many obstacles to IPTp delivery are relatively simple barriers that could be resolved in the short term. Other barriers are more entrenched within the overall healthcare system or socio-economic/cultural contexts, and will require medium- to long-term strategies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 23935459 · DOI · PMC3720261

Malaria chemoprevention and drug resistance: a review of the literature and policy implications [2]

Review article Plowe CV · · 2022 · cited 139 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
Chemoprevention strategies reduce malaria disease and death, but the efficacy of anti-malarial drugs used for chemoprevention is perennially threatened by drug resistance.
Closing excerpt
Decisions about whether, where and when chemoprevention strategies should be deployed or changed will continue to need to be made on the basis of imperfect evidence, but practical considerations such as prevalence patterns of resistance markers can help guide policy recommendations.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (203 words)

Chemoprevention strategies reduce malaria disease and death, but the efficacy of anti-malarial drugs used for chemoprevention is perennially threatened by drug resistance. This review examines the current impact of chemoprevention on the emergence and spread of drug resistant malaria, and the impact of drug resistance on the efficacy of each of the chemoprevention strategies currently recommended by the World Health Organization, namely, intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp); intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi); seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC); and mass drug administration (MDA) for the reduction of disease burden in emergency situations. While the use of drugs to prevent malaria often results in increased prevalence of genetic mutations associated with resistance, malaria chemoprevention interventions do not inevitably lead to meaningful increases in resistance, and even high rates of resistance do not necessarily impair chemoprevention efficacy. At the same time, it can reasonably be anticipated that, over time, as drugs are widely used, resistance will generally increase and efficacy will eventually be lost. Decisions about whether, where and when chemoprevention strategies should be deployed or changed will continue to need to be made on the basis of imperfect evidence, but practical considerations such as prevalence patterns of resistance markers can help guide policy recommendations.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 35331231 · DOI · PMC8943514

Primaquine clears submicroscopic Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes that persist after treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine and artesunate [3]

Randomized controlled trial Shekalaghe S, Drakeley C, Gosling R, Ndaro A, van Meegeren M, Enevold A, et al. · · 2007 · cited 105 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundP.
Closing excerpt
com ISRCTN61534963.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (220 words)

BackgroundP. falciparum gametocytes may persist after treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) plus artesunate (AS) and contribute considerably to malaria transmission. We determined the efficacy of SP+AS plus a single dose of primaquine (PQ, 0.75 mg/kg) on clearing gametocytaemia measured by molecular methods.MethodologyThe study was conducted in Mnyuzi, an area of hyperendemic malaria in north-eastern Tanzania. Children aged 3-15 years with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria with an asexual parasite density between 500-100,000 parasites/microL were randomized to receive treatment with either SP+AS or SP+AS+PQ. P. falciparum gametocyte prevalence and density during the 42-day follow-up period were determined by real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (QT-NASBA). Haemoglobin levels (Hb) were determined to address concerns about haemolysis in G6PD-deficient individuals.Results108 individuals were randomized. Pfs25 QT-NASBA gametocyte prevalence was 88-91% at enrolment and decreased afterwards for both treatment arms. Gametocyte prevalence and density were significantly lower in children treated with SP+AS+PQ. On day 14 after treatment 3.9% (2/51) of the SP+AS+PQ treated children harboured gametocytes compared to 62.7% (32/51) of those treated with SP+AS (pConclusionsPQ clears submicroscopic gametocytes after treatment with SP+AS and the persisting gametocytes circulated at densities that are unlikely to contribute to malaria transmission. For individuals without severe anaemia, addition of a single dose of PQ to an efficacious antimalarial drug combination is a safe approach to reduce malaria transmission following treatment.Trial registrationControlled-Trials.com ISRCTN61534963.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 17925871 · DOI · PMC1995753

Parasitological efficacy of seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Nampula, northern Mozambique [4]

Research article Bonnington C, Sitoe M, Pulido Tarquino IA, Enosse SM, Sararat C, Suwannasin K, et al. · · 2026 · cited 1 times (Europe PMC)

Abstract reading summary — source excerpts
Opening excerpt
BackgroundDeployment of seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) for young children using monthly sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine-amodiaquine (SPAQ) has recently been extended to Central and East Africa.
Closing excerpt
ConclusionsIn Nampula, northern Mozambique, amodiaquine had low parasitological efficacy and sulphadoxine and pyrimethamine did not contribute significantly to chemoprevention.
Interpretation limits
Verbatim excerpts from the authors’ abstract; the closing excerpt may describe a finding, limitation or recommendation. Design, population, effect size and uncertainty have not been independently extracted or appraised. Read the complete abstract and linked paper before interpreting the findings.
Read complete abstract (192 words)

BackgroundDeployment of seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) for young children using monthly sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine-amodiaquine (SPAQ) has recently been extended to Central and East Africa.MethodsA pilot pharmacometric assessment was nested within a larger deployment of SMC in a high malaria transmission area in northern Mozambique. SPAQ was given to 460 healthy children in two large villages. Simultaneous filter-paper blood spot malaria quantitative PCRs, blood slide microscopy and antimalarial drug measurements were taken before, then 7 and 28 d after first SPAQ administration.ResultsAfter SPAQ, parasitaemia prevalence decreased from 68% to 41%. Among children followed successfully for 28 d, malaria parasitaemia prevalence declined from 71% to 44%. Preventive efficacy was 97% for Plasmodium ovale and 42% for Plasmodium falciparum. Reinfections (N=50 with sufficient DNA for genotyping) and recrudescences (N=3) often grew through high concentrations of desethylamodiaquine, yet all 250 P. falciparum isolates genotyped were Pfcrt 76K, a molecular marker of 4-aminoquinoline susceptibility. One-third (21/64) of microscopy-detectable breakthrough P. falciparum infections had patent gametocytaemia. There was a clear chemoprevention exposure-response relationship evident for desethylamodiaquine, but not for sulphadoxine or pyrimethamine.ConclusionsIn Nampula, northern Mozambique, amodiaquine had low parasitological efficacy and sulphadoxine and pyrimethamine did not contribute significantly to chemoprevention.

Abstract reproduced from the open-access article under the recorded cc by licence; © the authors. PMID 41229392 · DOI · PMC13017671

Key reviews and meta-analyses

The most cited review-type papers among PubMed’s best-match results for this heading, listed with bibliographic details only. Follow the links for the full text and access terms.

  • Research article Pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum: what next? [5]
    Sibley CH, Hyde JE, Sims PF, Plowe CV, Kublin JG, Mberu EK, et al. · Trends Parasitol · 2001 · cited 261 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Intermittent preventive therapy for malaria during pregnancy using 2 vs 3 or more doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and risk of low birth weight in Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis [6]
    Kayentao K, Garner P, van Eijk AM, Naidoo I, Roper C, Mulokozi A, et al. · JAMA · 2013 · cited 237 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Effect of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance on the efficacy of intermittent preventive therapy for malaria control during pregnancy: a systematic review [7]
    ter Kuile FO, van Eijk AM, Filler SJ · JAMA · 2007 · cited 236 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Mapping 'partially resistant', 'fully resistant', and 'super resistant' malaria [8]
    Naidoo I, Roper C · Trends Parasitol · 2013 · cited 215 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Malaria prevention in pregnancy, birthweight, and neonatal mortality: a meta-analysis of 32 national cross-sectional datasets in Africa [9]
    Eisele TP, Larsen DA, Anglewicz PA, Keating J, Yukich J, Bennett A, et al. · Lancet Infect Dis · 2012 · cited 187 times (Europe PMC)
  • Research article Efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for malaria in African infants: a pooled analysis of six randomised, placebo-controlled trials [10]
    Aponte JJ, Schellenberg D, Egan A, Breckenridge A, Carneiro I, Critchley J, et al. · Lancet · 2009 · cited 175 times (Europe PMC)

References

  1. Hill J, Hoyt J, van Eijk AM, D'Mello-Guyett L, Ter Kuile FO, Steketee R, et al.. Factors affecting the delivery, access, and use of interventions to prevent malaria in pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2013. PMID 23935459 · DOI · PMC3720261
  2. Plowe CV. Malaria chemoprevention and drug resistance: a review of the literature and policy implications. . 2022. PMID 35331231 · DOI · PMC8943514
  3. Shekalaghe S, Drakeley C, Gosling R, Ndaro A, van Meegeren M, Enevold A, et al.. Primaquine clears submicroscopic Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes that persist after treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine and artesunate. . 2007. PMID 17925871 · DOI · PMC1995753
  4. Bonnington C, Sitoe M, Pulido Tarquino IA, Enosse SM, Sararat C, Suwannasin K, et al.. Parasitological efficacy of seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Nampula, northern Mozambique. . 2026. PMID 41229392 · DOI · PMC13017671
  5. Sibley CH, Hyde JE, Sims PF, Plowe CV, Kublin JG, Mberu EK, et al.. Pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum: what next?. Trends Parasitol. 2001. PMID 11756042 · DOI
  6. Kayentao K, Garner P, van Eijk AM, Naidoo I, Roper C, Mulokozi A, et al.. Intermittent preventive therapy for malaria during pregnancy using 2 vs 3 or more doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and risk of low birth weight in Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013. PMID 23403684 · DOI · PMC4669677
  7. ter Kuile FO, van Eijk AM, Filler SJ. Effect of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance on the efficacy of intermittent preventive therapy for malaria control during pregnancy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007. PMID 17579229 · DOI
  8. Naidoo I, Roper C. Mapping 'partially resistant', 'fully resistant', and 'super resistant' malaria. Trends Parasitol. 2013. PMID 24028889 · DOI
  9. Eisele TP, Larsen DA, Anglewicz PA, Keating J, Yukich J, Bennett A, et al.. Malaria prevention in pregnancy, birthweight, and neonatal mortality: a meta-analysis of 32 national cross-sectional datasets in Africa. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012. PMID 22995852 · DOI
  10. Aponte JJ, Schellenberg D, Egan A, Breckenridge A, Carneiro I, Critchley J, et al.. Efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for malaria in African infants: a pooled analysis of six randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Lancet. 2009. PMID 19765816 · DOI

About this article

Sources
NLM Medical Subject Headings (definition, synonyms); NCBI PubMed (counts, identifiers); Europe PMC (open-access abstracts and citation counts).
Verification
Every reference was resolved against PubMed on 2026-10-31; title, year and DOI matched.
Review state
automated source verified; no human expert review has been recorded yet.
Version
1, last updated 2026-10-31.

See how EvidenceLib is built. Spotted an error? Email support@evidencehelix.com.

Evidence strength

EvidenceHelix's computed view of the study designs behind this topic: how common meta-analyses, randomized trials and reviews are, how recent the literature is, and a plain-language reading. It describes the design mix of the literature. It is not a quality appraisal of any study, and it is not medical advice.

Included with the Researcher plan

Reading every article stays free. This computed view is part of the paid plans.

See plans Sign in

Your notes

Notes and highlights stay in this browser only; they are not sent to EvidenceHelix.

Related research topics

  • SulfadiazineDrugs and Chemicals
  • SulfamethoxazoleDrugs and Chemicals
  • BosentanDrugs and Chemicals
  • CelecoxibDrugs and Chemicals
  • FurosemideDrugs and Chemicals
  • TamsulosinDrugs and Chemicals

All 546 articles in Drugs and Chemicals →

At a glance

2,586
PubMed records on this heading
15%
published since 2020
164
review articles
470
randomized trials
10
verified references below

Counts come from PubMed on 2026-10-31; they show how much has been written, not how strong the evidence is.

Related topics See all →

  • SulfadiazineDrugs and Chemicals
  • SulfamethoxazoleDrugs and Chemicals
  • BosentanDrugs and Chemicals
  • CelecoxibDrugs and Chemicals
  • FurosemideDrugs and Chemicals

My notes & annotations (0)

Nothing yet. Select text and press Highlight, or write a note in the Notes tab. Stored in this browser only.

Sources

  • NLM MeSH record ↗
  • PubMed search used ↗

EvidenceLib is a research-education resource, not medical advice. It does not diagnose, prescribe or recommend starting, stopping or changing any treatment. Talk to a qualified clinician about your own situation. Methods, sources and licences · Legal · Support